Suppose the data of my Ractive contains both an array, and an integer representing the "current" index of my array. Is it possible to use a single keypath to refer to the "current" VALUE in my array? I've tried
myRactive.get("array[index]")
but this just returns undefined. Does this functionality exist? Or is there a "cleaner" way that I should be doing this?
Edit: I know that I can access each variable individually. What I'm looking for is something more concise, where I could access my data with a single call to get().
You access array elements in the Ractive data as follows:
myRactive.get("array")[index]
If index is in the Ractive data, you can access the array element like this:
myRactive.get("array")[myRactive.get("index")]
Related
In my Firestore document, I am trying to limit the fields that the users could update to only the ones I allow. I thought about a function that could check if request.resource.keys() contains any keys that are not the ones I allow, if it does, I block update, if not, I allow update. so far, my function looks like this:
function field_limit() {
let allow_keys = ["field1", "field2", "field3"];
return request.resource.keys() in allow_keys;
}
inside the path match:
allow update: if field_limit();
When I run a unit test in Emulator that modifies "field1", it does not pass. I think I am doing something wrong here because I am comparing the whole keys list against the allow_keys list.
What should I do in order to achieve the desired functionality then?
I thought about a solution to iterate through request.resource.keys(), and see if each key is in allow_keys. If one isn't, block update. But how to traverse through each value of a list?
edit. Should be request.resource.data.keys() instead of request.resource.keys(). Otherwise, it won't work.
The in operator doesn't work the way you're expecting. See the documentation for that - it only checks if a single value is in a list.
If you want to check if a list of values contains only a subset of values in another list, you should use hasOnly instead.
request.resource.keys().hasOnly(allow_keys)
This will evaluate true if the list request.resource.keys() contains only values from the allow_keys list.
I need to store a list of strings in a field and I need to be able to easily access each string by its value, but there isn't a "set" or "1d map" option in firestore. As a hack, I used a map and just stored each of the strings as "value": value. But firestore's array's methods and functionality seems to behave like a set, and if so it would be perfect for storing this type of data. Are firestore array's implemented as sets or more as a traditional array?
Firestore arrays are just arrays, but come with some special operators that allow you to use them as sets too.
Specifically, you can perform unions on arrays, which add an item to the array if it is not in there yet.
You can also query on documents where an array contains a specific, or one of a number of values.
Note that in all these cases (unions and queries), you need to specify the entire array value and cannot specify only one property of them. In your case with simple string values that makes sense, but when you store objects in arrays this also applies: you must specify the entire object for the query to match it.
I am trying to figure out how i would go about removing and adding to the profile array in the array of objects. I have the id's to get to the appropriate items in the arrays but it looks like i can only update the entire root array item.
doc().update({
technologyLearned: firebase.firestore.FieldValue.arrayRemove("?")
});
if this was a normal language i could technologyLearned[id].profiles[profileid] and get to the item i need to remove or add.
Since you can't index into an array to locate an item to remove, you will have to read the entire document, modify the array in memory, then write it back to the document.
The problem here is that technologiesLearned is an array (not that profiles is an array). If profiles was not nested under technologiesLearned array, you could use arrayRemove on it.
I stored an Array as a FieldValue in one of my document in Firestore. Now I want to update one of its element value. As per the documentation I can use arrayRemove or arrayUnion function to remove the element from array but I didn't see any method to update the value of element. Is there any way that I can help me to update the elements' value.
Here I stored array in "patients" field of document. This array represents list of patients. Look at 0th position of element. Here status's value is "current". I want to update this to "processed". Is there anyway that I can do so.
Also is there any way that I can query the elements of array on the basis of the value placed on status key.
As per the documentation I can use arrayRemove or arrayUnion function to remove the element from an array.
There is no way you can use one of those functions to add or remove elements from an array that contains objects. To be able to use those functions, your array should contain for example literal strings. In that way, you can add or remove one of the elements using arrayRemove() or arrayUnion() functions.
I didn't see any method to update the value of an element.
There is no update method. arrayUnion() method will add a new element in the array only if it does not exist. If you want to update an element, you have to remove it first from the array and then add the new one. This is also available in the case of strings and not in the case of objects.
Is there any way that I can help me to update the elements' value.
Yes, two ways in which you can achieve this. The first one would be to get the entire document, get the patients property as a list of hashmaps, iterate through its elements, make the desired changes and write the document back. The second one would be to transform that array into a subcollection where each patient will become a document. In this way, you can simply update add or remove a document using the corresponding functions.
Also is there any way that I can query the elements of the array on the basis of the value placed on the status key.
Using your current document structure, no. If you want to query the patients of a user based on the value of a specific property, you should definitely use the second approach. There is no way you can achieve this using your actual schema.
Here is the schema for test db:
I want to write a query that can get all the documents where contacts have id=1 in any of the array index.
I have checked array_contains operator for firestore but the thing is my array have map which then have field id.
Thanks
You currently can't build a query that looks for an object field within an array. The only things you can find in an array are the entire contents of an array element, not a part of an element.
With NoSQL type databases, the usual practice is to structure you data in a way that suits your queries. So, in your case, you're going to have to structure your data to let you find documents where an array item contains a certain string. So, you could create another array that contains just the strings you want to query for. You will have make sure to keep these arrays up to date.
You could also reconsider the use of an array here. Arrays are good for positional data, but unless these contacts need to be stored in a certain order, you might want to instead store an object whose keys are the id, and whose field data also contains the id and name.
As Doug said, you can't query it,
but, if you could structure your data to something that looks like this
Store your data as a map
Use id as key and name as value
Now you can write a query that can get all the documents where contacts have id=1
db.collection("test").where("contacts.1", ">=", "").get()
If you have an array of maps or objects and want to get the docoments that contains this specific map/object like this ?
array_of_maps.png
you can use
queryForCategory(categName: string, categAlias: string): Observable[] {
firestore.collection('<Collection name>', ref =>
ref.where('categories',
"array-contains", {
"alias": categAlias,
"title": categName
}
One soulions is as #Doug said, to add array with the data you need to query, and keep it uptodate.
Another solution is to make contacts as sub collection of the document, an then you could make queries of the contacts and get its parrent.
final Query contacts = db.collectionGroup("contacts").whereEqualTo("id", 1);
for (DocumentSnapshot document : querySnapshot.get().getDocuments()) {
System.out.println(document.getId());
System.out.println(document.getString("parent_id"));
}
If you don't want to add parent as another field, you can get it from parent reference, check this answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/56223319/1278463
snapshot.getRef().getParent().getParent().collection("people")
https://firebase.google.com/docs/firestore/query-data/queries#collection-group-query