It seems to me that if a column is not included in the conditional part of the ifelse statement, the ifelse statement in a dplyr mutate function does not work as expected:
mdf <- data.frame(a=c(1,2,3), b=c(3,4,5))
# this works:
> mdf %>% mutate(c=ifelse(a==1,0,1))
a b c
1 1 3 0
2 2 4 1
3 3 5 1
# This does not work (expected column c to be equal to a):
> mdf %>% mutate(c=ifelse(0==1,0,a))
a b c
1 1 3 1
2 2 4 1
3 3 5 1
# This does not work either (expected column c to be equal to a):
> mdf %>% mutate(c=ifelse("a" %in% names(.),a,0))
a b c
1 1 3 1
2 2 4 1
3 3 5 1
If using a regular if-statement, it does work:
> mdf %>% mutate(c=if("a" %in% names(.)){a}else{1})
a b c
1 1 3 1
2 2 4 2
3 3 5 3
However, I was hoping to use the ifelse statement, since it has a cleaner syntax. Is there a way to achieve the desired result with the ifelse statement?
I see that the length of the conditional statement determines what is returned. If the condition evaluates to one True/False value, it only returns one value (instead of the entire column). The value returned seems to be the first value of the desired column:
> mdf %>% mutate(c=ifelse("a" %in% names(.),a,0))
a b c
1 1 3 1
2 2 4 1
3 3 5 1
If I increase the lenght of the condition to the number of rows, the ifelse statement will return the entire column:
> mdf %>% mutate(c=ifelse(rep("a", nrow(.)) %in% names(.),a,0))
a b c
1 1 3 1
2 2 4 2
3 3 5 3
Consider the following dt:
dt <- data.table(a=c(1,1,2,3),b=c(4,5,6,4))
That looks like that:
> dt
a b
1: 1 4
2: 1 5
3: 2 6
4: 3 4
I'm here aggregating each column by it's unique values and then counting how many uniquye values each column has:
> dt[,lapply(.SD,function(agg) dt[,.N,by=agg])]
a.agg a.N b.agg b.N
1: 1 2 4 2
2: 2 1 5 1
3: 3 1 6 1
So 1 appears twice in dt and thus a.N is 2, the same logic goes on for the other values.
But the problem is if this transformations of the original datatable have different dimensions at the end, things will get recycled.
For example this dt:
dt <- data.table(a=c(1,1,2,3,7),b=c(4,5,6,4,4))
> dt[,lapply(.SD,function(agg) dt[,.N,by=agg])]
a.agg a.N b.agg b.N
1: 1 2 4 3
2: 2 1 5 1
3: 3 1 6 1
4: 7 1 4 3
Warning message:
In as.data.table.list(jval, .named = NULL) :
Item 2 has 3 rows but longest item has 4; recycled with remainder.
That is no longer the right answer because b.N should have now only 3 rows and things(vector) got recycled.
This is why I would like to transform the expression dt[,lapply(.SD,function(agg) dt[,.N,by=agg])] in a list with different dimensions, with the name of items in the list being the name of the columns in the new transformed dt.
A sketch of what I mean is:
newlist
$a.agg
1 2 3 7
$a.N
2 1 1 1
$b.agg
4 5 6 4
$b.N
3 1 1
Or even better solution would be to get a datatable with a track of the columns on another column:
dt_final
agg N column
1 2 a
2 1 a
3 1 a
7 1 a
4 3 b
5 1 b
6 1 b
Get the data in long format and then aggregate by group.
library(data.table)
dt_long <- melt(dt, measure.vars = c('a', 'b'))
dt_long[, .N, .(variable, value)]
# variable value N
#1: a 1 2
#2: a 2 1
#3: a 3 1
#4: a 7 1
#5: b 4 3
#6: b 5 1
#7: b 6 1
In tidyverse -
library(dplyr)
library(tidyr)
dt %>%
pivot_longer(cols = everything()) %>%
count(name, value)
This question already has answers here:
How to create a consecutive group number
(13 answers)
Closed 2 years ago.
I have data from an experiment that has multiple rows per item (each row has the reading time for one word of a sentence of n words), and multiple items per subject. Items can be varying numbers of rows. Items were presented in a random order, and their order in the data as initially read in reflects the sequence they saw the items in. What I'd like to do is add a column that contains the order in which the subject saw that item (i.e., 1 for the first item, 2 for the second, etc.).
Here's an example of some input data that has the relevant properties:
d <- data.frame(Subject = c(1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2),
Item = c(2,2,2,1,1,1,1,2,2,2))
Subject Item
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 1
1 1
2 1
2 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
And here's the output I want:
Subject Item order
1 2 1
1 2 1
1 2 1
1 1 2
1 1 2
2 1 1
2 1 1
2 2 2
2 2 2
2 2 2
I know I can do this by setting up a temp data frame that filters d to unique combinations of Subject and Item, adding order to that as something like 1:n() or row_number(), and then using a join function to put it back together with the main data frame. What I'd like to know is whether there's a way to do this without having to create a new data frame just to store the order---can this be done inside dplyr's mutate somehow if I group by Subject and Item, for instance?
Here's one way:
d %>%
group_by(Subject) %>%
mutate(order = match(Item, unique(Item))) %>%
ungroup()
# # A tibble: 10 x 3
# Subject Item order
# <dbl> <dbl> <int>
# 1 1 2 1
# 2 1 2 1
# 3 1 2 1
# 4 1 1 2
# 5 1 1 2
# 6 2 1 1
# 7 2 1 1
# 8 2 2 2
# 9 2 2 2
# 10 2 2 2
Here is a base R option
transform(d,
order = ave(Item, Subject, FUN = function(x) as.integer(factor(x, levels = unique(x))))
)
or
transform(d,
order = ave(Item, Subject, FUN = function(x) match(x, unique(x)))
)
both giving
Subject Item order
1 1 2 1
2 1 2 1
3 1 2 1
4 1 1 2
5 1 1 2
6 2 1 1
7 2 1 1
8 2 2 2
9 2 2 2
10 2 2 2
I have a data frame in R which is similar to the follows. Actually my real ’df’ dataframe is much bigger than this one here but I really do not want to confuse anybody so that is why I try to simplify things as much as possible.
So here’s the data frame.
id <-c(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3)
a <-c(3,1,3,3,1,3,3,3,3,1,3,2,1,2,1,3,3,2,1,1,1,3,1,3,3,3,2,1,1,3)
b <-c(3,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,3,2,1,1,1,2,1,3,1,2,2,1,3,3,2,3,2)
c <-c(1,3,2,3,2,1,2,3,3,2,2,3,1,2,3,3,3,1,1,2,3,3,1,2,2,3,2,2,3,2)
d <-c(3,3,3,1,3,2,2,1,2,3,2,2,2,1,3,1,2,2,3,2,3,2,3,2,1,1,1,1,1,2)
e <-c(2,3,1,2,1,2,3,3,1,1,2,1,1,3,3,2,1,1,3,3,2,2,3,3,3,2,3,2,1,3)
df <-data.frame(id,a,b,c,d,e)
df
Basically what I would like to do is to get the occurrences of numbers for each column (a,b,c,d,e) and for each id group (1,2,3) (for this latter grouping see my column ’id’).
So, for column ’a’ and for id number ’1’ (for the latter see column ’id’) the code would be something like this:
as.numeric(table(df[1:10,2]))
##The results are:
[1] 3 7
Just to briefly explain my results: in column ’a’ (and regarding only those records which have number ’1’ in column ’id’) we can say that number '1' occured 3 times and number '3' occured 7 times.
Again, just to show you another example. For column ’a’ and for id number ’2’ (for the latter grouping see again column ’id’):
as.numeric(table(df[11:20,2]))
##After running the codes the results are:
[1] 4 3 3
Let me explain a little again: in column ’a’ and regarding only those observations which have number ’2’ in column ’id’) we can say that number '1' occured 4 times, number '2' occured 3 times and number '3' occured 3 times.
So this is what I would like to do. Calculating the occurrences of numbers for each custom-defined subsets (and then collecting these values into a data frame). I know it is not a difficult task but the PROBLEM is that I’m gonna have to change the input ’df’ dataframe on a regular basis and hence both the overall number of rows and columns might change over time…
What I have done so far is that I have separated the ’df’ dataframe by columns, like this:
for (z in (2:ncol(df))) assign(paste("df",z,sep="."),df[,z])
So df.2 will refer to df$a, df.3 will equal df$b, df.4 will equal df$c etc. But I’m really stuck now and I don’t know how to move forward…
Is there a proper, ”automatic” way to solve this problem?
How about -
> library(reshape)
> dftab <- table(melt(df,'id'))
> dftab
, , value = 1
variable
id a b c d e
1 3 8 2 2 4
2 4 6 3 2 4
3 4 2 1 5 1
, , value = 2
variable
id a b c d e
1 0 1 4 3 3
2 3 3 3 6 2
3 1 4 5 3 4
, , value = 3
variable
id a b c d e
1 7 1 4 5 3
2 3 1 4 2 4
3 5 4 4 2 5
So to get the number of '3's in column 'a' and group '1'
you could just do
> dftab[3,'a',1]
[1] 4
A combination of tapply and apply can create the data you want:
tapply(df$id,df$id,function(x) apply(df[id==x,-1],2,table))
However, when a grouping doesn't have all the elements in it, as in 1a, the result will be a list for that id group rather than a nice table (matrix).
$`1`
$`1`$a
1 3
3 7
$`1`$b
1 2 3
8 1 1
$`1`$c
1 2 3
2 4 4
$`1`$d
1 2 3
2 3 5
$`1`$e
1 2 3
4 3 3
$`2`
a b c d e
1 4 6 3 2 4
2 3 3 3 6 2
3 3 1 4 2 4
$`3`
a b c d e
1 4 2 1 5 1
2 1 4 5 3 4
3 5 4 4 2 5
I'm sure someone will have a more elegant solution than this, but you can cobble it together with a simple function and dlply from the plyr package.
ColTables <- function(df) {
counts <- list()
for(a in names(df)[names(df) != "id"]) {
counts[[a]] <- table(df[a])
}
return(counts)
}
results <- dlply(df, "id", ColTables)
This gets you back a list - the first "layer" of the list will be the id variable; the second the table results for each column for that id variable. For example:
> results[['2']]['a']
$a
1 2 3
4 3 3
For id variable = 2, column = a, per your above example.
A way to do it is using the aggregate function, but you have to add a column to your dataframe
> df$freq <- 0
> aggregate(freq~a+id,df,length)
a id freq
1 1 1 3
2 3 1 7
3 1 2 4
4 2 2 3
5 3 2 3
6 1 3 4
7 2 3 1
8 3 3 5
Of course you can write a function to do it, so it's easier to do it frequently, and you don't have to add a column to your actual data frame
> frequency <- function(df,groups) {
+ relevant <- df[,groups]
+ relevant$freq <- 0
+ aggregate(freq~.,relevant,length)
+ }
> frequency(df,c("b","id"))
b id freq
1 1 1 8
2 2 1 1
3 3 1 1
4 1 2 6
5 2 2 3
6 3 2 1
7 1 3 2
8 2 3 4
9 3 3 4
You didn't say how you'd like the data. The by function might give you the output you like.
by(df, df$id, function(x) lapply(x[,-1], table))