So I'm making things complicated ...I think. A primary key basically is to make the row unique. Is that correct? Anyone want to show me an insert statement with the values for PK?
The SQLite documentation says:
On an INSERT, if the ROWID or INTEGER PRIMARY KEY column is not
explicitly given a value, then it will be filled automatically with an
unused integer, usually one more than the largest ROWID currently in
use. This is true regardless of whether or not the AUTOINCREMENT
keyword is used.
So, on a table like
CREATE TABLE test(id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, descr TEXT);
an insert with a valid id could be
INSERT INTO test(descr) VALUES('this is a test');
A primary key, also called a primary keyword, is a key in a relational database that is unique for each record. It is a unique identifier, such as a driver license number, telephone number (including area code), or vehicle identification number (VIN). A relational database must always have one and only one primary key.
if you are using CREATE TABLE, if you are creating the primary key on a single field, you can use:
CREATE TABLE mytable (
field1 TEXT,
field2 INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
field3 BLOB,
);
Reference more at: https://www.sqlite.org/lang_createtable.html & http://sqlite.org/faq.html#q11
Related
So i am trying to complete finance. Following is the .schema:
sqlite> .schema
CREATE TABLE users (id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT NOT NULL, username TEXT NOT NULL, hash TEXT NOT NULL, cash NUMERIC NOT NULL DEFAULT 10000.00);
CREATE TABLE sqlite_sequence(name,seq);
CREATE TABLE history(
symbol TEXT, name TEXT, shares INTEGER, price NUMERIC, time DATETIME
);
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX username ON users (username);
When i try to add foriegn key to history table it always return error. Here is my code:
sqlite> ALTER TABLE history ADD COLUMN id INT;
sqlite> ALTER TABLE history ADD FOREIGN KEY(id) REFRENCES users(id);
Parse error: near "FOREIGN": syntax error
ALTER TABLE history ADD FOREIGN KEY(id) REFRENCES users(id);
^--- error here
I think based on what I see in the sqlite docs that the statement should be together with the ADD column:
ALTER TABLE history ADD COLUMN id INTEGER REFERENCES users(id);
But you please check me on this syntax! Another option is to take care of creating the constraint at the same time that you create the table.
CREATE TABLE history(
symbol TEXT,
name TEXT,
shares INTEGER,
price NUMERIC,
time DATETIME,
id INTEGER,
FOREIGN KEY (id)
REFERENCES users (id));
It might not be something you have realized (yet) but every database has its unique flavor of SQL, so despite there being a SQL standard there are often little differences in the syntax of SQL for specific db implementations. So you always have to beware of this when looking up commands for your sql db.
Further detail on Sqlite foreign key constraints can be found here:
https://www.sqlitetutorial.net/sqlite-foreign-key/
SQLite's documentation says:
A UNIQUE constraint is similar to a PRIMARY KEY constraint, except that a single table may have any number of UNIQUE constraints.
What I'm wondering is, if I declare something like:
CREATE TABLE Example (
id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY UNIQUE);
Does SQLite create two indexes or one? Is the behavior different if I'm not using the rowid (i.e. if the column was id TEXT PRIMARY KEY UNIQUE)?
I realize the simplest thing to do is just remove UNIQUE but I'm curious what effect this will have.
When you define a primary key it will be unique, no need to define another index for unique column.
The point of primary keys is so that they are unique for any given row.
Meaning you can choose one or more fields to be a primary key, but a single field doesn't have to be unique.
Unique on the other hand has to be unique for the specified fields.
So it's more like a constraint you are placing.
Given this example:
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS user2domain (
userID INTEGER NOT NULL,
domainID INTEGER NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (userID, domainID),
UNIQUE(userID, domainID) ON CONFLICT IGNORE
)
You don't actually have to specify the unique constraint as the primary key would cover the same fields.
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS user2domain (
userID INTEGER NOT NULL,
domainID INTEGER NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (userID, domainID)
)
-- add this way
INSERT OR IGNORE INTO user2domain(userID, domainID) VALUES(#userID, #domainID)
This would be enough.
Use the Unique constraint when you absolutely feel like any fields
must be unique but not necessarily a row identifier.
The expected behaviour is overwriting. Primary is of a higher order precedence.
I have a SQLite DB that I am trying to use with EF Core database first.
It has a table of users, and a table of groups that users can belong to, and it has a mapping table because users can belong to multiple groups.
-- holds users
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS user (
_id INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
name TEXT,
);
-- holds groups users can belong to
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS group (
_id INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
name TEXT,
);
-- holds user group membership
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS map_group_user (
group_id INTEGER,
user_id INTEGER,
UNIQUE (group_id,user_id) ON CONFLICT REPLACE,
FOREIGN KEY(group_id) REFERENCES group(_id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
FOREIGN KEY(user_id) REFERENCES user(_id) ON DELETE CASCADE
);
When I scaffold this up I get a warning from dotnet ef scaffold that it could not identify a primary key for map_group_user and it does not generate a model, and neither the User nor Group model contains any reference to the other (expected).
Try adding an explicit primary key to the map_group_user bridge table:
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS map_group_user (
group_id INTEGER,
user_id INTEGER,
UNIQUE (group_id,user_id) ON CONFLICT REPLACE,
FOREIGN KEY(group_id) REFERENCES "group"(_id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
FOREIGN KEY(user_id) REFERENCES user(_id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
PRIMARY KEY (group_id, user_id)
);
The logical primary key for the map_group_user table is the combination of group_id and user_id, each combination which should ideally appear only once.
By the way, please avoid naming your tables and columns using reserved SQL keywords, such as group. I don't know if this was giving you an error, but I have placed "group" in double quotes to escape it.
I am using the DB Browser for SQLite to try and figure this out. I've opened Northwind.sqlite and in it it shows me the following for a table:
CREATE TABLE `Order Details` (
`OrderID` int,
`ProductID` int,
`UnitPrice` float ( 26 ),
`Quantity` int,
`Discount` float ( 13 ),
PRIMARY KEY(`OrderID`,`ProductID`)
);
However, in the Sql Server Northwind OrderID and ProductID are foreign keys, not primary keys. Does this work differently in SQLite? And if so, how do the relationships work?
thanks - dave
The above will create a table that has no FOREIGN keys but 2 indexes.
One a largely hidden index according to rowid.
The other, PRIMARY KEY(OrderID,ProductID) will be an index according to the combination of OrderId and ProductID.
some things about rowid (aka id)
rowid is an automatically created column called rowid (it can also be referenced using oid or rowid (case independent)) and if present is really the primary key.
rowid will be a unique signed integer using up to 64 bits. The lowest value and also the first value will be 1, the highest value being 9223372036854775807.
In later versions of SQLite 3.8.2 on the WITHOUT ROWID keyword was added to allow suppression of the rowid column/index (your Order Details table may benefit being a without rowid table).
if a column is defined with the type INTEGER PRIMARY KEY or INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT then that column (there can only be 1 such column per table) is an alias of for the rowid column.
AUTOINCREMENT introduces a rule that when inserting a row the rowid must be greater than any that exist or existed.
It DOES NOT guarantee that the rowid will monotonically increase, although generally the id will (even without AUTOINCREMENT (perhaps the most misused/misunderstood keyword in SQLite)).
Without AUTOINCREMENT SQlite may find a lower rowid and use that, but not until a rowid of 9223372036854775807 has been reached.
AUTOINCREMENT, if a rowid of 9223372036854775807 has been reached will is an SQLITE_FULL exception.
AUTOINCREMENT results in overheads (e.q. a table named sqlite_sequence is then maintained recording the highest given sequence number). The documentation recommends that it not be used unless required, which is rarely the case.
Some limited testing I did resulted in an 8-12% greater processing time for AUTOINCREMENT. What are the overheads of using AUTOINCREMENT for SQLite on Android?
For more about rowid see SQLite Autoincrement and also Clustered Indexes and the WITHOUT ROWID Optimization
Coding PRIMARY KEY (if not on an INTEGER column i.e. not an alias of rowid) implies a UNIQUE constraint. It is not saying/checking that the value or any of the values in a clustered index exists in any other table.
Note null is not considered to be the same value, so in your Order Details table it is possible to have any combination of the values as null.
Coding a FOREIGN KEY introduces a constraint that the referenced value(s) must exist in the respective table/column. Additionally :-
Usually, the parent key of a foreign key constraint is the primary key
of the parent table. If they are not the primary key, then the parent
key columns must be collectively subject to a UNIQUE constraint or
have a UNIQUE index. If the parent key columns have a UNIQUE index,
then that index must use the collation sequences that are specified in
the CREATE TABLE statement for the parent table.
SQLite Foreign Key Support
Considering all of this you may want to do make some changes to the Order Details table :-
You could make it a WITHOUT ROWID table.
You could make both the OrderID and the ProductID columns NOT NULL.
You could add FOREIGN KEY's to both the OrderID and the ProductID columns.
So perhaps you could have :-
CREATE TABLE `Order Details` (
`OrderID` int NOT NULL REFERENCES `Orders` (`OrderId`), -- ADDED NOT NULL and FKEY
`ProductID` int NOT NULL REFERENCES `Products`(`ProductId`) , -- ADDED NOT NULL and FKEY
`UnitPrice` float ( 26 ),
`Quantity` int,
`Discount` float ( 13 ),
PRIMARY KEY(`OrderID`,`ProductID`)
)
WITHOUT ROWID -- ADDED WITHOUT ROWID
;
The above uses column constraints
Alternately, utilising TABLE constraints, you could do :-
CREATE TABLE `Order Details` (
`OrderID` int NOT NULL, -- ADDED NOT NULL
`ProductID` int NOT NULL, -- ADDED NOT NULL
`UnitPrice` float ( 26 ),
`Quantity` int,
`Discount` float ( 13 ),
PRIMARY KEY(`OrderID`,`ProductID`),
FOREIGN KEY (`OrderId`) REFERENCES `Orders`(`OrderId`), -- ADDED FKEY AS TABLE CONSTRAINT
FOREIGN KEY (`ProductID`) REFERENCES `Products`(`ProductID`) -- ADDED FKEY AS TABLE CONSTRAINT
)
WITHOUT ROWID -- ADDED WITHOUT ROWID
;
Both have the same outcome, the only difference being where the FOREIGN KEY constraints are defined.
Both the above assumes that the referenced tables are Orders and Products.
Does SQLite indeed have a limitation that it is not possible to retrieve the name of a foreign key? I am asking because I couldn't find this limitation mentioned anywhere in their documentation.
For example, I run the following script:
CREATE TABLE
users (
id INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
first_name TEXT NOT NULL,
last_name TEXT NOT NULL
) ;
CREATE TABLE
orders (
id INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
user_id INTEGER NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT fk_users FOREIGN KEY (user_id) REFERENCES users(id)
) ;
Now I would like to check that the key "fk_users" was created indeed, so I run the following PRAGMA:
PRAGMA foreign_key_list(orders);
I would expect to see the name of my foreign key in the first column, but I am seeing some "0" value instead. Moreover, if I create multiple foreign keys with custom names, they are all called either "0" or "1".
Is this indeed a limitation of SQLite, or am I missing something?
There is no mechanism to extract the constraint name.
The table sqlite_master stores a CREATE command in the column "sql". You could query that command and do some parsing to extract the name of the foreign key. An example for a combined foreign key that works for me:
SELECT sql FROM sqlite_master WHERE name = 'song'
yields
CREATE TABLE "song" (
"songid" INTEGER,
"songartist" TEXT,
"songalbum" TEXT,
"songname" TEXT,
CONSTRAINT "fk__song_album" FOREIGN KEY ("songartist", "songalbum") REFERENCES "album" ("albumartist", "albumname")
)
and contains the name "fk__song_album" of the foreign key.
If one alters the foreign key with a query, the content of the sql column is modified/updated:
The text in the sqlite_master.sql column is a copy of the original CREATE statement text that created the object, except normalized as described above and as modified by subsequent ALTER TABLE statements. The sqlite_master.sql is NULL for the internal indexes that are automatically created by UNIQUE or PRIMARY KEY constraints.
https://www.sqlite.org/fileformat2.html
Extra tip:
In order to see the foreign key information in Navicat (Lite) ... right click on a table and choose "Design table". Then select the foreign keys tab.