I want to add a objects inside a array. I have to set a name for that object like
"identifiers": [
"IDENTIFIER": {
"primary": true
}
]
Here "IDENTIFIER" is the object name. But the first object inside array always created as a empty object like
"identifiers": [
{
"IDENTIFIER": {
"primary": true
}
}
]
I used the following JSON code in config file,
"identifiers": {
"title": "Identifiers",
"type": "array",
"location": "body",
"items": {
"title": "Identifier Fields",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"IDENTIFIER": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"primary": {
"title": "primary",
"required": true,
"type": "boolean",
"description": "",
"default": true
}
}
}
}
}
}
How to achieve this. Kindly help me.
Note : I can able to do using Object inside Object. but I don't want that.
Thanks in advance.
Related
I am trying to deploy a App service webapp via ARM template and need to put a secret from a key vault into an app setting (env variable).
I have always simply used an array of values from a parameters file to populate these app settings, but now I am struggling to get a keyvault value into that array. Something like shown below in an ARM parameter file.
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2019-04-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"someStringParam": {
"value": "stringLiteralValueHere"
},
"envVars": {
"value": [
{
"name": "envVarKeyName",
"value": "stringLiteralValueHere"
},
{
"name": "KVsecret1",
"value": ##KEY VAULT SECRET HERE##
}
]
}
}
}
I have tried using a reference to the keyvault for the value but that errors on deployment.
{
"name": "KVsecret1",
"reference": {
"keyVault": {
"id": "/subscriptions/<subscription_id>/resourceGroups/<resource_group>/providers/Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/<vault_name>"
},
"secretName": "secret1"
}
}
I have also tried using a parameter inside of the parameter file, but that just used the literal string for the value.
"parameters": {
"KVsecret1": {
"reference": {
"keyVault": {
"id": "/subscriptions/<subscription_id>/resourceGroups/<resource_group>/providers/Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/<vault_name>"
},
"secretName": "KVsecret1"
}
},
"envVars": {
"value": [
{
"name": "envVarKeyName",
"value": "stringLiteralValueHere"
},
{
"name": "KVsecret1",
"value": "[parameters('KVsecret1')]"
}
]
}
}
Is this possible??
EDIT: Adding some detail here.
I am also trying to shoe horn a reference to another resource to get put the app insights instrumentation key into an app setting. Below is what I would like to do, but the copy function needs to use the name of the property and that is dynamic in this case as it changes with the each member of the array from the parameter file.
{
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites/config",
"apiVersion": "2022-03-01",
"name": "[concat(parameters('backEndwebAppName'),'/appsettings')]",
"kind": "string",
"properties": {
"APPINSIGHTS_INSTRUMENTATIONKEY": "[reference(concat('microsoft.insights/components/',parameters('appInsightsName')),'2020-02-02').InstrumentationKey]",
"secret1FromKeyvault": "[parameters('secret1FromKeyvault')]",
"copy": [
{
"name": "envVarsFromParams",
"count": "[length(parameters('backEndEnvVariables'))]",
"input": {
"name": "[parameters('backEndEnvVariables')[copyIndex('envVarsFromParams').name]]",
"value": "[parameters('backEndEnvVariables')[copyIndex('envVarsFromParams').value]]"
}
}
]
},
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/sites', parameters('backEndwebAppName'))]"
]
},
This isn't possible today within the param file, but in your scenario (if it's as simple as your OP example) you can just union the two in your template. So in your parameter file, you have 2 params kvSecret (the reference) and envVars (all your other env vars) and then in the template use:
"variables": {
"keySecretObj": {
"name": "kvSecret",
"value": "[parameters('kvSecret')]"
},
"envVarsFinal": "[union(parameters(variables('kvSecretObj`), parameters(`envVars`))]"
That help?
I've been working on an issue and seem to be stuck, so asking on so in case anyone can help.
To describe the issue, I've got an existing Azure Key Vault setup, and wish to add a number of access policies to this resource group. It needs to be conditional as if the function name is "false" then that function should not be added to key vault access policy.
variable section:
"variables": {
"functionAccess": {
"value": [
{
"name": "[parameters('Function_1')]"
},
{
"name": "[parameters('Function_2')]"
},
{
"name": "[parameters('Function_3')]"
}
]
}
}
My Template :
{
"apiVersion": "2016-10-01",
"condition": "[not(equals(variables('functionAccess')[CopyIndex()].name, 'false'))]",
"copy": {
"batchSize": 1,
"count": "[length(variables('functionAccess'))]",
"mode": "Serial",
"name": "accessPolicies"
},
"name": "[concat(parameters('KeyVault_Name'), '/add')]",
"properties": {
"accessPolicies": [
{
"tenantId": "[subscription().tenantId]",
"objectId": "[if(not(equals(variables('functionAccess')[CopyIndex()].name, 'false')), reference(concat('Microsoft.Web/sites/', variables('functionAccess')[CopyIndex()].name), '2016-08-01', 'Full').identity.principalId, json('null'))]",
"permissions": {
"keys": [
"get",
"list"
],
"secrets": [
"get",
"list"
],
"certificates": [
"get",
"list"
]
}
}
]
},
"type": "Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/accessPolicies"
}
When I deploy my ARM template for the azure key vault I got this error message:
The language expression property '0' can't be evaluated, property name must be a string.
also tried below, but same error:
{
"apiVersion": "2018-02-14",
"name": "[concat(parameters('KeyVault_Name'), '/add')]",
"properties": {
"copy": [
{
"batchSize": 1,
"count": "[length(variables('functionAccess'))]",
"mode": "serial",
"name": "accessPolicies",
"input": {
"condition": "[not(equals(variables('functionAccess')[copyIndex('accessPolicies')].name, 'false'))]",
"tenantId": "[subscription().tenantId]",
"objectId": "[if(not(equals(variables('functionAccess')[copyIndex('accessPolicies')].name, 'false')), reference(concat('Microsoft.Web/sites/', variables('functionAccess')[copyIndex('accessPolicies')].name), '2016-08-01', 'Full').identity.principalId, json('null'))]",
"permissions": {
"keys": [
"get",
"list"
],
"secrets": [
"get",
"list"
],
"certificates": [
"get",
"list"
]
}
}
}
]
},
"type": "Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/accessPolicies"
}
There are a few options for dealing with filtering an array for copy operation. I deploy my ARM templates from PowerShell scripts and use PowerShell to setup parameter values. When I need special logic handle different inputs for different environments, I let PowerShell handle it.
If you must handle the filtering in ARM and you have the option to input a CSV list of functions, then perhaps the following will work. You can then use the functionAccessArray to iterate over in the copy operation.
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
},
"variables": {
"functionAccessCsv": "Function-0,Function-1,false,Function-4,false,Function-6,Function-7",
"functionAccessFiltered": "[replace(replace(variables('functionAccessCsv'), 'false', ''), ',,', ',')]",
"functionAccessArray": "[split(variables('functionAccessFiltered'), ',')]"
},
"resources": [
],
"outputs": {
"functionAccessCsvFiltered": {
"type": "string",
"value": "[variables('functionAccessFiltered')]"
},
"functionAccessArray": {
"type": "array",
"value": "[variables('functionAccessArray')]"
}
}
}
The result:
I just had the same issue. By using an array parameter with a default value instead of a variable, I got it to work.
"parameters": {
"functionAccess": {
"type": "array",
"defaultValue": [
"value1",
"value2",
"value3"
]
}
}
Hello I have the following scenario:
JSON object:
{
"$id": "1",
"someProp": "123",
"children": [{
"$id": "2",
"$type": "ClassB",
"Parent": {
"$ref": "1"
}
}]
}
JSON schema :
{
"id": "ClassA",
"required": true,
"type": [
"object",
"null"
],
"properties": {
"someProp": {
"required": true,
"type": [
"string",
"null"
]
},
"children": {
"id": "List<Child>",
"required": true,
"type": [
"array",
"null"
],
"items": {
"id": "Child",
"type": [
"object",
"null"
],
"properties": {
"id": {
"required": true,
"type": "integer"
},
"parent": {
"$ref": "ClassA"
}
}
}
}
}
}
I have a complex object who has reference loops, so I have configured json.net to make reference when the object is serialized. Everything is working as expected I can serialize and deserialize the object, but when I am validating the JSON object with the above schema I got the following error :
Required properties are missing from object : "someProp", path :
object.Children[0].parent
And that is correct how can make the schema look at the reference JSON object ?
Problem is with the "id" property of an object inside children array
"properties": {
"id": {
"required": true,
"type": "integer"
},
"parent": {
"$ref": "ClassA"
}
}
You are saying id requires to have property "id" and you don't have that property inside object, either changes "id" to "$id" or remove it from property list to satisfy schema.
"properties": {
"$id": {
"required": true,
"type": "integer"
},
"parent": {
"$ref": "ClassA"
}
}
Also make sure you have "id" / "$id" integer value, i.e.
"$id":2 not "$id":"2"
We've done quite a bit of swagger modelling, but one thing I am struggling with is how we could define that all our arrays will never be null, but will be an empty collection if we have no data.
Is there a way of explicitly defining this in Swagger?
Thanks
To define a model with a mandatory array, you can use required property :
{
"type": "object",
"required": [
"nonNullableArray"
],
"properties": {
"nonNullableArray": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"nullableArray": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}
}
Could someone give me an example of a model named "Multimedia.json" that I could use to store uploaded multimedia files (audio, video, or jpg)? Specifically, is there a type called "multimedia" or "binary"? Any strategies the Strongloop way?
Thanks,
{
"name": "Multimedia",
"base": "PersistedModel",
"idInjection": true,
"options": {
"validateUpsert": true
},
"properties": {
"title": {
"type": "string",
"required":true
},
"description": {
"type": "string"
},
"category": {
"type": "string" ---can this be a type called binary?
}
},
"validations": [],
"relations": {
"report": {
"type": "belongsTo",
"model": "Report",
"foreignKey": ""
}
},
"acls": [],
"methods": []
}
There is no built in way to do this, but StrongLoop themselves refer to this post in their documentation for the current best method to store metadata with the storage component.
https://stackoverflow.com/a/31118294/1753891
https://docs.strongloop.com/display/public/LB/Storage+component