Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I see JavaFX and Vaadin very similar except for the fact that JavaFX requires Java plugin in the browser. But otherwise it seems to offer the same capabilities. Why should I prefer Vaadin to JavaFX? Is there any case when Vaadin is a better solution?
You pretty much answered it yourself. You just need to look into it a bit more. Chrome started to disable their Java related plugins which will eventually push those apps off the shelf. Who knows when/if the other browsers follow that trend.
Chrome starts pushing Java off the web
Vaadin offers many features that you can easily see for yourself in their demo section. And it's in pure Java. It's still a young technology apparently, give or take 8 years old.
I'm not gonna give my personal opinion because this is not the place but I wished you would've just googled this simple query:
Vaadin vs. JavaFX
Related
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I am working on a new project which involves building a chat window. Normally, I would have no hesitation in using Flexbox for this project, however, a requirement of this project is that I support IE9.
I know that using tools like Modernizr can provide a fallback, but if I need to support this anyways is there much advantage of using this method?
No. Not worth it. You'll wind up doing everything twice to get the fallback support, so spend your effort doing it once, fully compatible with the oldest browser you need to support.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
Hi i am going to develop a professional website.
I wanted to know which css will be more suitable for designing purposes?
Bootstrap 3 or Foundation 5?
or is there any other css i can go for?
This depends on taste and use case. Bootstrap is able to provide good results verry fast. But you are bound to many parts of it. Foundation is able to give you a more general Framework. From what I know, both systems have problems with older internet explorers. But foundation maybe has some more Problems with that. Most companys I know, use Bootstrap. However, everyone has to adjust and customize the files for their fitting.
I use Boostrap because it works perfectly for my CMS (typo3).
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I am studying some popular CSS frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation etc. I pointed some out, and I'm willing to make my own CSS framework whether for my own projects or in later for free distribution. As I'm a front-end developer in most of the cases, I'm a bit slow with JavaScripts. So in my study I found some challenges in making a new CSS framework, like:
JavaScripts integration for a nice, clean and easy-to-use front-end
Common and general values for a fixed layout
The menu CSS
And also I found some features a bit challenging, like:
Responsive grids (I loved it)
But is there any checklist that should be fulfilled in CSS framework?
Maybe you can try yoeman to help you create your own css framework quickly and easily.
Here is the link on the details of Yoeman generator:
https://github.com/yeoman/yeoman/wiki/Generators
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
There are tons of resources on how to program using the APIs of various widget toolkits but I can't seem to find much in the way of a tutorial on how to create widget toolkits themselves or how they work n detail. They are basically just black boxes to me right now.
There is some info on QT:
http://qt-project.org/wiki/Category:QtInternals
but it seems quite specific to QT and not geared towards general theory.
Could anyone point me to some resources?
Thanks for reading
There are powerpoint presentaion slides on the following link:
http://aplcenmp.apl.jhu.edu/~davids/605741/handouts/6_SWT_Programming.pdf
Also you may have a look on pdf given on the following link:
http://www.loria.fr/~dutech/DDZ/SWT.pdf
It would have been great to know which programming language you are using (or you'll use) to develop widgets.
Anyways,there is a link which shows the basic concepts behind widgets and also their creation:
http://star.pst.qub.ac.uk/idl/Widget_Programming_Concepts.html
Go through the tutorial/description to see if it meets your need.
Hope it'll help you.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I've heard that Microsoft has unleashed a windows 8 style (previously known as metro) API for ASP.NET
Does anyone knows anything about it? What is it called? Where to get it from?
Unfortunately I don't have any link about that API. I've tried searching for it but didn't get any luck.
I have found some JQuery APIs, but I'm asking about the one done by Microsoft itself. Is there any?
I was hoping that there's a simple way of creating "metro look" without having to reinvent any wheel (if there's already an API for it)
That's not called an API, that's ususally called a theme: a set of stylesheets and images.
I think you are looking for Metro UI CSS. It's got little to do with Microsoft though.