I am trying to use a single 4KB string in my arduino sketch but this always seems to give a whole bunch of java errors in the console and never compiles. I believe, I am using it correctly:
const char sequence[] PROGMEM = {"0F0FF0 ... 0F0F0FF"};
By trial-and-error I determined that the maximum length I can get to compile successfully is 1104 characters. This doesn't seem to make much sense. Is there some unknown limitation in the compiler or is it an issue with the IDE? I'm using 1.0.5 but I get the same results in 1.6.5 as well. I'd really rather not split the array. Reading online, the size limit should be 32KB, which is far higher, than what I need.
Any help or explanation appreciated, please and thank you.
It's a limitation of the IDE, not the compiler. If you make it a single string still, but use C's string concatenation, it will compile. eg.
const char sequence[] PROGMEM = {
"0F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF0"
"0F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF0"
...
"0F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF00F0F0FF0"
};
Related
I wrote a barebone progran template in XC8 (1.37) that I use to develop and test new GLCD functions for the 18F family. Programming is done via a PICkit3. Since I need to quicky reprogram several times the code it is really important that programming is faster as much as possible.
Tipically, the code size is around 2K and it takes less than 10 sec to program,
Everiything is fine until I must use a font table, defined as:
const char font8[] = {....
Now, with just $400 bytes added, the compiler place the table at the ROM's end and the programming of 64K memory takes more than 1 minute.
Is there any way to avoid this?
I tried to manually limit the memory range in the MPLABX options, but this is annoying and a little unsafe (sometimes part of code is truncated).
A while back I had to write some code for emissions testing, where I needed to copy data between extreme ends of RAM. To do that I needed to specify the exact memory addresses. You can also use the C extension __at() construct. http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/50002053F.pdf#page=27
int scanMode __at(0x200);
const char keys[] __at(123) = { ’r’, ’s’, ’u’, ’d’};
int modify(int x) __at(0x1000) {
return x * 2 + 3;
}
I'm trying to get started with OpenCL but came across weird behavior of the OpenCL compiler with respect to white-space and can't seem to find any documentation about that.
C-style single-line comments (// foo) immediately cause a meaningless build error: At end of source: error: expected a "}". Multi-line comments (/* bar */) seem to work fine.
Line breaks seem to get stripped without adding whitespace which can cause errors. This example will not compile because of that:
__kernel
void TestKernel() {}
line 1: error: identifier "__kernelvoid" is undefined
This may totally depend on my machine and/or configuration but can somebody confirm that these things should not be this way?
I am using OpenCL via Cloo from .net/C#. The driver is from AMD OpenCL 2.0 AMD-APP (1642.5)
I think I figured it out. I was doing this:
var program = new ComputeProgram(context, File.ReadAllLines(filename));
File.ReadAllLines() returns an array of strings without the line-break characters which is the root of the errors I was getting.
Using File.ReadAllTest() instead fixed all the problems:
var program = new ComputeProgram(context, File.ReadAllText(filename));
But in my opinion some of the blame goes to either Cloo or the OpenCL API for accepting a string array but just concatenating it together..
Can anybody tell me how to measure the consumed RAM for a particular code running on Arduino Mega or Due.
There is two kinds of numbers to this question:
Global static usage and current run time.
The static estimated usage can be determined by adding the following line to (if it does not already exist)
.\arduino-1.5.5\hardware\arduino\avr\boards.txt
uno.upload.maximum_ram_size=2048
This then allows the compiler to output the additional 2nd line in the following example in the IDE's result window
Binary sketch size: 25,880 bytes (of a 32,256 byte maximum)
Estimated used SRAM memory: 990 bytes (of a 2048 byte maximum)
To see the amount of memory used at any given point. Including memory space currently in use, that exists while only in functions and members. This includes the HEAP and such. I use the following MemoryFree library at specific points in the code to reveal the high-water. The readme explains how to save unnecessarily/unintentionally used RAM by prints.
Note: That while the original Arduino IDE 1.0.5's boards.txt files does contain these ram_sizes, it does not actually use display usage. Where the original Arduino IDE 1.5.5 does, along with Arduino ERW 1.0.5 does (an non-supported fork).
In my Arduino IDE 2.1.0
I edit the file: /usr/share/arduino/hardware/arduino/boards.txt
but the second line don't appear
After read:
check-ram-memory-usage-arduino-optimization
measuring-free-memory
I tried:
Show vervose output during compilation
and use avr-size /tmp/build4042914391435450796.tmp/XXXXXXX.cpp.elf
then i get my memory used
Best Regards!
int freeRam () {
extern int __heap_start, *__brkval;
int v;
int fr = (int) &v - (__brkval == 0 ? (int) &__heap_start : (int) __brkval);
Serial.print("Free ram: ");
Serial.println(fr);
}
I have a bizarre one here with the serial output when trying to write some code for my Arduino Uno.
I have this proto-code:
MyClass myclass;
void setup()
{
Serial.Begin(9600);
Serial.println("Starting...");
}
void loop()
{
int status = myclass.DoWork();
Serial.println("Status: " + status);
}
class MyClass
{
int DoWork()
{
Serial.println("Doing some work...");
return 1;
}
}
Now when this runs I get the following output:
Starting...
Doing some work...
atus: 1
So the strange part is the "Status: 1" missing the first few characters. Is this because I am using serial in an object improperly or something?
I have noticed when I reference another library that also uses serial like MyClass does that I get other strange output behavior... so I assume that I am doing something wrong.
EDIT: In the end this turned out to actually be a memory issue. A library I was including was quite large and it was consuming the available memory. I found this by adding a few more debugging statements and found the corruption shifted around based on the string lengths and positions. By using the F() function I moved the strings to flash memory (e.g. I now run Serial.println(F("Starting...")); and it has corrected the strange output.
You cannot add strings and integers in C++. It would have been better for you if this failed to compile:
Serial.println("Status: " + status);
Instead the compiler guessed at something. It guessed wrong. Use this:
Serial.print("Status :");
Serial.println(status);
or for complete control of outputting numbers and strings learn to use C string formatting, sprintf()
In the end this turned out to actually be a memory issue. A library I was including was quite large and it was consuming the available memory. I found this by adding a few more debugging statements and found the corruption shifted around based on the string lengths and positions. By using the F() function I moved the strings to flash memory (e.g. I now run Serial.println(F("Starting...")); and it has corrected the strange output.
One more possible explanation.
I was running minicom to monitor, and I usually like that it auto-reconnects after resetting my device.
Well I minimized a terminal running minicom last night, and today I started a new instance that somehow also got connected to the same serial port (if that is even possible).
I think the two instances of minicom were each reading ~50% of the serial characters roughly at random, leaving me with quite a mess of text.
When I do
#include <inttypes.h>
long long value = 0;
printf("An 8 byte long integer value: %"PRId64".", value);
Eclipse shows me a syntax error in the printf line. Anybody knows how to get rid of it? This is the only way I know to have a printf working on both 32-bit and 64-bit architectures and Eclipse errors every few lines make it quite hard to see the real issues.
Thanks!
The question was answered here.
You need to add __STDC_FORMAT_MACROS in Project Properties->C/C++ General->Paths and Symbols.