I'm running an Ubuntu 14.04 instance that has docker installed on openstack. I'm trying to mount a volume into a docker container. I'm doing this with
docker run -t -i -v /mnt/data/dir:/mnt/test ubuntu
Where /mnt/data/dir is an NFS shared directory. Doing this gets me:
docker:
Error response from daemon: Container command '/bin/bash' could not be invoked..
However, using a local directory instead of a mounted directory works exactly as expected.
I understand that docker doesn't natively support an NFS mounted file system, however the errors I googled are usually not of the form that I've mentioned above.
Any clue on how to proceed
Edit: I forgot to mention that its not just limited to /bin/bash could not be invoked. I tried running a tomcat server and that gave me the exact same error.
I'm trying to run Image application from server "bert"
I connected through my OSX Maverick as
ssh ak324#bert.eecs.qmul.ac.uk
I compiled my file with
$ make
but when I run the resulting file
$ ./window
it gives me the following error:
Error: Unable to initialize gtk, is DISPLAY set properly?
How can I solve this problem?
You should connect with the -X or -Y option to be able to launch graphical applications:
ssh -X ak324#bert.eecs.qmul.ac.uk
If that doesn't help, you should consult /etc/ssh/sshd_config whether X11Forwarding is enabled.
On macOS you need to install xquartz for x11 support https://support.apple.com/de-de/HT201341.
Then you can connect with
ssh -Y ak324#bert.eecs.qmul.ac.uk
Try running ssh with the flags -Y -v.
If the following line appears on the terminal during the ssh connection, install xauth on your remote system.
debug1: Remote: No xauth program; cannot forward with spoofing.
As suggested here.
I am trying to run a simple MPI program using MPICH over a cluster of two machines. However, one is running Fedora 17 and the other is running Debian Squeeze - not necessarily a problem, but the issue is that the two distros put their mpi execs in different directories:
When I run the following from host1:
mpiexec -hosts host2 -np 1 -wdir /home/chris/src/mpi/ ./mpitest
it fails with the following error
bash: /usr/lib/mpich2/bin/hydra_pmi_proxy: No such file or directory
This seems to be because hydra_pmi_proxy is installed in /usr/lib/mpich2/bin on the Fedora machine but in /usr/bin on the Debian machine. I assume that when I spawn the process from host1 via ssh, it expects to find hydra_pmi_proxy in the same place on host2.
The program runs ok on both machines if I just run it locally on that node - I only get a problem when trying to run it on both.
I have searched the MPICH documentation for a way to override to remote path to hydra_pmi_proxy, but to no avail.
Can I do this somehow? I thought one of the advantages of MPICH was that it can easily handle hetrogeneous hosts....
Any insights would be most appreciated!
I managed to solve this problem not installing mpich hydra and the terminal (eg apt-get install MPICH2 or hydra). But instead I downloaded the source code: http://www.mpich.org/downloads/ (being the stable version).
Then I ran the following command on the machines Master and slave: export PATH = / home / you / mpich: $ PATH (On my computer I installed on my mpich directory).
Just solved this problem!
Thanks!
This can be solved by installing MPICH via its source code and mount the installation directory in the node in the same directory as the directory on server. then use export PATH = /home/you/mpich-installation-directory/bin: $PATH only on server.
This problem can be solved in NFS configuration with: exportfs -var (in master machine).
You have your /mirror directory, but it is necessary to add the directory /usr in /etc/exports:
/usr *(rw,sync,no_subtree_check)
In the client machine, edit /etc/fstab and add:
master-ip/usr /usr nfs defaults 0 0
Save and run the command mount -a.
After run df -h to see the mounted directory from master in slave/client.
I am trying
sudo mount -t cifs //<server>/<share> -o username=user#domain,password=**** /mnt/<mountpoint>
error message:
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on //server/share,
missing codepage or other error
In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
dmesg | tail or so
The syslog has
CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -22
I am able to mount the same share on another centos system. I can ping the server, mount point directory has been created.
I ran into this problem when using a host name and solved it by using an IP address. E.g.:
use
mount -t cifs //192.168.1.15/share
rather than
mount -t cifs //servername/share
Another possible solution is to install
cifs-utils
.
Ah, the dreaded -22. Basically this seems to be used as a catchall for "something didn't work", although technically it's referred to as an invalid argument.
The client does IMHO a very poor job of telling you the actual problem. (This may not be its fault - it doesn't always have access to that information).
However -- have you checked the logs on the server/machine you are connecting to?
I was connecting to an OS X samba server, and learned from what I found in the logs there that it was necessary to specify additional options under -o as follows:
nounix,sec=ntlmssp
Among the things these settings enable are "allow long names", and "ignore UNIX filename endings"...sec is to specify security flags.
Another possibility is that you're trying to access a filesystem of a type that mount.cifs can't actually handle.
For RHEL/Centos install package - "cifs-utils"
Maybe move the target?
sudo mount -t cifs -o username=user#domain,password=**** //<server>/<share> /mnt/<mountpoint>
Or maybe this solution? (Ubuntu, Debian methods)
sudo apt-get install smbfs
Or for CentOS, RedHat, Fedora try:
sudo yum install samba-client
I had a similar issue on Ubuntu 12.04 with the "mount" package (version 2.20.1-1ubuntu3).
It happened when I was trying to mount the server share using its hostname rahter than its IP.
Another way to solve the issue on Ubuntu was to install the cifs-utils package. That way I could also mount the samba share using the exact same command line (or fstab) but with hostname.
sudo mount -t cifs //hostname/share -o username=user,password=pwd /mnt/share
Just did a clean install of Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and got this trying to hook up my Linux HTPC.
Solved it by running: sudo apt-get install cifs-utils then remounting it.
CIFS returns code "-22" in many cases (not only invalid arguments).
For me installing keyutils did the trick:
apt-get install keyutils
My distribution is "Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS".
I figured this out by increasing the logging verbosity of CIFS:
echo 7 > /proc/fs/cifs/cifsFYI
# disable again via:
#echo 0 > /proc/fs/cifs/cifsFYI
Documentation on the bitmask ("7") for cifsFYI can be found here: https://www.kernel.org/doc/readme/Documentation-filesystems-cifs-README
After trying to mount once more dmesg included more helpful information:
Dec 7 12:34:20 pc1471 kernel: [ 5442.667417] CIFS VFS: dns_resolve_server_name_to_ip: unable to resolve:
Another maybe helpful link:
http://vlkan.com/blog/post/2015/01/08/smb-mount-troubleshoot/
I have Ubuntu Server 12.10 x64 installed as a VMware VM, running on OS X 10.8 (Mountain Lion).
On the Mac, in SYSTEM PREFERENCES > SHARING > FILE SHARING (on), I added a folder to share. For my tests, I created a new folder within my Public folder called "ubuntu".
In Ubuntu, I issued the following commands:
sudo mkdir /media/target
sudo mount.cifs //10.0.20.3/ubuntu /media/target -o username=davidallie,nounix,sec=ntlmssp,rw
Ubuntu prompted me for the password and, once entered, mounted the folder. I then ran:
df -H
which allowed me to verify the mounts and mount-points.
This has recently manifested thanks to a kernel bug in v5.18.8+, I was able to reproduce on v5.18.9 and v5.18.11.
Here is the relevant ticket on kernel.org, quote:
it appears that kernel 5.18.8 breaks cifs mounts on my machine. With
5.18.7, everything works fine. With 5.18.8, I am getting:
$ sudo mount /mnt/openmediavault/
mount error(22): Invalid argument
Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs) and kernel
log messages (dmesg)
The relevant /etc/fstab line is:
//odroidxu4.local/julian /mnt/openmediavault cifs
credentials=/home/julas/.credentials,uid=julas,gid=julas,vers=3.1.1,nobrl,_netdev,auto
0 0
Here is the offending commit, and here is the fix, which applies cleanly to v5.18.11. The cause is, from what I understand, a bug in old versions of the samba server in the negotiation protocol.
If this is your issue, you can:
patch your kernel yourself;
downgrade to v5.18.7;
switch to an LTS kernel;
use the userspace (and also really slow and awful) gvfs-smb;
upgrade the samba version on your server; or
add vers=2.0 to the mount.cifs options in /etc/fstab.
Note that while I haven't tried the last one personally, the venerable #SEBiGEM has confirmed in the comments that it works for v5.18.10.
Note also that I didn't try upgrading samba on the server at all because I hate touching the box it's running on - every time I upgrade anything everything breaks. Doing so might also not be an option for those with NAS appliances.
As a personal sidenote, it's a little sad that so many different things can cause -22. My answer is correct, but very very niche and specific to this point in time. I imagine in a month it will simply be useless noise.
Just experience the problem on RHEL 5. You don't need to install the samba suite, just the samba-client and any dependencies.
Maybe it's too late, but simplest solution described in kernel bug 50631:
in the latest code, unc mount parameter in mandatory. Modified command works for me:
sudo mount -t cifs //<server>/<share> -o username=user#domain,password=****,unc=\\\\<server>\\<share> /mnt/<mountpoint>
Try run the comamnd:
$modinfo cifs
filename: /lib/modules/3.2.0-60-virtual/kernel/fs/cifs/cifs.ko
version: 1.76
description: VFS to access servers complying with the SNIA CIFS Specification e.g. Samba and Windows
license: GPL
author: Steve French <sfrench#us.ibm.com>
srcversion: 9435BBC2F61D29F06643803
depends:
intree: Y
vermagic: 3.2.0-60-virtual SMP mod_unload modversions 686
parm: CIFSMaxBufSize:Network buffer size (not including header). Default: 16384 Range: 8192 to 130048 (int)
parm: cifs_min_rcv:Network buffers in pool. Default: 4 Range: 1 to 64 (int)
parm: cifs_min_small:Small network buffers in pool. Default: 30 Range: 2 to 256 (int)
parm: cifs_max_pending:Simultaneous requests to server. Default: 32767 Range: 2 to 32767. (int)
parm: echo_retries:Number of echo attempts before giving up and reconnecting server. Default: 5. 0 means never reconnect. (ushort)
parm: enable_oplocks:Enable or disable oplocks (bool). Default:y/Y/1 (bool)
If your getting any error then cifs is not installed. Just check with your admin. I thought it helps out.
Adding the option vers=3.0 to the mount command worked for me: sudo mount -t cifs -v <src> <dst> -o ...,vers=3.0,...
You need to install cifs-utils first , just as follows:
sudo yum install cifs-utils
I know this is old, but on older cifs-utils versions, you may have to add the following two lines to /etc/request-key.conf
create cifs.spnego * * /usr/sbin/cifs.upcall -c %k
create dns_resolver * * /usr/sbin/cifs.upcall %k
Workaround without installing additional packages (cifs-utils adds another 81mb in Debian Stretch):
$ FILESERVER_IP=$(getent hosts myfileserver.com | awk '{ print $1 ; exit }')
$ sudo mount -t cifs //${FILESERVER_IP}/<share> -o username=user#domain,password=**** /mnt/<mountpoint>
Many answers, but wasn't work for me.
Solution:
My NAS didn't support Samba 3.0, on which my mount switch automatically.
So I downgraded smb version:
mount -t cifs //192.168.0.2/Share -o rw,vers=1.0,username=*****,password=******* /media/1
It's work.
We had a command which used to work with previous version of wireshark (1) but does not working with latest version (1.6.1)
"C:\Program Files\Wireshark\tshark.exe" -i \Device\NPF_{282F8D86-F9CC-4575-8F20-7E9F5B04BB89} -l -q -R "h245" -S -T pdml -w C:\capture_0.cap "(host 172.24.161.49 or host 172.24.161.34 and not port 80 and not port 23) and tcp" 1>C:\capture_0.xml
It is giving the error message: "tshark: Read filters aren't supported when capturing and saving the captured packets."
what is wrong with this command?
FYI - I do have a complete cygwin installed on this machine. Will it make any difference?
Try with version 1.2.5 or earlier - it used to work back then. For some unknown reason this limitation was introduced.