I'm trying to come up with a way to simplify some SCSS attribute selectors. What I end up with is:
[data-attr="opt1"] { ... }
[data-attr="opt2"] { ... }
[data-attr="opt3"] { ... }
What I'm hoping for is to be able to write something closer to:
[data-attr]
&="opt1" { ... }
&="opt2" { ... }
&="opt3" { ... }
via a mixin, or whatever. Can't come up with a solution though. Any clever ideas?
I've come to this idea:
#mixin attrVal($value) {
$attr: str-slice(#{&}, 2, -2); // $attr = "data-attr"
#at-root {
[#{$attr}="#{$value}"] {
#content;
}
}
}
[data-attr] {
#include attrVal('opt1') { width: 10px; }
#include attrVal('opt2') { width: 20px; }
#include attrVal('opt3') { width: 30px; }
}
Output (tested on sassmeister.com)
[data-attr="opt1"] { width: 10px; }
[data-attr="opt2"] { width: 20px; }
[data-attr="opt3"] { width: 30px; }
For this specific example there's no that huge simplification, but with this approach you're actually decoupling the attribute name from its value (in the aim of code reuse).
Related
I created a SASS #mixin which contains #if conditions to assign styling to elements based on their z-index property to create some sort of elevation.
However what ever I am trying it will not work out.
I'm pretty sure I am doing something just slightly wrong that affects everything else.
I'd appreciate your feedback. Thanks in advance!
$background: #121212;
$surface: #1f1f1f;
$surface-shade_1: #282828;
$surface-shade_2: #303030;
%surface {
background-color: $surface;
}
%surface-shade_1 {
background-color: $surface-shade_1;
}
%surface-shade_2 {
background-color: $surface-shade_2;
}
#mixin elevation($elevationValue) {
#if $elevationValue>0 {
#extend %surface;
}
#else if $elevationValue>4 or $elevationValue=4 {
#extend %surface-shade_1;
}
#else if $elevationValue>8 or $elevationValue=8 {
#extend %surface-shade_2;
}
z-index: $elevationValue * 50;
}
nav {
#mixin elevation(4);
}
If you want to use #mixin inside the CSS files you can use like #include mixin-name and also use directly $elevationValue >= 4 instead of $elevationValue>4 or $elevationValue=4 it becomes much cleaner.
$background: #121212;
$surface: #1f1f1f;
$surface-shade_1: #282828;
$surface-shade_2: #303030;
%surface {
background-color: $surface;
}
%surface-shade_1 {
background-color: $surface-shade_1;
}
%surface-shade_2 {
background-color: $surface-shade_2;
}
#mixin elevation($elevationValue) {
#if $elevationValue > 0 {
#extend %surface;
}
#else if $elevationValue >= 4 {
#extend %surface-shade_1;
}
#else if $elevationValue >= 8 {
#extend %surface-shade_2;
}
z-index: $elevationValue * 50;
}
nav {
#include elevation(4);
}
I want to generate 9 typography classes, each with the following:
font-size: 2rem;
line-height: 1rem;
I'll be using standard typographic multipliers for font sizes and line-height. Instead of hard-coding all of these CSS classes, I was wondering if there was a more elegant way of generating them in a loop using LESS.
I found the following from another thread:
#iterations: 5;
.span-loop (#i) when (#i > 0) {
.span-#{i} {
width: ~"#{i}%";
}
.span-loop(#i - 1);
}
.span-loop (#iterations);
Which generates:
.span-5 {
width: 5%;
}
.span-4 {
width: 4%;
}
.span-3 {
width: 3%;
}
.span-2 {
width: 2%;
}
.span-1 {
width: 1%;
}
This is pretty close, but I'd love for my class names to more "named". How can I use a loop to generate classes for:
.small { }
.caption { }
.body { }
.subheader { }
.title { }
.headline { }
etc...
I'm also not tied to LESS, so if there's a better CSS preprocessor language, then I'm happy to use that instead :)
Thank you!
An example from documentation for further modification;)
for more complicated code, it is better to use scss than less
.for(#list, #code) {
& {
.loop(#i: 1) when (#i =< length(#list)) {
#value: extract(#list, #i);
#code();
.loop(#i + 1);
}
.loop();
}
}
#elements: small, caption, body, subheader, title, headline;
.for(#elements, {
#remfont: #i+1;
#remline: ((#i+1) * 1.5 / 3);
.#{value} {
font-size: ~"#{remfont}rem";
line-height: ~"#{remline}rem";
}
});
I am having trouble prepending the root class to my current selector in sass. I have the following code:
.cta-two-columns {
&__text-holder {
#at-root&#{__inner} {
// also tried #at-root __inner&{#}
// and many others like #at-root__inner
padding: rem(25px);
}
}
}
but this gives me the following:
.cta-two-columns__text-holder__inner {
padding: rem(25px);
}
I don't understand the above - what's the point of at-root as you may as well just do &__inneras it gave me the same as the two things I have shown I tried
how do I get
.cta-two-columns__text-holder .cta-two-columns__inner {
}
without having to resort to
.cta-two-columns {
&__text-holder {
.cta-two-columns__inner {
padding: rem(25px);
}
}
}
Or is this the only way to do it in sass?
#at-root doesn't really work like you may think in this case. #at-root will simply make the declaration outside the nest. To better understand, add another CSS declaration like below:
.cta-two-columns {
&__text-holder {
margin: 10px;
#at-root&#{__inner} {
padding: rem(25px);
}
}
}
This will produce the following CSS code:
.cta-two-columns__text-holder {
margin: 10px;
}
.cta-two-columns__text-holder__inner {
padding: rem(25px);
}
Simply imagine how the selector will be created without #at-root then make it outside.
Without it will produce this:
.cta-two-columns__text-holder {
margin: 10px;
}
.cta-two-columns__text-holder .cta-two-columns__text-holder__inner {
padding: rem(25px);
}
Then we simply omit .cta-two-columns__text-holder.
One idea to obtain what you want is to consider a variable where you can declare the main class then you will be able to nest as many element as you want:
$sel: '.cta-two-columns';
#{$sel}__text-holder {
#{$sel}__inner {
padding: rem(25px);
}
}
Will produce:
.cta-two-columns__text-holder .cta-two-columns__inner {
padding: rem(25px);
}
with more nested elements:
$sel: '.cta-two-columns';
#{$sel}__text-holder {
#{$sel}__outer {
#{$sel}__inner{
#{$sel}__wrap{
padding: rem(25px);
}
}
}
}
Will produce
.cta-two-columns__text-holder .cta-two-columns__outer .cta-two-columns__inner .cta-two-columns__wrap {
padding: rem(25px);
}
I'm working with the SCSS syntax of SASS to create a dynamic grid system but I've hit a snag.
I'm trying to make the grid system completely dynamic like this:
$columns: 12;
then I create the columns like this:
#mixin col-x {
#for $i from 1 through $columns {
.col-#{$i} { width: $column-size * $i; }
}
}
Which outputs:
.col-1 {
width: 4.16667%;
}
.col-2 {
width: 8.33333%;
}
etc...
This works well but what I want to do next is dynamically generate a long list of column classes separated by commas based on the number of $columns chosen - e.g I want it to look like this:
.col-1,
.col-2,
.col-3,
.col-4,
etc... {
float: left;
}
I've tired this:
#mixin col-x-list {
#for $i from 1 through $columns - 1 {
.col-#{$i}-m { float: left; }
}
}
but the output is this:
.col-1 {
float: left;
}
.col-2 {
float: left;
}
etc...
I'm a little stuck on the logic here as well as the SCSS syntax required to create something like this.
Does anyone have any ideas?
I think you may want to take a look at #extend. If you set that up something like:
$columns: 12;
%float-styles {
float: left;
}
#mixin col-x-list {
#for $i from 1 through $columns {
.col-#{$i}-m { #extend %float-styles; }
}
}
#include col-x-list;
It should render in your css file as:
.col-1-m, .col-2-m, .col-3-m, .col-4-m, .col-5-m, .col-6-m, .col-7-m, .col-8-m, .col-9-m, .col-10-m, .col-11-m, .col-12-m {
float: left;
}
#extend in the docs.
There's also a way to do what your question is specifically asking for: generate (and use) a list of classes with commas separating them. D.Alexander's response totally works in your situation, but I'm posting this alternative in case there's another use case for someone looking at this question.
Here's a Pen demonstrating: http://codepen.io/davidtheclark/pen/cvrxq
Basically, you can use Sass functions to achieve what you want. Specifically, I'm using append to add classes to my list, separated by commas, and unquote to avoid compilation conflicts with the period in the classnames.
So my mixin ends up looking like this:
#mixin col-x {
$col-list: null;
#for $i from 1 through $columns {
.col-#{$i} {
width: $column-size * $i;
}
$col-list: append($col-list, unquote(".col-#{$i}"), comma);
}
#{$col-list} {
float: left;
}
}
thnx to #davidtheclark here is a more generic version:
#mixin attr-x($attr, $attr-count: 10, $attr-steps: 10, $unit: '%') {
$attr-list: null;
#for $i from 1 through $attr-count {
$attr-value: $attr-steps * $i;
.#{$attr}#{$attr-value} {
#{$attr}: #{$attr-value}#{$unit};
}
$attr-list: append($attr-list, unquote(".#{$attr}-#{$attr-value}"), comma);
}
#{$attr-list} {
//append style to all classes
}
}
Use it like this:
#include attr-x('margin-left', 6, 5, 'px');
//or
#include attr-x('width');
The result looks like this:
.margin-left5 {
margin-left: 5px; }
.margin-left10 {
margin-left: 10px; }
...
.margin-left30 {
margin-left: 30px; }
.width10 {
width: 10%; }
.width20 {
width: 20%; }
...
.width100 {
width: 100%; }
Is it possible to #extend a SCSS placeholder with nesting, and have that nesting reflected in the resulting class?
Given a nested placeholder:
%my-form-field {
...
&__label {
...
}
&__feedback {
...
}
}
I currently have to do the following:
.one-of-many-targets {
#extend %my-form-field;
&__label {
#extend %my-form-field__label;
}
&__feedback {
#extend %my-form-field__feedback;
}
}
But I'd like to be able to simplify this to:
.one-of-many-targets {
#extend %my-form-field;
}
... and have it resolve to:
.one-of-many-targets { ... }
.one-of-many-targets__label { ... }
.one-of-many-targets__feedback { ... }
Is there a different way to write my placeholder and #extends to make the SCSS cleaner, as in the 2nd example?
You can use a mixin instead:
#mixin my-form-field() {
width: 10px;
&__label {
width: 20px;
}
&__feedback {
width: 30px;
}
}
.one-of-many-targets {
#include my-form-field();
}
will generate:
.one-of-many-targets {
width: 10px;
}
.one-of-many-targets__label {
width: 20px;
}
.one-of-many-targets__feedback {
width: 30px;
}
You could try use selector.append()
See: https://github.com/sass/sass/issues/2808#issuecomment-574413393
Also see more info why parent selector didn't work as you expect in extend-only selectors: https://github.com/sass/sass/issues/2262#issuecomment-291645428