I went through different answers on forums but could not find a solution. So I have an array like this:
var valuesArray = ["negative", "underweight", "neutral", "overweight", "positive"];
I have two variables:
var previousRating and var currentRating which dynamically get assigned with one of the values from valuesArray.
I am trying to find index of previousRating and currentRating in valuesArray like this:
var prevRatingCounter = valuesArray.indexOf(previousRating.toLowerCase());
var curRatingCouter = valuesArray.indexOf(currentRating.toLowerCase());
previousRating and curRating are string values but still I am getting error:
Object doesn't support this property or method
Can someone please help me figure this out. Thank you.
As explained in this answer, the version of ECMAScript used by server side JScript for writing classic ASP, is only 3.0 - the method indexOf() of arrays was introduced only in version 5.0 of ECMAScript as far as I can tell, hence it simply does not exist.
Writing such method isn't that hard, here is a working code sample:
<%
function IndexOf(arr, item) {
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
if (arr[i] == item) {
return i;
}
}
return -1;
}
%>
Then change the code to use it, e.g.
var prevRatingCounter = IndexOf(valuesArray, previousRating.toLowerCase());
If you need to use it in many different files, you can put the function in a file named e.g. "Common.asp" then include it wherever you need it.
I think that you have a problem with the inizialization.
This works fine:
var valuesArray = ["negative", "underweight", "neutral", "overweight", "positive"];
var previousRating = "underweight";
var currentRating = "neutral";
var valuesArray = ["negative", "underweight", "neutral", "overweight", "positive"];
var prevRatingCounter = valuesArray.indexOf(previousRating.toLowerCase());
var curRatingCouter = valuesArray.indexOf(currentRating.toLowerCase());
document.write(prevRatingCounter+" "+curRatingCouter);
Related
I have constructed my crossfilter-setup a bit different than in most examples I can find, namely:
I have data-array d with multiple data-sources included, among which is data1.
var cf = crossfilter(d3.range(0, d.data1.length));
Then I construct my dims like:
var dim = cf.dimension(function(i) { return d.data1[i].id; });
And I construct my groups like:
var group = dim.group().reduceSum(function(i) { return d.data1[i].total;});
This all works fine, but when I want to create custom reduce functions, the extra parameter i is giving me trouble.
var reduceAddPerc = function(p,v) {
p.sumOfSub += d.data1[i].var1;
p.sumOfTotal += d.data1[i].total;
p.finalVal = p.sumOfSub / p.sumOfTotal;
return p;
};
var reduceRemovePerc = function(p,v) {
p.sumOfSub -= d.data1[i].var1;
p.sumOfTotal -= d.data1[i].total;
p.finalVal = p.sumOfSub / p.sumOfTotal;
return p;
};
var reduceInitialPerc = function() {
return {sumOfSub:0, sumOfTotal:0, finalVal:0 };
};
And then defining the group with:
var group = dim.group().reduce(reduceAddPerc,reduceRemovePerc,reduceInitialPerc);
This doesn't work obviously, since the parameter i is now not known within the function. But I've tried adding the parameter (p,v,i), or nesting the functions by creating an additional function with parameter i around the (p,v) function, and also creating an additionao function(i) within the (p,v) function, but I cannot get this to work.
Does anyone have any help to offer?
In the custom reduce functions, the v parameter is the record currently being "reduced". In this case, it should be your counter, so just use it where you would normally use i. Is that not working?
I'm looking at an example by substack of using hyperscript, main-loop, and hyperx.
I'd like to recreate this example using hyperscript-helpers to get code similar to Elm. That module says it supports both hyperscript and virtual-hyperscript, so I'm trying virtual-hyperscript.
My code looks like this:
var vdom = require('virtual-dom')
var vh = require('virtual-hyperscript');
var hh = require('hyperscript-helpers')(vh);
var main = require('main-loop')
var div = hh.div;
var span = hh.span;
var h1 = hh.h1;
var loop = main({ times: 0 }, render, vdom)
document.querySelector('#content').appendChild(loop.target)
function render(state) {
return h1('title');
}
And it gives me an error:
Uncaught TypeError: Failed to execute 'appendChild' on 'Node': parameter 1 is not of type 'Node'.
What's going wrong? I assume something's not wired up correctly because
console.log(loop.target) //null
If it helps, I can post my html and the browserify build command I'm using
virtual-hyperscript is moved to https://github.com/Matt-Esch/virtual-dom/tree/master/virtual-hyperscript
See README at https://github.com/Raynos/virtual-hyperscript
The virtual-dom/h is just a new version of virtual-hyperscript.
My question is at the very end of the post.
I have tried everything from setting a timer for all the markers to be set to all kinds of calculations of the four corners, but nothing seems to be working.
Each time that I add a marker to the markermanager, I call this function below
public function markerSetBounds(someLat , someLng):void{
var bounds:LatLngBounds = new LatLngBounds();
for(var i:int = 0; i < myMarkers.length; i++)
{
var currentLatLon:LatLng = new LatLng(someLat , someLng);
bounds.extend(currentLatLon);
}
googleMap.setZoom(googleMap.getBoundsZoomLevel(bounds));
googleMap.setCenter(bounds.getCenter());
}
I believe I know why this does not work. I am only sending one set of lat, lng at a time.
However, when I tried the following, flex told me that it did not know what myMarkers[i].lat meant.
The following is how I fill myMarkers array
var someMarker:Marker = new Marker(new LatLng(someLat , someLng), new MarkerOptions({tooltip:someAddress, hasShadow: true}));
myMarkers.push(someMarker);
This is how I want to traverse through the array, but flex does not understand what .lat means.
for(var i:int = 0; i < myMarkers.length; i++)
{
var currentLatLon:LatLng = new LatLng(myMarkers[i].lat , myMarkers[i].lng);
bounds.extend(currentLatLon);
}
My question is how do I traverse through the myMarkers array to set currentLatLon. I have also tried a for each(var someObj:Marker in myMarkers) but it finds nothing. The markers are showing up on the map, but the bounds are not working.
Have you tried doing something like:
(myMarkers[i] as Marker).lat
Is this a problem at run time or compile time?
OK, I figured out was what the issue and it was that I had to place things in the correct order.
First, declare the LatLngBounds.
Second, make the markers.
Third, set the zoom
Forth, extend the bounds.
bounds = new LatLngBounds();
covToXML = new XML(event.result);
xmlToList = new XMLList(covToXML);
listToCol = new XMLListCollection(xmlToList);
someLat = Number(listToCol.children().child("geometry").child("location").child("lat").text());
someLng = Number(listToCol.children().child("geometry").child("location").child("lng").text());
someAddress = String(listToCol.children().child("formatted_address").text());
var markerOptions:MarkerOptions = new MarkerOptions();
markerOptions.icon = new (whichIcon(GlobalVars.randomIcon));
markerOptions.tooltip = someAddress;
markerOptions.hasShadow = true;
someMarker = new Marker(new LatLng(someLat , someLng), markerOptions);
someMarker.addEventListener(MapMouseEvent.CLICK,markerClicked);
myMarkers.push(someMarker);
googleMap.addOverlay(someMarker);
for each(someMarker in myMarkers)
{
var newLatLng:LatLng = someMarker.getLatLng();
// Alert.show(newLatLng.toString());
bounds.extend(newLatLng);
}
googleMap.setCenter(bounds.getCenter());
googleMap.setZoom(googleMap.getBoundsZoomLevel(bounds));
Thanks for all the suggestions and questions, which helped me to the solution.
I want to add a label in flex to display m/s2 (read meters per second square). I would need to use superscripting for this.
I have tried out the following code which is giving me a compilation error.
var richtxt1:RichText = new RichText();
richtxt1.text="m/s";
var richtxt2:RichText = new RichText();
var span:SpanElement = new SpanElement();
span.text = "2";
span.baselineShift = "superscript";
richtxt2.addChild(span);
richtxt1.text=rixhtxt1.txt + richtxt2.text
I am getting a compilation error for the line richtxt2.addChild(span)
The error is
Implicit coercion of a value of type flashX.textLayout.elements.SpanElement
to unrelated type flash.Display.DisplayObject
I think you've to do something like this
var xmlText:String = "<TextFlow xmlns='http://ns.adobe.com/textLayout/2008'>" +
"m/s <span baselineShift='superscript'>2</span>" +
"</TextFlow>";
var txtFlow:TextFlow = TextFlowUtil.importFromXML(xmlText);
var richTxt:RichText = new RichText();
richtxt.textFlow = txtFlow;
I've not tested it so please excuse me of any compilation errors.
This is the code I used in my iPad app to accomplish the above:
var xmlText:String = "m/s <span baselineShift='superscript'>2</span>";
var txtFlow:TextFlow = TextFlowUtil.importFromString(xmlText);
var richTxt:RichText = new RichText();
richTxt.textFlow = txtFlow;
this.addElement(richTxt);
It is based on kaychaks and information I found from Adobe's website. The differences are
I took out the TextFlow markup but left in the HTML;
importFromString rather than importFromXML; and
I added this.addElement(richText) to display the element.
Hello everyone this is my little Frankenstein code, don't make fun of it, it works!
So you would pass in the table name and a data as an Associative array which are objects.
I'm pretty sure this is not good code as I was and still am learning ActionScript. So what can I change or how would you guys make it better?
public function save(table:String,data:Object):void
{
var conn:SQLConnection = new SQLConnection();
var folder:File = File.applicationStorageDirectory;
var dbFile:File = folder.resolvePath("task.db");
conn.open(dbFile);
var stat:SQLStatement=new SQLStatement();
stat.sqlConnection=conn;
//make fields and values
var fields:String="";
var values:String="";
for(var sRole:String in data)
{
fields=fields+sRole+",:";
stat.parameters[":"+sRole]=data[sRole];
}
//trim off white space
var s:String=new String(fields);
var cleanString:String=s.slice( 0, -2 );
//over here we add : infront of the values I forget why
var find:RegExp=/:/g;
var mymyField:String=new String(cleanString.replace(find,""));
cleanString=":"+cleanString;
var SQLFields:String=mymyField;
var SQLValues:String=cleanString;
stat.text="INSERT INTO "+table+" ("+SQLFields+")VALUES("+SQLValues+")";
stat.execute();
}
The part where you build your query is quite a horror, to be honest. Half the code removes junk you added just a few lines before. This makes it hard to read and understand. Which is a sign of poor code quality. The following is far shorter and simpler:
//make fields and values
var fields:Array = [];
for(var field:String in data) {
fields.push(field);
stat.parameters[":"+field]=data[fieldName];
}
var sqlFields:String = fields.join(",");
var sqlValues:String = ":"+fields.join(",:");
stat.text="INSERT INTO "+table+" ("+sqlFields+")VALUES("+sqlValues+")";
stat.execute();
Someone once told me that a stupid idea that works isn't stupid. As programmer's our first goal is (often) to solve business issues; and as long as our code does that then we are successful. You don't need to apologize for code that works.
In terms of what I would do to change your snippet; I might just encapsulate it a bit more. Can the folder, dbFile, and db file name (task.db) be added either as properties to your class or arguments to the method?
Can you separate out the creation of the SQL Statement from the connection handling from your data parsing?
Some remarks,
As said before you can factorise out all the db connection so you can reuse the function without rewriting it if you need to change the db name.
Don't use new String() you can avoid it
it's not usefull to clean white space between your field :a, :b is the same as :a,:b
Some convention don't begin your local var name with an uppercase, and it's not usefull to reassign them to another var
If i don't get wrong after your //make fields and values can be rewritten for example as :
//make fields and values
var fields:String = "";
var values:String = "";
var fieldSeparator:String = "";
for(var sRole:String in data)
{
fields += fieldSeparator + sRole;
var paramName:String = ":" + sRole;
values += fieldSeparator + paramName;
stat.parameters[paramName] = data[sRole];
fieldSeparator = ",";
}
stat.text = "INSERT INTO " + table +" (" + fields + ") VALUES (" + values + ")";
stat.execute();