Related
I'm new with R and I'd like to create a plot with irregular intervals like the second one already suggested on another discussion (Uneven axis in base r plot). I'm not able to run the given script with my data.
I'd like to add more space between each Y label from 0 to 2000.
I'd also like to have less space between each Y label from 2000 to 7000. This would help me to distinguish the different lines in my graph that are really close to each other.
I don't want to use the ggplot function if it is possible.
Thanks a lot!!
Here what I've done (see my graph):
axis(2, c(seq(0, 2000, by=250), seq(2000,7000, by = 1000)), las = 1)
My actual graph
I have performed PCA Analysis using the prcomp function apart of the FactoMineR package on quite a substantial dataset of 3000 x 500.
I have tried plotting the main Principal Components that cover up to 100% of cumulative variance proportion with a fviz_eig plot. However, this is a very large plot due to the large dimensions of the dataset. Is there any way in R to split a plot into multiple plots using a for loop or any other way?
Here is a visual of my plot that only cover 80% variance due to the fact it being large. Could I split this plot into 2 plots?
Large Dataset Visualisation
I have tried splitting the plot up using a for loop...
for(i in data[1:20]) {
fviz_eig(data, addlabels = TRUE, ylim = c(0, 30))
}
But this doesn't work.
Edited Reproducible example:
This is only a small reproducible example using an already available dataset in R but I used a similar method for my large dataset. It will show you how the plot actually works.
# Already existing data in R.
install.packages("boot")
library(boot)
data(frets)
frets
dataset_pca <- prcomp(frets)
dataset_pca$x
fviz_eig(dataset_pca, addlabels = TRUE, ylim = c(0, 100))
However, my large dataset has a lot more PCs that this one (possibly 100 or more to cover up to 100% of cumulative variance proportion) and therefore this is why I would like a way to split the single plot into multiple plots for better visualisation.
Update:
I have performed what was said by #G5W below...
data <- prcomp(data, scale = TRUE, center = TRUE)
POEV = data$sdev^2 / sum(data$sdev^2)
barplot(POEV, ylim=c(0,0.22))
lines(0.7+(0:10)*1.2, POEV, type="b", pch=20)
text(0.7+(0:10)*1.2, POEV, labels = round(100*POEV, 1), pos=3)
barplot(POEV[1:40], ylim=c(0,0.22), main="PCs 1 - 40")
text(0.7+(0:6)*1.2, POEV[1:40], labels = round(100*POEV[1:40], 1),
pos=3)
and I have now got a graph as follows...
Graph
But I am finding it difficult getting the labels to appear above each bar. Can someone help or suggest something for this please?
I am not 100% sure what you want as your result,
but I am 100% sure that you need to take more control over
what is being plotted, i.e. do more of it yourself.
So let me show an example of doing that. The frets data
that you used has only 4 dimensions so it is hard to illustrate
what to do with more dimensions, so I will instead use the
nuclear data - also available in the boot package. I am going
to start by reproducing the type of graph that you displayed
and then altering it.
library(boot)
data(nuclear)
N_PCA = prcomp(nuclear)
plot(N_PCA)
The basic plot of a prcomp object is similar to the fviz_eig
plot that you displayed but has three main differences. First,
it is showing the actual variances - not the percent of variance
explained. Second, it does not contain the line that connects
the tops of the bars. Third, it does not have the text labels
that tell the heights of the boxes.
Percent of Variance Explained. The return from prcomp contains
the raw information. str(N_PCA) shows that it has the standard
deviations, not the variances - and we want the proportion of total
variation. So we just create that and plot it.
POEV = N_PCA$sdev^2 / sum(N_PCA$sdev^2)
barplot(POEV, ylim=c(0,0.8))
This addresses the first difference from the fviz_eig plot.
Regarding the line, you can easily add that if you feel you need it,
but I recommend against it. What does that line tell you that you
can't already see from the barplot? If you are concerned about too
much clutter obscuring the information, get rid of the line. But
just in case, you really want it, you can add the line with
lines(0.7+(0:10)*1.2, POEV, type="b", pch=20)
However, I will leave it out as I just view it as clutter.
Finally, you can add the text with
text(0.7+(0:10)*1.2, POEV, labels = round(100*POEV, 1), pos=3)
This is also somewhat redundant, but particularly if you change
scales (as I am about to do), it could be helpful for making comparisons.
OK, now that we have the substance of your original graph, it is easy
to separate it into several parts. For my data, the first two bars are
big so the rest are hard to see. In fact, PC's 5-11 show up as zero.
Let's separate out the first 4 and then the rest.
barplot(POEV[1:4], ylim=c(0,0.8), main="PC 1-4")
text(0.7+(0:3)*1.2, POEV[1:4], labels = round(100*POEV[1:4], 1),
pos=3)
barplot(POEV[5:11], ylim=c(0,0.0001), main="PC 5-11")
text(0.7+(0:6)*1.2, POEV[5:11], labels = round(100*POEV[5:11], 4),
pos=3, cex=0.8)
Now we can see that even though PC 5 is much smaller that any of 1-4,
it is a good bit bigger than 6-11.
I don't know what you want to show with your data, but if you
can find an appropriate way to group your components, you can
zoom in on whichever PCs you want.
Scatter plots are useless when number of plots is large.
So, e.g., using normal approximation, we can get the contour plot.
My question: Is there any package to implement the contour plot from scatter plot.
Thank you #G5W !! I can do it !!
You don't offer any data, so I will respond with some artificial data,
constructed at the bottom of the post. You also don't say how much data
you have although you say it is a large number of points. I am illustrating
with 20000 points.
You used the group number as the plotting character to indicate the group.
I find that hard to read. But just plotting the points doesn't show the
groups well. Coloring each group a different color is a start, but does
not look very good.
plot(x,y, pch=20, col=rainbow(3)[group])
Two tricks that can make a lot of points more understandable are:
1. Make the points transparent. The dense places will appear darker. AND
2. Reduce the point size.
plot(x,y, pch=20, col=rainbow(3, alpha=0.1)[group], cex=0.8)
That looks somewhat better, but did not address your actual request.
Your sample picture seems to show confidence ellipses. You can get
those using the function dataEllipse from the car package.
library(car)
plot(x,y, pch=20, col=rainbow(3, alpha=0.1)[group], cex=0.8)
dataEllipse(x,y,factor(group), levels=c(0.70,0.85,0.95),
plot.points=FALSE, col=rainbow(3), group.labels=NA, center.pch=FALSE)
But if there are really a lot of points, the points can still overlap
so much that they are just confusing. You can also use dataEllipse
to create what is basically a 2D density plot without showing the points
at all. Just plot several ellipses of different sizes over each other filling
them with transparent colors. The center of the distribution will appear darker.
This can give an idea of the distribution for a very large number of points.
plot(x,y,pch=NA)
dataEllipse(x,y,factor(group), levels=c(seq(0.15,0.95,0.2), 0.995),
plot.points=FALSE, col=rainbow(3), group.labels=NA,
center.pch=FALSE, fill=TRUE, fill.alpha=0.15, lty=1, lwd=1)
You can get a more continuous look by plotting more ellipses and leaving out the border lines.
plot(x,y,pch=NA)
dataEllipse(x,y,factor(group), levels=seq(0.11,0.99,0.02),
plot.points=FALSE, col=rainbow(3), group.labels=NA,
center.pch=FALSE, fill=TRUE, fill.alpha=0.05, lty=0)
Please try different combinations of these to get a nice picture of your data.
Additional response to comment: Adding labels
Perhaps the most natural place to add group labels is the centers of the
ellipses. You can get that by simply computing the centroids of the points in each group. So for example,
plot(x,y,pch=NA)
dataEllipse(x,y,factor(group), levels=c(seq(0.15,0.95,0.2), 0.995),
plot.points=FALSE, col=rainbow(3), group.labels=NA,
center.pch=FALSE, fill=TRUE, fill.alpha=0.15, lty=1, lwd=1)
## Now add labels
for(i in unique(group)) {
text(mean(x[group==i]), mean(y[group==i]), labels=i)
}
Note that I just used the number as the group label, but if you have a more elaborate name, you can change labels=i to something like
labels=GroupNames[i].
Data
x = c(rnorm(2000,0,1), rnorm(7000,1,1), rnorm(11000,5,1))
twist = c(rep(0,2000),rep(-0.5,7000), rep(0.4,11000))
y = c(rnorm(2000,0,1), rnorm(7000,5,1), rnorm(11000,6,1)) + twist*x
group = c(rep(1,2000), rep(2,7000), rep(3,11000))
You can use hexbin::hexbin() to show very large datasets.
#G5W gave a nice dataset:
x = c(rnorm(2000,0,1), rnorm(7000,1,1), rnorm(11000,5,1))
twist = c(rep(0,2000),rep(-0.5,7000), rep(0.4,11000))
y = c(rnorm(2000,0,1), rnorm(7000,5,1), rnorm(11000,6,1)) + twist*x
group = c(rep(1,2000), rep(2,7000), rep(3,11000))
If you don't know the group information, then the ellipses are inappropriate; this is what I'd suggest:
library(hexbin)
plot(hexbin(x,y))
which produces
If you really want contours, you'll need a density estimate to plot. The MASS::kde2d() function can produce one; see the examples in its help page for plotting a contour based on the result. This is what it gives for this dataset:
library(MASS)
contour(kde2d(x,y))
I'm working on trying to create a key for a heatmap, but as far as I know, I cannot use the existing tools for adding a legend since I've generated the colors myself (I manually turn a scaled variable into rgb values for a short rainbow ( [255,0,0] to [0,0,255] ).
Basically, all I want to do is use the rightmost 10th of the screen to create a rectangle with these 10 colors: "#0000FF", "#0072FF", "#00E3FF", "#00FFAA", "#00FF38", "#39FF00", "#AAFF00", "#FFE200", "#FF7100", "#FF0000"
with three numerical labels - at 0, max/2, and max
In essence, I want to manually produce an object that looks like a rudimentary heatmap color key.
As far as I know, split.screen can only split the screen in half, which isn't what I'm looking for. I want the graphic I already know how to produce to take up the leftmost 90% of the screen, and I want this colored rectangle to take up the other 10%.
Thanks.
EDIT: I greatly appreciate the advice about the best way to the the plot - that said, I still would like to know the best way to do the task originally asked - creating the legend by hand; I already am able to produce the exact heatmap graphic that I'm looking for - the false coloring wasn't the only problem with ggplot that I was having - it was just the final factor convincing me to switch. I need a non ggplot solution.
EDIT #2: This is close to the solution I am looking for, except this only goes up to 10 instead of accepting a maximum value as a parameter (I will be running this code on multiple data-sets, all with different maximum values - I want the legend to reflect this). Additionally, if I change the size of the graph, the key falls apart into disconnected squares.
Take a look at the layouts function (link). I think you want something like this:
layout(matrix(c(1,2), 1, 2, byrow = TRUE), widths=c(9,1))
## plot heatmap
## plot legend
I would also recommend the ggplot2 package and the geom_tile function which will take care of all of this for you.
Assuming your data is in a data frame with the x and y coordinates and heatmap value (e.g. gdat <- data.frame(x_coord=c(1,2,...), y_coord=c(1,1,...), val=c(6,2,...))) Then you should be able to produce your desired heat map plot with the following ggplot command:
ggplot(gdat) + geom_tile(aes(x=x_coord, y=y_coord, fill=val)) +
scale_fill_gradient(low="#0000FF", high="#FF0000")
To get your data into the following format you may want to look into the very useful reshape2 package.
Given a script no ggplot restriction on this answer here is how one could produce the plot with just base R.
colors <- c("#0000FF", "#0072FF", "#00E3FF", "#00FFAA", "#00FF38",
"#39FF00", "#AAFF00", "#FFE200", "#FF7100", "#FF0000")
layout(matrix(c(1,2), 1, 2, byrow = TRUE), widths=c(9,1))
plot(rnorm(20), rnorm(20), col=sample(colors, 20, replace=TRUE))
par(mar=c(0,0,0,0))
plot(x=rep(1,10), y=1:10, col=colors, pch=15, cex=7.1)
You may have to adjust the cex for your device.
For educational purpose I'm trying to plot a singel horizontal "numberline" with some datapoints with labels in R. I came this far;
library(plotrix)
source("spread.labels.R")
plot(0:100,axes=FALSE,type="n",xlab="",ylab="")
axis(1,pos=0)
spread.labels(c(5,5,50,60,70,90),rep(0,6),ony=FALSE,
labels=c("5","5","50","60","70","90"),
offsets=rep(20,6))
This gave me a numberline with smaller lines pointing up to (and a little bit "in") the labels from where the datapoints should lie on the numberline - but without the points itself. Can anyone give me additional or alternative R-codes for solving thess problems:
- datapoints itself still missing are not plotted,
- and labels maybe not evenly divided over the whole numberline,
- and lines come into the labels and not merely point to the labels
Thank a lot,
Benjamin Telkamp
I usually like to create plots using primitive base R graphics functions, such as points(), segments(), lines(), abline(), rect(), polygon(), text(), and mtext(). You can easily create curves (e.g. for circles) and more complex shapes using segments() and lines() across granular coordinate vectors that you define yourself. For example, see Plot angle between vectors. This provides much more control over the plot elements you create, however, it often takes more work and careful coding than more "pre-packaged" solutions, so it's a tradeoff.
For your case, it sounds to me like you're happy with what spread.labels() is trying to do, you just want the following changes:
add point symbols at the labelled points.
prevent overlap between labels and lines.
Here's how this can be done:
## define plot data
xlim <- c(0,100);
ylim <- c(0,100);
px <- c(5,5,50,60,70,90);
py <- c(0,0,0,0,0,0);
lx.buf <- 5;
lx <- seq(xlim[1]+lx.buf,xlim[2]-lx.buf,len=length(px));
ly <- 20;
## create basic plot outline
par(xaxs='i',yaxs='i',mar=c(5,1,1,1));
plot(NA,xlim=xlim,ylim=ylim,axes=F,ann=F);
axis(1);
## plot elements
segments(px,py,lx,ly);
points(px,py,pch=16,xpd=NA);
text(lx,ly,px,pos=3);