setting color:white; or even using the class icon-light or icon-white makes all font-awesome-icons white, except for fa-star which remains yellow no matter what I do!
I've tried overriding css with methods as desperate as using !important in an inline-styling on the element. the star remains yellow! (see image below)
Why is this, and how do I make it white?
(Using font-awesome 3.2.1 in order to support IE7, don't ask me why)
essentially this is my markup:
<i class="icon-white icon-star" style="color:white;"></i>
Or as it stands when I took the screenprint bellow:
<i class="icon-light icon-star" style="color:white !important;"></i>
as can be seen in the image, this inline-style rule essentially overrides a bunch of other css-rules saying the same thing; color should be white.
whats extra-funny about this behaviour is that chromes debugger under "Computed Styles" actually claims that the star IS white. which as you can see is not the case.
EDIT: I actually managed to solve this, but I have no idea why my solution works, so I'll leave the question open in hope someone might provide insight into what is actually going on here. Here's what I did:
If you look into font-awesome.css you'll find the following block:
.icon-star:before{
content:"\f005";
}
As a first step in my continued research of this mysterious error, I changed the class on my <i> to white-star and added the following to my stylesheet:
.white-star:before{
content:"\f005";
}
from there I was going to experiment with some other things when I to my surprise noticed that the star was white!
This is no longer an issue in need of solving, But I really would like to know whats going on here, so I'll just leave the question open in hope that someone might provide some insight (for me and the community).
The yellow is because it's a bitmap emoji. To get a vector (colorless) symbol you need to suffix the character with UNICODE VARIATION SELECTOR-15 which forces rendering to vector. This is documented here: http://mts.io/2015/04/21/unicode-symbol-render-text-emoji/
VARIATION SELECTOR-15 is U+FE0E.
So I finally figured it out. And of course the solution was obvious!
The Color for icon-star is set on the .icon-star:before element. What I was doing wrong here was setting color rules to the .icon-star element. Colors are of course inherited, but inheritance does not override rules set directly to child-elements(doh!). This is why adding !important had no effect.
Moral is: When styling FA-icons, set styles to the pseudo-element, not the parent!
Related
Have found great help with R on SO--now for something completely different.
I am working in WordPress 5.8.3.
I am building a website using the Blank Canvas theme, a child-theme of Seedlet--Not sure whether that is all relevant. I am a novice with WP and all things web development. I have installed the Events Calendar plugin and have it all configured with some test events and dates so no issues there. I am customizing the theme colours using the Additional CSS prompt from the WordPress dashboard interface.
I haven't gotten permission to publish the site, so unfortunately I can't offer a live demo. I will try to be explicit.
I have found helpful resources with instructions on how to use this utility for menus, for general custom CSS, and some useful information for changing properties of footers with CSS. Now I am trying to modify hyperlink colours within the Events calendar widget. I have approached this problem the same way as all the others but this one has stumped me. I elaborate:
From this image, you can see the Events Calendar hyperlink text is yellow. I opened the inspector and determined that this object is called .tribe-events-widget .tribe-events-widget-events-list__view-more-link. I thought the following code should change the colour
.tribe-events-widget .tribe-events-widget-events-list__view-more-link {
color:#000;
}
It does not. This code makes no visible change. However, when I also change the background-color like this:
.tribe-events-widget .tribe-events-widget-events-list__view-more-link {
background-color:black;
color:#000;
}
The result is:
This led me to believe that there is no colour option for this element---HOWEVER, the inspector shows that this element has the 'color' property:
And I'm stumped. I'm not even sure when or how this color-link-accent got defined. This check-mark toggle is not a permanent solution and besides, I would very much like to understand what is going on here.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
It's a bit difficult to be certain of the problem as we don't have the context, however I was surprised that you saw just this:
.tribe-events-widget .tribe-events-widget-events-list__view-more-link
and didn't find an anchor (a) element within it.
I would have expected that you'd have to do:
.tribe-events-widget .tribe-events-widget-events-list__view-more-link a {
color:#000;
}
as it is quite likely the anchor element will have its own special styling which will override your setting because of the increase specificity.
If that doesn't work then use your browser dev tools inspect facility to find out more about the context of that a element - you may need to give even more hints to the browser on pinning it down.
Well, this would have helped me, so I will post the solution to my question for posterity. I learned from this question and thread about overriding cascading commands. I still don't understand where the command producing the yellow text in the first place was, but I managed to override it by appending !important in my CSS. The full CSS to turn the text from yellow to black is:
.tribe-events-widget .tribe-events-widget-events-list__view-more-link {
color:black !important;
}
Reading on, this does not necessarily mean that I was specific enough about the context although I find it hard to tell in this case. This reference has some other useful info as to when it is appropriate to use !important. It seems this is not the optimal solution.
Hope somebody else can benefit from my toiling...
Using the exact same CSS,
the onclick pseudo effect works fine with this code on one page of same site:
<a data-url="#" class="btn btn-share referral_button">Button Text</a>
(but admittedly it is on a different page with different divs)
but not on another page, where the code is:
<a data-url="#" class="btn btn-share referral_button" onclick="javascript:$find('ABC').set_activeTabIndex(3);">Button Text</a>
instead of behaving as it should it shrinks when clicked - and sort of reverts to how it would look without any css styled - or at least not the correct css styling
I initially thought it was something to do with the onclick="javascript... stuff somehow clashing/over-riding and affecting the CSS from performing how it should but * EDIT it can't be this because I just removed the whole onclick section and the problem still existed :( **
so it must be something else..
the relevant CSS is here: sorry it's long and probably bloated. the most relevant stuff i believe is at the bottom...
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N7YQ5YuvY6DJn8-nr4sinx4LY7WOS88eErpRHe4IE_g/pub
Seeing as how its an invalid syntax, I would say remove the " \9" from all of your :active and .active statements
Like below:
.btn.active{background-color:#cccccc \9;}
EDIT: Furthermore, (not really relevant to the answer)
Your CSS is a pretty hot mess. (No offence)
You can easily clean that up and make it a lot more manageable.
Plus, it could just be my tired eyes, but it seams like half of it is just repeating and/or overwriting the other half (which goes back to cleaning it up and making it manageable).
Honestly though, your the one working on it, so its as long as you can read it and use it. To each their own. I prefer my CSS quite readable in a dev environment.
The most obvious suggestion is there is something on this mysterious "Other" page, that is overriding the style.
Use a tool like Firebug for Firefox to inspect the elements and its' styles this may give you a hint as to what is overiding the behaviour you are expecting.
Also check that the CSS is the same on both pages if you are not using a common CSS file.
Read up on CSS Specificity, which is could be the root cause of you problem. This could help explain why style b is overiding style a.
It boils down to some difference on the two pages.
I want a background image on my page (background.png), but some rogue CSS is thwarting me.
I can see that my style.css from line 39 is being overwritten. I would think this is being done by something like style.css. I search and do not find anything but my original desired specification in that file. I can not find out what css is doing the overriding.
I have searched all the css files I can think of for the specified image (bg_p2_28.jpg). I have searched all the css files for background, nothing seems to come up. It is not being specified in the main HTML
I am barely struggling through as a reasonably competent programmer that has not used HTML since the mid 1990's. I am just trying to modify a template I bought.
What techniques can I use, or how do I interpret what I have here shown here to figure out what CSS override is ultimately being pushed into the page?
EDIT:
Adding the !important; works. It feels very dirty for some reason. I do not know why. I have tried following the javascript in, but the debugger is confusing to the uninitiated. Is the Important! a terrible thing to do, or reasonable? I think it would be useful to understand where these are being set in the java code, but when I search the code, I think the values are stored in variable, so can only be caught at run time.
That's coming from the inline style="" attribute.
If you don't see it in the HTML source, it's probably being set by Javascript.
You can right-click the element in the inspector and click Break on Attribute Modifications to find out where.
You could try background: url(src) !important;, not the perfect solution, but i think it will work for you in this case.
The grey element.style means that it's a style attribute directly on the element itself. Any style on an element will override styles from style sheets unless the sytlesheet style is marked with !important
I've seen this used once or twice now, where ! mark is put before property name. For example:
!overflow: hidden;
(also, see here)
Can anyone shed some light on what its purpose is?
I can't find any information about it but it is apparently a hack. At least Chrome will not apply the styles where the property names have exclamation marks in them. What's interesting to me is that at least for the styles I checked, the exact same style is applied by another stylesheet except correctly -- so maybe it's just a straight up mistake.
Site:
oldfashionedgoods.com
I'm using SquareSpace to build a splash page for my site, and while I've been able to figure everything out, this last thing plaques me.
I'm trying to have it so when you type your email in to the submit field, it uses the font Cutive Mono, just like I'm using for the text above the box.
So far I have this:
input[type=text] {
color: #cc5723;
font-family: cutive mono;}
While I do not want it to be that amber color, I was messing with the color to make sure I was working with the correct item. The text changes color as I type, but the font will not change. What am I missing here?
I'm a complete newb so sorry if this is a dumb question! I already looked everywhere online, but nothing seems to work. Thanks!
I suspect it is being overridden by another CSS style. Try using:
input[type=text] {
color: #cc5723;
font-family: cutive mono !important;}
If that works then it is being overridden somewhere in your CSS.
NOTE:!important should only be used to test. It is not a solution.
I have tried a basic example here: http://jsfiddle.net/n4S3s/ which seems to work fine.
Your other styles have priority over this. Use
font-family: cutive mono !important;
to test.
Yep. important! works. I just wasn't sure of it, but here is the
DEMO
The other answers are correct; other styles in your CSS are overriding this one. I'm not sure I like using !important to force the style; I think of that as a last resort. But it's good for testing.
But more importantly, would you like to know how you could figure this out for yourself? Use the Developer Tools in Chrome (or any browser). Simply right-click the input element and select "Inspect Element". Then look at the Styles panel in the bottom right and you can see what styles are in effect for this element, and which CSS rules they came from. You can also temporarily toggle off any styles, edit the styles, etc.
Stack Overflow is a fast way to get questions answered, but the Developer Tools are much faster! :-)