I'm fighting two days already with this problem. I want to put div with images at absolute positions, below other div with images. Somehow divs are ignoring images and stack on top of each other.
example code is here: https://jsfiddle.net/6H4RA/10/
So it should display one image in the first row, and two images in the second.
I must be missing something obvious.
Here is the code from JSFiddle:
#banner-left {
position:absolute;
width:100px;
height:100px;
}
#header{
position:relative;
background: #ffa;
}
#footer {
position:relative;
margin-top:0px;
width: 100%;
background: #6cf;
}
<div id="header">
Header
<div id="banner-left">
<img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/522909800191901697/FHCGSQg0.png" width="100" height="100" alt="" />
</div>
</div>
<div id="footer">
FOOTER
<div id="banner-left">
<img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/522909800191901697/FHCGSQg0.png" width="100" height="100" alt="" />
</div>
<div id="banner-left" style="top:0px;left:100px;">
<img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/522909800191901697/FHCGSQg0.png" width="100" height="100" alt="" />
</div>
--edit--
I forgot to mention that images must be at absolute positions. That's the catch.
There may be no need to use absolute positioning in this layout design.
Here is how I might approach implementing this.
Note: id's should be unique on a web page, so I changed your #banner-left to a class .banner-left.
.banner-left {
float: left;
margin-right: 20px; /* if needed */
}
.banner-left img {
display: block;
}
#header {
overflow: auto;
background: #ffa;
}
#footer {
overflow: auto;
background: #6cf;
}
<div id="header">
<h1>Header</h1>
<div class="banner-left">
<img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/522909800191901697/FHCGSQg0.png" width="100" height="100" alt="" />
</div>
</div>
<div id="footer">
<h2>Footer</h2>
<div class="banner-left">
<img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/522909800191901697/FHCGSQg0.png" width="100" height="100" alt="" />
</div>
<div class="banner-left">
<img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/522909800191901697/FHCGSQg0.png" width="100" height="100" alt="" />
</div>
In you banner width id, add
display: inline-block;
I forgot to mention that images must be at absolute positions. That's the catch.
Marc, your example works great but i have lots of images with absolute position that i want to move depending on website size with a simple container div.
You have a couple of problems with your code.
First, you can't have multiple elements with the same id. This may not cause problems in your small jsfiddle right now, but it can and will come back and bite you in the rear, later on. However, that is easily solved by turning the ids into classes.
The other problem is that there is no more content in the header and footer divs after the text. Yes, there are the absolutely positioned blocks, but they don't count. Absolutely positioned elements don't partake in the page flow. So the header and footer divs don't have a clue about them!
The easiest solution, as possible in your example, is to give those divs a bottom padding of 100px, so that the images appear to be inside them instead of sticking out. (They don't really sit inside them, but they just are displayed in the same place where the parents' padding is.)
.banner-left {
position:absolute;
width:100px;
height:100px;
}
.banner-left img {
width:100px;
height:100px;
}
#header{
position:relative;
background: #ffa;
padding-bottom:100px;
}
#footer {
position:relative;
margin-top:0px;
width: 100%;
background: #6cf;
padding-bottom:100px;
}
<div id="header">
Header
<div class="banner-left">
<img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/522909800191901697/FHCGSQg0.png" alt="g" />
</div>
</div>
<div id="footer">
FOOTER
<div class="banner-left">
<img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/522909800191901697/FHCGSQg0.png" alt="g" />
</div>
<div class="banner-left" style="left:100px;">
<img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/522909800191901697/FHCGSQg0.png" alt="g" />
</div>
If, however, you don't know beforehand what the heights of the images are, you may have to run some Javascript on the images to figure out which one is the highest, or find out a way to avoid the display:absolute.
Related
I have rectangular, not necessarily square images.
Using Bootstrap's img-circle, I'd like to get circular crops, not elliptical/non-circular crops of these rectangular images.
How can this be accomplished? The crops should behave in an img-responsive manner and should be centered.
JSFiddle to illustrate the non-circular behavior of non-square img-circle images.
<div class="container-fluid text-center">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-xs-12">img-circle test</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-xs-6">
<img class="img-responsive" src="http://placekitten.com/g/200/200" />
</div>
<div class="col-xs-6">
<img class="img-responsive img-circle" src="http://placekitten.com/g/200/200" />
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-xs-6">
<img class="img-responsive" src="http://placekitten.com/g/200/400" />
</div>
<div class="col-xs-6">
<img class="img-responsive img-circle" src="http://placekitten.com/g/200/400" />
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-xs-6">
<img class="img-responsive" src="http://placekitten.com/g/400/200" />
</div>
<div class="col-xs-6">
<img class="img-responsive img-circle" src="http://placekitten.com/g/400/200" />
</div>
</div>
</div>
I see that this post is a little out of date but still...
I can show you and everyone else (who is in the same situation as I was this day) how i did it.
First of all, you need html like this:
<div class="circle-avatar" style="background-image:url(http://placekitten.com/g/200/400)"></div>
Than your css class will look like this:
div.circle-avatar{
/* make it responsive */
max-width: 100%;
width:100%;
height:auto;
display:block;
/* div height to be the same as width*/
padding-top:100%;
/* make it a circle */
border-radius:50%;
/* Centering on image`s center*/
background-position-y: center;
background-position-x: center;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
/* it makes the clue thing, takes smaller dimension to fill div */
background-size: cover;
/* it is optional, for making this div centered in parent*/
margin: 0 auto;
top: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
}
It is responsive circle, centered on original image.
You can change width and height not to autofill its parent if you want.
But keep them equal if you want to have a circle in result.
Link with solution on fiddle
I hope this answer will help struggling people. Bye.
I use these two methods depending on the usage. FIDDLE
<div class="img-div">
<img src="http://placekitten.com/g/400/200" />
</div>
<div class="circle-image"></div>
div.img-div{
height:200px;
width:200px;
overflow:hidden;
border-radius:50%;
}
.img-div img{
-webkit-transform:translate(-50%);
margin-left:100px;
}
.circle-image{
width:200px;
height:200px;
border-radius:50%;
background-image:url("http://placekitten.com/g/200/400");
display:block;
background-position-y:25%
}
You stated you want circular crops from recangles. This may not be able to be done with the 3 popular bootstrap classes (img-rounded; img-circle; img-polaroid)
You may want to write a custom CSS class using border-radius where you have more control. If you want it more circular just increase the radius.
.CattoBorderRadius
{
border-radius: 25px;
}
<img class="img-responsive CattoBorderRadius" src="http://placekitten.com/g/200/200" />
Fiddle URL: http://jsfiddle.net/ccatto/LyxEb/
I know this may not be the perfect radius but I think your answer will use a custom css class. Hope this helps.
use this in css
.logo-center{
border:inherit 8px #000000;
-moz-border-radius-topleft: 75px;
-moz-border-radius-topright:75px;
-moz-border-radius-bottomleft:75px;
-moz-border-radius-bottomright:75px;
-webkit-border-top-left-radius:75px;
-webkit-border-top-right-radius:75px;
-webkit-border-bottom-left-radius:75px;
-webkit-border-bottom-right-radius:75px;
border-top-left-radius:75px;
border-top-right-radius:75px;
border-bottom-left-radius:75px;
border-bottom-right-radius:75px;
}
<img class="logo-center" src="NBC-Logo.png" height="60" width="60">
You have to give height and width to that image.
eg. height : 200px and width : 200px
also give border-radius:50%;
to create circle you have to give equal height and width
if you are using bootstrap then give height and width and img-circle class to img
the problem mainly is because the width have to be == to the height, and in the case of bs, the height is set to auto so here is a fix for that in js instead
function img_circle() {
$('.img-circle').each(function() {
$w = $(this).width();
$(this).height($w);
});
}
$(document).ready(function() {
img_circle();
});
$(window).resize(function() {
img_circle();
});
You Need to take same height and width
and simply use the border-radius:360px;
You could simply use .rounded-circle bootstrap.
<img class="rounded-circle" src="http://placekitten.com/g/200/200"/>
You can even specify the width and height of the rounded image by providing an inline style to the image, which overrides the default size.
<img class="rounded-circle" style="height:100px; width: 100px" src="http://placekitten.com/g/200/200" />
I want it so that there are absolutely not white spaces at all. Non on the edges and nothing between the objects. I've tried everything but so far This is as close as I've got:
<div style="float: left; width:100%; "> <HR SIZE="130" COLOR="#262626" WIDTH="100%">
<img style="position:absolute;left:10;top:8;" src="logo.png">
</div>
<div id="map" style="width:100%; height:75%; position:fixed; left:0;top:0;overflow:hidden;"></div>
<HR SIZE="20" COLOR="#262626" WIDTH="100%">
You mean something like this? http://jsfiddle.net/FCvyh/2/
Add this css
body{
margin:0;
}
hr {
margin:0;
}
I guess you are not using a css reset, correct? The browser adds the random margins.
I've looked at other questions asking similar things, but the answers for them don't seem to work for my problem. I have a website that contains two divs on either side of a news slider, which is also in a div. The side divs are both floating to their respective sides. The problem is, when I make the window smaller, they (adLeft and adRight) overlap the center sliderDiv and go behind it. I've tried various things like making a min-width, overflow be hidden, or changing padding and margins, but I never see any difference. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Here's the website: http://thehummingbirdplace.com/
Here's the relevant html:
<div id="adLeft">
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Kathleen-Ball/e/B007QNUTC8/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_1/" target="_blank">
<img src="_images/advertisements/autumn.png" width="200" height="300" alt="Autumn's Hope" />
</a>
<br><br>
<a href="http://www.romancestorytime.com/" target="_blank">
<img src="_images/advertisements/loveCowboy.png" width="200" height="300" alt="For the Love of a Cowboy" />
</a>
</div>
<div class="clear">
</div>
<div id="adRight">
<a href="http://www.jeanjoachimbooks.com/" target="_blank">
<img src="_images/advertisements/lovesLastChance.png" width="200" height="300" alt="Love's Last Chance" />
</a>
<br><br>
<a href="http://www.jeanjoachimbooks.com/" target="_blank">
<img src="_images/advertisements/loversLiars.png" width="200" height="300" alt="Lovers and Liars" />
</a>
</div>
<div class="clear">
</div>
<div class="sliderDiv" id="slider">
<img src="_images/podcast/123013_slider.png" width="851" height="323" alt="Later in Life Romances" />
<img src="_images/podcast/122313_slider.png" width="851" height="323" alt="Christmas Contemporary Romances" />
<img src="_images/podcast/121613_slider.png" width="851" height="323" alt="Christmas Historicals" />
<img src="_images/podcast/120913_slider.png" width="851" height="323" alt="Christmas Novellas" />
<img src="_images/podcast/archive_slider.png" width="851" height="323" alt="Archive" />
</div>
And here is the css that applies to it:
#adLeft {
width: 200px;
margin-right: 50px;
float: left;
margin-left: 20px;
}
#adRight {
width: 200px;
margin-left: 50px;
float: right;
margin-right: 20px;
}
.clear {
float: clear;
}
.sliderDiv {
margin-right: auto;
margin-left: auto;
width: 851px;
position: relative;
z-index: 1;
margin-top: -48px;
}
I believe you were on the right track with using min-width, as you can use it on the body of the page to prevent it from scaling down to the point of overlap.
Adding:
body {
min-width: 1400px;
}
to your styles should do the trick. The min-width needs to be applied to body because that's the overall container which everything else is inheriting width from, and positioning against.
Alternatively, if you do not want your page to get cut off once the screen gets smaller than that minimum width, you can use media queries to hide or move the left and right side images so that they are no longer in a position to cause overlap.
A media query is used like so:
#media only screen
and (max-width: 1400px){
#adLeft, #adRight {
/* Some sort of styles here */
}
}
I hope that helps, let me know if you have any questions,
Cheers!
On the website I'm working on (this), I have a div with an img in it. This is the html
<div><overlay> <img class="img1" height="225" src="NYC/wtc1.JPG" width="225" /></overlay</div>
<div><overlay> <img class="img2" height="225" src="NYC/wtcmem.jpg" width="225" /></overlay></div>
<div><overlay> <img class="img3" height="225" src="NYC/sky.jpg" width="225" /></overlay></div>
<p> </p>
nothing too complicated. This is the CSS for the classes img1, img2, and img3.
.img1
{
position:absolute;
left:12%;
}
.img2
{
display:block;
margin:auto;
}
.img3
{
position:absolute;
right:12%;
}
also pretty simple. But, if you look at the website, the 3rd image (at least for me on Safari) is much lower than the other two. Why would this happen? I don't see anything in the CSS or HTML that would cause this.
If you have some markup like this:
<div class="wrapper">
<div><img class="img1" height="225" src="http://rwzimage.com/albums/NYC/wtc1.JPG" width="225" /></div>
<div><img class="img2" height="225" src="http://rwzimage.com/albums/NYC/wtcmem.jpg" width="225" /></div>
<div><img class="img3" height="225" src="http://rwzimage.com/albums/NYC/sky.jpg" width="225" /></div>
</div>
Then I think this CSS will have approximately the effect you're after:
.wrapper {
display: table;
width: 960px;
}
.wrapper > div {
display: table-cell;
width: 33%;
text-align: center;
}
.wrapper > div:hover img {
opacity: 0.5;
}
Demo. I set width: 960px; so that it would force things to be wider than the JSFiddle window, but you could set width: 100%; for your page.
I've tried to do the best I can with your code, the following will work for you:
<div class="container" style="overflow:hidden; text-align:center;">
<div style="display:inline-block; margin: 0px 80px;">
<div class="overlay">
<img class="img1" height="225" src="NYC/wtc1.JPG" width="225">
</div>
</div>
<div style="display:inline-block; margin: 0px 80px;">
<div class="overlay">
<img class="img2" height="225" src="NYC/wtcmem.jpg" width="225">
</div>
</div>
<div style="display:inline-block; margin: 0px 80px;">
<div class="overlay">
<img class="img3" height="225" src="NYC/sky.jpg" width="225">
</div>
</div>
</div>
Note that <overlay> is not a valid HTML element. also I've seen on the page you used something like <margin>. It's not a good practice to invent HTML elements.. You can get all the functionality you need using regular <div>s (although I don't think this will break your page.. maybe only in older browsers..).
What I basically did:
Wrapped the three <div>s with a container with text-align:center. This will make the three divs inside it aligned to the center.
Added display:inline-block; to make all the divs follow the text-align.
Added margins to the divs to space them
Note that I strongly recommend to replace your <overlay> with something like <div class="overlay">
div tag naturally stack vertically. So you will need to add an id to each div or you could just put all the img in one div.
The block css attribute is effecting the layout. It is pushing the next img to the next line.
CSS
.contain {
max-width:960px;
text-align:center;
}
.category {
position:relative;
display: inline-block;
float:left;
padding:10px;
}
.category2 {
position:relative;
display: inline-block;
pading:10px;
}
.category3 {
position:relative;
display: inline-block;
float:right;
margin-right:50%;
padding:10px;
}
HTML
<div align="center" class="category">
<img src="gemstoneshomebutton.png" />
</div>
<div align="center" class="category2">
<img src="dichroichomebutton.png" />
</div>
<div align="center" class="category3">
<img src="filigreehomebutton.png" />
</div>
i am trying to align 3 images that are 309 px wide , by 111 px high inside a container div,
and they don't align center and also the third image jumps down below the other two images.
I've tried to adjust the width of the container and the 3 divs, I've tried tables and changing the width on the actual html with no success.
This is my first time working with divs and i thought they would be easier, perhaps my math is off when assigning widths, or maybe I'm just structuring it all wrong.![here is an example of what i am trying to achieve, the three categories in the picture here.] http://i49.tinypic.com/2r2uqso.jpg
any
and all help would be appreciated.
CSS
.contain {
max-width:960px;
text-align:center;
}
.category {
position:relative;
display: inline-block;
float:left;
padding:10px;
}
HTML
<div align="center" class="category">
<img src="gemstoneshomebutton.png" />
</div>
<div align="center" class="category">
<img src="dichroichomebutton.png" />
</div>
<div align="center" class="category">
<img src="filigreehomebutton.png" />
</div>
Don't forget to add 'alt' attribute in the img tag! It is especially important for people who a partially sighted or blind.
http://www.myblogsplace.com/images-alt-text
Yes the alt attribute is really important. It is actually used by "screen reader" software so when a person is listening to the content of a webpage, like a blind person, can interact with that specific element. All images should have this attribute so it is accessible.