After a lot of hard work, my SpookyJS script works as I should and I got my spoils of war, an array of values I want to use to query my Collection in my Meteor app, but I have a huge problem.
I can't find a way to call any Meteor specific methods from spooky...
So my code is like this for the spooky.on function:
spooky.on('fun', function (courses) {
console.log(courses);
// Meteor.call('edxResult', courses); // doesn't work...
});
The console.log gives me the result I want:
[ 'course-v1:MITx+6.00.2x_3+1T2015',
'HarvardX/CS50x3/2015',
'course-v1:LinuxFoundationX+LFS101x.2+1T2015',
'MITx/6.00.1x_5/1T2015' ]
What I need is a way to call a Meteor.method with courses as my argument or a way to get access to the array in the current Meteor.method, after spookyjs finished it's work (Sadly I have no idea how to check whether spooky is finished)
My last idea would be to give the Meteor.method a callback function and store the array in the session or something, but that sounds like extremly bad design, there has to be a better way, I hope.
I am extremly proud of my little ghost, so any help to get it the last few pieces over the finish line would be extremly appricated.
Related
I'm a beginner in Ionic and Firebase. To learn using ionic+firebase, I'm writing a RandomQuote app to fetch a random entry from Firebase. A reload() method is called when I click a reload button, and the random quote is displayed as expected.
However, I also want the quote to display when the app is loaded, i.e., before I click the reload button. I call the reload() method in the constructor but it doesn't work. I have tried to search for answers on the web but cannot find anything that I could understand. Not sure if I'm searching the wrong keywords or in the wrong domains.
The following is the reload() method that I put in my FirebaseProvider class and called from my home.ts:
reload(){
this.afd.list('/quoteList/').valueChanges().subscribe(
data => {
this.oneQuote = data[Math.floor(Math.random() * data.length)];
}
)
return this.oneQuote;
}
Can anyone give me some hints? Or any pointer to useful books / materials for beginners will also be highly appreciated. Thank you very much.
Data is loaded from Firebase asynchronously. This means that by the time your return statement runs this.oneQuote doesn't have a value yet.
This is easiest to say by placing a few log statements around your code:
console.log("Before subscribing");
this.afd.list('/quoteList/').valueChanges().subscribe(
data => {
console.log("Got data");
}
)
console.log("After subscribing");
When you run this code, the output is:
Before subscribing
After subscribing
Got data
This is probably not what you expected. But it completely explains why your return statement doesn't return the data: that data hasn't been loaded yet.
So you need to make sure your code that needs the data runs after the data has been loaded. There are two common ways to do this:
By moving the code into the callback
By returning a promise/subscription/observable
Moving the code into the callback is easiest: when the console.log("Got data") statement runs in the code above, the data is guaranteed to be available. So if you move the code that requires the data into that place, it can use the data without problems.
Returning a promise/subscription/observable is a slightly trickier to understand, but nicer way to doing the same. Now instead of moving the code-that-needs-data into the callback, you'll return "something" out of the callback that exposes the data when it is available. In the case of AngularFire the easiest way to do that is to return the actual observable itself:
return this.afd.list('/quoteList/').valueChanges();
Now the code that needs the quotes can just subscribe to the return value and update the UI:
reload().subscribe(data => {
this.oneQuote = data[Math.floor(Math.random() * data.length)];
}
A final note: having a reload() method sounds like an antipattern. The subscription will already be called whenever the data in the quoteList changes. There is no need to call reload() for that.
I'm trying to follow the "Use the return value of a Meteor method in a template helper" pattern outlined here, except with collections.
Essentially, I've got something like this going:
(server side)
Meteor.methods({
queryTest: function(selector) {
console.log("In server meteor method...");
return MyCollection.find(selector);
}
});
(client side)
Meteor.call('queryTest', {}, function(error, results) {
console.log("in queryTest client callback...");
queryResult = [];
results.forEach(function(result) {
// massage it into something more useful for display
// and append it to queryResult...
});
Session.set("query-result", queryResult);
});
Template.query_test_template.helpers({
query_test_result: function() {
return Session.get("query-result");
}
});
The problem is, my callback (from Meteor.call) doesn't even get invoked.
If I replace the Method with just 'return "foo"' then the callback does get called. Also, if I add a ".fetch()" to the find, it also displays fine (but is no longer reactive, which breaks everything else).
What gives? Why is the callback not being invoked? I feel like I'm really close and just need the right incantation...
If it at all matters: I was doing all the queries on the client side just fine, but want to experiment with the likes of _ensureIndex and do full text searches, which from what I can tell, are basically only available through server-side method calls (and not in mini-mongo on the client).
EDIT
Ok, so I migrated things publish/subscribe, and overall they're working, but when I try to make it so a session value is the selector, it's not working right. Might be a matter of where I put the "subscribe".
So, I have a publish that takes a parameter "selector" (the intent is to pass in mongo selectors).
On the client, I have subscribe like:
Meteor.subscribe('my-collection-query', Session.get("my-collection-query-filter"));
But it has spotty behaviour. On one article, it recommended putting these on Templates.body.onCreate. That works, but doesn't result in something reactive (i.e. when I change that session value on the console, it doesn't change the displayed value).
So, if I follow the advice on another article, it puts the subscribe right in the relevant helper function of the template that calls on that collection. That works great, but if I have MULTIPLE templates calling into that collection, I have to add the subscribe to every single one of them for it to work.
Neither of these seems like the right thing. I think of "subscribing" as "laying down the pipes and just leaving them there to work", but that may be wrong.
I'll keep reading into the docs. Maybe somewhere, the scope of a subscription is properly explained.
You need to publish your data and subscribe to it in your client.
If you did not remove "autopublish" yet, all what you have will automatically be published. So when you query a collection on client (in a helper method for example), you would get results. This package is useful just for quick development and prototyping, but in a real application it should be removed. You should publish your data according to your app's needs and use cases. (Not all users have to see all data in all use cases)
I have an app where I want to display a counter of elements I have in one of the collection.
To do so I use a helper that I call in my HTML file {{nbPosts}}
UI.registerHelper('nbPosts', function () {
return Posts.find().count();
});
But to display it I need to subscribe to the whole Posts collection.
It does not seem right to me, any suggestion to do that in a better way without sending the whole collection ?
Thanks,
It depends on whether you need this to update the data reactively (which I think is not the best idea), or not. If reactivity is not important you can just use a server method, so
Meteor.methods({
'nbPosts': function () {
return Posts.find().count();
},
});
If you need reactivity you can implement a custom publish method, just like in this example. Just keep in mind that this will be a lot more expensive in terms of server usage, and so a much less efficient.
The easiest way would be to have a collection that just keeps track of the number of posts, and update it whenever a post is inserted or removed.
In Meteor, I got a collection that the client subscribes to. In some cases, instead of publishing the documents that exists in the collection on the server, I want to send down some bogus data. Now that's fine using the this.added function in the publish.
My problem is that I want to treat the bogus doc as if it were a real document, specifically this gets troublesome when I want to update it. For the real docs I run a RealDocs.update but when doing that on the bogus doc it fails since there is no representation of it on the server (and I'd like to keep it that way).
A collection API that allowed me to pass something like local = true this would be fantastic but I have no idea how difficult that would be to implement and I'm not to fond of modifying the core code.
Right now I'm stuck at either creating a BogusDocs = new Meteor.Collection(null) but that makes populating the Collection more difficult since I have to either hard code fixtures in the client code or use a method to get the data from the server and I have to make sure I call BogusDocs.update instead of RealDocs.update as soon as I'm dealing with bogus data.
Maybe I could actually insert the data on the server and make sure it's removed later, but the data really has nothing to do with the server side collection so I'd rather avoid that.
Any thoughts on how to approach this problem?
After some further investigation (the evented mind site) it turns out that one can modify the local collection without making calls to the server. This is done by running the same methods as you usually would, but on MyCollection._collection instead of just on Collection. MyCollection.update() would thus become MyCollection._collection.update(). So, using a simple wrapper one can pass in the usual arguments to a update call to update the collection as usual (which will try to call the server which in turn will trigger your allow/deny rules) or we can add 'local' as the last argument to only perform the update in the client collection. Something like this should do it.
DocsUpdateWrapper = function() {
var lastIndex = arguments.length -1;
if (arguments[lastIndex] === 'local') {
Docs._collection.update(arguments.slice(0, lastIndex);
} else {
Docs.update(arguments)
}
}
(This could of course be extended to a DocsWrapper that allows for insertion and removals too.)(Didnt try this function yet but it should serve well as an example.)
The biggest benefit of this is imo that we can use the exact same calls to retrieve documents from the local collection, regardless of if they are local or living on the server too. By adding a simple boolean to the doc we can keep track of which documents are only local and which are not (An improved DocsWrapper could check for that bool so we could even omit passing the 'local' argument.) so we know how to update them.
There are some people working on local storage in the browser
https://github.com/awwx/meteor-browser-store
You might be able to adapt some of their ideas to provide "fake" documents.
I would use the transform feature on the collection to make an object that knows what to do with itself (on client). Give it the corruct update method (real/bogus), then call .update rather than a general one.
You can put the code from this.added into the transform process.
You can also set up a local minimongo collection. Insert on callback
#FoundAgents = new Meteor.Collection(null, Agent.transformData )
FoundAgents.remove({})
Meteor.call 'Get_agentsCloseToOffer', me, ping, (err, data) ->
if err
console.log JSON.stringify err,null,2
else
_.each data, (item) ->
FoundAgents.insert item
Maybe this interesting for you as well, I created two examples with native Meteor Local Collections at meteorpad. The first pad shows an example with plain reactive recordset: Sample_Publish_to_Local-Collection. The second will use the collection .observe method to listen to data: Collection.observe().
I'm trying to secure accessing a specific collection but I'm having troubles doing it. I have no problems disabling the insert, update and delete with the Collection.allow() map.
The problem is that I also want to filter the results returned by the Collection.find() and Collection.findOne() function. I read about the Meteor.publish() and Meteor.subscribe() stuff, but somehow I cannot make it work (it's not getting filtered, I just can see all the results).
In my server-code I do the following:
Groups = new Meteor.Collection("groups");
Meteor.publish("myGroups", function() {
if (Functions.isAdmin(userId)) {
return Groups.find({
sort: {
name: 1
}
});
}
});
The function I'm using really works (so it's not that it's always returning true).
In the client-code I wrote the following:
Meteor.subscribe("myGroups");
Groups = new Meteor.Collection("groups");
Now when I do Groups.find{}); at the client I still get all results (and I should get no result).
Am I misunderstanding something or doing something wrong? I could of course make the collection completely server-side and use Meteor.methods() and Meteor.call() to get the collection data (so that it's always encapsulated by the server). But I really thought it would be cool that I didn't have to do that.
Also I wonder why this can't be done on the same level as insert/update/remove with Collection.allow(). I mean, it would be could that we could have the possibility to add a filter to the map for reading data through find/findOne.
Like #Tarang said, removing autopublish by executing the following command works:
meteor remove autopublish