Why does this not transition while the height does change? [duplicate] - css

Question

I'm currently designing a CSS 'mega dropdown' menu - basically a regular CSS-only dropdown menu, but one that contains different types of content.
At the moment, it appears that CSS 3 transitions don't apply to the 'display' property, i.e., you can't do any sort of transition from display: none to display: block (or any combination).
Is there a way for the second-tier menu from the above example to 'fade in' when someone hovers over one of the top level menu items?
I'm aware that you can use transitions on the visibility: property, but I can't think of a way to use that effectively.
I've also tried using height, but that just failed miserably.
I'm also aware that it's trivial to achieve this using JavaScript, but I wanted to challenge myself to use just CSS, and I think I'm coming up a little short.

Answer 1

You can concatenate two transitions or more, and visibility is what comes handy this time.
div {
border: 1px solid #eee;
}
div > ul {
visibility: hidden;
opacity: 0;
transition: visibility 0s, opacity 0.5s linear;
}
div:hover > ul {
visibility: visible;
opacity: 1;
}
<div>
<ul>
<li>Item 1</li>
<li>Item 2</li>
<li>Item 3</li>
</ul>
</div>
(Don't forget the vendor prefixes to the transition property.)
More details are in this article.

Answer 2

You need to hide the element by other means in order to get this to work.
I accomplished the effect by positioning both <div>s absolutely and setting the hidden one to opacity: 0.
If you even toggle the display property from none to block, your transition on other elements will not occur.
To work around this, always allow the element to be display: block, but hide the element by adjusting any of these means:
Set the height to 0.
Set the opacity to 0.
Position the element outside of the frame of another element that has overflow: hidden.
There are likely more solutions, but you cannot perform a transition if you toggle the element to display: none. For example, you may attempt to try something like this:
div {
display: none;
transition: opacity 1s ease-out;
opacity: 0;
}
div.active {
opacity: 1;
display: block;
}
But that will not work. From my experience, I have found this to do nothing.
Because of this, you will always need to keep the element display: block - but you could get around it by doing something like this:
div {
transition: opacity 1s ease-out;
opacity: 0;
height: 0;
overflow: hidden;
}
div.active {
opacity: 1;
height: auto;
}

Answer 3

At the time of this post all major browsers disable CSS transitions if you try to change the display property, but CSS animations still work fine so we can use them as a workaround.
Example Code (you can apply it to your menu accordingly) Demo:
Add the following CSS to your stylesheet:
#-webkit-keyframes fadeIn {
from { opacity: 0; }
to { opacity: 1; }
}
#keyframes fadeIn {
from { opacity: 0; }
to { opacity: 1; }
}
Then apply the fadeIn animation to the child on parent hover (and of course set display: block):
.parent:hover .child {
display: block;
-webkit-animation: fadeIn 1s;
animation: fadeIn 1s;
}
Update 2019 - Method that also supports fading out:
(Some JavaScript code is required)
// We need to keep track of faded in elements so we can apply fade out later in CSS
document.addEventListener('animationstart', function (e) {
if (e.animationName === 'fade-in') {
e.target.classList.add('did-fade-in');
}
});
document.addEventListener('animationend', function (e) {
if (e.animationName === 'fade-out') {
e.target.classList.remove('did-fade-in');
}
});
div {
border: 5px solid;
padding: 10px;
}
div:hover {
border-color: red;
}
.parent .child {
display: none;
}
.parent:hover .child {
display: block;
animation: fade-in 1s;
}
.parent:not(:hover) .child.did-fade-in {
display: block;
animation: fade-out 1s;
}
#keyframes fade-in {
from {
opacity: 0;
}
to {
opacity: 1;
}
}
#keyframes fade-out {
from {
opacity: 1;
}
to {
opacity: 0;
}
}
<div class="parent">
Parent
<div class="child">
Child
</div>
</div>

Answer 4

Instead of callbacks, which don't exist in CSS, we can use transition-delay property.
#selector {
overflow: hidden; /* Hide the element content, while height = 0 */
height: 0;
opacity: 0;
transition: height 0ms 400ms, opacity 400ms 0ms;
}
#selector.visible {
height: auto; opacity: 1;
transition: height 0ms 0ms, opacity 600ms 0ms;
}
So, what's going on here?
When visible class is added, both height and opacity start animation without delay (0 ms), though height takes 0 ms to complete animation (equivalent of display: block) and opacity takes 600 ms.
When visible class is removed, opacity starts animation (0 ms delay, 400 ms duration), and height waits 400 ms and only then instantly (0 ms) restores initial value (equivalent of display: none in the animation callback).
Note, this approach is better than ones using visibility. In such cases, the element still occupies the space on the page, and it's not always suitable.
For more examples please refer to this article.

Answer 5

I suspect that the reason that transitions are disabled if display is changed is because of what display actually does. It does not change anything that could conceivably be smoothly animated.
display: none; and visibility: hidden; are two entirely different things.
Both do have the effect of making the element invisible, but with visibility: hidden; it’s still rendered in the layout, but just not visibly so.
The hidden element still takes up space, and is still rendered inline or as a block or block-inline or table or whatever the display element tells it to render as, and takes up space accordingly.
Other elements do not automatically move to occupy that space. The hidden element just doesn’t render its actual pixels to the output.
display: none on the other hand actually prevents the element from rendering entirely.
It does not take up any layout space.
Other elements that would’ve occupied some or all of the space taken up by this element now adjust to occupy that space, as if the element simply did not exist at all.
display is not just another visual attribute.
It establishes the entire rendering mode of the element, such as whether it’s a block, inline, inline-block, table, table-row, table-cell, list-item, or whatever!
Each of those have very different layout ramifications, and there would be no reasonable way to animate or smoothly transition them (try to imagine a smooth transition from block to inline or vice-versa, for instance!).
This is why transitions are disabled if display changes (even if the change is to or from none — none isn’t merely invisibility, it’s its own element rendering mode that means no rendering at all!).

Answer 6

display is not one of the properties that transition works upon.
See Animatable CSS properties for the list of CSS properties that can have transitions applied to them. See CSS Values and Units Module Level 4, Combining Values: Interpolation, Addition, and Accumulation for how they are interpolated.
Up to CSS 3 was listed in 9.1. Properties from CSS (just close the warning popup)
I've also tried using height, but that just failed miserably.
Last time I had to do this, I used max-height instead, which is an animatable property (although it was a bit of a hack, it did work), but beware that it may be very janky for complex pages or users with low-end mobile devices.

Answer 7

I found better way for this issue, you can use CSS Animation and make your awesome effect for showing items.
.item {
display: none;
}
.item:hover {
display: block;
animation: fade_in_show 0.5s
}
#keyframes fade_in_show {
0% {
opacity: 0;
transform: scale(0)
}
100% {
opacity: 1;
transform: scale(1)
}
}

Answer 8

You can add a custom animation to the block property now.
#keyframes showNav {
from {opacity: 0;}
to {opacity: 1;}
}
.subnav-is-opened .main-nav__secondary-nav {
display: block;
animation: showNav 250ms ease-in-out both;
}
Demo
In this demo the sub-menu changes from display:none to display:block and still manages to fade.

Answer 9

Fade it in with CSS Animations:
.item {
display: none;
}
.item:hover {
display: block;
animation: fadeIn 0.5s;
}
#keyframes fadeIn {
from {
opacity: 0;
}
to {
opacity: 1;
}
}

Answer 10

According to W3C Working Draft 19 November 2013 display is not an animatable property. Fortunately, visibility is animatable. You may chain its transition with a transition of opacity (JSFiddle):
HTML:
Foo
<button id="hide-button">Hide</button>
<button id="show-button">Show</button>
CSS:
#foo {
transition-property: visibility, opacity;
transition-duration: 0s, 1s;
}
#foo.hidden {
opacity: 0;
visibility: hidden;
transition-property: opacity, visibility;
transition-duration: 1s, 0s;
transition-delay: 0s, 1s;
}
JavaScript for testing:
var foo = document.getElementById('foo');
document.getElementById('hide-button').onclick = function () {
foo.className = 'hidden';
};
document.getElementById('show-button').onclick = function () {
foo.className = '';
};
Note that if you just make the link transparent, without setting visibility: hidden, then it would stay clickable.

Answer 11

Edit: display none is not being applied in this example.
#keyframes hide {
0% {
display: block;
opacity: 1;
}
99% {
display: block;
}
100% {
display: none;
opacity: 0;
}
}
What's happening above is that through 99% of the animation display is set to block while the opacity fades out. In the last moment display property is set to none.
And the most important bit is to retain the last frame after the animation ends using animation-fill-mode: forwards
.hide {
animation: hide 1s linear;
animation-fill-mode: forwards;
}
Here are two examples: https://jsfiddle.net/qwnz9tqg/3/

Answer 12

My neat JavaScript trick is to separate the entire scenario into two different functions!
To prepare things, one global variable is declared and one event handler is defined:
var tTimeout;
element.addEventListener("transitionend", afterTransition, true);//firefox
element.addEventListener("webkitTransitionEnd", afterTransition, true);//chrome
Then, when hiding element, I use something like this:
function hide(){
element.style.opacity = 0;
}
function afterTransition(){
element.style.display = 'none';
}
For reappearing the element, I am doing something like this:
function show(){
element.style.display = 'block';
tTimeout = setTimeout(timeoutShow, 100);
}
function timeoutShow(){
element.style.opacity = 1;
}
It works, so far!

Answer 13

I ran into this today, with a position: fixed modal that I was reusing. I couldn't keep it display: none and then animate it, as it just jumped into appearance, and and z-index (negative values, etc) did weird things as well.
I was also using a height: 0 to height: 100%, but it only worked when the modal appeared. This is the same as if you used left: -100% or something.
Then it struck me that there was a simple answer. Et voila:
First, your hidden modal. Notice the height is 0, and check out the height declaration in transitions... it has a 500ms, which is longer than my opacity transition. Remember, this affects the out-going fade-out transition: returning the modal to its default state.
#modal-overlay {
background: #999;
background: rgba(33,33,33,.2);
display: block;
overflow: hidden;
height: 0;
width: 100%;
position: fixed;
top: 0;
left: 0;
opacity: 0;
z-index: 1;
-webkit-transition: height 0s 500ms, opacity 300ms ease-in-out;
-moz-transition: height 0s 500ms, opacity 300ms ease-in-out;
-ms-transition: height 0s 500ms, opacity 300ms ease-in-out;
-o-transition: height 0s 500ms, opacity 300ms ease-in-out;
transition: height 0s 500ms, opacity 300ms ease-in-out;
}
Second, your visible modal. Say you're setting a .modal-active to the body. Now the height is 100%, and my transition has also changed. I want the height to be instantly changed, and the opacity to take 300ms.
.modal-active #modal-overlay {
height: 100%;
opacity: 1;
z-index: 90000;
-webkit-transition: height 0s, opacity 300ms ease-in-out;
-moz-transition: height 0s, opacity 300ms ease-in-out;
-ms-transition: height 0s, opacity 300ms ease-in-out;
-o-transition: height 0s, opacity 300ms ease-in-out;
transition: height 0s, opacity 300ms ease-in-out;
}
That's it, it works like a charm.

Answer 14

Taking from a few of these answers and some suggestions elsewhere, the following works great for hover menus (I'm using this with Bootstrap 3, specifically):
nav .dropdown-menu {
display: block;
overflow: hidden;
max-height: 0;
opacity: 0;
transition: max-height 500ms, opacity 300ms;
-webkit-transition: max-height 500ms, opacity 300ms;
}
nav .dropdown:hover .dropdown-menu {
max-height: 500px;
opacity: 1;
transition: max-height 0, opacity 300ms;
-webkit-transition: max-height 0, opacity 300ms;
}
You could also use height in place of max-height if you specify both values since height:auto is not allowed with transitions. The hover value of max-height needs to be greater than the height of the menu can possibly be.

Answer 15

It is as simple as the following :)
#keyframes fadeout {
0% { opacity: 1; height: auto; }
90% { opacity: 0; height: auto; }
100% { opacity: 0; height: 0;
}
animation: fadeout linear 0.5s 1 normal forwards !important;
Get it to fade away, and then make it height 0;. Also make sure to use forwards so that it stays in the final state.

Answer 16

I've came across this issue multiple times and now simply went with:
.block {
opacity: 1;
transition: opacity 250ms ease;
}
.block--invisible {
pointer-events: none;
opacity: 0;
}
By adding the class block--invisible the whole Elements will not be clickable but all Elements behind it will be because of the pointer-events:none which is supported by all major browsers (no IE < 11).

Answer 17

Change overflow:hidden to overflow:visible. It works better. I use like this:
#menu ul li ul {
background-color:#fe1c1c;
width:85px;
height:0px;
opacity:0;
box-shadow:1px 3px 10px #000000;
border-radius:3px;
z-index:1;
-webkit-transition:all 0.5s ease;
-moz-transition:all 0.6s ease;
}
#menu ul li:hover ul {
overflow:visible;
opacity:1;
height:140px;
}
visible is better because overflow:hidden act exactly like a display:none.

Answer 18

Well another way to apply transition in this situation without using keyframes is to set the width of your element to zero and then unset it on hover
.className{
visibility:hidden;
opacity: 0;
transition: .2s;
width:0;
}
.className:hover{
visibility:visible;
margin-right: .5rem;
opacity: 1;
width:unset;
}

Answer 19

I appreciate all the answers. Here is what I'm using for similar purposes: transition vs animation.
Example: https://jsfiddle.net/grinevri/tcod87Le/22/
<div class="animation"></div>
<div class="transition"></div>
#keyframes animationTo {
0% { background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); }
100% { background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5); }
}
#keyframes animationFrom {
0% { background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5); }
100% { background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); }
}
.animation,
.transition{
margin: 5px;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1);
}
.animation{
animation: animationFrom 250ms;
}
.animation:hover{
background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5);
animation: animationTo 250ms;
}
.transition{
transition: background-color 250ms;
}
.transition:hover{
background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5);
}

Answer 20

I finally found a solution for me, by combining opacity with position absolute (not to occupy space when hidden).
.toggle {
opacity: 0;
position: absolute;
transition: opacity 0.8s;
}
.parent:hover .toggle {
opacity: 1;
position: static;
}

Answer 21

JavaScript is not required, and no outrageously huge max-height is needed. Instead, set your max-height on your text elements, and use a font relative unit such as rem or em. This way, you can set a maximum height larger than your container, while avoiding a delay or "popping" when the menu closes:
HTML
<nav>
<input type="checkbox" />
<ul>
<li>Link 1</li>
<li>Link 1</li>
<li>Link 1</li>
<li>Link 1</li>
</ul>
</nav>
CSS
nav input + ul li { // Notice I set max-height on li, not ul
max-height: 0;
}
nav input:checked + ul li {
max-height: 3rem; // A little bigger to allow for text-wrapping - but not outrageous
}
See an example here:
http://codepen.io/mindfullsilence/pen/DtzjE

Answer 22

After the accepted answer from Guillermo was written, the CSS
transition specification of 2012-04-03 changed the behavior of the visibility transition and now it is possible to solve this problem in a shorter way, without the use of transition-delay:
.myclass > div {
transition:visibility 1s, opacity 1s;
visibility:hidden; opacity:0
}
.myclass:hover > div
{ visibility:visible; opacity:1 }
The run time specified for both transitions should usually be
identical (although a slightly longer time for visibility is not a problem).
For a running version, see my blog post CSS Transition Visibility.
W.r.t. the title of the question "Transitions on the display: property" and in response to comments from Rui Marques and josh to the accepted answer:
This solution works in cases where it is irrelevant if the display or
visibility property is used (as it probably was the case in this question).
It will not completely remove the element as display:none, just make it invisible, but it still stays in the document flow and influences the position of the following elements.
Transitions that completely remove the element similar to display:none can be done using height (as indicated by other answers and comments), max-height, or margin-top/bottom, but also see
How can I transition height: 0; to height: auto; using CSS? and my blog post Workarounds for CSS Transitions on the Display and Height Properties.
In response to comment from GeorgeMillo:
Both properties and both transitions are needed: The opacity property
is used to create a fade-in and fade-out animation and the visibility
property to avoid the element still reacting on mouse
events. Transitions are needed on opacity for the visual effect and on
visibility to delay hiding until the fade-out is finished.

Answer 23

I suspect anyone just starting CSS transitions quickly discovers that they don't work if you're modifying the display property (block/none) at the same time. One workaround that hasn't yet been mentioned is that you can continue to use display:block/none to hide/show the element, but set its opacity to 0 so that even when it's display:block, it's still invisible.
Then to fade it in, add another CSS class such as "on" which sets the opacity to 1 and defines the transition for opacity. As you may have imagined, you'll have to use JavaScript to add that "on" class to the element, but at least you're still using CSS for the actual transition.
P.S. If you find yourself in a situation where you need to do both display:block, and add class "on", at the same time, defer the latter using setTimeout. Otherwise, the browser just sees both things as happening at once and disables the transition.

Answer 24

You can get this to work the natural way you expected - using display - but you have to throttle the browser to get it to work, using either Javascript or as others have suggested a fancy trick with one tag inside another. I don't care for the inner tag as it further complicates CSS and dimensions, so here's the Javascript solution:
https://jsfiddle.net/b9chris/hweyecu4/17/
Starting with a box like:
<div id="box" class="hidden">Lorem</div>
A hidden box.
div.hidden {
display: none;
}
#box {
transition: opacity 1s;
}
We're going to use a trick found in a related q/a, checking offsetHeight to throttle the browser instantaneously:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/16575811/176877
First, a library formalizing the above trick:
$.fn.noTrnsn = function () {
return this.each(function (i, tag) {
tag.style.transition = 'none';
});
};
$.fn.resumeTrnsn = function () {
return this.each(function (i, tag) {
tag.offsetHeight;
tag.style.transition = null;
});
};
Next, we're going to use it to reveal a box, and fade it in:
$('#button').on('click', function() {
var tag = $('#box');
if (tag.hasClass('hidden'))
tag.noTrnsn().removeClass('hidden')
.css({ opacity: 0 })
.resumeTrnsn().css({ opacity: 1 });
else
tag.css({ opacity: 0 });
});
This fades the box in and out. So, .noTrnsn() turns off transitions, then we remove the hidden class, which flips display from none to its default, block. We then set opacity to 0 to get ready for fading in. Now that we've set the stage, we turn transitions back on, with .resumeTrnsn(). And finally, kick off the transition by setting opacity to 1.
Without the library, both the change to display and the change to opacity would've gotten us undesirable results. If we simply removed the library calls, we'd get no transitions at all.
Note that the above does not set display to none again at the end of the fadeout animation. We can get fancier though. Let's do so with one that fades in and grows in height from 0.
Fancy!
https://jsfiddle.net/b9chris/hweyecu4/22/
#box {
transition: height 1s, opacity 1s;
}
We're now transitioning both height and opacity. Note that we are not setting height, which means it is the default, auto. Conventionally this cannot be transitioned - moving from auto to a pixel value (like 0) will get you no transition. We're going to work around that with the library, and one more library method:
$.fn.wait = function (time, fn) {
if (time)
this.delay(time);
if (!fn)
return this;
var _this = this;
return this.queue(function (n) {
fn.call(_this);
n();
});
};
This is a convenience method that lets us participate in jQuery's existing fx/animation queue, without requiring any of the animation framework that's now excluded in jQuery 3.x. I'm not going to explain how jQuery works, but suffice to say, the .queue() and .stop() plumbing that jQuery provides help us prevent our animations from stepping on each other.
Let's animate the slide down effect.
$('#button').on('click', function() {
var tag = $('#box');
if (tag.hasClass('hidden')) {
// Open it
// Measure it
tag.stop().noTrnsn().removeClass('hidden').css({
opacity: 0, height: 'auto'
});
var h = tag.height();
tag.css({ height: 0 }).resumeTrnsn()
// Animate it
.css({ opacity: 1, height: h })
.wait(1000, function() {
tag.css({ height: 'auto' });
});
} else {
// Close it
// Measure it
var h = tag.noTrnsn().height();
tag.stop().css({ height: h })
.resumeTrnsn()
// Animate it
.css({ opacity: 0, height: 0 })
.wait(1000, function() {
tag.addClass('hidden');
});
}
});
This code begins by checking on #box and whether it's currently hidden, by checking on its class. But it accomplishes more using the wait() library call, by adding the hidden class at the end of the slideout/fade animation, which you'd expect to find if it is in fact hidden - something the above simpler example could not do. This happens to also enable display/hiding the element over and over, which was a bug in the previous example, because the hidden class was never restored.
You can also see CSS and class changes being called after .noTrnsn() to generally set the stage for animations, including taking measurements, like measuring what will be the final height of #box without showing that to the user, before calling .resumeTrnsn(), and animating it from that fully-set stage to its goal CSS values.
Old Answer
https://jsfiddle.net/b9chris/hweyecu4/1/
You can have it transition on click with:
function toggleTransition() {
var el = $("div.box1");
if (el.length) {
el[0].className = "box";
el.stop().css({maxWidth: 10000}).animate({maxWidth: 10001}, 2000, function() {
el[0].className = "box hidden";
});
} else {
el = $("div.box");
el[0].className = "box";
el.stop().css({maxWidth: 10001}).animate({maxWidth: 10000}, 50, function() {
el[0].className = "box box1";
});
}
return el;
}
someTag.click(toggleTransition);
The CSS is what you'd guess:
.hidden {
display: none;
}
.box {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background-color: blue;
color: yellow;
font-size: 18px;
left: 20px;
top: 20px;
position: absolute;
-webkit-transform-origin: 0 50%;
transform-origin: 0 50%;
-webkit-transform: scale(.2);
transform: scale(.2);
-webkit-transition: transform 2s;
transition: transform 2s;
}
.box1{
-webkit-transform: scale(1);
transform: scale(1);
}
The key is throttling the display property. By removing the hidden class and then waiting 50 ms, then starting the transition via the added class, we get it to appear and then expand like we wanted, instead of it just blipping onto the screen without any animation. Similar occurs going the other way, except we wait till the animation is over before applying hidden.
Note: I'm abusing .animate(maxWidth) here to avoid setTimeout race conditions. setTimeout is quick to introduce hidden bugs when you or someone else picks up code unaware of it. .animate() can easily be killed with .stop(). I'm just using it to put a 50 ms or 2000 ms delay on the standard fx queue where it's easy to find/resolve by other coders building on top of this.

Answer 25

I had a similar issue that I couldn't find the answer to. A few Google searches later led me here. Considering I didn't find the simple answer I was hoping for, I stumbled upon a solution that is both elegant and effective.
It turns out the visibility CSS property has a value collapse which is generally used for table items. However, if used on any other elements it effectively renders them as hidden, pretty much the same as display: hidden but with the added ability that the element doesn't take up any space and you can still animate the element in question.
Below is a simple example of this in action.
function toggleVisibility() {
let exampleElement = document.querySelector('span');
if (exampleElement.classList.contains('visible')) {
return;
}
exampleElement.innerHTML = 'I will not take up space!';
exampleElement.classList.toggle('hidden');
exampleElement.classList.toggle('visible');
setTimeout(() => {
exampleElement.classList.toggle('visible');
exampleElement.classList.toggle('hidden');
}, 3000);
}
#main {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
width: 300px;
text-align: center;
}
.hidden {
visibility: collapse;
opacity: 0;
transition: visibility 2s, opacity 2s linear;
}
.visible {
visibility: visible;
opacity: 1;
transition: visibility 0.5s, opacity 0.5s linear;
}
<div id="main">
<button onclick="toggleVisibility()">Click Me!</button>
<span class="hidden"></span>
<span>I will get pushed back up...</span>
</div>

Answer 26

The simplest universal solution to the problem is: feel free to specify display:none in your CSS, however you will have change it to block (or whatever else) using JavaScript, and then you'll also have to add a class to your element in question that actually does the transition with setTimeout(). That's all.
I.e.:
<style>
#el {
display: none;
opacity: 0;
}
#el.auto-fade-in {
opacity: 1;
transition: all 1s ease-out; /* Future, future, please come sooner! */
-webkit-transition: all 1s ease-out;
-moz-transition: all 1s ease-out;
-o-transition: all 1s ease-out;
}
</style>
<div id=el>Well, well, well</div>
<script>
var el = document.getElementById('el');
el.style.display = 'block';
setTimeout(function () { el.className = 'auto-fade-in' }, 0);
</script>
This was tested in the latest sane browsers. Obviously it shouldn't work in Internet Explorer 9 or earlier.

Answer 27

I think SalmanPK has the closest answer. It does fade an item in or out, with the following CSS animations. However, the display property does not animate smoothly, only the opacity.
#-webkit-keyframes fadeIn {
from { opacity: 0; }
to { opacity: 1; }
}
#-webkit-keyframes fadeOut {
from { opacity: 1; }
to { opacity: 0; }
}
If you want to animate the element moving from display block to display none, I can't see that it is currently possible just with CSS. You have to get the height and use a CSS animation to decrease the height. This is possible with CSS as shown in the example below, but it would be tricky to know the exact height values you need to animate for an element.
jsFiddle example
CSS
#-webkit-keyframes pushDown {
0% {
height: 10em;
}
25% {
height: 7.5em;
}
50% {
height: 5em;
}
75% {
height: 2.5em;
}
100% {
height: 0em;
}
}
.push-down {
-webkit-animation: pushDown 2s forwards linear;
}
JavaScript
var element = document.getElementById("element");
// Push item down
element.className = element.className + " push-down";

Answer 28

This solution has excellent compatibility, and I haven't seen it yet:
.hidden-element {
position: absolute;
z-index: -1;
pointer-events: none;
visibility: hidden;
opacity: 0;
transition: visibility 0s, opacity .5s ease-out;
}
.hidden-element.visible {
position: static;
z-index: auto;
pointer-events: auto;
visibility: visible;
opacity: 1;
}
Explanation: it uses the visibility: hidden trick (which is compatible with “show-and-animate” in one step), but it uses the combination position: absolute; z-index: -1; pointer-events: none; to make sure that the hidden container does not take space and does not answer to user interactions.

Answer 29

You can do this with transition events, so you build two CSS classes for the transition, one holding the animation other, holding the display none state. And you switch them after the animation is ended? In my case I can display the divs again if I press a button, and remove both classes.
Try the snippet below...
$(document).ready(function() {
// Assign transition event
$("table").on("animationend webkitAnimationEnd", ".visibility_switch_off", function(event) {
// We check if this is the same animation we want
if (event.originalEvent.animationName == "col_hide_anim") {
// After the animation we assign this new class that basically hides the elements.
$(this).addClass("animation-helper-display-none");
}
});
$("button").click(function(event) {
$("table tr .hide-col").toggleClass(function() {
// We switch the animation class in a toggle fashion...
// and we know in that after the animation end, there
// is will the animation-helper-display-none extra
// class, that we nee to remove, when we want to
// show the elements again, depending on the toggle
// state, so we create a relation between them.
if ($(this).is(".animation-helper-display-none")) {
// I'm toggling and there is already the above class, then
// what we want it to show the elements , so we remove
// both classes...
return "visibility_switch_off animation-helper-display-none";
}
else {
// Here we just want to hide the elements, so we just
// add the animation class, the other will be added
// later be the animationend event...
return "visibility_switch_off";
}
});
});
});
table th {
background-color: grey;
}
table td {
background-color: white;
padding: 5px;
}
.animation-helper-display-none {
display: none;
}
table tr .visibility_switch_off {
animation-fill-mode: forwards;
animation-name: col_hide_anim;
animation-duration: 1s;
}
#-webkit-keyframes col_hide_anim {
0% {opacity: 1;}
100% {opacity: 0;}
}
#-moz-keyframes col_hide_anim {
0% {opacity: 1;}
100% {opacity: 0;}
}
#-o-keyframes col_hide_anim {
0% {opacity: 1;}
100% {opacity: 0;}
}
#keyframes col_hide_anim {
0% {opacity: 1;}
100% {opacity: 0;}
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<table>
<theader>
<tr>
<th>Name</th>
<th class='hide-col'>Age</th>
<th>Country</th>
</tr>
</theader>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Name</td>
<td class='hide-col'>Age</td>
<td>Country</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<button>Switch - Hide Age column with fadeout animation and display none after</button>

Answer 30

Instead of using display you could store the element 'off-screen' until you needed it, and then set its position to where you want it and transform it at the same time. This brings up a whole host of other design issues though, so your mileage may vary.
You probably wouldn't want to use display anyway, as you'd want the content to be accessible to screen readers, which for the most part try to obey rules for visibility - i.e., if it shouldn't be visible to the eye, it won't show up as content to the agent.