I use LESS partials, which are includes (#include) into the master LESS stylesheet. There's no reason each partial needs to compile to it's own css file, but it does, cluttering up the project.
In SASS, if you start the file with an underscore, it recognises it's only a partil so doesn't compile it. But LESS doesn't do the same. Is there a recognised way to name a LESS partial?
I'm using PHPStorm to compile the LESS.
You can add "LESS profiles" from Settings dialog. LESS profiles let you setup Source directory etc. and also Exclude files by path.
Related
I'm working on a Create-React-App project, which notoriously does not support css transpilers such as SASS and Less. The general solution, as discussed here and here, is to compile the source .less/.scss and import the build product .css into your components. Then you can remove all .css from source control and only track .less/.scss.
This is a fine solution, but only a handful of my components really need Less for clarity/extensibility; for the most part, pure css is fine. So, what I'd like to do is use .css everywhere except for some .less sprinkled in here and there. I can configure this with the Less compiler, but for source control I'd like to watch only the "source" css files, and ignore the "build" css files (generated from Less). Because of this I cannot blanket .gitignore all .css, since some are truly source files.
So, is there a glob pattern for this? Maybe:
*.css where *.less
I see two other possible solutions:
switch everything to .less, even when it's not necessary, and go on ignoring all *.css
selectively .gitignore only the .css that are build products.
I like option 2, but it just seems a little error prone and more maintenance.
Switch everything to less is the verter choice: only one why to make css. It is also easiest to understand how project works for a colleague.
You should also keep different css folders for generated and non generated css file. Then, you can just ignore folder with generated.
You could get 2 folders for exemple src and dist
Simply put source .css and .less files in the src folder and when compiling this folder, copy the .css files to the dist one while .less files are compiled.
But I prefer your "all .less" approach which is less confusing for other developpers.
Forgive me if this is naive, but I am used to using just CSS. Sass seems pretty cool and I'm down to learn it, but for some reason many of the Javascript or jQuery plugins I'm downloading have both a CSS and SCSS file associated with the stylesheet. I don't want to have to be editing two files to get results on the page, why would both be there when they seem like copies except for a few key areas? See image below, seems like there is an extra CSS file per SCSS. Is that because some browsers cannot compile the SCSS?
CSS and SCSS in same directory
Is that because some browsers cannot compile the SCSS?
Yes. There is a command line utility which converts the .scss to .css. Probably the .map file is a reverse-conversion aid for browser inspectors that understand it.
Whenever I have generated files (like a .min.js, or in your case .css that came from a .scss), I make sure the appropriate command-line conversion tool is executed automatically as part of my build script.
I'm not sure what kind of build system you are using, but there is some command line tool for conversion that will need to be executed.
You are not expected to manually update both formats. SCSS to CSS command-line converters existed long before any browser (is there one yet?) started to support SCSS.
No browser (at least major) is able to directly use SASS (or LESS). You always need to compile scss files to css, before you could use them.
You can compile css by build tools like grunt or gulp. You can even configure it to watch updates in scss files and recompile css if anything was changed.
You could have following types of files after build:
style.scss <- this is source file
style.css <- this is css file created from SASS file
style.min.css <- this is css file minified
style.css.map <- this is source map of scss file
Here you can read why css files are minified. Here you can read what are source maps for.
I'm just starting to play with SASS in Visual Studio. The question I have is that if I put my .scss file in the theme folder, the compiled CSS file will automatically be added to the site. The problem comes in that it generates a .css AND a .min.css file and BOTH are being applied to pages that use the theme.
Is there a way to have VS only add the .min.css automatically? I'd love to keep them in the theme folder and let VS handle linking everything automatically, but I don't want the stylesheet to be added twice. Or is there something else that is considered better/best practice that I should be doing with SASS files?
Are you using Web Essentials plugin to compile SASS? If yes, in its options, you can change it so when it compiles it can output min, css or either.
example for LESS (same for SASS):
Plus, even if VS is producing min and css files, it wouldn't make much difference since bundling will only use one file. You can just exclude certain files from the solution, and they will be ignored.
You could also look at build tools such as Gulp or Grunt to compile sass - they have much more options that you can apply.
please excuse my inexperience with, and lack of understanding of, Sass.
Basically I was assigned to do some edits on a site which has a main css page and a few scss subpages, all organized through an ftp directory.
I'm just confused how the index knows where to pull the scss pages in the ftp directory? I've looked through the code for the index page, as well as the linked css and js pages, and can't find any part that references the scss pages. Yet they still load within the original css? Am I missing something?
Thanks for the clarification.
SCSS is a preprocessor language. That means it will be converted to CSS. The SCSS files do not get loaded by the website. Instead you will have to make your changes to the SCSS files and then convert them to CSS. It is likely that there is a system in place which takes care of that for you. Take a look around and find out whether there is a gulpfile or a gruntfile hanging out somewhere.
The main.scss file gets compiled to the main.css file. The output produced by the sass compiler replaces the main.css file. There is no link. You need to compile your main.scss file using sass.
Apart from that, you use 'CSS file' rather than 'CSS page' as CSS is an acronym for cascading style sheet which is definitely not page in itself.
Web browsers don't know what a SCSS or SASS file is. They only load CSS.
Your site could have a build tool (grunt, gulp, rake etc) to compile your .scss source files into .css files, which is then published to your web site.
Sometimes your application server will know how to do the translation on the fly and you can just edit the .scss file.
A lot of the time many .scss files will be combined into one .css file so you are often editing a different file to what you would expect when you look at what .css is loaded the browser.
I am building a set of Sass stylesheets using Compass.
I also have a minified copy of bootstrap.css that I would like to include in my deployed site. However, I'm not sure where to keep it or what to do with it.
If I rename it to bootstrap.scss then Compass will pick it up and compile it. This takes a few seconds and I really don't need to add to the build time.
If I leave it named as bootstrap.css then it gets ignored.
Ideally there would be a flag, or some way of telling compass to simply copy that file across rather than attempt to compile it. Does that exist?
If your CSS file should not be compiled into your finished CSS file, then it should be placed wherever your compiled CSS files go. However, this is generally not the desired behavior: a vanilla CSS #import generates extra HTTP requests.
There isn't really a down side to having your CSS file compiled by Sass, as the compilation of that file should be cached (unless you're deleting your .sass-cache files?). Sass should only recompile a file if it or something it depends on changes.