___________________________________________
############################################################################################
FATAL ERROR in
action number 4
of Create Event
for object eng_Global:
DoSet :: Invalid comparison type
at gml_Script_Data_Load (line 1) - ///Data_Load()
############################################################################################
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
stack frame is
gml_Script_Data_Load (line 1)
called from - gml_Object_eng_Global_CreateEvent_4 (line 60) - Data_Load();
I get this error on a comment, not an actual if statement, I can't bypass this without commenting out Data_Load(), which is what loads the users' data.
I recently updated to version 1.4.1567, maybe that is a bug in this version.
I should state that "Connected" and "Guest" variables are both integers (boolean) and do not get set to string at any point in the code.
Here is the Data_Load() script:
///Data_Load()
if (Connected && !Guest) {
ini_open(User_Name+"_NSD_Temp.ini");
// Base Statistics
Level = ini_read_real("Statistics","Level",Level);
Exp_Total = ini_read_real("Statistics","Experience_Total",Exp_Total);
Exp = ini_read_real("Statistics","Experience",Exp);
Exp_Left = ini_read_real("Statistics","Experience_Left",Exp_Left);
Exp_Max = ceil(Level*5);
Gold = ini_read_real("Statistics","Gold",Gold);
Gold_Total = ini_read_real("Statistics","Gold_Total",Gold_Total);
Karma = ini_read_real("Statistics","Karma",Karma);
Karma_Total = ini_read_real("Statistics","Karma_Total",Karma_Total);
Highscore = ini_read_real("Statistics","Highscore",Highscore);
Weapons_Inv_Length = ini_read_real("Statistics","Weapons_Inv_Length",Weapons_Inv_Length);
Stones_Inv_Length = ini_read_real("Statistics","Stones_Inv_Length",Stones_Inv_Length);
Stone_Slots_Owned = ini_read_real("Statistics","Stones_Slots_Owned",Stones_Slots_Owned);
// Game
Ninja_Name = ini_read_string("Game","Ninja_Name",Ninja_Name);
Ninja_Level = ini_read_real("Game","Ninja_Level",Ninja_Level);
Ninja_Health = ini_read_real("Game","Ninja_Health",Ninja_Health);
Ninja_Health_Max = ini_read_real("Game","Ninja_Health_Max",Ninja_Health_Max);
Ninja_Health_Regen_Upgrade = ini_read_real("Game","Ninja_Health_Regen_Upgrade",Ninja_Health_Regen_Upgrade);
Ninja_Health_Regen = Ninja_Health_Base*(Ninja_Health_Regen_Upgrade)/room_speed;
Ninja_Weapon = ini_read_real("Game","Ninja_Weapon",Ninja_Weapon);
Ninja_Colour = ini_read_real("Game","Ninja_Colour",Ninja_Colour);
Ninja_Power = ini_read_real("Game","Ninja_Power",Ninja_Power);
Ninja_Max_Speed = ini_read_real("Game","Ninja_Max_Speed",Ninja_Max_Speed);
Ninja_Attack_Speed = ini_read_real("Game","Ninja_Attack_Speed",Ninja_Attack_Speed);
// Weapons Inventory
for (i=0; i<Weapons_Inv_Length; i++) {
Weapons_Inv[i,0] = i;
Weapons_Inv[i,1] = ini_read_real("Weapons Inventory","Inv_Slot_"+string(i),0);
Weapons[Weapons_Inv[i,1],5] = ini_read_real("Weapons Inventory","Inv_Slot_"+string(i)+"_Owned",Weapons[Weapons_Inv[i,1],5]);
}
// Stones Inventory
for (i=0; i<Stones_Inv_Length; i++) {
Stones_Inv[i,0] = i;
Stones_Inv[i,1] = ini_read_real("Stones Inventory","Inv_Slot_"+string(i),0);
Stones[Stones_Inv[i,1],5] = ini_read_real("Stones Inventory","Inv_Slot_"+string(i)+"_Owned",Stones[Stones_Inv[i,1],5]);
}
// Equipped Stones
for (i=0; i<Stone_Slots_Owned; i++) {
Stone_Slots[i,0] = i;
Stone_Slots[i,1] = ini_read_real("Stones Equipped","Slot_"+string(i),Stone_Slots[i,1]);
}
// Costume Colours
for (i=0; i<array_height_2d(Colours); i++) {
Colours[i,5] = ini_read_real("Costume Colours",Colours[i,1],Colours[i,5]);
}
// Stats
Stat_Clouds_Clicked = ini_read_real("Stats","Clouds_Clicked",Stat_Clouds_Clicked);
Stat_Stars_Clicked = ini_read_real("Stats","Stars_Clicked",Stat_Stars_Clicked);
// Options
SoundFX = ini_read_real("Options","SoundFX",SoundFX);
// Version
Save_Version = ini_read_string("Version","Current",Save_Version);
// Resets
ForceResets = ini_read_string("External","Force_Resets",Force_Resets);
ini_close();
if (ForceResets != Force_Resets) {
Data_Erase();
}
Data_Submit();
} // If Connected & Not Guest
GM's compiler is always weird about those line errors. It often doesn't count blank lines as actual lines.
If you adjust for that issue, the real line of code that is throwing the error is this:
if (ForceResets != Force_Resets) {
Maybe it doesn't like that you're basically asking "If something is not equal to itself", which hardly makes sense. That statement will always evaluate to false, so you should probably remove it.
Seeing as you don't declare var on any of these variables, then you're manipulating the variables on the instance that called this script. If there's somehow a ForceResets script variable, and a ForceResets variable on the calling instance, then this whole thing might be a naming issue. I'm also making this assuming because you called:
ForceResets = ini_read_string("External","Force_Resets",Force_Resets);
Where that third parameter isn't declared anywhere in this script.
All in all, I'd say that you need to clean this script up a little.
Pro Tip: Use for(var i = 0; ... instead of for(i = 0 99% of the time. Otherwise you're leaving this instance with an i variable that it will never use.
Related
I want to create multiple records at the same time using client script. This is what I'm doing:
var ceateDatasource = app.datasources.Reservation.modes.create;
var newItem = ceateDatasource.item;
newItem.User = user; //'eric'
newItem.Description = description; //'000'
newItem.Location_Lab_fk = lab.value.Id; //'T'
newItem.Area_fk = area.value.Id; //'L'
newItem.Equipment_fk = equipment.value.Id; //'S'
for(var i = 0 ; i < 3; i ++) {
newItem.Start_Date = startDate;
newItem.Start_Hours = '03';
newItem.Start_Minutes = '00';
newItem.End_Date = startDate;
newItem.End_Hours = '23';
newItem.End_Minutes = '30';
// Create the new item
ceateDatasource.createItem();
}
But the result I'm getting is this one:
The three records are created but the only the first one has data. The other two records have empty values on their fields. How can I achieve this?
Thanks.
Update(2019-3-27):
I was able to make it work by putting everything inside the for loop block. However, I have another question.
Is there any method like the below sample code?
var recordData = [Data1, Data2, Data3]
var ceateDatasource;
var newItem = new Array(recordData.length) ;
for(var i = 0 ; i < recordData.length; i ++) {
ceateDatasource = app.datasources.Reservation.modes.create;
newItem[i] = ceateDatasource.item;
newItem[i].User = recordData[i].user;
newItem[i].Description = recordData[i].Description;
newItem[i].Location_Lab_fk = recordData[i].Location_Lab_fk;
newItem[i].Area_fk = recordData[i].Area_fk;
newItem[i].Equipment_fk = recordData[i].Equipment_fk;
newItem[i].Start_Date = recordData[i].Start_Date;
newItem[i].Start_Hours = recordData[i].Start_Hours;
newItem[i].Start_Minutes = recordData[i].Start_Minutes;
newItem[i].End_Date = recordData[i].End_Date;
newItem[i].End_Hours = recordData[i].End_Hours;
newItem[i].End_Minutes = recordData[i].End_Minutes;
}
// Create the new item
ceateDatasource.createItem();
First, it prepares an array 'newItem' and only calls 'ceateDatasource.createItem()' one time to save all new records(or items).
I try to use this method, but it only saves the last record 'newItem[3]'.
I need to write a callback function in 'ceateDatasource.createItem()' but Google App Maker always show a warning "Don't make functions within a loop". So, are there any methods to call 'createItem()' one time to save several records? Or are there some functions like 'array.push' which can be used?
Thanks.
As per AppMaker's official documentation:
A create datasource is a datasource used to create items in a particular data source. Its item property is always populated by a draft item which can be bound to or set programmatically.
What you are trying to do is create three items off the same draft item. That why you see the result you get. If you want to create multiple items, you need to create a draft item for each one, hence all you need to do is put all your code inside the for loop.
for(var i = 0 ; i < 3; i ++) {
var ceateDatasource = app.datasources.Reservation.modes.create;
var newItem = ceateDatasource.item;
newItem.User = user; //'eric'
newItem.Description = description; //'000'
newItem.Location_Lab_fk = lab.value.Id; //'T'
newItem.Area_fk = area.value.Id; //'L'
newItem.Equipment_fk = equipment.value.Id; //'S'
newItem.Start_Date = startDate;
newItem.Start_Hours = '03';
newItem.Start_Minutes = '00';
newItem.End_Date = startDate;
newItem.End_Hours = '23';
newItem.End_Minutes = '30';
// Create the new item
ceateDatasource.createItem();
}
If you want to save several records at the same time using client script, then what you are looking for is the Manual Save Mode. So all you have to do is go to your model's datasource and click on the checkbox "Manual Save Mode".
Then use the same code as above. The only difference is that in order to persist the changes to the server, you need to explicitly save changes. So all you have to do is add the following after the for loop block:
app.datasources.Reservation.saveChanges(function(){
//TODO: Callback handler
});
I am trying to get all the steps inside a particular workflow ONLY in FileNet Process Engine. But no luck getting it. I am not sure if what I am trying to achieve is available in the API because I looked for days but cannot see it.
Here is my code
String workflowName = "Sample workflow 1";
String[] workClassNames = myPESession.fetchWorkClassNames(true);
for (int i = 0; i < workClassNames.length; i++) {
System.out.println(workClassNames[i]);
}
// Launch Workflow VWStepElement
VWStepElement stepElement = myPESession.createWorkflow(workflowName);
System.out.println(stepElement.getWorkflowName());
System.out.println(stepElement.getSubject());
System.out.println(stepElement.getComment());
System.out.println(stepElement.getStepDescription());
System.out.println("Parameters");
String[] a = stepElement.getParameterNames();
for (int i = 0; i < a.length; i++)
{
if (a[i] != null)
{
Object _parameterValue = stepElement.getParameterValue(a[i]);
System.out.println("\t" + a[i] + "=" + _parameterValue);
}
}
It is static part that is the same for any instance of particular workflow. Thus you should obtain it from the workflow definition, not the running workflow instance.
You should start with VWWorkflowDefinition, iterate through each map obtained using getMaps() and then obtain the steps from VWMapDefinition using getSteps().
Try this
VWWorkflowDefinition defn = peSession.fetchWorkflowDefinition(workSpaceId, workflowIdentifier, convert);
VWMapDefinition vwMapDefinition = defn.getMap(workflowname);
VWMapNode[] mapNode = vwMapDefinition.getSteps()//Gets all of the steps contained in this map.
then iterate the mapNode.
I have constructed my crossfilter-setup a bit different than in most examples I can find, namely:
I have data-array d with multiple data-sources included, among which is data1.
var cf = crossfilter(d3.range(0, d.data1.length));
Then I construct my dims like:
var dim = cf.dimension(function(i) { return d.data1[i].id; });
And I construct my groups like:
var group = dim.group().reduceSum(function(i) { return d.data1[i].total;});
This all works fine, but when I want to create custom reduce functions, the extra parameter i is giving me trouble.
var reduceAddPerc = function(p,v) {
p.sumOfSub += d.data1[i].var1;
p.sumOfTotal += d.data1[i].total;
p.finalVal = p.sumOfSub / p.sumOfTotal;
return p;
};
var reduceRemovePerc = function(p,v) {
p.sumOfSub -= d.data1[i].var1;
p.sumOfTotal -= d.data1[i].total;
p.finalVal = p.sumOfSub / p.sumOfTotal;
return p;
};
var reduceInitialPerc = function() {
return {sumOfSub:0, sumOfTotal:0, finalVal:0 };
};
And then defining the group with:
var group = dim.group().reduce(reduceAddPerc,reduceRemovePerc,reduceInitialPerc);
This doesn't work obviously, since the parameter i is now not known within the function. But I've tried adding the parameter (p,v,i), or nesting the functions by creating an additional function with parameter i around the (p,v) function, and also creating an additionao function(i) within the (p,v) function, but I cannot get this to work.
Does anyone have any help to offer?
In the custom reduce functions, the v parameter is the record currently being "reduced". In this case, it should be your counter, so just use it where you would normally use i. Is that not working?
I've got a JS array which is writing to a text file on the server using StreamWriter. This is the line that does it:
sw.WriteLine(Request.Form["seatsArray"]);
At the moment one line is being written out with the entire contents of the array on it. I want a new line to be written after every 5 commas. Example array:
BN,ST,A1,303,601,BN,ST,A2,303,621,BN,WC,A3,303,641,
Should output:
BN,ST,A1,303,601,
BN,ST,A2,303,621,
BN,WC,A3,303,641,
I know I could use a string replace but I only know how to make this output a new line after every comma, and not after a specified amount of commas.
How can I get this to happen?
Thanks!
Well, here's the simplest answer I can think of:
string[] bits = Request.Form["seatsArray"].Split(',');
for (int i = 0; i < bits.Length; i++)
{
sw.Write(bits[i]);
sw.Write(",");
if (i % 5 == 4)
{
sw.WriteLine();
}
}
It's not terribly elegant, but it'll get the job done, I believe.
You may want this afterwards to finish off the current line, if necessary:
if (bits[i].Length % 5 != 0)
{
sw.WriteLine();
}
I'm sure there are cleverer ways... but this is simple.
One question: are the values always three characters long? Because if so, you're basically just breaking the string up every 20 characters...
Something like:
var input = "BN,ST,A1,303,601,BN,ST,A2,303,621,BN,WC,A3,303,641,";
var splitted = input.Split(',');
var cols = 5;
var rows = splitted.Length / cols;
var arr = new string[rows, cols];
for (int row = 0; row < rows; row++)
for (int col = 0; col < cols; col++)
arr[row, col] = splitted[row * cols + col];
I will try find a more elegant solution. Properly with some functional-style over it.
Update: Just find out it is not actually what you needs. With this you get a 2D array with 3 rows and 5 columns.
This however will give you 3 lines. They do not have a ending ','. Do you want that? Do you always want to print it out? Or do you want to have access to the different lines?:
var splitted = input.Split(new [] { ','}, StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries);
var lines = from item in splitted.Select((part, i) => new { part, i })
group item by item.i / 5 into g
select string.Join(",", g.Select(a => a.part));
Or by this rather large code. But I have often needed a "Chunk" method so it may be reusable. I do not know whether there is a build-in "Chunk" method - couldn't find it.
public static class LinqExtensions
{
public static IEnumerable<IList<T>> Chunks<T>(this IEnumerable<T> xs, int size)
{
int i = 0;
var curr = new List<T>();
foreach (var x in xs)
{
curr.Add(x);
if (++i % size == 0)
{
yield return curr;
curr = new List<T>();
}
}
}
}
Usage:
var lines = input.Split(',').Chunks(5).Select(list => string.Join(",", list));
Is it possible to sort an XMLList? All the examples I can find on it create a new XMLListCollection like this:
MyXMLListCol = new XMLListCollection(MyXMLList);
I don't think the XMLListCollection in this case has any reference to the XMLList so sorting it would leave my XMLList unsorted, is this correct?
How can I sort the XMLList directly?
Thanks
~Mike
So I finally got my search terms altered enough I actually churned up an answer to this.
Using the technique I got from here:
http://freerpad.blogspot.com/2007/07/more-hierarchical-sorting-e4x-xml-for.html
I was able to come up with this:
public function sortXMLListByAttribute(parentNode:XML,xList:XMLList,attr:String):void{
//attr values must be ints
var xListItems:int = xList.length();
if(xListItems !=0){
var sortingArray:Array = new Array();
var sortAttr:Number = new Number();
for each (var item:XML in xList){
sortAttr = Number(item.attribute(attr));
if(sortingArray.indexOf(sortAttr)==-1){
sortingArray.push(sortAttr);
}
//piggy back the removal, just have to remove all of one localName without touching items of other localNames
delete parentNode.child(item.localName())[0];
}
if( sortingArray.length > 1 ) {
sortingArray.sort(Array.NUMERIC);
}
var sortedList:XMLList = new XMLList();
for each(var sortedAttr:Number in sortingArray){
for each (var item2:XML in xList){
var tempVar:Number = Number(item2.attribute(attr));
if(tempVar == sortedAttr){
sortedList += item2
}
}
}
for each(var item3:XML in sortedList){
parentNode.appendChild(item3);
}
}
}
Works pretty fast and keeps my original XML variable updated. I know I may be reinventing the wheel just to not use an XMLListCollection, but I think the ability to sort XML and XMLLists can be pretty important
While there is no native equivalent to the Array.sortOn function, it is trivial enough to implement your own sorting algorithm:
// Bubble sort.
// always initialize variables -- it save memory.
var ordered:Boolean = false;
var l:int = xmlList.length();
var i:int = 0;
var curr:XML = null;
var plus:XML = null;
while( !ordered )
{
// Assume that the order is correct
ordered = true;
for( i = 0; i < l; i++ )
{
curr = xmlList[ i ];
plus = xmlList[ i + 1 ];
// If the order is incorrect, swap and set ordered to false.
if( Number( curr.#order ) < Number( plus.#order ) )
{
xmlList[ i ] = plus;
xmlList[ i + 1 ] = curr;
ordered = false;
}
}
}
but, realistically, it is far easier and less buggy to use XMLListCollection. Further, if someone else is reading your code, they will find it easier to understand. Please do yourself a favor and avoid re-inventing the wheel on this.