How do I access to Google Calendar through CalDAV API? - google-calendar-api

I'm trying to access to Google Calendar through CalDAV API with Google's API library for Ruby (I use service accounts as the application type).
I've written following code, but this doesn't work when the HTTP method is PUT or POST and outputs an error "HTTP method not allowed" with the status code 405. However, it works correctly when the method is GET or DELETE.
require 'google/api_client'
client = Google::APIClient.new(
application_name: 'test',
application_version: '1.0.0'
)
calendar_id = 'CALENDER_ID'
BASE_URL = "https://apidata.googleusercontent.com/caldav/v2/#{calendar_id}/events/"
key = Google::APIClient::KeyUtils.load_from_pkcs12('P12_FILE', 'notasecret')
client.authorization = Signet::OAuth2::Client.new(
token_credential_uri: 'https://www.googleapis.com/oauth2/v3/token',
audience: 'https://www.googleapis.com/oauth2/v3/token',
scope: 'https://www.googleapis.com/auth/calendar',
issuer: 'foobar#developer.gserviceaccount.com',
signing_key: key)
client.authorization.fetch_access_token!
body = <<EOS
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:test
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:CAMPHOR- Schedule 201503
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Asia/Tokyo
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:19700101T000000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0900
TZOFFSETTO:+0900
TZNAME:JST
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20150224T080050Z
UID:4807869c-ba02-48cc-aed5-0e0f5ff19022
DTSTART:20150331T150000
DTEND:20150331T200000
DESCRIPTION:
SUMMARY:DEST 2015-03-31 15:00:00 +0900 2015-03-31 20:00:00 +0900
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
EOS
request = Google::APIClient::Request.new(
uri: BASE_URL,
body: body,
http_method: :post,
headers: {
'Content-Type' => 'application/xml; charset=utf-8'
}
)
result = client.execute(request)
puts result.response.status
puts result.response.env
Could you tell me how should I fix this code to be able to use the all methods?

The initial problem is you can't PUT to the collection resource like that in CalDAV. See section 5.3.2 of the spec for more details. In other words, the URL should be something like ".../events/somerandomeventid.ics"
That said, you're headed down a bad path here.
The API client you're using isn't meant to be used with CalDAV.
Unless you have a good reason to use CalDAV, don't. Use the calendar API.
Calendar isn't meant to be used with non-user accounts like that. Sure, it might work, but it's not in the spirit of the product/API.

Related

Google Cloud Print or other service to auto print using C# or PHP

Are there ANY code examples of how to use Google Cloud Print (using the new OAuth 2) and how when a document comes into the Google Cloud Print queue to automatically print it?
Pretty much what I am trying to do is not spend thousands of dollars that when an order is submitted to our online store, that the order automatically gets printed to our printer. Any ideas, pointers, code examples.
I have done a bunch of searching, and a lot of examples using C#, use Google's old service, not the OAuth2, documentation.
Pretty much, I need a service that will sent a print command to our printer when we get an order in. I can write the part from the store to the service, it is the service to the printer part I have a ton of trouble with.
Thanks in advance.
There's a brilliant PHP class you can download and use that does exactly that:
https://github.com/yasirsiddiqui/php-google-cloud-print
The problem with what you want to achieve is that Google Cloud Print is meant for authenticated users submitting their own print jobs. If I understand correctly, you want to have the server submit a print job as a callback after receiving an order. Therefore, print jobs need to be submitted by a service account, not a Google user. This can be done (we use it in production at the company I work for) using a little hack, described here:
Share printer with Google API Service Account
I can't help you with C# or PHP code, basically you need to be able to make JWT authenticated calls to Google Cloud Print, here you are a code snippet in NodeJS, hope it helps:
var request = require('google-oauth-jwt').requestWithJWT();
service.submitJob = function(readStream,callback) {
// Build multipart form data
var formData = {
printerid: cloudPrintConfig.googleId,
title: 'My Title',
content: readStream,
contentType: "application/pdf",
tag: 'My tag',
'ticket[version]': '1.0',
'ticket[print]': ''
};
// Submit POST request
request({
uri: cloudPrintConfig.endpoints.submit,
json: true,
method: 'post',
formData: formData,
jwt: cloudPrintConfig.jwt
}, function (err, res, body) {
if (err) {
callback(err,null);
} else {
if (body.success == false) {
callback('unsuccessful submission',null);
} else {
callback(null, body);
}
}
});
}
Details about JWT credentials can be found here

Angular2 http default headers common Authorization tokens

In angular 1, I was able to manipulate the http object so the request header for a post included authentication like this:
$http.defaults.headers.common['Authorization'] = "Token " + sessionobject.token;
return $http({
method: 'POST',
url: SERVER_ENVIRONMENT + 'updatepath',
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
'Data-Type': 'json'
},
data: {
id : id,
...
}
})
Can you please help me find the equvilant in Angular 2 that generates the same post request? many thnx in advance
You extend the Angular2 class BaseRequestOptions to provide custom headers for all Http calls
class MyOptions extends BaseRequestOptions {
header:Headers=new Header({
'Authorization': 'Bearer ' + localStorage.getItem('token')
});
}
This class override can then be plugged into DI so that for the request options http picks MyOptions
bootstrap(App, [HTTP_PROVIDERS, provide(RequestOptions, {useClass: MyOptions})]);
The issue with this approach is that the token should be available during bootstrapping, which is not the case most of the time.
The other option is to create a custom http service. One such implementations is available here https://gist.github.com/chandermani/9166abe6e6608a31f471
As Chandermani said in his question you can specify your own options for requests. You can define things statically or a bit more dynamically by overriden the merge method. With the latter you can extend request options based of provided options for the current request.
For more details have a look at this question:
Handling refresh tokens using rxjs
Since you use tokens, an important feature is that they expire after an amount of time. This means that you need to refresh them based on refresh tokens. This can be done transparently in Angular2 by extending the Http class and leveraging observable operators like flatMap.
For more details have a look at this question:
Handling refresh tokens using rxjs

Symfony2 Authorize.net SIM error

I want to use Authorize.net SIM payment method in Symfony using payum.org.
There is no official gateway for it but there is one in omnipay: omnipay-authorizenet. There is also omnipay-bridge in payum so it is possible to use omnipay gateways in payum.
So I use this setup and after submitting the authorize.net form I get the error:
[date] request.CRITICAL: Uncaught PHP Exception Omnipay\Common\Exception\InvalidRequestException: "Incorrect hash" at .../authorize/vendor/omnipay/authorizenet/src/Message/SIMCompleteAuthorizeRequest.php line 42 {"exception":"[object] (Omnipay\\Common\\Exception\\InvalidRequestException(code: 0): Incorrect hash at .../authorize/vendor/omnipay/authorizenet/src/Message/SIMCompleteAuthorizeRequest.php:42)"} []
BUT this is NOT because of the generated hashes being incorrect - it is because capture url is called second time without the POST data.
On a clean installation of Symfony2 with 3 packages:
composer.json:
"payum/payum-bundle": "0.15.*",
"omnipay/authorizenet": "~2.0",
"payum/omnipay-bridge": "*#stable"
config.yml:
payum:
security:
token_storage:
AppBundle\Entity\PaymentToken: { doctrine: orm }
storages:
AppBundle\Entity\Payment: { doctrine: orm }
gateways:
authorizeGateway:
omnipay_offsite:
type: AuthorizeNet_SIM
options:
hashSecret: 'Simon'
ApiLoginId: 'xxx'
transactionkey: 'xxx'
testMode: false
developerMode: true
Controller:
/**
* #Route("/prepare", name="prepare")
*/
public function prepareAction()
{
$gatewayName = 'authorizeGateway';
$storage = $this->get('payum')->getStorage('AppBundle\Entity\Payment');
$payment = $storage->create();
$payment->setNumber(uniqid());
$payment->setCurrencyCode('USD');
$payment->setTotalAmount(1);
$payment->setDescription('A description');
$payment->setClientId('anId');
$payment->setClientEmail('foo#example.com');
$storage->update($payment);
$captureToken = $this->get('payum.security.token_factory')->createCaptureToken(
$gatewayName,
$payment,
'done' // the route to redirect after capture
);
return $this->redirect($captureToken->getTargetUrl());
}
/**
* #Route("/done", name="done")
*/
public function doneAction(Request $request)
{
...
}
Going to /prepare shows a redirecting to authorize.net page for a second and I'm redirected to external test.authorize.net/gateway/transact.dll (on https) page where I specify card number (test card number) and expiration date in the future.
Submitting this form gives:
An error occurred while trying to report this transaction to the merchant. An e-mail has been sent to the merchant informing them of the error. The following is the result of the attempt to charge your credit card.
This transaction has been approved.
It is advisable for you to contact the merchant to verify that you will receive the product or service.
I'm getting the email about Merchant Email Receipt and the one about the error:
Authorize.Net Developer Center Merchant,
Your script timed out while we were trying to post transaction results to it.
Transaction ID: XXX
Transaction Result: This transaction has been approved.
The transaction is processed correctly, the capture script is called, hashes match and then the capture is called again without post data - then hashes don't match and authorize displays error.
Requests that are made from symfony profiler:
Token IP Method URL Time Status
fe39ec 198.241.162.104 GET .../payment/capture/vVgoUCPtgCOglv6rLwhIbUp64RZ_oIql1_KDpWjdrdk Tue, 17 Nov 2015 09:47:36 +0100 500
bba47c 198.241.162.104 GET .../payment/capture/vVgoUCPtgCOglv6rLwhIbUp64RZ_oIql1_KDpWjdrdk Tue, 17 Nov 2015 09:47:36 +0100 200
c95b83 198.241.162.104 POST .../payment/capture/vVgoUCPtgCOglv6rLwhIbUp64RZ_oIql1_KDpWjdrdk Tue, 17 Nov 2015 09:47:36 +0100 302
a87347 myip GET .../payment/capture/vVgoUCPtgCOglv6rLwhIbUp64RZ_oIql1_KDpWjdrdk Tue, 17 Nov 2015 09:47:30 +0100 200
c95d57 myip GET .../prepare Tue, 17 Nov 2015 09:47:29 +0100 302
From what i see when we call /prepare we get redirected to capture right away this goes to authorize's form. Then after a few seconds (when credit card data is filled in and submitted) authorize (different ip) makes post request to capture. This is 302 redirect (and probably should be a SIM response with javascript code to go back to our page?). Capture is called secod time with GET and calculated hashes don't match - this is 500 response - authorize stays on their url and shows the error message. Done script is never called.
What can be the issue? It's difficult to debug this further because there is payum, omnipay-bridge, omnipay, authorize combined.
Im testing this on the environment accessible from the internet with account on http://developer.authorize.net/ with test mode off.
UPDATE:
If I add notify token to the controller, like this:
/**
* #Route("/prepare", name="prepare")
*/
public function prepareAction()
{
$gatewayName = 'authorizeGateway';
$storage = $this->get('payum')->getStorage('AppBundle\Entity\Payment');
$payment = $storage->create();
$payment->setNumber(uniqid());
$payment->setCurrencyCode('USD');
$payment->setTotalAmount(1); // 1.23 EUR
$payment->setDescription('A description');
$payment->setClientId('anId');
$payment->setClientEmail('foo#example.com');
$storage->update($payment);
$captureToken = $this->get('payum.security.token_factory')->createCaptureToken(
$gatewayName,
$payment,
'done' // the route to redirect after capture
);
$tokenFactory = $this->get('payum.security.token_factory');
$notifyToken = $tokenFactory->createNotifyToken($gatewayName, $payment);
$payment->setDetails(['notifyUrl' => $notifyToken->getTargetUrl()]);
$storage->update($payment);
return $this->redirect($captureToken->getTargetUrl());
}
I get error "Request Notify{model: ArrayObject} is not supported.":
[2015-11-17 17:46:50] request.INFO: Matched route "payum_notify_do". {"route_parameters":{"_controller":"Payum\\Bundle\\PayumBundle\\Controller\\NotifyController::doAction","payum_token":"Lv5ovrC-8vikIB9ItDVLcNfuRzjjaD_pPiE3-6VIV8Y","_route":"payum_notify_do"},"request_uri":".../payment/notify/Lv5ovrC-8vikIB9ItDVLcNfuRzjjaD_pPiE3-6VIV8Y"} []
[2015-11-17 17:46:50] security.INFO: Populated the TokenStorage with an anonymous Token. [] []
[2015-11-17 17:46:50] request.CRITICAL: Uncaught PHP Exception Payum\Core\Exception\RequestNotSupportedException: "Request Notify{model: ArrayObject} is not supported." at .../authorize/vendor/payum/core/Payum/Core/Exception/RequestNotSupportedException.php line 29 {"exception":"[object] (Payum\\Core\\Exception\\RequestNotSupportedException(code: 0): Request Notify{model: ArrayObject} is not supported. at .../authorize/vendor/payum/core/Payum/Core/Exception/RequestNotSupportedException.php:29)"} []
Omnipay bridge 0.15.x does not set a notifyUrl, and the omnipay gateway uses return url as notify one. When notification comes (before you are redirected) the capture token is invalidated and no longer available.
There are two solutions:
Upgrade to 1.0 where notifyUrl is generated. Btw you can use omnipay gateway factory instead of omnipay_offsite.
or you have to generate notify url yourself, and set it to notifyUrl
$tokenFactory = $this->get('payum.security.token_factory');
$notifyToken = $tokenFactory->createNotifyToken($gatewayName, $payment);
$payment->setDetails(['notifyUrl' => $notifyToken->getTargetUrl()]);
$storage->update($payment);

What am I doing wrong in this QBO v3 API (IPP) Attachments upload python request?

Intuit offers these instructions for uploading attachments (which become Attachable objects that can be associated with one or more transactions).
I believe I'm using python's requests module (via rauth's OAuth1Session module—see below for how I'm creating the session object) to generate these requests. Here's the code leading up to the request:
print request_type
print url
print headers
print request_body
r = session.request(request_type, url, header_auth,
self.company_id, headers = headers,
data = request_body, **req_kwargs)
result = r.json()
print json.dumps(result, indent=4)
and the output of these things:
POST
https://quickbooks.api.intuit.com/v3/company/0123456789/upload
{'Accept': 'application/json'}
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="Invoice 003"; filename="Invoice 003.pdf"
Content-Type: application/pdf
<#INCLUDE */MyDir/Invoice 003.pdf*#>
{
"Fault": {
"type": "SystemFault",
"Error": [
{
"Message": "An application error has occurred while processing your request",
"code": "10000",
"Detail": "System Failure Error: Cannot consume content type"
}
]
},
"time": "[timestamp]"
}
I have confirmed (by uploading an attachment through the QBO web UI and then querying the Attachable object through the API) that application/pdf is included in the list of acceptable file types.
At sigmavirus24's suggestion, I tried removing the Content-Type line from the headers, but I got the same result.
Here's how I'm creating the session object (which, again, is working fine for other QBO v3 API requests of every type you see in Intuit's API Explorer):
from rauth import OAuth1Session
def create_session(self):
if self.consumer_secret and self.consumer_key and self.access_token_secret and self.access_token:
session = OAuth1Session(self.consumer_key,
self.consumer_secret,
self.access_token,
self.access_token_secret,
)
self.session = session
else:
raise Exception("Need four creds for Quickbooks.create_session.")
return self.session
What might I be missing here?
EDIT: current area of exploration is here; I just formed the header you see (that has the "INCLUDE" string there) directly. Perhaps I should be using rauth to attach the file...
Without being able to see what code you're using with requests, I'm going to take a shot in the dark and tell you to remove setting your own Content-Type. You probably don't want that. It looks like you want multipart/form-data and requests will set that on its own if you stop fighting it.
It looks like you're missing the boundaries that QuickBooks is expecting (based on what you linked).
---------------------------acebdf13572468
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="file_content_01"; filename="IMG_0771.jpg"
Content-Type: image/jpeg
<#INCLUDE *Y:\Documents\IMG_0771.jpg*#>
---------------------------acebdf13572468--
The first and last line above seem to be what you're missing.

Cross Domain AJAX Post using easyXdm

I am trying to get a cross domain AJAX post to work using the easyXdm library.
In my local development environment I have two sites:
1. http://localhost/MySite/ws/easyXDM/cors/index.html (EasyXdm file)
2. http://localhost/MyClientSite/TestPage.html (AJAX post from here)
TestPage.html (AJAX Post)
var rpc = new easyXDM.Rpc({
remote: "http://localhost/MySite/ws/easyXDM/cors/index.html"
},
{
remote: {
request: {}
}
});
rpc.request({
url: "http://localhost/MySite/ws/MyService.asmx/DoSomething",
method: "POST",
data: jsonData
}, function(response) {
console.log(JSON.parse(response.data));
$('#thanksDiv').fadeIn(2000, function () {
$('#thanksDiv').fadeOut(4000);
});
});
When I do the AJAX post I get the following in my browser's console:
easyXDM present on 'http://localhost/MySite/ws/easyXDM/cors/index.html?xdm_e=http%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%2FMyClientSite%2FTestPage.html&xdm_c=default884&xdm_p=4
native JSON found
easyXDM.Rpc: constructor
{Private}: preparing transport stack
{Private}: using parameters from query
easyXDM.stack.SameOriginTransport: constructor
easyXDM.stack.QueueBehavior: constructor
easyXDM.stack.RpcBehavior: init
{Private}: firing dom_onReady
... deferred messages ...
easyXDM.Rpc: constructor
{Private}: preparing transport stack
{Private}: using parameters from query
easyXDM.stack.SameOriginTransport: constructor
easyXDM.stack.QueueBehavior: constructor
easyXDM.stack.RpcBehavior: init
... end of deferred messages ...
easyXDM.stack.SameOriginTransport: init
easyXDM.stack.RpcBehavior: received request to execute method request using callback id 1
easyXDM.stack.RpcBehavior: requested to execute procedure request
easyXDM.stack.QueueBehavior: removing myself from the stack
Problem: The web service never actually receives the data. This is obvious as my AJAX post success function should show a thanksDiv and also a record should be created in the *database.
Note: I am replacing my existing AJAX post code as I need to use easyXdm to overcome an issue with Internet Explorer 6 and 7 on a client's site.
Additional Information:
The file-structure where my easyXdm files are located is as follows:
/ws/easyXDM/easyXDM.debug.js
/ws/easyXDM/easyXdm.swf
/ws/easyXDM/json2.js
/ws/easyXDM/name.html
/ws/easyXDM/cors/index.html
My web service was throwing a HTTP 500 server error as jsonData was not being sent correctly via easyXdm.
The json data looks like this before it was posted:
{ "param1": "value1", "param2": "value2"...... }
However, the web service was receiving the data one character per line e.g.
{
"
p
a
r
a
m
"
....
I was not serialising the json data prior to my post. So, based on the original code I posted in the original question:
To get it working I changed the line
data: jsonData
to
data: JSON.parse(jsonData)

Resources