I am trying to create a QT based application that scan and connect WiFi networks. I am using this example as a reference code.
Is it possible to assign static IP for the WiFi connection using QNetworkConfiguration or any related class ?
How to authenticate the networks that are password protected ?
thanks in advance......
I have created a net work session using the below code set..
void BearerMonitor::createNewSessionFromQml(QString ssid)
{
QList<QNetworkConfiguration> allConfigurations = manager.allConfigurations();
while (!allConfigurations.isEmpty()) {
QNetworkConfiguration config = allConfigurations.takeFirst();
if(config.name()==ssid)
createSessionFor(config);
}
}
SessionWidget::SessionWidget(const QNetworkConfiguration &config, QObject *parent):QObject(parent)
{
session = new QNetworkSession(config, this);
session->open();
}
No you can't. At least not with just Qt APIs.
Please read this and in particular this. QNetworkConfiguration is just a facility to manage network configurations. Editing such configurations is demanded to native code / OS interactions. From the second link:
Note that the QNetworkConfiguration object only provides limited information about the configuration details themselves. It's main purpose is to act as a configuration identifier through which link layer connections can be created, destroyed and monitored.
Even the "start/stop network interfaces" claim is not entirely true since such a feature is available only in certain OSs (not the mobile ones). See the "Platform capabilities" section of the second link for more details about that.
The same reasoning applies to the password question. Once a network is registed in the OS with the corresponding password (because of native code or the user physically registering it) a new configuration is available to the NetworkConfigurationManager, granted that the list of configurations is updated via updateConfigurations(). The new configuration contains the password but you can't edit it from Qt APIs.
Native code is the only solution, as said. Still, Apple does not want you to mess up with WiFi programatically since private APIs for that cannot be used in iOS > 5.1 (the oldest version supported by Qt as for Qt 5.4).
Related
GetTwinAsync() returns always Twin object with empty properties, all properties of my IoT edge module are null when I run my IoT edge device in Simulator, in my Linux server works everything fine. I should wait also about 20 seconds to get a response from GetTwinAync().
If we look at it, this problem is expected. If you read this Understand and use module twins in IoT Hub document, then you will see that from module app, only has permission to read desired properties and read/write reported properties. If you check this image below you will understand better.
The lifecycle of a module twin is linked to the corresponding module identity. Modules twins are implicitly created and deleted when a module identity is created or deleted in IoT Hub.
To access all module properties, you can do it from solution back end and require the ServiceConnect permission. You will need Microsoft.Azure.Devices V1.16.0-preview-001 or later. The following is a console app code snippet.
...
RegistryManager registryManager = RegistryManager.CreateFromConnectionString(connectionString);
Module module;
try
{
module = await registryManager.AddModuleAsync(new Module(deviceID, moduleID));
}
catch (ModuleAlreadyExistsException)
{
module = await registryManager.GetModuleAsync(deviceID, moduleID);
}
...
For more detailed explanation and example check this Get started with IoT Hub module identity and module twin (.NET). If your issue still persist then you can open an issue on azure-iot-sdk-csharp repository.
we are trying to set some telemetry environment on a Juniper VMX (virtual) router located on AWS.
We configured the router following the documentation, and tried to get some telemetry data from it via jtimon and Telegraf.
The gRPC connection is established and we do receive data, but not exactly what we want. Before continuing, I'm sharing the configuration that we use :
Router configuration (telemetry-related) :
system {
services {
extension-service {
request-response {
grpc {
clear-text {
port 32767;}
skip-authentication;
}
}
notification {
allow-clients {
address 0.0.0.0/0;
}
}
}
}
schema {
openconfig {
unhide;}
On Telegraf, we have these settings (for example) :
[[inputs.jti_openconfig_telemetry]]
servers = ["10.0.100.202:32767"]
sample_frequency = "10000ms"
sensors = [
"15000ms /junos/system/linecard/cpu/memory"
"2000ms /components"
]
collection_jitter = "0s"
flush_interval = "15s"
flush_jitter = "0s"
precision = ""
debug = true
quiet = false
Basically, our sensors gets created on the router, and we can see them with the show agent sensors command. What we cannot understand is that if we change the sensor in the configuration file of Telegraf, we will still receive the information of all previously subscribed sensors. To be clear : in the example, we subscribe to /junos/system/linecard/cpu/memory and /components. If I delete these lines, subscribe to /interfaces and run Telegraf, we will receive the information from the 3 sensors (/components, .../cpu/memory and /interfaces).
As we understand, this is due to an "ephemeral-configuration" called "junos-analytics", as written in the official documentation :
Starting in Junos OS Release 18.2R1, when an external streaming server, or collector, provisions sensors to export data through gRPC on devices running Junos OS, the sensor configuration is committed to the junos-analytics instance of the ephemeral configuration database, and the configuration can be viewed by using the show ephemeral-configuration instance junos-analytics operational command.
Thing is, we don't understand how to edit/disable/delete this "junos-analytics" instance. From what we see, some new sensors (sometimes with the exact same path) get created (with a different sensor ID / name) everytime we run Telegraf. We don't know how to delete them (we tried with a delete services analytics sensor *sensor_name* but it resulted in a "statement not found" error message...).
To sum up, we do receive our sensors' data, but it comes in the middle of lots and lots of other (useless) previously subscribed data.
I feel like we might be missing something in the router configuration, as Telegraf and jtimon show the same behaviour/results.
Any help is appreciated, I can of course share more information if needed ! Thanks in advance :)
Just in case someone is having the same problem : we contacted the Juniper support, they asked us to upgrade our Junos version (from 18.2 to 19.X) and that solves the problem !
getting NETWORK_COMMUNICATION when calling coreRouter.calculateRoute
not sure what url is't trying to reach ,
so can not test connection issue.
coreRouter.calculateRoute(routePlan, new CoreRouter.Listener() {
#Override
public void onCalculateRouteFinished(List<RouteResult> list,
RoutingError routingError) {
the routingError returns NETWORK_COMMUNICATION .
Using phone to test and am connected to the wifi network and can view webpages via the chrome browser
NETWORK_COMMUNICATION with SDK usually indicates a connectivity issue with HERE Servers, the connectivity issue could occur
if there are issues accessing HERE Servers by the SDK, make sure all *here.com are whitelisting if you device is using any proxy or
The map data on the device is very old and it is not being maintained anymore and make sure the device map is updated using the corresponding method in SDK MapLoader.checkForMapDataUpdate() and MapLoader.performMapDataUpdate()
I start my qt application in the user's .profile file (not root) to make the app start on boot. Sometimes when my application start, it reports an warning as below:
"No such interface 'org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties' on object at path /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/ActiveConnection/1"
I searched on google but did not find a explanation.
It seems my app is still working fine, but I want to locate the problem.
The application is running on ubuntu and using Qt5.
Thanks in advance.
Edit
I tried to debug dbus based on Eligijus Pupeikis's help with running:
gdbus introspect --system \
--dest org.freedesktop.NetworkManager \
--object-path /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/ActiveConnection
it returns:
node /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/ActiveConnection {
node 0 {
};
};
So, this means there is no such object just as the error message said, right?
And also, this gns3 team member says this problem is about Qt and Ubuntu.
Does this mean I don't need to solve it? I not familiar with the relationship between dbus and qt.
Most likely there is no such object "/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/ActiveConnection/1" and because of that it can't find 'org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties' interface.
From documentation org.freedesktop.NetworkManager.Connection.Active :
Objects that implement the Connection.Active interface represent an attempt to connect to a network using the details provided by a Connection object. The Connection.Active object tracks the life-cycle of the connection attempt and if successful indicates whether the connected network is the "default" or preferred network for access. NetworkManager has the concept of connections, which can be thought of as settings, a profile or a configuration that can be applied on a networking device. Such settings-connections are exposed as D-Bus object and the active-connection expresses this relationship between device and settings-connection. At any time a settings-connection can only be activated on one device and vice versa. However, during activation and deactivation multiple active-connections can reference the same device or settings-connection as they are waiting to be activated or to be deactivated.
You can't know that that ActiveConnection object with specifically index 1 exists so you need to check by reading ActiveConnections property from /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager object's org.freedesktop.NetworkManager interface.
To have better visualize and understand how it looks I suggest D-Bus debugger. If you are using Gnome check out D-Feet.
I'm creating a Qt Symbian application and need to connect to internet. In some way I need to let the user choose a connection ONCE when the app starts or use the DEFAULT connection if that is enabled.
Before I just used qt_SetDefaultIap() to set the connection on start. It worked perfect but now I need to use QtMobility instead. I have tried the following in QMainWindow when my app starts:
QNetworkConfigurationManager manager;
const bool selectIap = (manager.capabilities()& QNetworkConfigurationManager::CanStartAndStopInterfaces);
QNetworkConfiguration defaultIap = manager.defaultConfiguration();
if(!defaultIap.isValid() && (!selectIap && defaultIap.state() != QNetworkConfiguration::Active))
{
// let the user know that there is no access point available
}
session = new QNetworkSession(defaultIap,this);
session->open();
But there must be something I'm missing as the application always asks the user to choose connection each time it uses internet not just once as I want. And even if I choose a connection the application asks three times. EDIT: It works on Nokia 5800 but not on N97.
This seems to be a problem for many people as it has been discussed before:
http://discussion.forum.nokia.com/forum/showthread.php?196396-how-to-use-QNetworkConfigurationManager-to-handle-access-point
http://discussion.forum.nokia.com/forum/showthread.php?199401-How-to-use-bearer-management-to-select-access-point
http://discussion.forum.nokia.com/forum/showthread.php?199472-How-can-I-set-the-best-one-access-point-as-default
Any ideas on how to get this working?
if your phone settings are set as 'Always ask' in (5800) Menu -> Settings -> Destinations -> Options -> Default connection, then QNetworkConfigurationManager.defaultConfiguration() will return the UserChoice configuration, which will always popup a query.
If you wish to control which access point is really used, then you could enumerate/list the configurations (QNetworkConfigurationManager::allConfigurations(), choose the one you want, and then create a QNetworkSession based on it and call QNetworkSession::open(). After that if you instantiate and use e.g. QNetworkAccessManager to perform web queries, they should use that configuration "automatically".