Specificity of inherited CSS properties - css

What is the level of CSS specificity received by inherited properties? I read through the W3 recommendation regarding CSS specificity and so I understand how to calculate the different specificities of css rules which are directly targeting the same element, but I see no mention there of the level of specificity given to inherited attributes.
In particular, the issue I'm encountering has to do with header elements, though I would be very interested to understand this in general.
For example, here's a snippet of HTML:
<h2>This should be black</h2>
<div class="all_red_text">
<h2>This should be red</h2>
</div>
Now if I include some CSS like this:
.all_red_text { color: red; }
I will get the result I expect. On the other hand, if I the css which I included was
h2 { color: black; }
.all_red_text { color: red; }
then all the text will be black. In the first case there is some default browser CSS which is able to be overridden by the inherited property, but then when the same property is manually specified in the second example it takes precedence over the inherited property.

Any declaration that matches element directly will get priority over the property that's inherited from the element's parent. Specificity has nothing to do with that.

CSS is applied to elements in this form:
Priority 1: inline styles
Priority 2: CSS ID styles
Priority 3: CSS class/pseudo-class styles
Priority 4: CSS element styles
Priority 5: Inherited styles
So, using your HTML structure & CSS:
h2 { color: black; }
.all_red_text { color: red; }
<h2>This should be black (and is black)</h2>
<div class="all_red_text">
(This text is indeed red.)
<h2>This should be red (actually, its parent is red - this text is black)</h2>
</div>
The .all_red_text CSS is telling the div.all_red_text element and everything inside it to have red text. The h2 CSS is telling the h2 elements directly to have black text. When the h2 is rendered, it sees "my parent element wants me to have red text, but I'm directly being told to have black text". The same idea applies to further up parents, including the HTML and browser defaults - this allows you to, for example, set the font-family on the html element and have it apply to everything on your (well formatted) web page, unless something specifically overrides it.
If you want the h2 inside div.all_ted_text to also have red text, you'd need to tell those h2 elements directly to have red text; something like this:
.all_red_text h2 { color: red; }
CSS-Tricks has a pretty nice guide on this, although they don't currently go too deep into inherited properties.

There is no such thing as specificity of inherited CSS properties. Selectors, not properties, have specificity.
In your example, both h2 elements match only one of the rules, h2 { color: black; }. Thus, the color of h2 is black (assuming there are no other style sheets that affect the rendering). Anything set on some other elements (including the parent of the second h2 element) does not affect this the least.
If the rule h2 { color: black; } is absent and there are no other rules affecting the situation, then there is no color set on either of the h2 elements. According to the definition of the color property, the value is then inherited from the parent.

Two or more selectors gets engaged into Specificity War, if and only if
they end up targetting the exact same element. However, If two selectors (targetting the same element) have equal specificity weight, then there are other factors like you said, inheritance or the styles getting over ridden in the css file.

Related

In CSS, * selector winning over !important [duplicate]

What is the level of CSS specificity received by inherited properties? I read through the W3 recommendation regarding CSS specificity and so I understand how to calculate the different specificities of css rules which are directly targeting the same element, but I see no mention there of the level of specificity given to inherited attributes.
In particular, the issue I'm encountering has to do with header elements, though I would be very interested to understand this in general.
For example, here's a snippet of HTML:
<h2>This should be black</h2>
<div class="all_red_text">
<h2>This should be red</h2>
</div>
Now if I include some CSS like this:
.all_red_text { color: red; }
I will get the result I expect. On the other hand, if I the css which I included was
h2 { color: black; }
.all_red_text { color: red; }
then all the text will be black. In the first case there is some default browser CSS which is able to be overridden by the inherited property, but then when the same property is manually specified in the second example it takes precedence over the inherited property.
Any declaration that matches element directly will get priority over the property that's inherited from the element's parent. Specificity has nothing to do with that.
CSS is applied to elements in this form:
Priority 1: inline styles
Priority 2: CSS ID styles
Priority 3: CSS class/pseudo-class styles
Priority 4: CSS element styles
Priority 5: Inherited styles
So, using your HTML structure & CSS:
h2 { color: black; }
.all_red_text { color: red; }
<h2>This should be black (and is black)</h2>
<div class="all_red_text">
(This text is indeed red.)
<h2>This should be red (actually, its parent is red - this text is black)</h2>
</div>
The .all_red_text CSS is telling the div.all_red_text element and everything inside it to have red text. The h2 CSS is telling the h2 elements directly to have black text. When the h2 is rendered, it sees "my parent element wants me to have red text, but I'm directly being told to have black text". The same idea applies to further up parents, including the HTML and browser defaults - this allows you to, for example, set the font-family on the html element and have it apply to everything on your (well formatted) web page, unless something specifically overrides it.
If you want the h2 inside div.all_ted_text to also have red text, you'd need to tell those h2 elements directly to have red text; something like this:
.all_red_text h2 { color: red; }
CSS-Tricks has a pretty nice guide on this, although they don't currently go too deep into inherited properties.
There is no such thing as specificity of inherited CSS properties. Selectors, not properties, have specificity.
In your example, both h2 elements match only one of the rules, h2 { color: black; }. Thus, the color of h2 is black (assuming there are no other style sheets that affect the rendering). Anything set on some other elements (including the parent of the second h2 element) does not affect this the least.
If the rule h2 { color: black; } is absent and there are no other rules affecting the situation, then there is no color set on either of the h2 elements. According to the definition of the color property, the value is then inherited from the parent.
Two or more selectors gets engaged into Specificity War, if and only if
they end up targetting the exact same element. However, If two selectors (targetting the same element) have equal specificity weight, then there are other factors like you said, inheritance or the styles getting over ridden in the css file.

Is there a reason as to why the HTML tag is sometimes a CSS selector? [duplicate]

How are these three rules different when applied to the same HTML document?
html {
color: black;
background-color: white;
}
body {
color: black;
background-color: white;
}
* {
color: black;
background-color: white;
}
html {
color: black;
background-color: white;
}
This rule applies the colors to the html element. All descendants of the html element inherit its color (but not background-color), including body. The body element has no default background color, meaning it's transparent, so html's background will show through until and unless you set a background for body.
Although the background of html is painted over the entire viewport, the html element itself does not span the entire height of the viewport automatically; the background is simply propagated to the viewport. See this answer for details.
body {
color: black;
background-color: white;
}
This rule applies the colors to the body element. All descendants of the body element inherit its color.
Similarly to how the background of html is propagated to the viewport automatically, the background of body will be propagated to html automatically, until and unless you set a background for html as well. See this answer for an explanation. Because of this, if you only need one background (in usual circumstances), whether you use the first rule or the second rule won't make any real difference.
You can, however, combine background styles for html and body with other tricks to get some nifty background effects, like I've done here. See the above linked answer for how.
* {
color: black;
background-color: white;
}
This rule applies the colors to every element, so neither of the two properties is implicitly inherited. But you can easily override this rule with anything else, including either of the above two rules, as * has literally no significance in selector specificity.
Because this breaks the inheritance chain completely for any property that is normally inherited such as color, setting those properties in a * rule is considered bad practice unless you have a very good reason to break inheritance this way (most use cases that involve breaking inheritance require you to do it for just one element, not all of them).

Styles applied to HTML element are always overridden

I apply styles to the <html> element and to the <body> element. Is it possible to have the styles on the <html> element apply over the <body's styles?
Applying CSS to <html> doesn't seem to follow the usual rules of CSS specificity. Is this true?
Example: http://jsfiddle.net/59dpy/
Try to make all background colors red.
If you want all of the background red, why add a yellow background to the body? In any case, you just need something more specific.
.test2 { background: red; }
is all you would really need.
Calculating Specificity
The actual specificity of a group of nested selectors takes some calculating. Basically, you give every ID selector (“#whatever”) a value of 100, every class selector (“.whatever”) a value of 10 and every HTML selector (“whatever”) a value of 1. Then you add them all up and hey presto, you have the specificity value.
p has a specificity of 1 (1 HTML selector)
div p has a specificity of 2 (2 HTML selectors, 1+1)
.tree has a specificity of 10 (1 class selector)
div p.tree has a specificity of 12 (2 HTML selectors + a class selector, 1+1+10)
#baobab has a specificity of 100 (1 id selector)
body #content .alternative p has a specificity of 112 (HTML selector + id selector + class
selector + HTML selector, 1+100+10+1)
So if all of these examples were used, div p.tree (with a specificity of 12) would win out
over div p (with a specificity of 2) and body #content .alternative p would win out over all of them, regardless of the order.
Specificity - CSS | MDN
I apply styles to the <html> element and to the <body> element. Is it possible to have the styles on the <html> element apply over the <body>'s styles?
Apply over the body's styles? Not really. In your question, you appear to be confused about CSS's specificity: this defines how different styles compete over the same element when they clash, with the more specific and last defined style winning out.
If html tries to set the background to blue, and html.test tries to set the background to red, the background will be red as that's more specific.
This doesn't apply to child elements
It does not mean those rules then override the childrens' styles. You seem to think that because html.test is more specific a selector than body, the html.test style should also override the body style. That's not the case!
Cascading style sheets don't work that way. Styles only cascade down wherever inheritance applies until a child element overrides that style. The child's style will always win out over its parent's style, and then that will cascade down to its child elements if it's an inherited style (until, again, one of those children overrides it).
Specificity says that out of any competing styles, the most specific one that could apply to the html element wins out. In your provided jsFiddle, there aren't any competing styles, and the html element is now red.
That's it; specificity has no more role to play here. Your body element is then given a background color of yellow. Background colors are not inherited by default, but even if they were, body would not ever inherit its parent's background because you assigned one to it specifically.
You need to apply your styles to the body specifically
In this scenario, you need to either make the body just inherit the html element's style:
body { background-color: inherit; }
Or not give the body a style in the first place.
Or you need to set a specific rule for when the html element has the test class applied:
html.test {
background-color: red;
}
body {
background-color: yellow;
}
html.test > body {
/* Don't have a background color when the HTML should have one
so that the HTML's background can show through. */
background-color: transparent;
}

Repurposing CSS Class Selectors

I don't know what this technique is called, I've only seen it used. It's a way to repurpose the same selectors with CSS.
For example if I create
h1 {
font-size:18px;
color:#FFFFFF;
font-family:Arial, Helvetica;margin:0;
padding:0;
}
h2 {
font-size:18px; color:#000000;
font-family:Arial, Helvetica;
font-weight:normal;margin:0;
padding:0;
}
I can repurpose the h selectors with something like
.whatever h1 {
color: #000;
font: 2.0em arial, sans-serif;
background-color: #fff3ea;
margin: 50px 0px 0px 50px;
}
.whatever h2 {
color: #000;
font: 1.7em bold arial, sans-serif;
background-color: #fff3ea;
margin: 25px 0px 25px 75px;
}
If h1 and h2 appear inside of a div called whatever, then they will assume those properties. You can do this with ID tags and class tags but I can't for the life of me remember how this is done.
Any thoughts?
This is called specificity.
It's a key feature of CSS which means properties in the more specific selector (.whatever h1) will override properties in less specific ones (h1). It allows you to set general styles for most of the elements on the page (e.g. all h1 elements), and then change the properties of a small subset of those elements using a more specific selector that identifies, for example, only the h1 elements inside another element whose class is whatever:
HTML
<h1>I'm green with envy</h1>
<h1>And so am I</h1>
<div class="whatever">
<h1>Because I'm rather special</h1>
</div>
CSS
h1{
color: green;
}
.whatever h1{
color: blue;
}
RESULT
The CSS selector .whatever h1 means "any h1 element inside another element with a class of whatever". You could also give the h1 element its own class to achieve the same effect; you just write the CSS slightly differently to reflect the fact that the h1 element you're targeting now has its own class:
HTML
<h1 class="whatever">I'm special</h1>
CSS
h1.whatever{
color: blue;
}
Always try to give your classes and IDs meaningful names that refer to the element's role within the page, rather than its colour or other attributes. i.e. It is much better to use ".introduction" instead of ".bigredtext" or ".whatever". That way, if you change the colour of your intro text to bright blue, you don't have to rename the class in your CSS and HTML, and everything in your HTML will read better too. (This is what people are talking about when they mention "semantics" and "semantic naming conventions".)
How specificity is determined (simple rules to remember)
User agents (web browsers) use a formula to calculate how specific each selector is and which should take precedence over the other. In very simple terms, from less specific to more specific:
Selectors with only the name of the element (e.g. h1) are the least specific of all
Selectors with a .class are more specific than selectors with no class
Selectors with an #id are more specific than selectors with a .class
Selectors lower down in a stylesheet take precedence over earlier identical selectors
Those are the four main rules worth learning about specificity, and they will cover most simple use cases. These two additional rules aren't related to specificity, but they're worth knowing too:
Inline styles such as <h1 style="color: blue"> will take precedence over external rules declared separately in external stylesheets or inside <style> tags. You probably shouldn't use inline styles, but it's worth knowing this just in case you come across them.
Properties within a selector that use the !important flag "trump" everything and can't be overruled. Likewise, you probably shouldn't choose to use the !important flag, but there are times when you may be forced to.
How specificity is really determined (how to calculate it precisely)
Of course, it gets a little more complicated than the above (but not by much) when you start chaining classes, IDs, and elements together, which is why it can be helpful to learn how to calculate specificity precisely rather than working on intuition alone, as it will save you a lot of time when your stylesheets get bigger and more complicated.
If you'd like to learn more, Smashing Magazine has a piece titled "CSS Specificity and Inheritance" that's worth a look. They reference Andy Clarke's famous Star Wars Chart, which might be an easier way to visualise specificity if you're familiar with Star Wars, but it will probably just make things even more confusing if you're not! (Click the image below to read more on Andy's site.)
You faced overriding the selectors.
example:
<div class="one">
<div id="two">
<h1> This is H1 text </h1>
</div>
</div>
so you have set H1 to FFF - white color by:
h1 {
color:#fff;
}
now we do first override ( using ID ):
div#two h1 {
color:#888;
}
and the third, notice you don't have to put current element, you can set it for each element with given class:
.one div#two h1 {
color:#000;
}
so in the end we have black text color.
The raw ones are to set "global" styling. The nested ones are to give exac styles to given elements.
Also you can use chaining class/id selectors for <div id="one" class="two three four"> you can select it using div#one.two.three.four - without spaces

Why doesn't my child element inherit color from its parent when parent has more specific selector?

Why in the following code world is blue rather than red?
The specificity of .my_class is 0,0,1,0, but it should inherit the color of #my_id whose specificity is higher at (0,1,0,0).
#my_id {
color: red;
}
.my_class {
color: blue;
}
<p id='my_id'>
Hello
<span class='my_class'>
world
</span>
</p>
See: w3c: 6 Assigning property values, Cascading, and Inheritance - 6.2 Inheritance
An inherited value takes effect for an element only if no other style declaration has been applied directly to the element.
This style applies to an element with id="my_id":
#my_id {
color: red;
}
... and will apply (inherit) to an element nested within having class="my_class" only if its color property is otherwise unspecified.
...which no longer is the case once you declare:
.my_class {
color: blue;
}
The reason this happens is due to inheritance, not specificity.
Look at it this way, if the span didn't have that class, it would inherit the color red from the parent <p> element and "world" would be red. But note that that's due to inheritance.
When you set color for the span, via the class, that overrides the inherited value.
Specificity is for determining which rule to use in multiple competing rules. In your example, there are no competing rules for <span>, so specificity does not come into play. However, if you added this to your styles:
#my_id span {color: orange}
you would see that "world" is orange because of the specificity of the id being more than the class.
It goes based on specificity and location. The class is applied directly to the text, but the ID is further away.
For a long explanation: http://monc.se/kitchen/38/cascading-order-and-inheritance-in-css
A simpler way to think of it, specificity order applies at the same level, if a style is on a parent more local then it applies, regardless of if an ancestor has a style with higher specificity (since it's further away, or less-local).

Resources