I have a method using
HostingEnvironment.QueueBackgroundWorkItem which I wish to unit test some behaviour before this call, however, the test is failing with System.InvalidOperationException : Operation is not valid due to the current state of the object.
I suspect this I need to mock the HostingEnvironment but unaware of how to.
To resolve this issue I defined an interface
public interface ITaskScheduler
{
void QueueBackgroundWorkItem(Action<CancellationToken> workItem);
}
In production code I inject implementation
public class AspNetTaskScheduler : ITaskScheduler
{
public void QueueBackgroundWorkItem(Action<CancellationToken> workItem)
{
HostingEnvironment.QueueBackgroundWorkItem(workItem);
}
}
In test code I inject implementation
public class TaskScheduler : ITaskScheduler
{
public void QueueBackgroundWorkItem(Action<CancellationToken> workItem)
{
workItem.Invoke(new CancellationToken());
}
}
I think this is an OK solution since unit tests work and my classes that queue background tasks are decoupled from HostingEnvironment.
I ended up doing this to keep things simple:
/// <summary>
/// add some jobs to the background queue
/// </summary>
public static class BackgroundTaskScheduler
{
/// <summary>
/// send the work item to the background queue
/// </summary>
/// <param name="workItem">work item to enqueue</param>
public static void QueueBackgroundWorkItem(Action<CancellationToken> workItem)
{
try
{
HostingEnvironment.QueueBackgroundWorkItem(workItem);
}
catch (InvalidOperationException)
{
workItem.Invoke(new CancellationToken());
}
}
}
Then to fire a job simply:
BackgroundTaskScheduler.QueueBackgroundWorkItem(ct =>
{
// bla
});
A little bit neater than calling HostingEnvironment.QueueBackgroundWorkItem regardless of whether there's an ASP.NET AppDomain then catching the InvalidOperationException is:
public static void QueueBackgroundWorkItem(Action<CancellationToken> workItem)
{
if (HostingEnvironment.IsHosted)
{
HostingEnvironment.QueueBackgroundWorkItem(workItem);
}
else
{
workItem.Invoke(new CancellationToken());
}
}
Related
Is there anyway to define and add method filters for hub functions (like ActionFilters in mvc)
I mean something like this :
public class MyHub : Hub
{
[Log]
public string RegisterUser(UserModel model){
...
}
}
where I can do some control inside the LogAttribute implementation.
You should be able to achieve similar functionality to action filters in ASP.NET MVC by using SignalR's Hub pipeline:
public class LoggingPipelineModule : HubPipelineModule
{
protected override bool OnBeforeIncoming(IHubIncomingInvokerContext context)
{
Debug.WriteLine("Invoking '{0}.{1}({2})'.",
context.MethodDescriptor.Hub.Name,
context.MethodDescriptor.Name,
string.Join(", ", context.Args));
return base.OnBeforeIncoming(context);
}
protected override object OnAfterIncoming(object result, IHubIncomingInvokerContext context)
{
Debug.WriteLine("Finished Invoking '{0}.{1}'. Returned '{2}'.",
context.MethodDescriptor.Hub.Name,
context.MethodDescriptor.Name,
result);
return base.OnAfterIncoming(result, context);
}
}
If you only want to log for methods with a custom attribute attached, you can check for your custom attribute before logging:
protected override bool OnBeforeIncoming(IHubIncomingInvokerContext context)
{
if (context.MethodDescriptor.Attributes.OfType<MyAttribute>().Any())
{
// Log here.
}
return base.OnBeforeIncoming(context);
}
You can register your module before your call to MapSignalR:
public void Configuration(IAppBuilder app)
{
GlobalHost.HubPipeline.AddModule(new LoggingPipelineModule());
app.MapSignalR();
}
I'm developing an ASP.NET MVC 5 Web API application with C#, .NET Framework 4.5.1, Entity Framework 6.1.1 and the latest version of Ninject (I have also installed Ninject.MVC5).
I'm learning how to implement dependency injection, and I think I have learned it, but I have a question. These are my interfaces and classes.
Unit of work interface:
public interface IUnitOfWork
{
void Commit();
}
Custom DbContext implementation (I use IUnitOfWork interface to allow DI):
public class EFDbContext : DbContext, IUnitOfWork
{
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
[ ... ]
}
public void Commit()
{
this.SaveChanges();
}
}
And this is how allow Dependency Injection with Ninject and Ninject.Web.Common.
I have a class, NinjectConfigurator, that adds bindings:
public class NinjectConfigurator
{
public void Configure(IKernel container)
{
// Add all bindings/dependencies
AddBindings(container);
// Use the container and our NinjectDependencyResolver as
// application's resolver
var resolver = new NinjectDependencyResolver(container);
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.DependencyResolver = resolver;
}
private void AddBindings(IKernel container)
{
ConfigureLog4net(container);
container.Bind<IUnitOfWork>().To<EFDbContext>().InRequestScope();
container.Bind<IGenericRepository<User>>().To<GenericRepository<User>>();
}
private void ConfigureLog4net(IKernel container)
{
log4net.Config.XmlConfigurator.Configure();
var loggerForWebSite = LogManager.GetLogger("MattSocialNetworkWebApi");
container.Bind<ILog>().ToConstant(loggerForWebSite);
}
}
And finally, I have this on NinjectWebCommon:
/// <summary>
/// Load your modules or register your services here!
/// </summary>
/// <param name="kernel">The kernel.</param>
private static void RegisterServices(IKernel kernel)
{
var containerConfigurator = new NinjectConfigurator();
containerConfigurator.Configure(kernel);
}
I use .InRequestScope() because I want a EFDbContext instance per request.
My question is: When do I have to do EFDbContext.SaveChanges()? If I'm using one instance per request I think I have to save the changes at the end of the request, isn't it?
Where do I have to put EFDbContext.Commit()?
The way I do it, and have seen done other places, is to either commit in your business layer, or in your controller, after each transaction. That means sometimes SaveChanges() will be called more than once per request, but that shouldn't be a significant problem.
I've learned a lot from looking at the code for SocialGoal, which can be found here. It uses Autofac for DI, but it's the same principles as your own code. Maybe you can get some inspiration and answers there too.
I am using unity, entity framework 4 with POCO classes, repository pattern for DAL and services for Business Logic control.
I also want to use Unit of Work so I can package together CRUD operations which I perform on different services and then commit them all together.
My question is what would be the proper way to inject the Unit Of Work mechanism into my application using Microsoft Unity?
I understand that I can put the IUnitOfWork together with the repository on the constructor of the proper service and then if Unity mapping is specified it would auto initiate the proper instances, but this way I do not pass the global unit of work but rather create a new instance on each level, which can't be a smart way to do it (actually the repository is initiated even before the service).
What am I missing? (Attached is constructor code as I wrote it now of service and its repository).
U also understand that I can use Unity's ParameterOverrides method to take some global instance of Unit of Work (lets say from my aspx.cs file) and pass it into the service and then into the repository. But it seems a bit lame. Is this my only option?
Thanks
public class GenericRepository<T> : IUnitOfWorkRepository, IGenericRepository<T> where T : BaseEntity, IAggregateRoot
{
private IUnitOfWork _uow;
/// <summary>
/// Returns the active object context
/// </summary>
private ObjectContext ObjectContext
{
get
{
return ObjectContextManager.GetObjectContext();
}
}
public GenericRepository(IUnitOfWork uow)
{
_uow = uow;
}
//blahhhh...
public void Add(T entity)
{
_uow.RegisterNew(entity, this);
}
public void Delete(T entity)
{
_uow.RegisterRemoved(entity, this);
}
//.....blah blah....
public void PersistCreationOf(IAggregateRoot entity)
{
this.ObjectContext.AddObject(GetEntitySetName(), entity);
}
public void PersistUpdateOf(IAggregateRoot entity)
{
// Do nothing as EF tracks changes
}
public void PersistDeletionOf(IAggregateRoot entity)
{
this.ObjectContext.DeleteObject(entity);
}
}
public class CategoryRepository : GenericRepository<XComSolutions.FB.Domain.Model.Entities.Category>, ICategoryRepository
{
public CategoryRepository(IUnitOfWork uow)
: base(uow)
{ }
}
public class CategoryService : ICategoryService
{
public int myID {get; set;}
private ICategoryRepository _categoryRepository;
private IUnitOfWork _uow;
public CategoryService(ICategoryRepository categoryRepository,
IUnitOfWork uow)
{
_categoryRepository = categoryRepository;
_uow = uow;
}
public List<Category> GetAll()
{
return _categoryRepository.GetAll();
}
}
Define an IUnitOfWorkFactory and inject that in your services:
public class Service
{
private readonly IUnitOfWorkFactory factory;
public Service(IUnitOfWorkFactory factory)
{
this.factory = factory;
}
public void DoOperation()
{
using (UnitOfWork context = this.factory.CreateNew())
{
this.DoSomeStuff(context);
this.DoMoreStuff(context);
context.SubmitChanges();
}
}
}
What I think you need to do is to define unit of work factory. You register this factory with your DI container and you resolve for this factory every time you need your unit of work. Then you get unit of work from the factory, work with it and let it go. You often will see that you need your unit of work within a scope of single method or single class. This article discuss Unit of Work pattern in connection with Entity Framework: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/dd882510.aspx
I'm trying to add logging with aspect orientated programming using castle windsor in plain asp.net, i.e. not MVC
I've added a class that implements the IInterceptor interface and an attribute that inherits from Attribute.
public class LogAttribute : Attribute
{
public Level LogLevel { get; set; }
public LogAttribute(Level level)
{
LogLevel = level;
}
}
public class LoggingInterceptor : IInterceptor
{
public void Intercept(IInvocation invocation)
{
MethodInfo mi = invocation.Method;
LogAttribute[] atts = (LogAttribute[])mi.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(LogAttribute), true);
// if method not marked with InternalUseRestricted attribute, then pass on call
if (atts.Length == 0)
{
invocation.Proceed();
}
else
{
ISeiLogger log = LoggerFactory.GetLogger(mi.DeclaringType.ToString());
//assume only one logging attribute
//log on entry
log.LogEnter(atts[0].LogLevel);
//allow code to continue
invocation.Proceed();
//log on exit
log.LogExit(atts[0].LogLevel);
}
}
}
Now in the global.asax.cs I've added the following:
public partial class Global : System.Web.HttpApplication, IoCProvider
{
private void InitializeIoC()
{
container = new WindsorContainer();
container.Install(new Sei.Aspect.AspectInstaller());
}
public IWindsorContainer Container
{
get { return container; }
}
private static Sei.Logging.ISeiLogger log;
private IWindsorContainer container;
public override void Init()
{
base.Init();
InitializeIoC();
}
and I've created an installer class:
public class AspectInstaller : IWindsorInstaller
{
public void Install(IWindsorContainer container, IConfigurationStore store)
{
//container.Register(AllTypes.FromAssembly(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly()).BasedOn<IInterceptor>().Configure(component => component.LifeStyle.PerWebRequest));
container.Register(Component.For<IInterceptor>().ImplementedBy<LoggingInterceptor>().LifeStyle.PerWebRequest);
container.Register(Component.For<IInterceptor>().ImplementedBy<InternalUseRestrictedInterceptor>().LifeStyle.PerWebRequest);
container.Register(Component.For<IInterceptor>().ImplementedBy<CachingInterceptor>().LifeStyle.PerWebRequest);
}
}
I now want to add the attribute to some arbitary page's code behind class and some arbitary virtual method, as in
[Log(Level.Info)]
protected string Login(string username, string password)
{
DoSomething();
}
This obviously doesn't work. Do I need to change the way I'm instantiating the page (its a page's code-behind class) to use a container? Or is it the way I'm registering the interceptors? I want to be able to use the interceptors on any class going forward and not have to tell the container about each and every class that I have in my application.
Short answer: it's not possible.
Long answer: due to the way ASP.NET Web Forms works, it doesn't let anyone interfere with the page instantiation. Some claim that using a custom PageHandlerFactory lets you do IoC, but this only lets you set properties after the page has been instantiated, which is simply not enough for proxying.
So runtime proxy libraries such as DynamicProxy or LinFu can't do anything about this. But you may be able to use compile-time aspect weavers, such as PostSharp.
Alternatively, make your code-behind as slim as possible, deferring actual logic to Windsor-managed components.
I have the following code in my ASP.NET project
public sealed class IoC
{
private static readonly IDependencyResolver resolver =
Service.Get("IDependencyResolver") as IDependencyResolver;
static IoC()
{
}
private IoC()
{
}
public static IDependencyResolver Container
{
get
{
return resolver;
}
}
}
public static class Service
{
public static object Get(string serviceName)
{
// Code to create and return instance...
}
}
Is IoC.Container going to be thread safe?
Initialization of static fields is thread-safe: that is, the .NET runtime guarantees that your field will be initialized only once in the program, no matter how many threads access it and in what order.
As Andrey points out, the Service.Get method itself needs to be thread-safe.
IoC itself looks ok, but the whole structure will not be thread-safe if resolver is not thread safe. If you want to have resolver per thread you can use attribute [ThreadStatic]