Strange behavior with passing defaults={"_format" = "xml"} to controller (seemed to work before):
/**
* #Route("/orderxml/{orderguid}", name="_show_order_xml", defaults={"_format" = "xml"})
*/
public function showOrderXML($orderguid)
{
....
$xmloutput = $this->container->get('templating')
->render($templateName, $tpl_data);
$response = new Response($xmloutput);
}
Though I pass defaults={"_format" = "xml"}, the response is still received with content-type=text/html.
Tried to debug the Request - it comes with empty Content-Type header. Attributes of Request do contain _format=xml, but also contain media-type="text/html", which is not familiar to me. As stated in the docs, _format determines the content-type of Request and Response objects.
Currently the only thing I could do is $response->headers->set('Content-Type', 'text/xml');
How can this be fixed?
P.S.: symfony 2.3
_format define the content-type, but you set it only as default. Since the request goes with contant-type html, the default doesn't matter. you have also to set the _format in the requirements to xml only too.
Related
I'm creating client side Blazor app with Microsoft.OData.Client. When I create new entity like this:
var dataServiceContext = this.ClientFactory.CreateClient<Container>(new Uri("http://localhost:5000/odata"));
var newAsset = new CreateAssetDto()
{
TechnicalName = "from_client_4",
DisplayNameFormat = "format from client",
Icon = "client/icon",
InheritedFrom = Guid.NewGuid(),
IsActive = true,
Translation = new AssetTranslationDto
{
Title = "Client Asset",
Language = "en",
Description = "This is asset from client"
}
};
dataServiceContext.AddToAssets(newAsset);
await dataServiceContext.SaveChangesAsync();
I get an exception stating that response to this POST request is missing Location header. When I run fiddle to see what's going on I can see that it actually made 2 requests.
The first request is POST but doesn't include the body and recieves 204 response.
The second request is the one that actually contains the data creating new Asset and response contains Location header as it should.
I guess OData Client is complaining about Location header missing in the response for the first request (since response for second request does contain the header). But why is it even making the first request?
Any idea how to deal with this problem?
It's possible that the first request is a preflight request sent by the browser. But normally CORS preflight requests are sent using OPTIONS method, not POST. So this case is curious.
I am a contributor to the project but do not have enough reputation to add comments here to get clarifications. Could you create an issue on https://github.com/OData/odata.net ?
At times I return, at server level, some extra information alongside with a HTTP 404
For example, instead of returning just a 404, which can puzzle my client whether the routing is correct or not, it will also receive something like
the identifier 'abc' is unknown
I usually set the content type to text/plain and return some text in the Content
Another alternative is to set the ReasonPhrase instead.
Which one is the best way / convention? Set Content or set ReasonPhrase?
The error message should be put in response body (Content), not in response Reason Phrase.
According to RFC 2616：
The Reason-Phrase is intended to give a short textual description of the Status-Code...The client is not required to examine or display the Reason-Phrase.
Some explanation:
Reason-Phrase is short, textual description of Status-Code, it should describe Status Code itself, not custom error message. If custom error message is very long, or the message has JSON structure, using Reason-Phrase certainly violates the specification.
As the specification indicate, the client (browser) is not required to examine the Reason-Phrase, which means Reason-Phrase may get ignored for some browsers, in some time.
You can use custom error responses and overrides the 404 and any other error you want
visit here
Spring MVC: How to return custom 404 errorpages?
Create a view and set this code in app/Exception/Handler.php :
/*Render an exception into a response.
*
* #param \Illuminate\Http\Request $request
* #param \Exception $e
* #return \Illuminate\Http\Response
*/
public function render($request, Exception $e)
{
if($e instanceof NotFoundHttpException)
{
return response()->view('missing', [], 404);
}
return parent::render($request, $e);
}
Set this use to get it working :
use Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\Exception\NotFoundHttpException;
For more info you can visit
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/custom-error.html
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/web-forms/overview/older-versions-getting-started/deploying-web-site-projects/displaying-a-custom-error-page-cs
I feel like this should be easy. I have an app where all I am trying to do is have a form page (index.jsp) that calls a servlet (CheckInfo.java) which sets a new header (myHeader) and redirects the user to another page (redirect.jsp). All of these files are on the same server. The index.jsp is sending the request just fine and CheckInfo is processing and redirecting, but myHeader is not showing up on redirect.jsp. I've read several posts talking about response.sendRedirect sends a 302 which doesn't pass headers and that I should use RequestDispatcher, but nothing seems to work. Is there no way to send headers from a servlet to a jsp?
Here is the servlet code:
response.setHeader("myHeader", "hey there");
response.sendRedirect("redirect.jsp");
I have also tried this:
response.setHeader("myHeader", "hey there");
RequestDispatcher view = request.getRequestDispatcher("redirect.jsp");
view.forward(request, response);
And I have this in redirect.jsp:
System.out.println(request.getHeader("myHeader"));
This does not print anything.
If the answer to my question is no... then I would settle for a way to set the header once I got back to the jsp. My reverse proxy is looking for a specific header to determine whether or not to perform an action. Obviously I tried response.addHeader() on redirect.jsp, but the page has already loaded at that point so that just made me feel dumb.
response.setHeader("myHeader", "hey there");
response.sendRedirect("redirect.jsp");
You are adding it as response header and it is 302 response. Browser on seeing a 302 response will just look for Location header and fire a new request to this location. Custom headers in the response are untouched whereas you are expecting these custom response headers to be included in the request (to new redirect location) which is not being sent.
Solution:-
1. you can use request dispatcher and forward the request instead of external redirect. And you need to use request attributes here.
2. you can call submit form using an ajax request may be jquery like and handle the response manually(for 302 response) but would not suggest you to use this approach as it is not a cleaner and intuitive approach. Just mentioning so that you know there are other ways to achieve this.
The problem is that the redirect() method of the response initiates a new request altogether, thereby loosing the attributes that were set before redirecting. Luckily there is a fluent way of solving the problem still. See below
response.setHeader("myHeader", "hey there");
request.getRequestDispatcher("redirect.jsp").forward(request, response);
Then in your destination you can do response.getHeaders("myHeader")
I have tested the code.
I hope it's clear that in case of asking the client to redirect to another URL - the browser shall not honor the cookies.
However, the 2nd method - where server forwards the request is feasible. The main mistake appears to be in mutating the response while we are supposed to change the request.
Then again, one cannot directly mutate a HttpServletRequest object. Here is one way to do so:
HttpServletRequestWrapper requestWrapper = new HttpServletRequestWrapper(request){
public String getHeader(String name) {
String value = super.getHeader(name);
if(Strings.isNullOrEmpty(value)) {
...
value = myNewHeader;
}
return value;
}
public Enumeration<String> getHeaders(String name) {
List<String> values = Collections.list(super.getHeaders(name));
if(values.size()==0) {
...
values.add(myNewHeader);
}
return Collections.enumeration(values);
}
public Enumeration<String> getHeaderNames() {
List<String> names = Collections.list(super.getHeaderNames());
names.add(myNewHeaderName);
...
return Collections.enumeration(names);
}
}
Followed by:
RequestDispatcher view = request.getRequestDispatcher("redirect.jsp");
// OR (If you can get servletContext)
RequestDispatcher view = servletContext.getRequestDispatcher("redirect.jsp");
view.forward(requestWrapper, response);
Reference:
https://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/javax/servlet/http/HttpServletRequestWrapper.html
For the headers case - getHeader(), getHeaders() and getHeaderNames() fn in the reqWrapper obj need Overriding.
Similarly you can override cookies and params.
See also: Modify request parameter with servlet filter
NOTE: It might not be possible to forward a req to an endpoint which expects a different MIME type.
A client side redirect creates a new HTTP request/response pair.
This link may help you more on debugging perspective -
Sending Custom headers
I am trying to carry JSON data in an HTTP GET request message, but my Spring MVC server can't seem to retrieve the JSON data from the GET request body.
HTTP's GET method does not include a request body as part of the spec. Spring MVC respects the HTTP specs. Specifically, servers are allowed to discard the body. The request URI should contain everything needed to formulate the response.
If you need a request body, change the request type to POST, which does include the request body.
Based on official info
https://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/docs/4.1.0.RC2/spring-framework-reference/html/mvc.html
#RequestMapping("/something")
public ResponseEntity<String> handle(HttpEntity<byte[]> requestEntity) throws UnsupportedEncodingException {
String requestHeader = requestEntity.getHeaders().getFirst("MyRequestHeader"));
byte[] requestBody = requestEntity.getBody();
HttpHeaders responseHeaders = new HttpHeaders();
responseHeaders.set("MyResponseHeader", "MyValue");
return new ResponseEntity<String>("Hello World", responseHeaders, HttpStatus.CREATED);
}
In case anyone's here trying to get the OpenAPI generation to treat the fields of the request object as separate GET params, you'll want to use #ParameterObject (org.springdoc.api.annotations.ParameterObject) which was added here: https://github.com/springdoc/springdoc-openapi/issues/590
I'm writing a flex application that polls an xml file on the server to check for updated data every few seconds, and I'm having trouble preventing it from caching the data and failing to respond to it being updated.
I've attempted to set headers using the IIS control panel to use the following, without any luck:
CacheControl: no-cache
Pragma: no-cache
I've also attempted adding a random HTTP GET parameter to the end of the request URL, but that seems like it's stripped off by the HttpService class before the request is made. Here's the code to implement it:
http.url = "test.xml?time=" + new Date().getMilliseconds();
And here's the debug log that makes me think it failed:
(mx.messaging.messages::HTTPRequestMessage)#0
body = (Object)#1
clientId = (null)
contentType = "application/x-www-form-urlencoded"
destination = "DefaultHTTP"
headers = (Object)#2
httpHeaders = (Object)#3
messageId = "AAB04A17-8CB3-4175-7976-36C347B558BE"
method = "GET"
recordHeaders = false
timestamp = 0
timeToLive = 0
url = "test.xml"
Has anyone dealt with this problem?
The cache control HTTP header is "Cache-Control" ... note the hyphen! It should do the trick. If you leave out the hyphen, it is not likely to work.
I used the getTime() to make the date into a numeric string that did the trick. I also changed GET to POST. There were some issues with different file extensions being cached differently. For instance, a standard dynamic extension like .php or .jsp might not be cached by the browser and
private var myDate:Date = new Date();
[Bindable]
private var fileURLString:String = "http://www.mysite.com/data.txt?" + myDate.getTime();
Hopefully this helps someone.
I also threw a ton of the header parameters at it but they never fully did the trick. Examples:
// HTTPService called service
service.headers["Pragma"] = "no-cache"; // no caching of the file
service.headers["Cache-Control"] = "no-cache";