Subset dataframe in a list by a dataframe column criteria - r

I have a list of dataframes. I need to subset a dataframe of this list according to a criteria in one column of the dataframe.
(all dataframes of the list have the same number and names of columns, and the same number of rows)
For example, I have:
l <- list(data.frame(x=c(2,3,4,5), y = c(4,4,4,4), z=c(2,3,4,5)),
data.frame(x=c(1,4,7,3), y = c(7,7,7,7), z=c(2,5,7,8)),
data.frame(x=c(2,3,1,8), y = c(1,1,1,1), z=c(6,4,1,3)))
names(l) <- c("MH1", "MH2","MH3")
output
$MH1
x y z
1 2 4 2
2 3 4 3
3 4 4 4
4 5 4 5
$MH2
x y z
1 1 7 2
2 4 7 5
3 7 7 7
4 3 7 8
$MH3
x y z
1 2 1 6
2 3 1 4
3 1 1 1
4 8 1 3
So I want to subset the dataframe for which column "y" is the closest to a given number. For example if I say a=3, the chosen dataframe should be "MH1" (where column y=4)
If "l" was a dataframe I will do something like:
closestDF <- subset(l, abs(l$y - a) == min(abs(l$y - a))
How can I do this with the list of dataframes?

Following the answers and comments of #David Arenburg, #akrun and #shadow, here there are three possible solutions to the problem I posted:
Option 1)
library(data.table)
rbindlist(l)[abs(y - a) == min(abs(y - a))]
Option 2) (needs an R version > 3.1.2)
library(dplyr)
bind_rows(l) %>% filter(abs(y-a)==which.min(abs(y-a)))
Option 3) (also works perfectly, but computationally less faster than the first 2 options if used within a big loop or an iterative process)
l[[which.min(sapply(l, function(df) sum(abs(df$y - a))))]]

Related

freq() renames columns during printing

I want to get a one-way frequency table for each column in my dataframe (a count of each unique value in each column). I am following this tutorial, which suggests using the count() function from the plyr package.
for (col in mtcars[c("gear","carb")]){
freq <- count(col)
write.table(freq, file='filename.txt')
}
I would expect the output to look like this:
gear freq
1 3 15
2 4 12
3 5 5
Instead the column name is replaced with 'x':
x freq
1 3 15
2 4 12
3 5 5
Why is this happening, and how can I modify my for loop so that it prints the column name instead of 'x'?
(There is probably a better, vectorized way to do this other than using a for loop, but I'm new to R and can't quite figure out the syntax.)
In a for loop:
for (col in c("gear","carb")){
print(plyr::count(mtcars, col))
}
Using lapply():
lapply(c("gear","carb"), function(col) plyr::count(mtcars, col))
To be clear, count is not renaming anything. In your loop it receives col which is a vector. A vector does not have column names, and so count does not know what name it should use. It uses x as a place holder.
This will also work (with the names of the columns of the dataset mtcar as input, with result as a list of dataframes):
lapply(c("gear","carb"), function(x){df <- as.data.frame(table(mtcars[x])); names(df) <- c(x, 'freq'); df})
[[1]]
gear freq
1 3 15
2 4 12
3 5 5
[[2]]
carb freq
1 1 7
2 2 10
3 3 3
4 4 10
5 6 1
6 8 1

How to remove outiers from multi columns of a data frame

I would like to get a data frame that contains only data that is within 2 SD per each numeric column.
I know how to do it for a single column but how can I do it for a bunch of columns at once?
Here is the toy data frame:
df <- read.table(text = "target birds wolfs Country
3 21 7 a
3 8 4 b
1 2 8 c
1 2 3 a
1 8 3 a
6 1 2 a
6 7 1 b
6 1 5 c",header = TRUE)
Here is the code line for getting only the data that is under 2 SD for a single column(birds).How can I do it for all numeric columns at once?
df[!(abs(df$birds - mean(df$birds))/sd(df$birds)) > 2,]
target birds wolfs Country
2 3 8 4 b
3 1 2 8 c
4 1 2 3 a
5 1 8 3 a
6 6 1 2 a
7 6 7 1 b
8 6 1 5 c
We can use lapply to loop over the dataset columns and subset the numeric vectors (by using a if/else condition) based on the mean and sd.
lapply(df, function(x) if(is.numeric(x)) x[!(abs((x-mean(x))/sd(x))>2)] else x)
EDIT:
I was under the impression that we need to remove the outliers for each column separately. But, if we need to keep only the rows that have no outliers for the numeric columns, we can loop through the columns with lapply as before, instead of returning 'x', we return the sequence of 'x' and then get the intersect of the list element with Reduce. The numeric index can be used for subsetting the rows.
lst <- lapply(df, function(x) if(is.numeric(x))
seq_along(x)[!(abs((x-mean(x))/sd(x))>2)] else seq_along(x))
df[Reduce(intersect,lst),]
I'm guessing that you are trying to filter your data set by checking that all of the numeric columns are within 2 SD (?)
In that case I would suggest to create two filters. 1 one that will indicate numeric columns, the second one that will check that all of them within 2 SD. For the second condition, we can use the built in scale function
indx <- sapply(df, is.numeric)
indx2 <- rowSums(abs(scale(df[indx])) <= 2) == sum(indx)
df[indx2,]
# target birds wolfs Country
# 2 3 8 4 b
# 3 1 2 8 c
# 4 1 2 3 a
# 5 1 8 3 a
# 6 6 1 2 a
# 7 6 7 1 b
# 8 6 1 5 c

Extract data from data.frame based on coordinates in another data.frame

So here is what my problem is. I have a really big data.frame woth two columns, first one represents x coordinates (rows) and another one y coordinates (columns), for example:
x y
1 1
2 3
3 1
4 2
3 4
In another frame I have some data (numbers actually):
a b c d
8 7 8 1
1 2 3 4
5 4 7 8
7 8 9 7
1 5 2 3
I would like to add a third column in first data.frame with data from second data.frame based on coordinates from first data.frame. So the result should look like this:
x y z
1 1 8
2 3 3
3 1 5
4 2 8
3 4 8
Since my data.frames are really big the for loops are too slow. I think there is a way to do this with apply loop family, but I can't find how. Thanks in advance (and sorry for ugly message layout, this is my first post here and I don't know how to produce this nice layout with code and proper data.frames like in another questions).
This is a simple indexing question. No need in external packages or *apply loops, just do
df1$z <- df2[as.matrix(df1)]
df1
# x y z
# 1 1 1 8
# 2 2 3 3
# 3 3 1 5
# 4 4 2 8
# 5 3 4 8
A base R solution: (df1 and df2 are coordinates and numbers as data frames):
df1$z <- mapply(function(x,y) df2[x,y], df1$x, df1$y )
It works if the last y in the first data frame is corrected from 5 to 4.
I guess it was a typo since you don't have 5 columns in the second data drame.
Here's how I would do this.
First, use data.table for fast merging; then convert your data frames (I'll call them dt1 with coordinates and vals with values) to data.tables.
dt1<-data.table(dt)
vals<-data.table(vals)
Second, put vals into a new data.table with coordinates:
vals_dt<-data.table(x=rep(1:dim(vals)[1],dim(vals)[2]),
y=rep(1:dim(vals)[2],each=dim(vals)[1]),
z=matrix(vals,ncol=1)[,1],key=c("x","y"))
Now merge:
setkey(dt1,x,y)[vals_dt,z:=z]
You can also try the data.table package and update df1 by reference
library(data.table)
setDT(df1)[, z := df2[cbind(x, y)]][]
# x y z
# 1: 1 1 8
# 2: 2 3 3
# 3: 3 1 5
# 4: 4 2 8
# 5: 3 4 8

sort and number within levels of a factor in r

if i have the following data frame G:
z type x
1 a 4
2 a 5
3 a 6
4 b 1
5 b 0.9
6 c 4
I am trying to get:
z type x y
3 a 6 3
2 a 5 2
1 a 4 1
4 b 1 2
5 b 0.9 1
6 c 4 1
I.e. i want to sort the whole data frame within the levels of factor type based on vector x. Get the length of of each level a = 3 b=2 c=1 and then number in a decreasing fashion in a new vector y.
My starting place is currently with sort()
tapply(y, x, sort)
Would it be best to first try and use sapply to split everything first?
There are many ways to skin this cat. Here is one solution using base R and vectorized code in two steps (without any apply):
Sort the data using order and xtfrm
Use rle and sequence to genereate the sequence.
Replicate your data:
dat <- read.table(text="
z type x
1 a 4
2 a 5
3 a 6
4 b 1
5 b 0.9
6 c 4
", header=TRUE, stringsAsFactors=FALSE)
Two lines of code:
r <- dat[order(dat$type, -xtfrm(dat$x)), ]
r$y <- sequence(rle(r$type)$lengths)
Results in:
r
z type x y
3 3 a 6.0 1
2 2 a 5.0 2
1 1 a 4.0 3
4 4 b 1.0 1
5 5 b 0.9 2
6 6 c 4.0 1
The call to order is slightly complicated. Since you are sorting one column in ascending order and a second in descending order, use the helper function xtfrm. See ?xtfrm for details, but it is also described in ?order.
I like Andrie's better:
dat <- read.table(text="z type x
1 a 4
2 a 5
3 a 6
4 b 1
5 b 0.9
6 c 4", header=T)
Three lines of code:
dat <- dat[order(dat$type), ]
x <- by(dat, dat$type, nrow)
dat$y <- unlist(sapply(x, function(z) z:1))
I Edited my response to adapt for the comments Andrie mentioned. This works but if you went this route instead of Andrie's you're crazy.

Generating random number by length of blocks of data in R data frame

I am trying to simulate n times the measuring order and see how measuring order effects my study subject. To do this I am trying to generate integer random numbers to a new column in a dataframe. I have a big dataframe and i would like to add a column into the dataframe that consists a random number according to the number of observations in a block.
Example of data(each row is an observation):
df <- data.frame(A=c(1,1,1,2,2,3,3,3,3),
B=c("x","b","c","g","h","g","g","u","l"),
C=c(1,2,4,1,5,7,1,2,5))
A B C
1 1 x 1
2 1 b 2
3 1 c 4
4 2 g 1
5 2 h 5
6 3 g 7
7 3 g 1
8 3 u 2
9 3 l 5
What I'd like to do is add a D column and generate random integer numbers according to the length of each block. Blocks are defined in column A.
Result should look something like this:
df <- data.frame(A=c(1,1,1,2,2,3,3,3,3),
B=c("x","b","c","g","h","g","g","u","l"),
C=c(1,2,4,1,5,7,1,2,5),
D=c(2,1,3,2,1,4,3,1,2))
> df
A B C D
1 1 x 1 2
2 1 b 2 1
3 1 c 4 3
4 2 g 1 2
5 2 h 5 1
6 3 g 7 4
7 3 g 1 3
8 3 u 2 1
9 3 l 5 2
I have tried to use R:s sample() function to generate random numbers but my problem is splitting the data according to block length and adding the new column. Any help is greatly appreciated.
It can be done easily with ave
df$D <- ave( df$A, df$A, FUN = function(x) sample(length(x)) )
(you could replace length() with max(), or whatever, but length will work even if A is not numbers matching the length of their blocks)
This is really easy with ddply from plyr.
ddply(df, .(A), transform, D = sample(length(A)))
The longer manual version is:
Use split to split the data frame by the first column.
split_df <- split(df, df$A)
Then call sample on each member of the list.
split_df <- lapply(split_df, function(df)
{
df$D <- sample(nrow(df))
df
})
Then recombine with
df <- do.call(rbind, split_df)
One simple way:
df$D = 0
counts = table(df$A)
for (i in 1:length(counts)){
df$D[df$A == names(counts)[i]] = sample(counts[i])
}

Resources