Related
Is it possible to make a CSS class that "inherits" from another CSS class (or more than one).
For example, say we had:
.something { display:inline }
.else { background:red }
What I'd like to do is something like this:
.composite
{
.something;
.else
}
where the ".composite" class would both display inline and have a red background
There are tools like LESS, which allow you to compose CSS at a higher level of abstraction similar to what you describe.
Less calls these "Mixins"
Instead of
/* CSS */
#header {
-moz-border-radius: 8px;
-webkit-border-radius: 8px;
border-radius: 8px;
}
#footer {
-moz-border-radius: 8px;
-webkit-border-radius: 8px;
border-radius: 8px;
}
You could say
/* LESS */
.rounded_corners {
-moz-border-radius: 8px;
-webkit-border-radius: 8px;
border-radius: 8px;
}
#header {
.rounded_corners;
}
#footer {
.rounded_corners;
}
You can add multiple classes to a single DOM element, e.g.
<div class="firstClass secondClass thirdclass fourthclass"></div>
Rules given in later classes (or which are more specific) override. So the fourthclass in that example kind of prevails.
Inheritance is not part of the CSS standard.
Yes, but not exactly with that syntax.
.composite,
.something { display:inline }
.composite,
.else { background:red }
Keep your common attributes together and assign specific (or override) attributes again.
/* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ */
/* Headings */
/* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ */
h1, h2, h3, h4
{
font-family : myfind-bold;
color : #4C4C4C;
display:inline-block;
width:900px;
text-align:left;
background-image: linear-gradient(0, #F4F4F4, #FEFEFE);/* IE6 & IE7 */
}
h1
{
font-size : 300%;
padding : 45px 40px 45px 0px;
}
h2
{
font-size : 200%;
padding : 30px 25px 30px 0px;
}
The SCSS way for the given example, would be something like:
.something {
display: inline
}
.else {
background: red
}
.composite {
#extend .something;
#extend .else;
}
More info, check the sass basics
An element can take multiple classes:
.classOne { font-weight: bold; }
.classTwo { font-famiy: verdana; }
<div class="classOne classTwo">
<p>I'm bold and verdana.</p>
</div>
And that's about as close as you're going to get unfortunately. I'd love to see this feature, along with class-aliases someday.
No you can't do something like
.composite
{
.something;
.else
}
This are no "class" names in the OO sense. .something and .else are just selectors nothing more.
But you can either specify two classes on an element
<div class="something else">...</div>
or you might look into another form of inheritance
.foo {
background-color: white;
color: black;
}
.bar {
background-color: inherit;
color: inherit;
font-weight: normal;
}
<div class="foo">
<p class="bar">Hello, world</p>
</div>
Where the paragraphs backgroundcolor and color are inherited from the settings in the enclosing div which is .foo styled. You might have to check the exact W3C specification. inherit is default for most properties anyway but not for all.
I ran into this same problem and ended up using a JQuery solution to make it seem like a class can inherit other classes.
<script>
$(function(){
$(".composite").addClass("something else");
});
</script>
This will find all elements with the class "composite" and add the classes "something" and "else" to the elements. So something like <div class="composite">...</div> will end up like so: <div class="composite something else">...</div>
You can do is this
CSS
.car {
font-weight: bold;
}
.benz {
background-color: blue;
}
.toyota {
background-color: white;
}
HTML
<div class="car benz">
<p>I'm bold and blue.</p>
</div>
<div class="car toyota">
<p>I'm bold and white.</p>
</div>
Don't forget:
div.something.else {
// will only style a div with both, not just one or the other
}
You can use the converse approach to achieve the same result - start from the composite and then remove styling using the unset keyword. For example, if you start with the following sample composition:
.composite {
color: red;
margin-left: 50px;
background-color: green
}
you can then increase selector specificity to selectively remove styles using unset:
.composite.no-color {
color: unset
}
.composite.no-margin-left {
margin-left: unset
}
.composite.no-background-color {
background-color: unset
}
Here is a JSFiddle demonstrating this approach.
One benefit of this approach is that because the specificity of the compound selectors is higher than the composite itself, you do not need all of the combinations of classes to achieve the desired results for multiple combinations:
/* Multi-unset compound selector combinations, such as the one that follows, ARE NOT NECESSARY because of the higher specificity of each individual compound selectors listed above. This keeps things simple. */
.composite.no-background-color.no-color.no-margin-left {
background-color: unset;
color: unset;
margin-left: unset
}
Furthermore, at 96% support for the unset keyword, browser coverage is excellent.
Perfect timing: I went from this question to my email, to find an article about Less, a Ruby library that among other things does this:
Since super looks just like footer, but with a different font, I'll use Less's class inclusion technique (they call it a mixin) to tell it to include these declarations too:
#super {
#footer;
font-family: cursive;
}
In Css file:
p.Title
{
font-family: Arial;
font-size: 16px;
}
p.SubTitle p.Title
{
font-size: 12px;
}
I realize this question is now very old but, here goes nothin!
If the intent is to add a single class that implies the properties of multiple classes, as a native solution, I would recommend using JavaScript/jQuery (jQuery is really not necessary but certainly useful)
If you have, for instance .umbrellaClass that "inherits" from .baseClass1 and .baseClass2 you could have some JavaScript that fires on ready.
$(".umbrellaClass").addClass("baseClass1");
$(".umbrellaClass").addClass("baseClass2");
Now all elements of .umbrellaClass will have all the properties of both .baseClasss. Note that, like OOP inheritance, .umbrellaClass may or may not have its own properties.
The only caveat here is to consider whether there are elements being dynamically created that won't exist when this code fires, but there are simple ways around that as well.
Sucks css doesn't have native inheritance, though.
Unfortunately, CSS does not provide 'inheritance' in the way that programming languages like C++, C# or Java do. You can't declare a CSS class an then extend it with another CSS class.
However, you can apply more than a single class to an tag in your markup ... in which case there is a sophisticated set of rules that determine which actual styles will get applied by the browser.
<span class="styleA styleB"> ... </span>
CSS will look for all the styles that can be applied based on what your markup, and combine the CSS styles from those multiple rules together.
Typically, the styles are merged, but when conflicts arise, the later declared style will generally win (unless the !important attribute is specified on one of the styles, in which case that wins). Also, styles applied directly to an HTML element take precedence over CSS class styles.
Don't think of css classes as object oriented classes, think of them as merely a tool among other selectors to specify which attribute classes an html element is styled by. Think of everything between the braces as the attribute class, and selectors on the left-hand side tell the elements they select to inherit attributes from the attribute class. Example:
.foo, .bar { font-weight : bold; font-size : 2em; /* attribute class A */}
.foo { color : green; /* attribute class B */}
When an element is given the attribute class="foo", it is useful to think of it not as inheriting attributes from class .foo, but from attribute class A and attribute class B. I.e., the inheritance graph is one level deep, with elements deriving from attribute classes, and the selectors specifying where the edges go, and determining precedence when there are competing attributes (similar to method resolution order).
The practical implication for programming is this. Say you have the style sheet given above, and want to add a new class .baz, where it should have the same font-size as .foo. The naive solution would be this:
.foo, .bar { font-weight : bold; font-size : 2em; /* attribute class A */}
.foo { color : green; /* attribute class B */}
.baz { font-size : 2em; /* attribute class C, hidden dependency! */}
Any time I have to type something twice I get so mad! Not only do I have to write it twice, now I have no way of programatically indicating that .foo and .baz should have the same font-size, and I've created a hidden dependency! My above paradigm would suggest that I should abstract out the font-size attribute from attribute class A:
.foo, .bar, .baz { font-size : 2em; /* attribute base class for A */}
.foo, .bar { font-weight : bold; /* attribute class A */}
.foo { color : green; /* attribute class B */}
The main complaint here is that now I have to retype every selector from attribute class A again to specify that the elements they should select should also inherit attributes from attribute base class A. Still, the alternatives are to have to remember to edit every attribute class where there are hidden dependencies each time something changes, or to use a third party tool. The first option makes god laugh, the second makes me want to kill myself.
That's not possible in CSS.
The only thing supported in CSS is being more specific than another rule:
span { display:inline }
span.myclass { background: red }
A span with class "myclass" will have both properties.
Another way is by specifying two classes:
<div class="something else">...</div>
The style of "else" will override (or add) the style of "something"
As others have said, you can add multiple classes to an element.
But that's not really the point. I get your question about inheritance. The real point is that inheritance in CSS is done not through classes, but through element hierarchies. So to model inherited traits you need to apply them to different levels of elements in the DOM.
While direct inheritance isn't possible.
It is possible to use a class (or id) for a parent tag and then use CSS combinators to alter child tag behaviour from it's heirarchy.
p.test{background-color:rgba(55,55,55,0.1);}
p.test > span{background-color:rgba(55,55,55,0.1);}
p.test > span > span{background-color:rgba(55,55,55,0.1);}
p.test > span > span > span{background-color:rgba(55,55,55,0.1);}
p.test > span > span > span > span{background-color:rgba(55,55,55,0.1);}
p.test > span > span > span > span > span{background-color:rgba(55,55,55,0.1);}
p.test > span > span > span > span > span > span{background-color:rgba(55,55,55,0.1);}
p.test > span > span > span > span > span > span > span{background-color:rgba(55,55,55,0.1);}
p.test > span > span > span > span > span > span > span > span{background-color:rgba(55,55,55,0.1);}
<p class="test"><span>One <span>possible <span>solution <span>is <span>using <span>multiple <span>nested <span>tags</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
I wouldn't suggest using so many spans like the example, however it's just a proof of concept. There are still many bugs that can arise when trying to apply CSS in this manner. (For example altering text-decoration types).
I was looking for that like crazy too and I just figured it out by trying different things :P... Well you can do it like that:
composite.something, composite.else
{
blblalba
}
It suddenly worked for me :)
In specific circumstances you can do a "soft" inheritance:
.composite
{
display:inherit;
background:inherit;
}
.something { display:inline }
.else { background:red }
This only works if you are adding the .composite class to a child element. It is "soft" inheritance because any values not specified in .composite are not inherited obviously. Keep in mind it would still be less characters to simply write "inline" and "red" instead of "inherit".
Here is a list of properties and whether or not they do this automatically:
https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/propidx.html
Less and Sass are CSS pre-processors which extend CSS language in valuable ways. Just one of many improvements they offer is just the option you're looking for. There are some very good answers with Less and I will add Sass solution.
Sass has extend option which allows one class to be fully extended to another one. More about extend you can read in this article
I think this one is a better solution:
[class*=“button-“] {
/* base button properties */
}
.button-primary { ... }
.button-plain { ... }
Actually what you're asking for exists - however it's done as add-on modules. Check out this question on Better CSS in .NET for examples.
Check out Larsenal's answer on using LESS to get an idea of what these add-ons do.
CSS doesn't really do what you're asking. If you want to write rules with that composite idea in mind, you may want to check out compass. It's a stylesheet framework which looks similar to the already mentioned Less.
It lets you do mixins and all that good business.
For those who are not satisfied with the mentioned (excellent) posts, you can use your programming skills to make a variable (PHP or whichever) and have it store the multiple class names.
That's the best hack I could come up with.
<style>
.red { color: red; }
.bold { font-weight: bold; }
</style>
<? define('DANGERTEXT','red bold'); ?>
Then apply the global variable to the element you desire rather than the class names themselves
<span class="<?=DANGERTEXT?>"> Le Champion est Ici </span>
Have a look at CSS compose:
https://bambielli.com/til/2017-08-11-css-modules-composes/
according to them:
.serif-font {
font-family: Georgia, serif;
}
.display {
composes: serif-font;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 35px;
}
I use it in my react project.
If you want a more powerful text preprocessor than LESS, check out PPWizard:
http://dennisbareis.com/ppwizard.htm
Warning the website is truly hideous and there's a small learning curve, but it's perfect for building both CSS and HTML code via macros. I've never understood why more web coders don't use it.
You can achieve what you want if you preprocess your .css files through php.
...
$something='color:red;'
$else='display:inline;';
echo '.something {'. $something .'}';
echo '.else {'. $something .'}';
echo '.somethingelse {'. $something .$else '}';
...
I thought I had my CSS down fairly well but I cannot seem to figure out why this problem occurs. I must be doing something wrong.
So if I want to select multiple elements that are children to a div I could write:
#mydiv > input, label{
}
Am I correct? I thought this to be true until I realized that other inputs and labels in my site were inheriting these CSS properties even though they were not in the div called #mydiv. To fix the issue I had to use:
#mydiv > input, #mydiv > label {
}
But I am pretty sure that this is not the quickest way to do so. I tried checking the Selector Page on W3.org but they do not give an example for my situation.
What am I doing wrong?
Am I correct?
No. The grouping selector (comma) has the lowest precedence, so you cannot use it to select multiple elements that are children of a div using this selector:
#mydiv > input, label
The most concise selector is the one that you found on your own:
#mydiv > input, #mydiv > label
You can DRY things up a bit using nested rules in LESS or Sass, though that does introduce a dependency in your code and/or build process.
Your second snippet is the simplest way to do it with pure CSS. The comma , separates isolated CSS selectors, so that's why you needed to begin each with #mydiv for both selectors.
You could use something like LESS, which would allow nested rules. Non-germane example:
#header {
h1 {
font-size: 26px;
font-weight: bold;
}
p { font-size: 12px;
a { text-decoration: none;
&:hover { border-width: 1px }
}
}
}
But you're probably better off with pure CSS.
Your second method is good
#mydiv > input, #mydiv > label {
}
If you wanted to somehow do this without using multiple selectors separated by a comma, you could use a class name for both your input and label elements
.your-class-name {
}
or if for some reason input and label were the only two types of child elements for #mydiv, then you could use the universal selector like this:
#mydiv > * {
}
I want to override another style sheet and set the float for all elements to none. If I use 'div, span, a' as the selectors or even 'body div, body span, body a', it doesn't override the previous class selector. I could use !important but this isnt great for obvious reasons.
.class {
float: left;
}
/* my overide */
div, span, a {
float: none;
}
Note- in the code ive only shown the class of 'class', but actaully their are many classes and id's.
Is there a way to do this without using !important? The reason im doing this is im mobile optimizing my site with media queries. I need to remove absolute positioning, floats, etc for all elements, but then i will want to add some of these styles to specific elements.
Thanks
As I wrote in my comment above:
Using the * selector is generally ill-advised. Selectors focus on the
key selector first (the right most selector) and so using the *
selector means that the browser must find all elements on the page.
This is a huge performance issue.
You can read more in this answer: (why) is the CSS star selector considered harmful?
Rather than using the * selector as you have, I'd stick with targetting the elements you want to affect, specifically.
Chances are, there will only be a few types of elements in your page that are floating.
These are usually some divs, perhaps some images, a list or two?
div, img, ul, ol{
float:none;
}
If there's a few more you can include them also.
#jdin; for overide the .class float just write like this:
div.class, span.class, a.class {
float: none;
}
EDIT:
Define an ID in your body tag like this
HTML:
<body id="home">
<div>Tag</div>
<span class="class">Class</span>
<div id="id">ID</div>
</body>
CSS:
body#home *{background:pink;border:1px solid #000}
Check this example http://jsfiddle.net/sandeep/D7Sg6/2/
Hey SO, I am a bit rusty with my CSS, so bear with me :)
I am working with a layout that has a border-bottom property for h2,h3,h4,h5,h6. One of my pages uses h3 to display titles for a FAQ listing, and it has an anchor tag since there is an expand/contract script active (click title, FAQ appears below title). I do not want these particular h3 elements to have the border. Is there a particular CSS syntax that I can use to achieve this? maybe something like:
#content a,h3 {
border-bottom:none;
}
This is obviously wrong since it will just clear any bottom borders for any a/h3 elements that reside in my content container.
thanks!
Clarification:
<h3>Text</h3>
There's no CSS selector that will select elements based on their parent. The best solution is to give the FAQ container an ID or class and then:
#faq h3 {
border-bottom: none;
}
The following is a demonstration of what each css-selector would match to. Note that it is not acceptable by web-standards to place h3's within a's.
a h3 { styles }
<h3>Hello</h3>
h3 a { styles }
<h3>Hello</h3>
Use this instead :
h3>a { text-decoration: none; }
Doing so you target every 'a' childs of 'h3'
Prefer the use of classes and tags selectors versus ids the most you can, as targeting ids tend to make your css code less flexible and extensible. Think inheritance as in OOP.
For further reading and complete coverage of the CSS selectors you can refer to :
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-CSS2-20090423/selector.html#child-selectors
Cheers
#content a>h3 { border-bottom:none; }
should do it. The > means 'next tag must be'.
#content a h3 { border-bottom:none; }
would probably work too.
You use the comma for multiple rules e.g
h1, h2, h3 {
color: red;
}
For red h1 to h3
Is it possible to make a CSS class that "inherits" from another CSS class (or more than one).
For example, say we had:
.something { display:inline }
.else { background:red }
What I'd like to do is something like this:
.composite
{
.something;
.else
}
where the ".composite" class would both display inline and have a red background
There are tools like LESS, which allow you to compose CSS at a higher level of abstraction similar to what you describe.
Less calls these "Mixins"
Instead of
/* CSS */
#header {
-moz-border-radius: 8px;
-webkit-border-radius: 8px;
border-radius: 8px;
}
#footer {
-moz-border-radius: 8px;
-webkit-border-radius: 8px;
border-radius: 8px;
}
You could say
/* LESS */
.rounded_corners {
-moz-border-radius: 8px;
-webkit-border-radius: 8px;
border-radius: 8px;
}
#header {
.rounded_corners;
}
#footer {
.rounded_corners;
}
You can add multiple classes to a single DOM element, e.g.
<div class="firstClass secondClass thirdclass fourthclass"></div>
Rules given in later classes (or which are more specific) override. So the fourthclass in that example kind of prevails.
Inheritance is not part of the CSS standard.
Yes, but not exactly with that syntax.
.composite,
.something { display:inline }
.composite,
.else { background:red }
Keep your common attributes together and assign specific (or override) attributes again.
/* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ */
/* Headings */
/* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ */
h1, h2, h3, h4
{
font-family : myfind-bold;
color : #4C4C4C;
display:inline-block;
width:900px;
text-align:left;
background-image: linear-gradient(0, #F4F4F4, #FEFEFE);/* IE6 & IE7 */
}
h1
{
font-size : 300%;
padding : 45px 40px 45px 0px;
}
h2
{
font-size : 200%;
padding : 30px 25px 30px 0px;
}
The SCSS way for the given example, would be something like:
.something {
display: inline
}
.else {
background: red
}
.composite {
#extend .something;
#extend .else;
}
More info, check the sass basics
An element can take multiple classes:
.classOne { font-weight: bold; }
.classTwo { font-famiy: verdana; }
<div class="classOne classTwo">
<p>I'm bold and verdana.</p>
</div>
And that's about as close as you're going to get unfortunately. I'd love to see this feature, along with class-aliases someday.
No you can't do something like
.composite
{
.something;
.else
}
This are no "class" names in the OO sense. .something and .else are just selectors nothing more.
But you can either specify two classes on an element
<div class="something else">...</div>
or you might look into another form of inheritance
.foo {
background-color: white;
color: black;
}
.bar {
background-color: inherit;
color: inherit;
font-weight: normal;
}
<div class="foo">
<p class="bar">Hello, world</p>
</div>
Where the paragraphs backgroundcolor and color are inherited from the settings in the enclosing div which is .foo styled. You might have to check the exact W3C specification. inherit is default for most properties anyway but not for all.
I ran into this same problem and ended up using a JQuery solution to make it seem like a class can inherit other classes.
<script>
$(function(){
$(".composite").addClass("something else");
});
</script>
This will find all elements with the class "composite" and add the classes "something" and "else" to the elements. So something like <div class="composite">...</div> will end up like so: <div class="composite something else">...</div>
You can do is this
CSS
.car {
font-weight: bold;
}
.benz {
background-color: blue;
}
.toyota {
background-color: white;
}
HTML
<div class="car benz">
<p>I'm bold and blue.</p>
</div>
<div class="car toyota">
<p>I'm bold and white.</p>
</div>
Don't forget:
div.something.else {
// will only style a div with both, not just one or the other
}
You can use the converse approach to achieve the same result - start from the composite and then remove styling using the unset keyword. For example, if you start with the following sample composition:
.composite {
color: red;
margin-left: 50px;
background-color: green
}
you can then increase selector specificity to selectively remove styles using unset:
.composite.no-color {
color: unset
}
.composite.no-margin-left {
margin-left: unset
}
.composite.no-background-color {
background-color: unset
}
Here is a JSFiddle demonstrating this approach.
One benefit of this approach is that because the specificity of the compound selectors is higher than the composite itself, you do not need all of the combinations of classes to achieve the desired results for multiple combinations:
/* Multi-unset compound selector combinations, such as the one that follows, ARE NOT NECESSARY because of the higher specificity of each individual compound selectors listed above. This keeps things simple. */
.composite.no-background-color.no-color.no-margin-left {
background-color: unset;
color: unset;
margin-left: unset
}
Furthermore, at 96% support for the unset keyword, browser coverage is excellent.
Perfect timing: I went from this question to my email, to find an article about Less, a Ruby library that among other things does this:
Since super looks just like footer, but with a different font, I'll use Less's class inclusion technique (they call it a mixin) to tell it to include these declarations too:
#super {
#footer;
font-family: cursive;
}
In Css file:
p.Title
{
font-family: Arial;
font-size: 16px;
}
p.SubTitle p.Title
{
font-size: 12px;
}
I realize this question is now very old but, here goes nothin!
If the intent is to add a single class that implies the properties of multiple classes, as a native solution, I would recommend using JavaScript/jQuery (jQuery is really not necessary but certainly useful)
If you have, for instance .umbrellaClass that "inherits" from .baseClass1 and .baseClass2 you could have some JavaScript that fires on ready.
$(".umbrellaClass").addClass("baseClass1");
$(".umbrellaClass").addClass("baseClass2");
Now all elements of .umbrellaClass will have all the properties of both .baseClasss. Note that, like OOP inheritance, .umbrellaClass may or may not have its own properties.
The only caveat here is to consider whether there are elements being dynamically created that won't exist when this code fires, but there are simple ways around that as well.
Sucks css doesn't have native inheritance, though.
Unfortunately, CSS does not provide 'inheritance' in the way that programming languages like C++, C# or Java do. You can't declare a CSS class an then extend it with another CSS class.
However, you can apply more than a single class to an tag in your markup ... in which case there is a sophisticated set of rules that determine which actual styles will get applied by the browser.
<span class="styleA styleB"> ... </span>
CSS will look for all the styles that can be applied based on what your markup, and combine the CSS styles from those multiple rules together.
Typically, the styles are merged, but when conflicts arise, the later declared style will generally win (unless the !important attribute is specified on one of the styles, in which case that wins). Also, styles applied directly to an HTML element take precedence over CSS class styles.
Don't think of css classes as object oriented classes, think of them as merely a tool among other selectors to specify which attribute classes an html element is styled by. Think of everything between the braces as the attribute class, and selectors on the left-hand side tell the elements they select to inherit attributes from the attribute class. Example:
.foo, .bar { font-weight : bold; font-size : 2em; /* attribute class A */}
.foo { color : green; /* attribute class B */}
When an element is given the attribute class="foo", it is useful to think of it not as inheriting attributes from class .foo, but from attribute class A and attribute class B. I.e., the inheritance graph is one level deep, with elements deriving from attribute classes, and the selectors specifying where the edges go, and determining precedence when there are competing attributes (similar to method resolution order).
The practical implication for programming is this. Say you have the style sheet given above, and want to add a new class .baz, where it should have the same font-size as .foo. The naive solution would be this:
.foo, .bar { font-weight : bold; font-size : 2em; /* attribute class A */}
.foo { color : green; /* attribute class B */}
.baz { font-size : 2em; /* attribute class C, hidden dependency! */}
Any time I have to type something twice I get so mad! Not only do I have to write it twice, now I have no way of programatically indicating that .foo and .baz should have the same font-size, and I've created a hidden dependency! My above paradigm would suggest that I should abstract out the font-size attribute from attribute class A:
.foo, .bar, .baz { font-size : 2em; /* attribute base class for A */}
.foo, .bar { font-weight : bold; /* attribute class A */}
.foo { color : green; /* attribute class B */}
The main complaint here is that now I have to retype every selector from attribute class A again to specify that the elements they should select should also inherit attributes from attribute base class A. Still, the alternatives are to have to remember to edit every attribute class where there are hidden dependencies each time something changes, or to use a third party tool. The first option makes god laugh, the second makes me want to kill myself.
That's not possible in CSS.
The only thing supported in CSS is being more specific than another rule:
span { display:inline }
span.myclass { background: red }
A span with class "myclass" will have both properties.
Another way is by specifying two classes:
<div class="something else">...</div>
The style of "else" will override (or add) the style of "something"
As others have said, you can add multiple classes to an element.
But that's not really the point. I get your question about inheritance. The real point is that inheritance in CSS is done not through classes, but through element hierarchies. So to model inherited traits you need to apply them to different levels of elements in the DOM.
While direct inheritance isn't possible.
It is possible to use a class (or id) for a parent tag and then use CSS combinators to alter child tag behaviour from it's heirarchy.
p.test{background-color:rgba(55,55,55,0.1);}
p.test > span{background-color:rgba(55,55,55,0.1);}
p.test > span > span{background-color:rgba(55,55,55,0.1);}
p.test > span > span > span{background-color:rgba(55,55,55,0.1);}
p.test > span > span > span > span{background-color:rgba(55,55,55,0.1);}
p.test > span > span > span > span > span{background-color:rgba(55,55,55,0.1);}
p.test > span > span > span > span > span > span{background-color:rgba(55,55,55,0.1);}
p.test > span > span > span > span > span > span > span{background-color:rgba(55,55,55,0.1);}
p.test > span > span > span > span > span > span > span > span{background-color:rgba(55,55,55,0.1);}
<p class="test"><span>One <span>possible <span>solution <span>is <span>using <span>multiple <span>nested <span>tags</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
I wouldn't suggest using so many spans like the example, however it's just a proof of concept. There are still many bugs that can arise when trying to apply CSS in this manner. (For example altering text-decoration types).
I was looking for that like crazy too and I just figured it out by trying different things :P... Well you can do it like that:
composite.something, composite.else
{
blblalba
}
It suddenly worked for me :)
In specific circumstances you can do a "soft" inheritance:
.composite
{
display:inherit;
background:inherit;
}
.something { display:inline }
.else { background:red }
This only works if you are adding the .composite class to a child element. It is "soft" inheritance because any values not specified in .composite are not inherited obviously. Keep in mind it would still be less characters to simply write "inline" and "red" instead of "inherit".
Here is a list of properties and whether or not they do this automatically:
https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/propidx.html
Less and Sass are CSS pre-processors which extend CSS language in valuable ways. Just one of many improvements they offer is just the option you're looking for. There are some very good answers with Less and I will add Sass solution.
Sass has extend option which allows one class to be fully extended to another one. More about extend you can read in this article
I think this one is a better solution:
[class*=“button-“] {
/* base button properties */
}
.button-primary { ... }
.button-plain { ... }
Actually what you're asking for exists - however it's done as add-on modules. Check out this question on Better CSS in .NET for examples.
Check out Larsenal's answer on using LESS to get an idea of what these add-ons do.
CSS doesn't really do what you're asking. If you want to write rules with that composite idea in mind, you may want to check out compass. It's a stylesheet framework which looks similar to the already mentioned Less.
It lets you do mixins and all that good business.
For those who are not satisfied with the mentioned (excellent) posts, you can use your programming skills to make a variable (PHP or whichever) and have it store the multiple class names.
That's the best hack I could come up with.
<style>
.red { color: red; }
.bold { font-weight: bold; }
</style>
<? define('DANGERTEXT','red bold'); ?>
Then apply the global variable to the element you desire rather than the class names themselves
<span class="<?=DANGERTEXT?>"> Le Champion est Ici </span>
Have a look at CSS compose:
https://bambielli.com/til/2017-08-11-css-modules-composes/
according to them:
.serif-font {
font-family: Georgia, serif;
}
.display {
composes: serif-font;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 35px;
}
I use it in my react project.
If you want a more powerful text preprocessor than LESS, check out PPWizard:
http://dennisbareis.com/ppwizard.htm
Warning the website is truly hideous and there's a small learning curve, but it's perfect for building both CSS and HTML code via macros. I've never understood why more web coders don't use it.
You can achieve what you want if you preprocess your .css files through php.
...
$something='color:red;'
$else='display:inline;';
echo '.something {'. $something .'}';
echo '.else {'. $something .'}';
echo '.somethingelse {'. $something .$else '}';
...