This question already has answers here:
Create counter within consecutive runs of certain values
(6 answers)
Closed 1 year ago.
I have this vector :
x = c(1,1,1,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,1)
And I want to do a cumulative sum for the positive numbers only. I should have the following vector in return:
xc = (1,2,3,4,5,0,1,0,0,0,1,2)
How could I do it?
I've tried : cumsum(x) but that do the cumulative sum for all values and gives :
cumsum(x)
[1] 1 2 3 4 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 8
One option is
x1 <- inverse.rle(within.list(rle(x), values[!!values] <-
(cumsum(values))[!!values]))
x[x1!=0] <- ave(x[x1!=0], x1[x1!=0], FUN=seq_along)
x
#[1] 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
Or a one-line code would be
x[x>0] <- with(rle(x), sequence(lengths[!!values]))
x
#[1] 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
Here's a possible solution using data.table v >= 1.9.5 and its new rleid funciton
library(data.table)
as.data.table(x)[, cumsum(x), rleid(x)]$V1
## [1] 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
Base R, one line solution with Map Reduce :
> Reduce('c', Map(function(u,v) if(v==0) rep(0,u) else 1:u, rle(x)$lengths, rle(x)$values))
[1] 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
Or:
unlist(Map(function(u,v) if(v==0) rep(0,u) else 1:u, rle(x)$lengths, rle(x)$values))
x=c(1,1,1,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,1)
cumsum_ <- function(x) {
r <- rle(x)
s <- split(x, rep(seq_along(r$values), rle(x)$lengths))
return(unlist(sapply(s, cumsum), use.names = F))
}
(xc <- cumsum_(x))
# [1] 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
I dont know much of R but i have written a small code in Python. Logic remains the same in all language. Hope this will help you
x=[1,1,1,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,1]
tot=0
for i in range(0,len(x)):
if x[i]!=0:
tot=tot+x[i]
x[i]=tot
else:
tot=0
print x
x<-c(1,1,1,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,1)
skumulowana<-function(x) {
dl<-length(x)
xx<-numeric(dl+1)
for (i in 1:dl){
ifelse (x[i]==0,xx[i+1]<-0,xx[i+1]<-xx[i]+x[i])
}
wynik<<-xx[1:dl+1]
return (wynik)
}
skumulowana(x)
## [1] 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
Try this one-liner...
Reduce(function(x,y) (x+y)*(y!=0), x, accumulate=T)
split and lapply version:
x <- c(1,1,1,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,1)
unlist(lapply(split(x, cumsum(x==0)), cumsum))
step by step:
a <- split(x, cumsum(x==0)) # divides x into pieces where each 0 starts a new piece
b <- lapply(a, cumsum) # calculates cumsum in each piece
unlist(b) # rejoins the pieces
Result has useless names but is otherwise what you wanted:
# 01 02 03 04 05 11 12 2 3 41 42 43
# 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
Here is another base R solution using aggregate. The idea is to make a data frame with x and a new column named x.1 by which we can apply aggregate functions (cumsum in this case):
x <- c(1,1,1,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,1)
r <- rle(x)
df <- data.frame(x,
x.1=unlist(sapply(1:length(r$lengths), function(i) rep(i, r$lengths[i]))))
# df
# x x.1
# 1 1 1
# 2 1 1
# 3 1 1
# 4 1 1
# 5 1 1
# 6 0 2
# 7 1 3
# 8 0 4
# 9 0 4
# 10 0 4
# 11 1 5
# 12 1 5
agg <- aggregate(df$x~df$x.1, df, cumsum)
as.vector(unlist(agg$`df$x`))
# [1] 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
Related
I have a vector of numbers in a data.frame such as below.
df <- data.frame(a = c(1,2,3,4,2,3,4,5,8,9,10,1,2,1))
I need to create a new column which gives a running count of entries that are greater than their predecessor. The resulting column vector should be this:
0,1,2,3,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,0,1,0
My attempt is to create a "flag" column of diffs to mark when the values are greater.
df$flag <- c(0,diff(df$a)>0)
> df$flag
0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0
Then I can apply some dplyr group/sum magic to almost get the right answer, except that the sum doesn't reset when flag == 0:
df %>% group_by(flag) %>% mutate(run=cumsum(flag))
a flag run
1 1 0 0
2 2 1 1
3 3 1 2
4 4 1 3
5 2 0 0
6 3 1 4
7 4 1 5
8 5 1 6
9 8 1 7
10 9 1 8
11 10 1 9
12 1 0 0
13 2 1 10
14 1 0 0
I don't want to have to resort to a for() loop because I have several of these running sums to compute with several hundred thousand rows in a data.frame.
Here's one way with ave:
ave(df$a, cumsum(c(F, diff(df$a) < 0)), FUN=seq_along) - 1
[1] 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 0
We can get a running count grouped by diff(df$a) < 0. Which are the positions in the vector that are less than their predecessors. We add c(F, ..) to account for the first position. The cumulative sum of that vector creates an index for grouping. The function ave can carry out a function on that index, we use seq_along for a running count. But since it starts at 1, we subtract by one ave(...) - 1 to start from zero.
A similar approach using dplyr:
library(dplyr)
df %>%
group_by(cumsum(c(FALSE, diff(a) < 0))) %>%
mutate(row_number() - 1)
You don't need dplyr:
fun <- function(x) {
test <- diff(x) > 0
y <- cumsum(test)
c(0, y - cummax(y * !test))
}
fun(df$a)
[1] 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 0
a <- c(1,2,3,4,2,3,4,5,8,9,10,1,2,1)
f <- c(0, diff(a)>0)
ifelse(f, cumsum(f), f)
that it is without reset.
with reset:
unlist(tapply(f, cumsum(c(0, diff(a) < 0)), cumsum))
I would love some help understanding the syntax needed to do a certain calculation in R.
I have a dataframe like this:
a b c
1 1 0
2 1 1
3 1 0
4 2 0
5 2 0
6 3 1
7 3 0
8 3 0
9 4 0
and I want to create a new column "d" that has a value of 1 if (and only if) any of the values in column "c" equal 1 for each group of rows that have the same value in column "b." Otherwise (see rows 4,5 and 9) column "d" gives 0.
a b c d
1 1 0 1
2 1 1 1
3 1 0 1
4 2 0 0
5 2 0 0
6 3 1 1
7 3 0 1
8 3 0 1
9 4 0 0
Can this be done with a for loop? If so, any advice on how to write that would be greatly appreciated.
Using data.table
setDT(df)
df[, d := as.integer(any(c == 1L)), b]
Since you asked for a loop:
# adding the result col
dat <- data.frame(dat, d = rep(NA, nrow(dat)))
# iterate over group
for(i in unique(dat$b)){
# chek if there is a one for
# each group
if(any(dat$c[dat$b == i] == 1))
dat$d[dat$b == i] <- 1
else
dat$d[dat$b == i] <- 0
}
of course the data.table solutions is more elegant ;)
To do this in base R (using the same general function as the dat.table method any), you can use ave:
df$d <- ave(cbind(df$c), df$b, FUN=function(i) any(i)==1)
I have a vector of numbers in a data.frame such as below.
df <- data.frame(a = c(1,2,3,4,2,3,4,5,8,9,10,1,2,1))
I need to create a new column which gives a running count of entries that are greater than their predecessor. The resulting column vector should be this:
0,1,2,3,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,0,1,0
My attempt is to create a "flag" column of diffs to mark when the values are greater.
df$flag <- c(0,diff(df$a)>0)
> df$flag
0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0
Then I can apply some dplyr group/sum magic to almost get the right answer, except that the sum doesn't reset when flag == 0:
df %>% group_by(flag) %>% mutate(run=cumsum(flag))
a flag run
1 1 0 0
2 2 1 1
3 3 1 2
4 4 1 3
5 2 0 0
6 3 1 4
7 4 1 5
8 5 1 6
9 8 1 7
10 9 1 8
11 10 1 9
12 1 0 0
13 2 1 10
14 1 0 0
I don't want to have to resort to a for() loop because I have several of these running sums to compute with several hundred thousand rows in a data.frame.
Here's one way with ave:
ave(df$a, cumsum(c(F, diff(df$a) < 0)), FUN=seq_along) - 1
[1] 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 0
We can get a running count grouped by diff(df$a) < 0. Which are the positions in the vector that are less than their predecessors. We add c(F, ..) to account for the first position. The cumulative sum of that vector creates an index for grouping. The function ave can carry out a function on that index, we use seq_along for a running count. But since it starts at 1, we subtract by one ave(...) - 1 to start from zero.
A similar approach using dplyr:
library(dplyr)
df %>%
group_by(cumsum(c(FALSE, diff(a) < 0))) %>%
mutate(row_number() - 1)
You don't need dplyr:
fun <- function(x) {
test <- diff(x) > 0
y <- cumsum(test)
c(0, y - cummax(y * !test))
}
fun(df$a)
[1] 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 0
a <- c(1,2,3,4,2,3,4,5,8,9,10,1,2,1)
f <- c(0, diff(a)>0)
ifelse(f, cumsum(f), f)
that it is without reset.
with reset:
unlist(tapply(f, cumsum(c(0, diff(a) < 0)), cumsum))
I've got a column in my dataset that contains a collection of 0,1 and 2. The 2's are a weird leftover from some previous transformation, and I need to convert them to 1. I've written a simple loop to do this
for (i in my.cl.accept$enroll){
if (i==2){
i=1
}
}
however, this doesn't change the actual contents of the dataframe. ifelse() doesn't work, because I don't need to change the other digits at all; just the number 2.
I've been using R a little more after coming from python, what simple thing am I misunderstanding here?
Lets generate a sample set:
set.seed(10)
DF <- data.frame(
a=1:10,
b=sample(0:2,10,rep=T))
DF
Now, replace every entry corresponding to 2 with 1:
DF$b[DF$b==2] <- 1
DF
Note: This is a vectorized method, and will always work faster than loop iterations.
Dunno whether this is what you want?
> A<- 1:10
> B<- c(rep(0,5), rep(1,3), rep(2,2))
> data <- data.frame(A,B)
> data
A B
1 1 0
2 2 0
3 3 0
4 4 0
5 5 0
6 6 1
7 7 1
8 8 1
9 9 2
10 10 2
> data[data$B==2,]$B <- 1
> data
A B
1 1 0
2 2 0
3 3 0
4 4 0
5 5 0
6 6 1
7 7 1
8 8 1
9 9 1
10 10 1
Are you sure you're using ifelse correctly? It actually does allow you to only change one value to another. Here's an example:
> x <- sample(c(0, 1, 2), 10, TRUE)
> x
## [1] 2 1 1 0 2 2 0 0 2 1
> ifelse(x == 2, 1, x)
## [1] 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1
For future reference, your good old-fashioned for loop should go something like this...
for (i in 1:length(my.cl.accept$enroll)){
if (my.cl.accept$enroll[i] == 2){
my.cl.accept$enroll[i] <- 1
} else {
my.cl.accept$enroll[i]
}
}
I am trying to reshape the following dataset with reshape(), without much results.
The starting dataset is in "wide" form, with each id described through one row. The dataset is intended to be adopted for carry out Multistate analyses (a generalization of Survival Analysis).
Each person is recorded for a given overall time span. During this period the subject can experience a number of transitions among states (for simplicity let us fix to two the maximum number of distinct states that can be visited). The first visited state is s1 = 1, 2, 3, 4. The person stays within the state for dur1 time periods, and the same applies for the second visited state s2:
id cohort s1 dur1 s2 dur2
1 1 3 4 2 5
2 0 1 4 4 3
The dataset in long format which I woud like to obtain is:
id cohort s
1 1 3
1 1 3
1 1 3
1 1 3
1 1 2
1 1 2
1 1 2
1 1 2
1 1 2
2 0 1
2 0 1
2 0 1
2 0 1
2 0 4
2 0 4
2 0 4
In practice, each id has dur1 + dur2 rows, and s1 and s2 are melted in a single variable s.
How would you do this transformation? Also, how would you cmoe back to the original dataset "wide" form?
Many thanks!
dat <- cbind(id=c(1,2), cohort=c(1, 0), s1=c(3, 1), dur1=c(4, 4), s2=c(2, 4), dur2=c(5, 3))
You can use reshape() for the first step, but then you need to do some more work. Also, reshape() needs a data.frame() as its input, but your sample data is a matrix.
Here's how to proceed:
reshape() your data from wide to long:
dat2 <- reshape(data.frame(dat), direction = "long",
idvar = c("id", "cohort"),
varying = 3:ncol(dat), sep = "")
dat2
# id cohort time s dur
# 1.1.1 1 1 1 3 4
# 2.0.1 2 0 1 1 4
# 1.1.2 1 1 2 2 5
# 2.0.2 2 0 2 4 3
"Expand" the resulting data.frame using rep()
dat3 <- dat2[rep(seq_len(nrow(dat2)), dat2$dur), c("id", "cohort", "s")]
dat3[order(dat3$id), ]
# id cohort s
# 1.1.1 1 1 3
# 1.1.1.1 1 1 3
# 1.1.1.2 1 1 3
# 1.1.1.3 1 1 3
# 1.1.2 1 1 2
# 1.1.2.1 1 1 2
# 1.1.2.2 1 1 2
# 1.1.2.3 1 1 2
# 1.1.2.4 1 1 2
# 2.0.1 2 0 1
# 2.0.1.1 2 0 1
# 2.0.1.2 2 0 1
# 2.0.1.3 2 0 1
# 2.0.2 2 0 4
# 2.0.2.1 2 0 4
# 2.0.2.2 2 0 4
You can get rid of the funky row names too by using rownames(dat3) <- NULL.
Update: Retaining the ability to revert to the original form
In the example above, since we dropped the "time" and "dur" variables, it isn't possible to directly revert to the original dataset. If you feel this is something you would need to do, I suggest keeping those columns in and creating another data.frame with the subset of the columns that you need if required.
Here's how:
Use aggregate() to get back to "dat2":
aggregate(cbind(s, dur) ~ ., dat3, unique)
# id cohort time s dur
# 1 2 0 1 1 4
# 2 1 1 1 3 4
# 3 2 0 2 4 3
# 4 1 1 2 2 5
Wrap reshape() around that to get back to "dat1". Here, in one step:
reshape(aggregate(cbind(s, dur) ~ ., dat3, unique),
direction = "wide", idvar = c("id", "cohort"))
# id cohort s.1 dur.1 s.2 dur.2
# 1 2 0 1 4 4 3
# 2 1 1 3 4 2 5
There are probably better ways, but this might work.
df <- read.table(text = '
id cohort s1 dur1 s2 dur2
1 1 3 4 2 5
2 0 1 4 4 3',
header=TRUE)
hist <- matrix(0, nrow=2, ncol=9)
hist
for(i in 1:nrow(df)) {
hist[i,] <- c(rep(df[i,3], df[i,4]), rep(df[i,5], df[i,6]), rep(0, (9 - df[i,4] - df[i,6])))
}
hist
hist2 <- cbind(df[,1:2], hist)
colnames(hist2) <- c('id', 'cohort', paste('x', seq_along(1:9), sep=''))
library(reshape2)
hist3 <- melt(hist2, id.vars=c('id', 'cohort'), variable.name='x', value.name='state')
hist4 <- hist3[order(hist3$id, hist3$cohort),]
hist4
hist4 <- hist4[ , !names(hist4) %in% c("x")]
hist4 <- hist4[!(hist4[,2]==0 & hist4[,3]==0),]
Gives:
id cohort state
1 1 1 3
3 1 1 3
5 1 1 3
7 1 1 3
9 1 1 2
11 1 1 2
13 1 1 2
15 1 1 2
17 1 1 2
2 2 0 1
4 2 0 1
6 2 0 1
8 2 0 1
10 2 0 4
12 2 0 4
14 2 0 4
Of course, if you have more than two states per id then this would have to be modified (and it might have to be modified if you have more than two cohorts). For example, I suppose with 9 sample periods one person could be in the following sequence of states:
1 3 2 4 3 4 1 1 2