For example, I have two sibling pages Index.aspx and Orders.aspx in one folder. On the page Index.aspx I have the link to Orders.aspx. What is the correct way to implement this:
<a runat="server" href="~/Orders.aspx">
or
<a href="Orders.aspx">
I know what runat="server" does (server-control, performance impact etc.).
You really never need to run markup with a run at server tag if it's never used in code behind, if it is then you should use a ASP.NET control for it.
So just a hyperlink without runat=server would be fine.
It's always best to use ASP.NET controls on your page though if an upgrade in the future could require language translations, or have some logic assigned to them in the future. So always plan ahead on your designs.
If both views are in the same folder, than the second one:
<a href="Orders.aspx">
Related
Climbing the learning curve for creating asp.net webform pages with Visual Studio 2010 (VB).
I had written a fairly complicated .aspx page with form controls, including textboxes and buttons, etc. I never thought to place the form controls inside a <form> block. Instead, all the controls include the "runat" directive; for example, <asp:textbox id="txtUserName" runat="server"> etc. In the codebehind I access the data with strUserName = txtUserName.text. This seems to work just fine.
Now, though, I received some form pages from our contracted "professional" web developer wherein the form code is all enclosed in a <form runat="server">block, and none of the controls include the runat directive. Accessing the data from these controls is a little different: It uses the <input type="text name="txtUserName" id="txtUserName" /> method, and accessing the data in the codebehind
is strUserName = Request.Form("txtUserName").ToString.
My method seems to work fine, but I am wondering if there is a difference in behavior or reliability between my method and his. Even though my way works, am I doing it wrong?
Mine is based on online research I have done to learn this stuff, and I don't remember seeing anything that looked like his. However, just today I see places that are saying that on .aspx pages, form controls MUST be enclosed in a <form> block (i.e., this page at w3schools.com).
Can anyone clarify this for me?
Thanks for your help!
You're not doing it incorrectly (you're using my preferred approach) but your inputs should still be in an enclosing Form tag.
He's using HtmlControls (System.Web.UI.HtmlControls namespace) and you're using web controls (System.Web.UI.WebControls.) Your controls provide better functionality on the server (viewstate and accessing via server code) and his approach is lighter weight.
I have an aspx page and controls on it. For the purpose consuming it at client side javascript I would like to place attributes for my elements. I would like to do it all in the markup, not in code behind. It seems the placed attributes will be all lowercased at client side.
For example:
<asp:LinkButton ID="anyButton" runat="server" confirmationMessage='any message'...
will be rendered at client side as:
<a confirmationmessage='any message'...
Consequently I must use this casing all my javascript code. Not a big issue, but quite disturbing if you like strict naming conventions.
Thanks in advance
The deal is that when you have the following on your site it works:
Click Me!
But the above fails to work if that site is a nested application.
I have seen two solutions to this opportunity in asp.net.
The first solution that I found was to add the following:
<a runat="server" href="~/Some/Path/file.aspx" class="button">Click Me!</a>
I have not tried this because I feel it would add more crap to your view state.
The solution that I have tried is:
Click Me!
The question is, what is the preferred method of addressing paths in nested applications?
You want to use HyperLink server control. It is meant for that kind of thing.
<asp:HyperLink runat="server" ID="HyperLink1"
NavigateUrl="~/Some/Path/file.aspx"
CssClass="button">Click Me!</asp:HyperLink>
Render as
<a id="HyperLink1" class="button" href="/Some/Path/file.aspx">Click Me1</a>
ASP.Net HyperLink control uses ResolveClientUrl to resolve the given url, so you do not need to do anything.
Situation: I have been creating webpages in HTML5/CSS3 & Javascript using Sublime 2 text editor for a year, however a college course now requires me to use Asp.Net and Visual Studio 2010. I do not use the designer because I am proficient at doing things by hand, however I find that writing asp: inside every element is time consuming and causes syntax errors when applied to some HTML 5 tags and not others.
Example HTML 5: <button id="btn" type="submit" value="Button"/>
Example Asp.net: <asp:Button ID="Button1" runat="server" Text="Button" />
Question: Can the asp: portion be omitted without effecting anything or is it required for IIS or the C# back-end functionality? What about runat="server" can that be omitted?
Google has come up dry regarding my inquiry, so any help is appreciated.
you simply cannot remove either of the two
but hear me out why, because I have a feeling you are not familiar with ASP and therefor are mistaking the meaning of the asp: and the runat="server" syntax.
first: runat="server"
this property on an element, tells the the compiler that this is actually a server side control
so a <button/> is not the same as an <button runat="server"/>
the first one is pure html, while the second one is a control, which can be bound to on the server side. .Net will give it a clientID (not to be mistaken by the ID you have to give it yourself).
second: asp:
this is a prefix, on certain elements, that tells the compiler these are ASP controls (the default controls given by the ASP.net framework). These include Buttons, TextBoxes, DropDownLists, ...
do not mistake 1 of these with a html element.
an <asp:Button id="myAspButton" runat="server"/>
is not the same as a <button id="myHtmlButton"/>
the first, is a server side control, which can be bound to (see it's runat="server" attribute), and this control renders to the browser as a <input type="submit"/> for example.
you could alter the rendering of the asp.net button class to make it return something entirely differnt if you wish.
and you are also not limited to using asp.net classes.
you can create your own controls, and put them in a custom created library
you could give those your own prefix.
if I created such a custom control, I could register a prefix for it in the web.config file,
and thus I could create a custom button extending from the original one (but with a default label in front...
<myc:CustomButton ID="myButton" Text="myButton" Label="myLabel" runat="server"/>
which could render into:
<label>myLabel</label>
<button ID="*******">myButton</button>
the asterisks are symbolizing the Unique ID it will get from the .net framework
if you want to know more on custom controls, or extending default controls
here is a step by step explanation to create custom controls, or extend from a TextBox control.
it also shows how you add a custom prefix for your controls (in the this case 'cc')
you can find more info here
The runat="server" part is required to tell .NET that it will have to render a button there (which will contain .NET specific ID for processing upon POST). Not too familiar with web forms (I started with MVC), but I would assume that the asp: part is to help distinguish between server controls and standard HTML markup.
Why not try removing it and if it breaks something, then you know it's needed. For instance if the button doesn't show up after removing it, then obviously the .NET markup parser needs it to be there in order to know that it is a place holder for a server control.
I have an aspx document (I know nothing about asp, .net, aspx, nada). It is a normal html table structure for the most part, but there are strings of asp that seem to be inserting some sort of dynamic content. They are in the form:
<asp:Image ID="imgTopImage" runat="server" ImageUrl="~/Images/topbar.jpg" />
<asp:Label ID="lblStyleCaption" runat="server" CssClass="label_caption" Text="Theme: " Visible="false" />
<asp:DropDownList ID="dropStyles" Width="150" runat="server" AutoPostBack="true" />
It seems that whenever I delete one of these——something as innocuous as, say, the line with the asp:Image tag, which I would think should just remove the image, when I load the page I get run-time errors. It's very particular. My question is, is this compiled somehow, which is making it so fragile. Even just changing the topbar.jpg to something.png gives me an error. Do I need to track down the original files this was compiled from, or is this normal server-side asp(x?) that I'm just somehow else goofing up my changes to?
ASPX pages are compiled, and those tags refer to objects that are known to the server, so removing them could cause errors.
First, some basics in layman's terms
Tags that begin with ASP: (Example, <ASP:Button id="btnSubmit" runat="Server" Text="Click Me" />)
are not standard html buttons. They are server controls. When generating the html that goes out to the browser, the ASP.NET runtime looks at the server controls and creates the appropriate content depending on the browser visiting the page.
In the case of the Button control, it's usually a standard html button, but the runtime also generates the JavaScript and such to handle the button's server-side click event.
Why you're probably seeing errors when you remove a control:
Quite often, there's server-side code that's written that accesses these controls. For example, the developer may have decided to change the Text or the Visible property due to some event.
If this is the case, and you remove the <asp:Button> tag, then there will be server-side code that references an object that no longer exists in the aspx page, hence the errors.
More at these links on Server Controls:
http://www.w3schools.com/aspnet/aspnet_controls.asp
(Actually, this older one is better for a new-to-asp.net developer: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/zsyt68f1(VS.71).aspx
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/306459
I'd also recommend taking some time watching basic videos or going through the tutorials at http://www.asp.net/get-started
I just noticed this in your question:
Even just changing the topbar.jpg to something.png gives me an error.
That is a bit odd, but I know of at least one way it could happen...
Generally, Visual Studio will give you a warning (and not an error) if you include a relative URL to an image or a linked page that doesn't exist. The warning shouldn't block you from compiling. However, Visual Studio does have a setting that tells it to treat warnings as errors. That will block it from compiling. Here's how that would be set up:
from Project Settings> Configuration Properties select the build
setting and change the “treat warnings as errors” settings to true.
If you wish to NOT treat warnings as errors, simply change the setting to false.