In "regular" eclipse i'm able to press ctrl(command)-1 on an unknown method and one of the refactor suggestion would be to create it, I can't emulate this behavior in ggts, am I missing something ?
Related
I haven't found anything about this.
In PL/SQL, if I provide a constructor for an object, the default one will still be created, or it's like in C++ or Java?
Yes, the default constructor is still there. Incidently, if you create another constructor with the same name and arguments you'll get an error PLS-307: too many declarations of ... when you try to use it.
I have followed this tutorial for the most part to explain what I am doing. http://www.asp.net/data-access/tutorials/creating-a-business-logic-layer-vb
What i need to do is figure out the best way to approach to be able to update my formview. I do not understand what the tutorial is trying to explain to me so i tried it the way i have updated a gridview before. But I am receiving "No parameterless constructor defined for this object." I tried to debug and view the callstack but it does not really tell me much.
I have my sql stored procedure to update which when executed works fine.
I also have another class in which i reference the application details class
applicant.vb
This is the code in order for when you click the view details link on the gridview it passes you off to another page that shows that applicants details it is within the same applicant.vb class
I am trying to update using the following method on the .aspx page but i receive the following error "No parameterless constructor defined for this object."
Memberdetails.aspx
Without knowing which line of code is causing that error, I can't say for sure, however, my guess is that your error is on this line of code.
_applicantadapter = New applicantTableAdapter
Put an open parentheses after applicantTableAdapter to see the different constructor signatures available to you for that type. I bet you'll see none of the options allow no parameters.
That error means that the object type you are trying to instantiate requires that you include parameter(s) (and you are not).
I'm trying to bind a TableViewer to a
models = List<ModelObject>
, but I don't really get the hang of it. The binding should be possible via master-detail and a databinding context (DataBindingContext), so that I'm able to write the changes of the list (and its elements) to the model only on request (dbc being set to POLICY_ON_REQUEST), i.e. in a saving action of an editor.
With simple Text fields this works like a charm, but I can't find any similar example for TableViewers.
When I look at the API for instance of ViewerSupport, then I can only bind it, but without the option of giving a DBC or a master-detail. This works:
ViewerSupport.bind(aViewer, new WritableList(models, ModelObject.class), BeanProperties.value(ModelObject.class, "name")));
But as stated it doesn't allow to use a dbc nor a master-detail.
Is there a solution to that, or does TableViewer just not support databinding as I intend to use it?
Is there a workaround or some API i missed?
Thx for the answers in advance!
Now that I looked a bit further I figured out how to use master-detail:
tmp = BeansObservables.observeDetailList(masterObservable,
"name", ModelObject.class)
ViewerSupport.bind(aViewer, tmp, BeanProperties.value(ModelObject.class, "name")));
The question remains, how to make the changes in the list and the list elements not directly persisting (that is POLICY_ON_REQUEST), so that I can save them on user request. More specifically: How do I inject a DataBindingContext somewhere...
I am sort of new to Unity all seems to be fine but I am kind of lost when to use
ResolvedParameter in Unity.
Googled and looked on MSDN but still cannot understand when to use it.
Do you have a simple example that could illustrate it's use.
Thanks a lot for your help
You may wish to configure a Type with constructor parameters of a resolved service and a string. In this case you would use ResolvedParameter.
Container.RegisterType<IRepository, Repository>(
new InjectionConstructor(
new ResolvedParameter<IClassifier>(),
"ConnectionString"));
It's for method injection; see Entering Configuration Information on MSDN. Scroll down to "Dynamically Configuring Constructor, Property, and Method Injection" and note that the ResolvedParameter is actually a parameter to the InjectionMethod constructor.
I've never encountered a need to use it. Constructor injection will solve 95% of your issues, and property injection will solve the other 5%. (Caveat: I've only used Unity on a couple of projects, so I don't claim to be an expert.)
As I see it its to be used when you have a constructor where at least one parameter can not be obtained from the container while the rest can. In such a situation you declare how to resolve each ctor parameter when actually creating a new instance of that type.
Container.RegisterSingleton<IConnectionManager, ConnectionManager>(new InjectionConstructor(new ResolvedParameter<INetworkClientFactory>(), Container.Resolve<IBackoffAlgorithm>(), 10));
In my example, the IConnectionManager instance obtains the first parameter from the container (via ResolvedParameter), the 2nd one via Container.Resolve<>, and the 3rd one is a hard-coded integer.
ResolvedParameter should behave equal to a direct Container.Resolve<> but looks a tad cleaner.
I'm re-writing an MXML item renderer in pure AS. A problem I can't seem to get past is how to have each item renderer react to a change on a static property on the item renderer class. In the MXML version, I have the following binding set up on the item renderer:
instanceProperty={callInstanceFunction(ItemRenderer.staticProperty)}
What would be the equivalent way of setting this up in AS (using BindingUtils, I assume)?
UPDATE:
So I thought the following wasn't working, but it appears as if Flex is suppressing errors thrown in the instanceFunction, making it appear as if the binding itself is bad.
BindingUtils.bindSetter(instanceFunction, ItemRenderer, "staticProperty");
However, when instanceFunction is called, already initialized variables on the given instance are all null, which was the cause of the errors referenced above. Any ideas why this is?
You have 2 options that I am aware of:
Option 1
You can dig into the code that the flex compiler builds based on your MXML to see how it handles binding to static properties. There is a compiler directive called -keep-generated-actionscript that will cause generated files to stick around. Sleuthing through these can give you an idea what happens. This option will involve instantiating Binding objects and StaticPropertyWatcher objects.
Option 2
There is staticEventDispatcher object that gets added at build time to classes containing static variables see this post http://thecomcor.blogspot.com/2008/07/adobe-flex-undocumented-buildin.html. According to the post, this object only gets added based on the presence of static variables and not getter functions.
Example of Option 2
Say we have a class named MyClassContainingStaticVariable with a static variable named MyStaticVariable and another variable someobject.somearrayproperty that we want to get updated whenever MyStaticVariable changes.
Class(MyClassContainingStaticVariable).staticEventDispatcher.addEventListener(
PropertyChangeEvent.PROPERTY_CHANGE,
function(event:PropertyChangeEvent):void
{
if(event.property == "MyStaticVariable")
{
someobject.somearrayproperty = event.newValue as Array;
}
});
I think you need to respond to the "PropertyChanged" event.
If you're going to do that, use a singleton instead of static. I don't think it will work on a static. (If you have to do it that way at all, there are probably a couple ways you could reapproach this that would be better).
var instance:ItemRenderer = ItemRenderer.getInstance();
BindingUtils.bindProperty(this, "myProperty", instance, "theirProperty");
After fiddling with this for a while, I have concluded that this currently isn't possible in ActionScript, not even with bindSetter. It seems there are some MXML-only features of data bindings judging by the following excerpt from the Adobe docs (though isn't it all compiled to AS code anyways)?
You cannot include functions or array
elements in property chains in a data
binding expression defined by the
bindProperty() or bindSetter() method.
For more information on property
chains, see Working with bindable
property chains.
Source: http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/help.html?content=databinding_7.html
You can create a HostProxy class to stand in for the funciton call. Sort of like a HostFunctionProxy class which extends from proxy, and has a getProperty("functionInvokeStringWithParameters") which will invoke the function remotely from the host, and dispatch a "change" event to trigger the binding in typical [Bindable("change")] Proxy class.
You than let the HostProxy class act as the host, and use the property to remotely trigger the function call. Of course, it'd be cooler to have some TypeHelperUtil to allow converting raw string values to serialized type values at runtime for method parameters (splitted by commas usually).
Example:
eg.
var standInHost:Object = new HostFunctionProxy(someModelClassWithMethod, "theMethodToCall(20,11)");
// With BindingUtils.....
// bind host: standInHost
// bind property: "theMethodToCall(20,11)"
Of course, you nee to create such a utlity to help support such functionality beyond the basic Flex prescription. It seems many of such (more advanced) Flex bindings are usually done at compile time, but now you have to create code to do this at runtime in a completely cross-platform Actionscript manner without relying on the Flex framework.