Can you float elements that are positioned in any way? Or do floated elements have to be static? For example, is it possible to float elements which are positioned relatively?
Float and position are two different things, although they do influence each other. Floats have zero impact on elements which are positioned absolutely or fixed. Floats only have an impact on elements which are positioned statically (Default) or relatively.
Much of this is dictated by a single subsection within the spec. In particular if you're only concerned about how the position property interacts with the float property, then that subsection says that
you cannot float an element that is absolutely positioned (either position: absolute or position: fixed), but
you can float an element that is either relatively positioned or static (i.e. non-positioned).
In both cases, the position property will take effect as normal, but the float property will not have any effect on an absolutely positioned element. This means that an absolutely positioned element will remain in its absolute position, and a relatively positioned element can still be shifted relative to where it would originally have been located, taking the float property into account (as well as acting as a containing block for other positioned elements).
Related
Am a right to conclude that a CSS margin (e.g. margin-left) influences the final position of an absolute postioned element? It seems a negative margin-left pulls it to the left (of it's absolute postion), a positive value to the right (of it's absolute postion).
Can someone explain me more about the combination absolute positioned elements and margins?
Thanks.
Correct. Margins influence where the edges of an absolutely positioned element begin.
Lets understand it this way:
When you have an statically-positioned element, the element is part of the normal flow of the document. Hence, any margins applied on it are considered 'with respect to its surrounding elements'.
When you have an relatively-positioned element, the element is still part of the normal flow of the document. Hence, any margins applied on it are still considered 'with respect to its surrounding elements'.
BUT,
When you have an absolutely-positioned element, the element is taken out of the normal flow of the document. This element's positioning is now dictated by the first parent container that is not statically positioned (or the top level body element as a fallback). Hence, when you apply margin, the parent container is taken as the 'surrounding element' and the margin in calculated with 'respect to it'.
Hope this helps.
Hy,
I read on the web that absolutely positioned elements have no height. Can someone explain this in a simple way and possible illustrate it with an example.
I think you're a bit confused. You probably heard that elements which contain only absolutely positioned elements have no height. That makes more sense.
An absolutely positioned element, like any element, would have the height of it's content, unless specified otherwise with height or min-height.
An element containing only absolutely (or floated) positioned elements have no height, because their content (a.k.a. the positioned elements) are taken out of the document's flow. Which means, they aren't rendered along the render tree of the document, where inline elements stack horizontally, and block elements are stacked vertically, but are rendered on an absolute position, relative to the nearest positioned ancestor. Because of that, their size doesn't count towards the parent's height.
Are offset properties (left, top, bottom, right) only for non-static positions?
Can they be applied to a statically positioned element? If so, what are the differences from
applying them to non-statically positioned elements?
to offset an element it's position has to be position:relative
the co-ordinates, top, right, bottom and left serve different purposes depending on if the element is relatively or absolutely positioned.
When is an element offset as opposed to moved?
when you actually offset using position: relative; the element is not removed from the flow, and indeed the space that the element would have taken up if it had remained static (the default) is still reserved for it, therefore you have just offset it from it's original position. Any element following it will appear where it would have done even if you hadn't offset it's predecessor - like this example
Moving, not offsetting
If however you actually want to move an element, then it needs to be removed from the flow, so there is no space reserved for it, and then that's when you use position:absolute; or fixed.. that is the difference
Summary
static is the default, and you just use margins to move it around, it will ignore co-ordinates and z-index
relative is reserved space, co-ordinates will offset it from it's original space
absolute will remove the element from the flow and the co-ordinates will be calculated according to it's containing block, which is the nearest relatively positioned ancestor (or the body element if no relatively positioned ancestors exist)
fixed does not have a containing block, i.e. you can't specify which element it should be positioned in relation to, it will just fix itself in relation to the viewport
and finally an element will not accept a z-index if it's position is the default of static, so position: relative; without any co-ordinates applied is similar to static, but it is useful for z-indexing and being a containing block for absolutely positioned elements
It makes little sense to apply them to position: static elements, as they are static.
To shift a static element over by a certain amount, you can change it's position property to position: relative;.
Now, you can shift it around with top, left, etc.
There exist a few more types of position, namely position: fixed and position: absolute.
fixed makes the element fixed to the screen and it's unaffected by scrolling, so it's as if it's stuck to the computer monitor. Setting its top, etc. sets the position.
absolute makes the element positioned relative to the document and ignore all layout rules. Setting it's position sets where it is positioned on the document.
They can be applied to absolute and fixed position elements, which are essentially the same but fixed always uses the document window as its anchor. You can also apply them to relatively positioned elements in which case they are an offset from what is best described as the default inline positioning.
in between lots of floated elements if we give position:relative to any element to use position:absolution inside, will it effect to flow of document?
FLOAT 1 | FLOAT 2 | FLOAT 3 + position relative | Float 4
if i only want to give pixel perfect position to an element inside Float 3 box then what should i do? I need compatibility in all browser including IE6
No, it won't. Position relative normally does not affect the flow of the document (siblings) at all unless it is a browser bug. Of course it is meant to affect how a position:absolute child is positioned.
position: relative is the correct way to allow for an absolutely positioned child element.
No, position: relative won't affect that element's flow, it will just allow you to give child elements absolutely positioned to it, and a few extra tricks (like using z-index to raise it's z stacking index).
what is the containing block of an absolutely positioned element? it seems the rule can be a bit complicated...
the spec should be here:
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#containing-block-details
i want to verify if the following is true:
for simplicity, assume the containing block is a block element (not inline element)...
1) if the absolute positioned element has a closest ancestor that is positioned "non static" (relative, fixed, or absolute), then that ancestor is the containing block. the absolute positioned element is relative to it.
2) if there is no such ancestor, then the viewport is the containing block, and so the absolute positioned element is relative to the viewport.
no matter what the containing block is above, the width:100% or n% and height:100% or n% are both relative to the containing block.
that's why a
<div style="position:absolute;width:100%;height:100%;background:green"></div>
right under <body> will cover up the whole viewport exactly -- no more, no less.
we could also use position: fixed, except IE 6 doesn't support it... and so the poor programmer need to use position: absolute instead... (well, not a big deal)
Is that an accurate description of an absolute positioned element? If so, i think IE 6 and above, FF, Safari, Chrome all follow this behavior accurately?
You are correct. The containing block is the last positioned element. so if you want to explicitly set the container then give it position:relative. Most browsers get this right. CSS doesn't really have a 'viewport', I think the top is the HTML element though don't hold me to that. IE prior to 7 had an unnamed element above HTML though.
Summary:
position: relative
Does nothing except set the positioning context for all the elements contained within it. You can then position: absolute any element it contains by setting (typically one or two) values from the possible top, right, bottom or left.
If you give an element with position: relative a top, right, bottom or left value, it will shift position accordingly but leave a blank space where it would be by default. In other words, it remains within the document flow but offset.
position: absolute
To position something absolutely, you need to ask 'absolutely, but relative to which containing element'? It will either be the entire body (the default) or some other element on the page that is already positioned (usually with relative or absolute - fixed is also useful and supported in IE 7 but see this bug). It is then taken out of the document flow - other elements might appear beneath it, but won't flow around it. If it appears behind another element, you need to set the z-index property to move it in front.
A common solution is to have a centred container (margin: 0 auto) with position: relative within which other items are placed with position: absolute.
Finally, I like this little interactive CSS positioning demo.