Is it possible to display a template for a related pod?
$mypod = pods('custompage', 'page-slug');
$related_pod = $mypod->field('top_feature');
Now I want to call something like
$related_pod->template('FeatureTemplate');
I can't seem to find a solid answer in this docs, is this possible?
What you are trying to do will not work. The problem is that $related_pod is not an object of the Pods class, and therefore you can not call the method template() on it.
It is possible to use the ID of the related item to build a second Pods object for the related post, which we can then call the method template() on. Normally we wouldn't do this because we don't need to and its not the most performant way of working.
Here is how you can do this. IMPORTANT: this assumes that "top_feature" is a single select field, as it is in OP's case. This will not work for a multi-select field.
```
$mypod = pods( 'custompage', 'page-slug' );
$relationship_field = $mypod->field( 'top_feature' );
if ( $relationship_field ) {
//get ID of related item
//Depending on content type you may need to use, 'id', instead of 'ID'
$related_item_id = pods_v( 'ID', $relationship_field );
$related_pod = pods( 'name_of_related_pod', $related_item_id, true );
if ( is_a( $related_pod, 'Pods' && $related_pod->id() === $id ) ) {
$related_pod->template( 'FeatureTemplate' );
}
}
```
Related
I'm using the PowerPack's 'Advanced Posts' widget Elementor addon to display a set of custom posts. It provides useful fields for setting the orderby preference, including title.
However, I want to further customize the sorting method. In this case, the post titles are all names of people, and I want to sort by last names alphabetically, which isn't an option in the field settings.
For example, this is what I have right now sorting by title:
Alex Xela
Edgar Allen
John Doe
But I want it to be sorted as such, by last names:
Edgar Allen
John Doe
Alex Xela
The documentation explains how to customize the query through code, as it seems to use WPquery API, and so far I can manipulate the orderby data of the query as such:
add_action( 'powerpack/query/provider-query', function( $query )
{
//this code gets called upon the query with query_id 'provider-query'
$query->set('orderby', 'title');
});
However, I cannot figure out how to make a custom orderby rule 'last_name' that I can replace 'title' with in the above code that filters by last name.
I was able to get some insight from the accepted answer for https://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/198610/how-to-filter-by-last-name-for-custom-post
However, that seems to be for manual use of the WPquery class, and I can't see how to implement it with respect to the PowerPack API's hook in the code I made above.
For example, with the top answer I mentioned above, they recommended the code to be something that in my particular case would be similar to
add_filter( 'powerpack/query/provider-query', function( $orderby, $query )
{
if( $get_order = $query->get( 'order' ) )
{
if( in_array( strtoupper( $get_order ), ['ASC', 'DESC'] ) )
{
global $wpdb;
$orderby = " SUBSTRING_INDEX( {$wpdb->posts}.post_title, ' ', -1 ) " . $get_order;
}
}
return $orderby;
}, PHP_INT_MAX, 2 );
But that results in a fatal error (it seems the hook API for 'powerpack/query/provider-query' does not accept the callback if it has more than just the $query object passed as its argument.
I have posts with slugs with special characters. One of them is the following:
http://localhost/wp-json/wp/v2/posts?slug=my-post!
Unfortunately, WP REST API not showing the content since it has (!) within the slug.
Is there any solution you guys would recommend?
I have found the solution (at least for my case), not sure if it'll work for you but may indicate you the way to go. We need to tap into the function used to sanitize the slugs, as I said in my comment, by default is wp_parse_slug_list. Looking at the code the function that actually sanitizes the slug is sanitize_title.
Looking at the source code, wp_parse_slug_list calls sanitize_title with only one argument, which means that the context used is save. This means that, for posts that were already saved without being sanitized by this function, the slug won't match and the post will be inaccessible through the API. The solution is to change the sanitizing function slightly by adding a filter:
add_filter('rest_post_collection_params', function($query_params) {
$query_params['slug']['sanitize_callback'] = 'sanitize_rest_api_slug';
return $query_params;
}, 20, 1);
function sanitize_rest_api_slug( $list ) {
if ( ! is_array( $list ) ) {
$list = preg_split( '/[\s,]+/', $list );
}
foreach ( $list as $key => $value ) {
$list[ $key ] = sanitize_title( $value, '', 'query' );
}
return array_unique( $list );
}
The filter is actually being applied on the function get_collection_params() on the class-wp-rest-posts-controller class, but if you look at the source code, the filter has a variable depending on the post_type, so if you have another special kind of posts defined (besides post) you need to add/change a filter for that kind as well.
I hope this helps somebody else like me, even if it's too late for your issue.
What I need to be able to do is apply a value for an attribute in the URL, so only the products match that attribute are displayed. I don't want to do any widgets or other visible filters on the page.
For this I presume I would need to use one of the webhooks, and filtering out all products that are about to be displayed.
Can anyone advise which hook will be best in this case and a simple explanation on how the triggered function will return the new array of products?
Thanks in advance!
NB: I also want to query a custom attribute, which does not have any terms, just a straight key/value.
UPDATE 1
I'm playing with two techniques; one is very reliable, and that's basically to use:
if (!$product->attributes || $product->get_attribute( 'testKey' ) != $_GET["testKey"]) {
//return;
}
at the top of content-product.php, but of course WooCommerce will still say the original value for found_posts. Certainly not ideal.
I've come across that something like this should work in functions.php:
function testFilter($meta_query) {
$meta_query[] = array (
'key' => 'testKey',
'value' => 'testVal',
'compare' => '='
);
return $meta_query;
}
add_filter( 'woocommerce_product_query_meta_query', 'testFilter', 9 );
Except it doesn't, returns no results, doesn't matter if I use LIKE, EXISTS etc. Am I using it wrong?
UPDATE 2
I'm not going to say this is the answer, as this only seems to look for one value within a group of custom attributes, but this result has helped.
add_filter( 'wpv_filter_query', 'wpv_filter_color_attribute' );
function wpv_filter_color_attribute( $query_args) {
$tax_query = array();
$tax_query['taxonomy'] = 'pa_size';
$tax_query['field'] = 'term_id';
$tax_query['terms'] = $_GET['pa_size'];
$query_args['tax_query'] = array($tax_query);
return $query_args;
}
You should replace "pa_size" with your attribute taxonomy slug, also $_GET['pa_size'] with the right URL parameter.
You can filter products by attributes using above code. I have not tried this. But, this may help you.
Hello I am trying to get lowest priority number from all the functions that hook into wp_head.
My code is this.
function wpcrown_wpcss_loaded() {
global $wp_filter;
$lowest_priority = max(array_keys($wp_filter['wp_head']));
add_action('wp_head', 'wpcrown_wpcss_head', $lowest_priority + 1);
$arr = $wp_filter['wp_head'];
}
add_action('wp_head', "wpcrown_wpcss_loaded");
But its shown error like this.
Warning: array_keys() expects parameter 1 to be array
Warning: max() [<a href='function.max'>function.max</a>]: When only one parameter is given, it must be an array in
Please help to solve this.
Thanks
As Benoti said $wp_filter is no longer an array so array_keys is throwing these warnings because expects an array.
If you want to add scripts / styles / whatever you have in wpcrown_wpcss_head at the end of the head (to give priority) this should work:
1) Comment this action:
// add_action('wp_head', "wpcrown_wpcss_loaded");
2) Use this one instead:
add_action('wp_head', "wpcrown_wpcss_head");
Hope it helps.
Be carefull on the use of $wp_filters as an array since WordPress 4.7,
Here is the guidelines for wp .4.,7
Make.wordpress that explain:
If your plugin directly accesses the $wp_filter global rather than using the public hooks API, you might run into compatibility issues.
Case 1: Directly setting callbacks in the $wp_filter array
$wp_filter['save_post'][10]['my_special_key'] = array( 'function' => 'my_callback_function', 'accepted_args' => 2 );
This will no longer work, and will cause a fatal error. $wp_filter['save_post'] is no longer a simple array. Rather, it is an object that implements the ArrayAccess interface.
You have two options to work around. The first (and preferred) method is to use the add_filter() or add_action() functions.
add_action( 'save_post', 'my_callback_function', 10, 2 );
If, for some reason, you absolutely cannot, you can still work around this.
if ( ! isset( $wp_filter['save_post'] ) ) {
$wp_filter['save_post'] = new WP_Hook();
}
$wp_filter[ 'save_post' ]->callbacks[10]['my_special_key'] = array( 'function' => 'my_callback_function', 'accepted_args' => 2 );
Case 2: Directly unsetting callbacks in the $wp_filter array
unset( $wp_filter['save_post'][10][ $my_callback_id ] );
This will fail for the same reason as case one. To work around, you can use the standard remove_filter() / remove_action() functions.
remove_action( 'save_post', 'my_callback_function', 10, 2 );
Or, if you absolutely must access the array directly:
if ( isset( $wp_filter[ 'save_post' ] ) ) {
unset( $wp_filter['save_post']->callbacks[10][ $my_callback_id ] );
}
Case 3: Checking if a hook is an array
if ( isset( $wp_filter['save_post'] ) && is_array( $wp_filter['save_post'] ) ) {
// do something
}
This will always return false. $wp_filter['save_post'] is a WP_Hook object. To check if a hook has callbacks, use has_action() or has_filter()
if ( has_action( 'save_post' ) ) {
// do something
}
Case 4: Moving the $wp_filter array pointer manually
If you’re calling next() or prev() on the $wp_filter array pointer to manually manage the order that callbacks are called in (or if you’re doing it to work around #17817), you will likely be unsuccessful. Use callback priorities, add_action() / add_filter(), and remove_action() / remove_filter() appropriately and let WordPress manage execution order.
I am using search api and Solr, When I echo the result variable , it gave me the following results
stdClass Object
(
[entity] => 442415
[_entity_properties] => Array
(
[search_api_relevance] => 1
[search_api_excerpt] =>
[search_api_item_id] => 442415
)
)
In views i added ( custom text field, that is global variable), With this nid 442415, i will do certain node load operation and finally,
i will get price for the specific product. This code block will execute inside the foreach.
_views_pre_render
Please guideme,
which hook i should use , _views_post_execute or _views_pre_render ?
How to assign new value in to which variable and how to print that in tpl
Finally, i want to display the price on each item
This link resolved my problem.
Solution approach
function mymodule_views_pre_render(&$view) {
if($view->name == 'my_view') {
foreach($view->result as &$row) {
$row->_entity_properties['nothing'] = 'new value';
}
}
}
views-view-field--view-name--display-name--nothing.tpl.php
print $row->_entity_properties['nothing'];