I have two nic in my Linux and I want to run some loopback test (packets sent out from one nic and received from the other). I have extra switch and/or router available but I don't want to use fancy features such as source NAT.
It seems easy at the first glance but I have tried to put the two nic in the same subnet and in different subnets with static routes. But none of them worked.
This is a quite common scenario but I can't find any working solution online. Can anyone help? Thanks
I think you can use network namespace to solve the problem
Related
I've been told that it is bad practice to have two interfaces on the same device on the same subnet. i.e. two Ethernet ports on a switch should be on different subnets. Could somebody explain why this is the case? (preferably simply as possible as I'm new to networking)
Because routing in your OS normally sets one of Ethernet card as out gate to specified subnet and all traffic to this subnet will have only 1 output. Second route to same subnet will have bigger Metrik value and will use to send some data if first interface is down. Even if somebody will send request to second interface answer can have first Ip as sender.
If you try to increase throughput to subnet you must use aggregation of Ethernet link. you`ll have 2 physically link and 1 IP.
subnet is the logical division of the IP network based on the subnet-mask/netmask. So unless you plan to have two different separate networks, you need not to have two different subnets. This link explains most of the possible cases to explain what it means by subnetworks on a switch.
Whether two interfaces on the same subnet is good or bad depends entirely of what you're trying to accomplish.
If you need link redundancy or a simple way of load sharing (L2 or L3) it may the right way to go.
If you need network/uplink redundancy or a more complex way of load sharing (L3 only) you connect to two different networks (multi-homing). This is also the setup for a router connecting the two networks.
I'm new to ROS, wish someone can answer my stupid question.
I have a static IP 140.113.xxx.xxx, and a 4G dongle with floating IP 192.168.8.100. I want to use ROS to transmit data between them. Can ROS do that? Because I found some website said ROS can only transmit data in the same Internet domain, but I think this must have some trick to solve this problem.
this has nothing to do with ROS.Theses are IPs in two different networks, you either create a propper routing or you give a second device an IP in the same net. However 192.168.x.x should not be used in the internet or any other non private networks
Not sure if I should ask this question here, but this is a technology community so why not.
I'm running a local network which is setup like this:
Modem -> Access Point -> Switch -> Server/5 other computers
and my problem is the 5 other computers only two computers can have access to the internet (which are connected though Ethernet).
Also, any device that's connected to my wireless network can't access the internet either.
I know it's not a problem from my ISP since two computers are connected to the internet. And I know it's not a wireless problem since my local server can be reached though the access point.
I'm not sure what is the problem since I replaced all the cables, devices, and done tons of resets.
Appreciate your help, or direction to where I can get help.
Thanks all, but my problem was that I used static IP and didn't assign more than three, two computers and a printer. completely a beginner's mistake.
I don't know if you are familiar with computer networks but I think it's a network problem. Maybe your router (modem) can provide only two IPs and that's why only two computers can connect the internet. To verify this you can check what is your IP, and what is your Subnet Mask. Type ipconfig in your cmd and give me your IP and the subnet mask to check if this is the problem or not.
I'm working on a Wake on LAN service that will run from a web site and should interact with many different platforms - therefore, no Windows-only solutions. When a user registers their system with the web site, I need to get the MAC address to use in constructing the "magic" packet. I have a Java Applet that is able to do this for me and am aware of an ActiveX control that will work, but I'm wondering if there is a way to do this server-side by querying routers/switches. Since the system may be on any of a number of different physical subnets, using ARP won't work -- unless there's a way to configure the router(s) to perform the ARP on my behalf.
Anyone know of any network APIs, proprietary or otherwise, that can be used to look up MAC addresses given an IP address? I think we're using Cisco routers, but it's a complicated network and there may be multiple vendors involved at various levels. I'd like to get some background information on possible solutions before I go to make a sacrifice to the network gods. No point in abasing myself if it's not technically possible. :-)
EDIT: We do have the network infrastructure set up to allow directed broadcast, though figuring out the exact broadcast address since netmasks are not always /24 is another conundrum that I need to solve.
If you are on a local network that uses DHCP you might be able to look in the servers database to get the MAC of the last user with that address. In the future you could watch the network for ARP requests and cache the responses in some sort of table. You might also look at using RMON or SNMP to try and query the Address Tables on the switches and routers.
It should be noted that to use WoL across routers you either need to enable Directed Broadcasts or you need to have a relay server in the local segment.
Been a while since I played routers and swtiches but this might be a starting point for what to query using SNMP http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk362/technologies_tech_note09186a00801c9199.shtml
Use the following:
getmac /s destIp
To get the remote session Mac address.
I don't know if these might be helpful but take a look:
http://www.webdeveloper.com/forum/showthread.php?t=134120
http://www.qualitycodes.com/tutorial.php?articleid=19
You've said everything I can think of...
The source MAC address changes as a packet hops from device to device so unless the client is on the same subnet, the server won't be able to get the MAC address. (You would do it via ARP)
A signed java applet or activex control would be the easiest solution. It would be able to (almost passively) get all the networking info you need (IE doesn't even prompt to run a signed applet)
If you are fully aware of the network that is using the service then you could probably query a gateway's client-list via SNMP or CDP. You would be able to map out IP-Addresses to MAC addresses... but this is really vendor dependent (but common) and wouldn't be much better (imo) than having an applet.
Currently the application is using a Java 6 applet that allows me to extract both the hostname and the MAC address from the remote system. I don't like having this dependency on Java 6, but Snow Leopard and Windows both support it, so I can probably live with it.
On a related-front our networking folks approached me for some help with converting some existing code to ASP.NET. During the conversation I asked if they had live MAC address information (since they do port shutoffs based on suspicious network activity -- viruses/worms). Turns out they do and we may be able to leverage this project to get access to the information from the network database.
I don't think there is any way to accomplish this. When the IP packet goes via the first router the host's MAC information is lost (as you know MAC is only used in ethernet layer). If the router most close to your PC was capable of telling the remote MAC code to you, again it would only see the MAC of the next router between your PC and the "other end".
Start sacrificing.
There's no general way to do this in terms of the network unless you have no routers involved. With a router involved, you will never see the MAC address of the originating system.
This assumes that the originating system only ever has a single network interface, so has only a single MAC address.
In fact, are you even sure that your "magic packet" (whatever that is) will reach the system you want it to reach, through the routers? That sounds like a function the routers or other network infrastructure should be performing.
Mac address is only used on network segments, and is lost at each hop. Only IP is preserved for end-to-end - and even then the from ip address is rewritten when Natted. I guess my answer is, not possible unless everything is on the same network segment, or your routers are set up for proxy arp (which is not really realistic).
You can only get MAC entries in the ARP table for machines on the same network. If you connect to a machine via a router then you will only see the routers MAC address in the ARP table. So there is no way of knowing the foreign host’s MAC address unless it's a host on the same network (no routers involved).
And by the way there are many similar question already on SO.
if it's a windows system you can use NBTSTAT -A
this will return the netbios info and the IP is there
any Management system like SMS or Altiris will have this info
The DHCP server is a good idea
If it's local you can ping it and then quickly run ARP -a
look for the IP and the MAC will be there.
you might need to write a small batch file.
if you have access to the PC you can use WMI to access the info for the Nic with DHCP.
As said above we can get mac address from a known IP address if that host is in the same subnet. First ping that ip; then look at arp -a | grep and parse the string on nix* to get mac address.
We can issue system command from all programming languages standard API's and can parse the output to get mac address.Java api can ping an IP but I am not sure if we parse the ping output(some library can do it).
It would be better to avoid issuing system command and find an alternative solution as it is not really Platform Independent way of doing it.
Courtesy: Professor Saleem Bhatti
I have 2 network devices that talk to each other over Ethernet. I would like to sniff the traffic using Wireshark. But the devices are going through a switch. The switch routes the traffic to only the ports that need the data.
At another location I have a hub. All the traffic is repeated across all the ports.
Is there a way to tell the switch to send the traffic down my port also?
EDIT: This is an unmanaged switch.
You might want to look into ARP spoofing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARP_poisoning
Since this is an unmanaged switch, the only way that I can think of is to temporarily put a hub between the switch and one of the devices you want to monitor, then plug a laptop into that hub to do the monitoring. The laptop should now see all traffic between the device and the switch.
This is pretty easy since you can do it at the location of one of the devices. You just need a hub, two more lengths of CAT cable and the computer you are using to monitor with.
The switch may have a management interface that lets you do that. Be warned that if you do, you'll wreck performance on the switch since everything attached to it will now have to deal with collisions.
If the switch is a managed switch, it likely has a mode to act like a hub. Just be careful not to leave it like that.
Some will also have ways to mirror ports and such as well. You need to find out what kind of switch it is.
RE Edit: If it is unmanaged, then you are boned. Use a hub, a managed switch or run wireshark on the computer(s) affected.
You could try a port redirector, like this one. You would configure one device to talk to your computer instead of the other device, and the redirector will send the data to the real target. There are several programs like this out there, or you could write your own.