I'm loading some unregistered DirectShow filters manually from a DLL by CLSID and I'd like to find out the name of the filter (as it appears in GraphEdit).
I've tried using the IBaseFilter:QueryFilterInfo method but that only appears to work when the filter is part of a graph and even then, it returns the name that was given to the filter when the filter was added to the graph.
I'm looking for the default name that the filter would have when an instance of it is added to a graph in GraphEdit. Is it possible to get that, and how?
Filter graph assigns unique name to the filter when filter is joining the graph. The name can be suggested by filter adder, then in case of collision filter graph might append a number as a suffix. When no name is given by the adder, filter graph takes "default" name from QueryFilterInfo or from filter registration information, where friendly name was also a part of registration.
The registration names are managed by Filter Mapper, and accessible there programmatically. Then in turn it keeps the information in registry under category keys, esp. HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{083863F1-70DE-11D0-BD40-00A0C911CE86}\Instance key.
Related
I'm trying to create an ARM template which queries the list of resources (i.e. Cosmos DB instances) in the selected resource group so the user can pick from the list. I then want to use the selected resource to get a property and use it elsewhere in the template.
I don't want the user to have to know the resource name and type it in, rather I'd prefer to produce a list to choose from.
I've tried using a parameter type of string or array along with the [list(resourceId('<id>', resourceGroup().name, '<date>')] but it doesn't produce a drop-down list.
Is this even possible?
I am trying to retrieve info from intune via GraphApi.
Want to filter on bundleId or packageId field (located under appIdentifier).
But I can't seem to find a way to do this.
Target result is :
userId,os_type (based on either #odata.type or packageId/bundleId).
Step further is that i want to identify certain apps by filtering on for example startswith(packageId,'com.microsoft').
I have tried combinations on "/deviceAppManagement/managedAppRegistrations?$filter=startswith(bundleId,'com.m'). But I keep on ending up on "invalid filter clause" whenever i want to execute a filter action.
Trying to recover from microsoft documentation if any filtering is possible on this part of graph seems impossible.
Currently we are using power automate to retrieve data and that works if we don't filter / select.
screenshot of json result
Use the following filter: startsWith(microsoft.graph.iosVppApp/bundleId, 'com.microsoft')
I found a pointer at this reddit post: https://www.reddit.com/r/Intune/comments/cxkwm3/using_graph_to_show_all_apps_from_one_vpp_token/
When it comes to creating/updating custom objects, can I use both dedupeFields or lookupField when pushing the data to Marketo?
What is the difference between the two?
I'm not sure what do you mean under lookupField, as there is no such input field described in the API documentation of the Sync Custom Objects endpoint. (That is the endpoint to create or update custom objects.)
In the other hand, you do not need such a standalone lookup field, as with the input array you provide the objects you want to create or update, with all their important values. Have a look at the sample payload in the docs.
When input is used together with the optional dedupeBy and action fields, you have full control over which object you want to create or update.
Also, the endpoint expects the name of the dedupe field under dedupeBy key, as opposed to dedupeFields. So the name is singular; you can provide a single field name use, and it does what you can expect: if the value in the field for a given record is not unique, an error will be returned for the individual record.
I created a custom object and i want to get all its existing records. Is there a way of doing that via the REST API? Seems like a very basic and simple operation but i couldn't find information about it anywhere.
As you say, it seems like a basic task, but in the reality, it is more complex indeed.
Unfortunately, the Get Custom Object endpoint (which is the only endpoint to fetch Custom Objects) requires the filterType and filterValues parameters to be present as well. Basically this means that you have to have some information about the queried objects beforehand.
Also, a further restriction is that the value of filterType can only be one of the “searchable” fields of the Custom Object, meaning that it has to be either a Link field or a Dedupe field. (These fields are listed under the searchableFields property in the response from the Describe Custom Objects endpoint.)
So as mentioned above, you have to know the values for at least one of the properties of your Custom Objects before you make the query.
With additional queries though, you can grab these required values.
Let's say, you have your Custom Object linked to the Lead Object, and the Link field is called Owner Email (with the REST API name being ownerEmail) which links to the Email Address field of the Lead Object. In this case you could set the filterType to ownerEmail and set the emails of the leads as filterValues.
Then it is up to you how you gather the emails of those Leads who has a Custom Object attached. Luckily the REST API won’t throw an error if you provide a value that has no corresponding Custom Objects.
If your Custom Object is linked to a Lead, it's a bit complex but you can do like this:
Create a smart list and filter with "Has You Custom Object"
Get the smart list with API (GET /rest/asset/v1/smartLists.json)
Based on this list of Leads, get all Custom Objects (see the other answer).
Please explain above question with example scenario I am confusing which is best.
If you to fetch a specific object based on keyword or any identity in list then you have to iterate the list get object and compare with its values
In map you can directly create key value pair..you can pass key and get the value.
ex:
A object user is present which has several properties one of them is user code
Now if you have list of user object then you will fetch one by one user object and compare the code of each user...but in map you can directly store user object with user code as key pass the key and get the desired object
map.get("key");
but if you requirement is not based on key type access better to use list.. example as you to just display list of items or you have to perform sublisting.
Too broad question, but will try to shorten it:
When you have to get the value based on key (key can be anything) then you go for hashmap. Consider a telephone directory where you go to appropriate name and search for person's name to find his number.
While if you have similar object's and want to store them somehow and later on retrieve it say by index or traverse them one by one then you go for list. So if your task is to find employees older than age 50 yrs, you can just return a list of employees who are older than 50.