I feel like I'm missing something very obvious here. I've been working with Fullcalendar (admittedly on a basic level) on our website. The code I've been using is as such:
<link href='fullcalendar.css' rel='stylesheet' />
<link href='fullcalendar.print.css' rel='stylesheet' media='print' />
<script src='lib/moment.min.js'></script>
<script src='lib/jquery.min.js'></script>
<script src='fullcalendar.min.js'></script>
<script>
$(document).ready(function() {
$('#calendar').fullCalendar({
editable: false,
height: "auto",
eventLimit: false, // allow "more" link when too many events
events: [
{
title: 'Event Title 1',
start: '2014-09-26',
end: '2014-09-29',
color: '#266A2E'
}, {
title: 'Event Title 2',
start: '2015-06-01',
end: '2015-08-22',
color: '#990000'
}
]
});
});
body {
/* margin: 40px 10px;
padding: 0;
font-family: "Lucida Grande",Helvetica,Arial,Verdana,sans-serif;
font-size: 14px;*/
}
#calendar {
max-width: 900px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
<body>
<div id='calendar'></div>
</body>
Now this has been working fine for the time being with the exception that the names of the events will disappear if it is longer than the event. IE If the event only runs for one day and the title is Camp out at Millerton Lake then on the calendar it would show "Camp out at M". For the longest time I thought that was the unavoidable truth about it and just made sure to use creative titles if the event name ran too long. But now we are moving our hand coded website to a wordpress template and I found that there is a plugin that helps with this. I used https://wordpress.org/plugins/full-calendar-js/ and got it hooked up to a google calendar to allow quick and easy editing. Then I realized that on the WP site it was actually wrapping the text on the events onto multiple lines. I looked through the documentation again and tried many different google searches and searches here on Stackoverflow but cant' find anything that relates to event titles on the calendar wrapping as a setting. Am I missing something? Is there a line of code I can add on our older hand coded site that will force text to wrap instead of becoming hidden?
Related
I have a simple html do display an animation i made in After Effects, but i can't display the animation when loading it locally (data.json). But if i upload the animation through LottieFiles and use the link generated in my html file, it works. Can someone please explain me why i am not being able to load the animation through my data.json instead from the generated link ?
Bellow i put the code i have so far:
<head>
<!-- Meta -->
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>Bodymovin Demo</title>
<style>
body {
text-align: center;
}
h1 {
margin-top: 2em;
}
#bm {
width: 1000px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Test Animation</h1>
<div id="bm"></div>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/bodymovin/5.5.9/lottie.js"></script>
<script>
var animation = bodymovin.loadAnimation({
container: document.getElementById('bm'),
renderer: 'svg',
loop: true,
autoplay: true,
// this way works, but if i put 'data.json' which is on the same directory of this file it doesn't work
path: 'https://assets7.lottiefiles.com/packages/lf20_kxQ49M.json'
});
</script>
</body>
I also have a link to my 'data.json' file:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xsikpLLQY-7FMV1_S5VelmB2_85LD-oi/view?usp=sharing
Most likely you are getting a CORS error.
For security reasons browsers don't seem to allow you to load JSON files stored on your computer, it will work as long as the .json file is hosted online.
So through lottiefiles as you've done, or on your web hosting.
I'm trying to make a simple example work on my local environment. I want to make a map on my website, but once I downloaded the necessary files I've got strange problems. First, I had to add for the example script link the 'type="module"' code, which is already made me crazy. Nobody tests these applications, or my environment is so special? Why are they even using the import tag, if it's not working in the most used browser like a charm?! After I extended the example code and changed the import links to be fine for my environment (ol/Map.js to /ol/Map.js), now I've got this error you can read in the title. Failed to resolve module specifier "rbush". What can I do? I have no idea. There must be a main point I have missed. The example (https://openlayers.org/en/latest/examples/simple.html) works fine online on openlayers.org, but If I follow the instructions It don't on my end. Why?
OpenLayers 5.1.3 is meant to be used with the npm package manager as described here:
https://openlayers.org/en/latest/doc/tutorials/bundle.html
To use it without including the dependencies and "building" it, see the quick start page in the documentation:
Put a map on a page
Below you'll find a complete working example. Create a new file, copy in the contents below, and open in a browser:
<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://cdn.rawgit.com/openlayers/openlayers.github.io/master/en/v5.1.3/css/ol.css" type="text/css">
<style>
html,
body {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
}
.map {
height: 100%;
}
</style>
<script src="https://cdn.rawgit.com/openlayers/openlayers.github.io/master/en/v5.1.3/build/ol.js"></script>
<title>OpenLayers example</title>
</head>
<body>
<div id="map" class="map"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
var map = new ol.Map({
target: 'map',
layers: [
new ol.layer.Tile({
source: new ol.source.OSM()
})
],
view: new ol.View({
center: ol.proj.fromLonLat([37.41, 8.82]),
zoom: 4
})
});
</script>
</body>
</html>
working example of the "simple" example
I'm using the Polymer/web-component-tester to run automated tests of my components.
I've run into an issue where a component test will pass if run in isolation, but fail when run using a file glob - for example:
FAILS: wct components/**/test
SUCCEEDS: wct components/btn-component/test
After a fair bit of digging, I found the reason is the change in browser behaviour: in both cases the launched browser has two iFrames side-by-side, with the right one showing the test progress, and the left showing the component. The globbed test run results in a significantly narrower left (component) iFrame.
When using polymer-gestures to simulate mouse clicks, the narrower iFrame causes issues because it can often render a horizontal scrollbar and change a component's clickability.
The following is an example of a component & test that fails as described. It renders a Cancel button a few hundred pixels to the right.
Component
<link rel="import" href="../../bower_components/polymer/polymer.html">
<polymer-element name="btn-component" attributes="name">
<template>
<style>
:host {
display: block;
width: 400px;
}
</style>
<div layout horizontal>
<span flex></span>
<div id="cancel_button" on-tap="{{cancel}}">Cancel</div>
</div>
</template>
<script>
Polymer({
ready: function() {
console.log("btn-component component ready!");
},
cancel: function(event, detail, sender) {
console.log("Cancel Btn!", event, detail, sender);
this.fire('cancel_btn', {});
}
});
</script>
</polymer-element>
Test
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>btn-component Tests</title>
<script src="../../../bower_components/webcomponentsjs/webcomponents.js"></script>
<script src="../../../bower_components/web-component-tester/browser.js"></script>
<script src="../../../bower_components/polymer-gestures/test/js/fake.js"></script>
<link href="../btn-component.html" rel="import">
</head>
<body>
<btn-component id="component"></btn-component>
<script>
function runAfterEvent(eventName, element, callback) {
var listener = function(event) {
element.removeEventListener(eventName, listener)
callback(event.detail);
};
element.addEventListener(eventName, listener);
}
suite('<btn-component>', function() {
var c = document.getElementById('component');
var fake = new Fake();
test('hitting cancel fires cancel event', function(done) {
runAfterEvent('cancel_btn', c, function(event) {
assert.ok(1, "the cancel_btn event should be fired");
done();
});
var cancelBtn = document.querySelectorAll("btn-component /deep/ #cancel_button")[0];
console.log(cancelBtn);
setTimeout(function() {
fake.downOnNode(cancelBtn);
fake.upOnNode(cancelBtn);
}, 1000);
});
});
</script>
The fail happens trying to click the button.
I guess there's a variety of ways to approach resolving this - including in my own tests (e.g. checking the viewport size vs the element position and scrolling right before trying to simulate a click), but starts to get quite fiddly/fragile. A reasonable option might be to add a config to wct that specifies a minimum viewport size on the component iFrame.
Perhaps I'm missing some available configuration that could help here. Is there a recommended way to handle this scenario?
A simple solution is pretty obvious. I added the following to my test's index.html
<style>
#subsuites {
width: 600px !important;
}
</style>
The css used by the wct tool sets the width at 50% and nests frames when using file globs - resulting in progressive narrowing.
I'm trying to insert a map in a single post in Jekyll.
Here is the visible effort of my attempt to this: github link
Here is the link to the github's account itself: link
I took a default template, ie Hyde.
Then I added the Leaflet's CSS and JS files in the _includes/head.html
Then I created a post that relied on the _layouts/default.html (default draws from head.html)
As I said, I'm attempting to insert a single map in a single post. If you look at the first link, it shows the map all over the blog in a weird manner.
It doesn't show up in the single post itself.
How can I make this work?
I'm hoping to eventually have a series of posts each with their own map, if that's possible.
Here is the code in the solitary post that I have up so far:
---
layout: default
title: Trying to integrate map in jekyll
---
<div id="map">
</div>
<script>
var map = L.map('map').setView([34.00000, -118.260126], 14);
mapLink =
'OpenStreetMap'; L.tileLayer(
'http://{s}.tile.openstreetmap.org/{z}/{x}/{y}.png', { attribution: 'Map data © ' + mapLink, maxZoom: 18, }).addTo(map);
var marker = L.marker([34.063298, -118.260126]) .addTo(map).bindPopup("<b>Blah Blah Blah</b><br /><a href='http://www.cnn.com'>Additional Information</a><br />").openPopup();
</script>
I realize that this post relies a lot on links, and that's frowned up on here at SO. But I have no other way of explaining my problem.
Correct code in _includes/head.html is :
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/leaflet/0.7.3/leaflet.css">
not
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/leaflet/0.7.3/leaflet.css"></script>
and
<style type="text/css">
#map {
width:400px;
height:550px;
background-color: red;
}
</style>
not
<style type="text/css">
#map {
width:400px%;
height:550px;
background-color: red;
}
</style>
I would like the website visitor to be able to select the language on certain pages using the code I am provided which all works fine:
<div id="google_translate_element"></div><script type="text/javascript">
function googleTranslateElementInit() {
new google.translate.TranslateElement({pageLanguage: 'en', includedLanguages: 'ar,bg,cs,da,de,el,en,eo,es,fi,fr,hr,hu,id,it,ja,ko,lt,lv,nl,no,pl,pt,ro,ru,sv,th,tl,tr,uk,vi,zh-CN,zh-TW', layout: google.translate.TranslateElement.InlineLayout.SIMPLE, gaTrack: true, gaId: 'MY_GOOGLE_ID'}, 'google_translate_element');
}
However, I would like the code above with regards to selecting the language only displayed on certain pages.
What code would I have to put on the pages where it should continue to translate but where the Google translate select box does not display?
Thank you
The best thing to do is add a class to your <body> like so <body class="page-1"> for each page(each page different class), then style it with CSS to display:none;
.page-1 #google_translate_element {
display: none;
}