Is there any way to get a display:table cell, to keep its padding of its parent div?
If I have a bootstrap div like so:
<div class="col-sm-5 defaultRowHeight" id="row1">
<div style="display: table">
<div class="tableCellMiddle">
The padding rule from col-sm-5 that comes from bootstrap is ignored. I want to use table cell so I can easily v-align.
here is a fiddle
http://jsfiddle.net/w79w8f6a/
The 1st 2 boxes work as I expect but they dont in my real world example at my closed source.
the bottom 2 boxes lose all their padding or margin but that doesnt mimic my issue in my real source.
any ideas?
Related
I have a simple flex div set to a column like this:
<div fxFlex="column">
<div>
test
</div>
<div>
test 2
</div>
</div>
When the alignment is like this, there is top and bottom padding added to each div. When I set fxFlex="row" then it gets rid of the padding. I want each div to not have any padding in column direction.
Let's say I have this structure:
<div className="row">
<div class="col-sm">
<div>TEST</div>
</div>
<div class="col-sm">
<div>TEST<br>TEST<br>TEST</div>
</div>
</div>
Basically, I know how to make the columns of the same height (using the .equal class on the row) however, what I need is the child div of the column to also be of the same height. Currently, if one of the child divs is shorter, it won't look aligned because I set the background color to be in the child div and not on the col-sm div.
I cannot set the background on col-sm for flexibility reasons. E.g. I may need to use that child div component in another section that doesn't use 'col-sm'.
Mine currently is the one on top, I want it to become the one at the bottom:
A situation like this, for me, would be time to turn to jQuery or a plugin such as MatchHeight.
matchHeight makes the height of all selected elements exactly equal.
I'm making a box based layout and I'm having issues with the gutters in bootstrap 3. Since they've been changed to be padded since bootstrap 2, every time I want to add padding to a box it completely destroys the gutter. I can't seem to find a way of remedying the problem.
I use a .box class to highlight the box from it's gutter and give them background colours and images. I want padding inside the box for the text so it's not right on the edge of the box walls, so I made a .box-inner class, but I can't just apply padding to it :/
<div class="col-md-12">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-6">
<div class="box">
<div class="box-inner">
<h1>Test2</h1>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Any help would be very appreciated! I've been banging my head against the wall for hours.
Fiddle here, I highlighted the problem areas with a comment:
http://jsfiddle.net/kbj8dd0e/6/
Sure you can add padding. Just add it to the .box.
Have a look at this:
http://jsfiddle.net/kbj8dd0e/5/
(note that I changed the col-md to col-xs to make it show better in that small fiddle pane, but the same should work for any col class.)
All I did was move the padding to the .box class to be able to remove the redundant .box-inner. I also removed all your instances of <div class="row"><div class="col-md-12">...</div></div> as this just adds markup and serves no purpose whatsoever.
Or am I missing something here?
I want to frame a div surrounding divs having higher z-index.
(The framed div will contain a slideshow with elements, animated and with wierd margins, and the masking divs are supposed to hide the the texts being animated from the side.)
I'm thinking something like:
<div class="fullwith mask"></div>
<div class="mask leftpadding"></div>
<div id="slideshow" style="width:640px;height:405px;"></div>
<div class="mask rightpadding"></div>
<div class="fullwith mask"></div>
I've created this fiddle that by no means work, please fill the gap or tell me if I'm off the mark here.
This might explain my question a bit better:
I need one child div positioned on top of the other so that the last-child is only showing around the edges, but the two child divs need to scroll together and keep the background of the first-child div static. This mesa that the viewport would be the first-child, but the content of the first and second child would have to scroll within the container so they can scroll together., with the first-child being the viewport.
I have the following HTML structure:
<div class="container">
<div class="text">
<div class="row">Row</div>
<div class="row">Row</div>
<div class="row">Row</div>
<div class="row">Row</div>
<div class="row">Row</div>
<div class="row">Row</div>
</div>
<div class="bars">
<div class="a"></div>
<div class="a"></div>
<div class="b"></div>
<div class="c"></div>
<div class="b"></div>
<div class="a"></div>
</div>
</div>
The bars extend to the width of the page, and the text div is overlaid on top of them, with a margin around it. I position each bars div so that they match up at the same horizontal level with the visually corresponding row.
The text div is positioned to be x pixels from each side, so that there is a margin around it. This way, you can see the ends of the bars below it.
The markup is easy, but I can't figure out the CSS for this...
text is positioned absolutely, so that it can extend to the bounds of the page with a margin. This is fine if the content inside it stays within the bounds, but it does not in this case.
This is all very hard to explain, but basically, here's the problem: I set container to overflow:scroll because I need the bars to scroll with the rows. Since text has a background image, and is positioned so that you can just see the ends of the rows beneath it, it has to be position:absolute. This doesn't work, however, when the content exceeds the bounds of text. I can't add the background image tocontainerbecause it would cover the ends of thebars`.
Does that make sense? No? Here's a jsFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/charlescarver/BskaP/2/
Does it still not make sense? Here's a picture:
Any ideas? Ask me some questions so I can explain this better.
You don't need a lot of the css that's there -- for example the .container. If I understand correctly (and I'm not 100% sure I do) you'd like a image on the .text div which remains fixed while the rest of the page -- bars and text scroll.
You cannot put the image on the text div as it will scroll; rather, I suggest putting the image on each .row with a position: fixed as well as using padding-bottom:20px instead of the margin, so that there appears to be an image behind all of the rows and the effect is continuous. That will give you the effect I think you're after
http://jsfiddle.net/BskaP/5/
You can use jQuery's scrollTop() function to get an elements position based on scroll. Coupled with a scroll() event, you should be able to sort something out.
So put something in your scroll event to offset the position of your rows and text by the value of scrollTop().
scrollTop() : http://api.jquery.com/scrollTop/
scroll event : http://api.jquery.com/scroll/
My initial thoughts was to avoid JavaScript by combining the rows and text elements together and fake the rows being behind the text... but given your specific situation I couldn't come up with anything...
You should add overflow:auto to row. Here is a jsfiddle that proves it works: http://jsfiddle.net/BskaP/3/
I added an extra long row to it for an example.
I don't know if this is what you want, but I think it is.