I'm looking for a way to maximize a map inside a Bootstrap row. In the following syntax, the left col-md-9 div is the map, and the right side is a fixed 240px wide image.
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-9">
<div id="mapid" style="width: 100%; height: 400px;"></div>
</div>
<div class="col-md-3">
<p id="delta">
<%= #myimage %>
<br>
</p>
</div>
</div>
With a fluid layout, it can get ugly quickly. Is there a way to maximize the map in a fluid layout? I want the map to increase with the fluidity and the image retaining 240px with a small margin.
You can just do it with flexbox, and there are utilities from Bootstrap you can use: https://getbootstrap.com/docs/4.3/utilities/flex/
<div class="d-md-flex flex-md-row flex-md-nowrap align-items-md-start">
<!-- map -->
<iframe />
<!-- image -->
<img />
</div>
Since the map/iframe is setup as 100% width, normally this will push the other item off the row. But with flexbox, by default, the flexbox children have flex-shrink: 1; turn on. That means it will shrink for you. That's how you can get the width maximization for the map.
demo: https://jsfiddle.net/davidliang2008/x56ao2pz/8/
I have one child div vertically centered under a parent div {parent div has a certain height}. I have assigned the child div with height:100% but it is not taking this property only on safari. Here is a screenshot about the issue.Safari bug
Everything is working fine in chrome and moz but safari. Here is the live version of the website. http://www.ravnapp.com/
Any help will be appreciated, Thank You !
Update: Here is the relevent html code.
<div class="uk-width-medium-1-2 uk-width-small-1-2 uk-width-large-1-2">
<div class="action-image uk-position-relative">
<div class="uk-cover-background">
<img src="img/action1.png" width="100%" height="" alt="">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="uk-width-medium-1-2 uk-width-small-1-2 uk-width-large-1-2 action-text uk-vertical-align">
<div class="uk-vertical-align-middle">
<h1 class="avenirlight">TOTAL PRIVACY <br><span class="avenirmedium">AND CONTROL</span></h1>
<p class="desp blenderbook">Ravn is yours to use as you like. Everything is safe and secure and even your notifications are fully disguised. Your privacy is our priority.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="uk-width-medium-1-2 uk-width-small-1-2 uk-width-large-1-2 action-text uk-vertical-align">
<div class="uk-vertical-align-middle">
<h1 class="avenirlight">EXHALE, <br><span class="avenirmedium">FINALLY</span></h1>
<p class="desp blenderbook">Ravn is 100% discreet. All your activity is stored within Ravn so you won’t have any surprises popping up in your chat history or camera roll. We’ve got your back.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="uk-width-medium-1-2 uk-width-small-1-2 uk-width-large-1-2">
<div class="action-image uk-position-relative">
<div class="uk-cover-background">
<img src="img/action2.png" width="100%" height="" alt="">
</div>
</div>
</div>
It looks like the container divs don't actually have a height set on them and they need to have a height before the content can vertically center. since you are going full screen and setting width to 50% and want the height to match.. just add
height: 50vw;
to each container. This will set the height to half the viewport width, which will match the width of the box given your current setup.
You will have to adjust your images to be actually square though as they are a few pixels short.
I have a block:
<section id="why">
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-xs-12">
<img src="img/image.png" alt="image">
</div>
</div>
</div>
.container have a margins of left and right, and i can't position image on left of body.
I need to pull image on left of body, and i need to make it responsive.
it looks like this
Give this a try.
You don't need the container, row or col divs.
<section id="why" class="text-left">
<img src="img/image.png" alt="image">
</section>
To make an img responsive use this:
<img src="..." class="img-responsive" alt="Responsive image">
The .container has a padding of 15px on each side. By using a tool like Chrome Inspector, you can see the styles that each div has.
If not inspector, try removing each div that you have, one at a time and seeing how each one works. The time it took to ask this question, you could have narrowed it down by simply experimenting.
The official website is more than useful, is very well-documented, and it will clear up a lot of things if you take a little bit to read through it.
http://getbootstrap.com/css/
give this a try
<div id="why" class="pull-left">
<img src="..." class="img-responsive">
</div>
you will now have a responsive image. But take note that the class img-responsive by default is display: block. if you want to resize the image, just set the width and height of the image.
I have this markup:
<div class="girls" style="text-align:center; margin-top:100px">
<img src="images/1.png" />
<img src="images/2.png" />
<img src="images/3.png" />
<img src="images/4.png" />
and this css (I'm using Twitter Bootstrap) :
img {
height: auto;
max-width: 100%;
vertical-align: middle;
border: 0;
-ms-interpolation-mode: bicubic;
}
The images have equal width and height and are displayed inline.
On my resolution are ok, fit the entire width (1366px), but on lower resolutions the images don't fit.
So, I need to keep the proportions on every screen resolution ( lower than 1366px in my case)
I've found this picturefill
Which I think is helpful for me, but I'm thinking that it's a simpler solution for my case because I have 4 images which I need to display them horizontally and make them scale on every resolution.
Thanks!
You can set the style width attribute of the images to 25%, without specifying height. That's gonna work if you're always putting 4 images, they have the same width between them and your container div is always at 100%.
HTH
Francisco
If you are using Twitter Bootstrap, then use markup properly like in Twitter Bootstrap documentation:
<div class="row-fluid">
<div class="span3">
<img src="http://placehold.it/350x400"/>
</div>
<div class="span3">
<img src="http://placehold.it/350x400"/>
</div>
<div class="span3">
<img src="http://placehold.it/350x400"/>
</div>
<div class="span3">
<img src="http://placehold.it/350x400"/>
</div>
<div>
http://jsfiddle.net/zNLBG/
I want to create alternating 100% colored blocks. An "ideal" situation is illustrated as an attachment, as well as the current situation.
Desired setup:
Currently:
My first idea was to create an div class, give it a background color, and give it 100% width.
.block {
width: 100%;
background: #fff;
}
However, you can see that this obviously doesn't work. It's confined to a container area. I tried to close the container and that didn't work either.
The container class is intentionally not 100% width. It is different fixed widths depending on the width of the viewport.
If you want to work with the full width of the screen, use .container-fluid:
Bootstrap 3:
<body>
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-6"></div>
<div class="col-lg-6"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-8"></div>
<div class="col-lg-4"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-12"></div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
Bootstrap 2:
<body>
<div class="row">
<div class="span6"></div>
<div class="span6"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="span8"></div>
<div class="span4"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="span12"></div>
</div>
</body>
QUICK ANSWER
Use multiple NOT NESTED .containers
Wrap those .containers you want to have a full-width background in a div
Add a CSS background to the wrapping div
Fiddles: Simple: https://jsfiddle.net/vLhc35k4/ , Container borders: https://jsfiddle.net/vLhc35k4/1/
HTML:
<div class="container">
<h2>Section 1</h2>
</div>
<div class="specialBackground">
<div class="container">
<h2>Section 2</h2>
</div>
</div>
CSS: .specialBackground{ background-color: gold; /*replace with own background settings*/ }
FURTHER INFO
DON'T USE NESTED CONTAINERS
Many people will (wrongly) suggest, that you should use nested containers. Well, you should NOT.
They are not ment to be nested. (See to "Containers" section in the docs)
HOW IT WORKS
div is a block element, which by default spans to the full width of a document body - there is the full-width feature. It also has a height of it's content (if you don't specify otherwise).
The bootstrap containers are not required to be direct children of a body, they are just containers with some padding and possibly some screen-width-variable fixed widths.
If a basic grid .container has some fixed width it is also auto-centered horizontally.
So there is no difference whether you put it as a:
Direct child of a body
Direct child of a basic div that is a direct child of a body.
By "basic" div I mean div that does not have a CSS altering his border, padding, dimensions, position or content size. Really just a HTML element with display: block; CSS and possibly background.
But of course setting vertical-like CSS (height, padding-top, ...) should not break the bootstrap grid :-)
Bootstrap itself is using the same approach
...All over it's own website and in it's "JUMBOTRON" example:
http://getbootstrap.com/examples/jumbotron/
This is how you can achieve your desired setup with Bootstrap 3:
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="row"> <!-- Give this div your desired background color -->
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12">
... your content here ...
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
The container-fluid part makes sure that you can change the background over the full width. The container part makes sure that your content is still wrapped in a fixed width.
This approach works, but personally I don't like all the nesting. However, I haven't found a better solution so far.
There is a workaround using vw. Is useful when you can't create a new fluid container.
This, inside a classic 'container' div will be full size.
.row-full{
width: 100vw;
position: relative;
margin-left: -50vw;
left: 50%;
}
After this there is the sidebar problem (thanks to #Typhlosaurus), solved with this js function, calling it on document load and resize:
function full_row_resize(){
var body_width = $('body').width();
$('.row-full').css('width', (body_width));
$('.row-full').css('margin-left', ('-'+(body_width/2)+'px'));
return false;
}
In bootstrap 4, you can use 'w-100' class (w as width, and 100 as 100%)
You can find documentation here:
https://getbootstrap.com/docs/4.0/utilities/sizing/
If you can't change the HTML layout:
.full-width {
width: 100vw;
margin-left: -50vw;
left: 50%;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-xs-12">a</div>
<div class="col-xs-12">b</div>
<div class="col-xs-12 full-width">c</div>
<div class="col-xs-12">d</div>
</div>
</div>
Demo: http://www.bootply.com/tVkNyWJxA6
Sometimes it's not possible to close the content container.
The solution we are using is a bit different but prevent a overflow because of the
firefox scrollbar size!
.full-width {
margin-top: 15px;
margin-bottom: 15px;
position: relative;
width: calc(100vw - 10px);
margin-left: calc(-50vw + 5px);
left: 50%;
}
Here is a example: https://jsfiddle.net/RubbelDeKatz/wvt9253q
Instead of
style="width:100%"
try using
class="col-xs-12"
it will save you 1 character :)
Sorry, should have asked for your css as well. As is, basically what you need to look at is giving your container div the style .container { width: 100%; } in your css and then the enclosed divs will inherit this as long as you don't give them their own width. You were also missing a few closing tags, and the </center> closes a <center> without it ever being open, at least in this section of code. I wasn't sure if you wanted the image in the same div that contains your content or separate, so I created two examples. I changed the width of the img to 100px simply because jsfiddle offers a small viewing area. Let me know if it's not what you're looking for.
content and image separate: http://jsfiddle.net/QvqKS/2/
content and image in same div (img floated left): http://jsfiddle.net/QvqKS/3/
I would use two separate 'container' div as below:
<div class="container">
/* normal*/
</div>
<div class="container-fluid">
/*full width container*/
</div>
Bare in mind that container-fluid does not follow your breakpoints and it is a full width container.
I'd wonder why someone would try to "override" the container width, since its purpose is to keep its content with some padding, but I had a similar situation (that's why I wanted to share my solution, even though there're answers).
In my situation, I wanted to have all content (of all pages) rendered inside a container, so this was the piece of code from my _Layout.cshtml:
<div id="body">
#RenderSection("featured", required: false)
<section class="content-wrapper main-content clear-fix">
<div class="container">
#RenderBody()
</div>
</section>
</div>
In my Home Index page, I had a background header image I'd like to fill the whole screen width, so the solution was to make the Index.cshtml like this:
#section featured {
<!-- This content will be rendered outside the "container div" -->
<div class="intro-header">
<div class="container">SOME CONTENT WITH A NICE BACKGROUND</div>
</div>
}
<!-- The content below will be rendered INSIDE the "container div" -->
<div class="content-section-b">
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
MORE CONTENT
</div>
</div>
</div>
I think this is better than trying to make workarounds, since sections are made with the purpose of allowing (or forcing) views to dynamically replace some content in the layout.
Though people have mentioned that you will need to use .container-fluid in this case but you will also have to remove the padding from bootstrap.
The following answer is not exactly optimal by any measure, but I needed something that maintains its position within the container whilst it stretches the inner div fully.
https://jsfiddle.net/fah5axm5/
$(function() {
$(window).on('load resize', ppaFullWidth);
function ppaFullWidth() {
var $elements = $('[data-ppa-full-width="true"]');
$.each( $elements, function( key, item ) {
var $el = $(this);
var $container = $el.closest('.container');
var margin = parseInt($container.css('margin-left'), 10);
var padding = parseInt($container.css('padding-left'), 10)
var offset = margin + padding;
$el.css({
position: "relative",
left: -offset,
"box-sizing": "border-box",
width: $(window).width(),
"padding-left": offset + "px",
"padding-right": offset + "px"
});
});
}
});
This must work (Mobile phone as well as Desktop screen):
class: alignfull and class: img-fluid will do the magic.
<div class="alignfull">
<img class="img-fluid" style="background-size: cover;
background-position: center ;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
height: auto;
min-width: 100%;
width: -moz-available; "
src="{{ $image->image }}" alt="An image">
</div>