I'm creating a user library and extending the Selenium2Library.
And in my class I have a method called "select_from_list_by_value" and the same method exists in Selenium2Library.
Due to this I get the following error:
Multiple keywords with name 'Select From List By Value' found.
Give the full name of the keyword you want to use.
Found: 'Selenium2Library.Select From List By Value' and 'MyLibrary.Select From List By Value'
How can I bypass the above error? I'm in a situation where I can't change the name of the keyword in the test scripts which leads to unnecessary rework.
This is certainly possible using Set Library Search Order
Thanks for Kevin O. pointing to me a right direction.
Related
I have added django-model-utils to an existing (large) project, and the build is now failing, as part of the build includes static type checking with mypy.
It complains that models that I have added objects = InheritanceManager() to, don't have attributes for reverse ForeignKeys, if the reverse FK is accessed in a method on that model. For example, take the following:
class Student(Model):
school = ForeignKey(School, related_name='students')
class School(Model):
objects = InheritanceManager() # IRL School is a subclass of some other model
def something(self):
return self.students.filter(...)
Then running mypy on it, will return:
error: "School" has no attribute "students"
And even if I remove the related_name, and use self.student_set (i.e. the default django relation), it will still produce the same type of error. Only removing the InheritanceManager fixes the static type checking. Of course, I'm using it for a reason as I need to select_subclasses elsewhere in the code.
Has anyone come across this, or have a fix?
django-stubs uses plugin to add all managers. This plugin is triggered only if added manager is a "subclass" (not just real subclass, but also recognizable by mypy as such) of models.Manager.
django-model-utils is untyped, so InheritanceManager is in fact Any for mypy, and plugin does not see it. To solve exactly this issue I was adding py.typed marker to django-model-utils as a CI stage after package installation. You can also use a fork with py.typed or create a stub package for django-model-utils. This can result in other issues and doesn't give good type checking (all unannotated methods have Any as implicit arguments and return type), but is better than nothing. For my needs the marker was sufficient.
py.typed marker is an empty file located in package root (venv/lib/.../django_model_utils/py.typed) - it tells mypy that package does not need separate stubs and contains all necessary types.
I have project, with some custom ConstraintValidator. I wanted to build custom message. I did so and everyting works just fine. Then we met need to have 'api' module, which means, that you have to split bean validation annotation and ConstraintValidator, have to use #Constraint(validatedBy = {}) and setup pairing manually using ConstraintMapping. Everyting stil works, except for message interpolation.
Log now contains kinda cryptic message:
Expression variables have been defined for constraint interface whatever.SomeValidation while Expression Language is not enabled.
All of that while I'm literary using the same code as one mentioned here:
https://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/stable/validator/reference/en-US/html_single/#_custom_contexts
to disableDefaultConstraintViolation and register custom one.
Any ideas what can cause that?
I have a keyword like "Click Menu Item" which takes an argument ${menuItem}.It then clicks on the corresponding menu item making a dynamic locator xpath.
I need to define/set the LocatorVariables and their Xpaths in separate Locators.robot resource file so that my testcases/keywords are xpaths free.
** Keywords ***
Click Menu Item
[Arguments] ${menuItem}
Click Element ${MenuBarLeft_MenuItem}
So I want to accept the variable ${menuItem} in a Global Scope so that it will be accessible in Locators.robot Resource file.
Though, I understand this can be achieved by using below:
"Set Global Variable ${menuItem} ${menuItem}"
but i wanted to know is there an way I can skip this step by automatic defining the scope while accepting the variable in keyword.
Also please let me know if there is a better way to handle dynamic locators for such case.
i wanted to know is there an way I can skip this step by automatic defining the scope while accepting the variable in keyword.
No, there is not.
The answer given by #Bryan Oakley is correct. There is no way to dynamically assign the scope. That said, this doesn't mean what you're doing is the only way that results in no replication of element locators.
A few answers that may help you are:
Page Object Pattern: centralizing by modeling your application's pages.
Custom Locator Strategy using an external YAML file
Accessing elements located by custom locator strategy with Javascript
Custom Locator using Get Webelement
I have a transmogrifier pipeline to insert objects to my Zope database (importing zexp files from a directory structure). This works - the objects are created; but I don't get them added to the portal_catalog.
I added a section to add the objects to the catalog explicitly, inspired by plone.app.transmogrifier.reindexobject: I call portal_catalog.catalog_object(obj) for each item.
The objects exist, and getPhysicalPath yields the correct values, but the objects are not added. There is no error message or exception whatsoever.
I tried to specify the list of indexes (the idxs argument), but this didn't change anything. If not specified, all indexes should be filled anyway, right?
Since it looks like a transaction problem to me (no errors, but nothing stored in the catalog either), I tried transaction code (begin, savepoint, commit, and in case of exceptions abort), but it didn't help. When I call the catalog immediately after the catalog_object call (portal_catalog(path='/Plonesite/full/path/to/object')), nothing has happened, and an empty list is returned.
The catalog does contain objects; even objects of my custom datatypes (AT-based). Not even the Folder objects of my imports are indexed.
Without the objects in the catalog, my import is useless. What can I do?
Thank you!
Edit: Any hint about how to get my object trees in the catalog is appreciated! Even if it can't be integrated in my process. I need the contents cataloged ...
My custom content types are contained in the Plone Catalog Tool page selection field, but I don't know whether this is sufficient.
Edit 2:
Somehow my objects have been catalogued - the unrestrictedSearchResults method shows them! However, it can't be the desired solution to use this method all over; so I need to "un-restrict" the entries somehow.
It turned out that I have a monkey:patch (xmlns:monkey="http://namespaces.plone.org/monkey") for the Products.CMFPlone.CatalogTool.CatalogTool.searchResults method; this filters the catalog for my additional field subportal unless a special value for it is given - even in the management view ... Unfortunately, I had no way to specify this special value in that view.
Thus, the solution was to weed out all wrong values (for subportals which don't exist in the other Zope tree) to have the default value take effect.
Quite specific to my setup, I'm afraid ...
Does anybody know if it is possible in a compound template to use a string item in the package and execute it as if were a dreamweaver template? And whether you apply the same method to other mediators (like razor)?
Thanks
Mark
I suspect this is not possible.
Package.EvaluateExpression may be useful, but as the name suggests it'll only work on expressions, not large snippets of code with embedded expressions (i.e. TEL)
Engine.GetMediator expects a Template and returns the appropriate Mediator for it. Your problem then is that the IMediator interface only defines the Transform method, which requires an Engine, a Template and a Package.
I can't think of any elegant ways around these. Maybe write your own Mediator, but that would still expect a Package, not a string, so you'd have to first store the string based Item from another TBB.
My advice: Sounds like you need to go back to the drawing board and find an alternative solution to your problem.
I'm afraid that won't be possible on just any item in the Package, since the Engine expects Templates to be based on Tridion items.
If your Template Item is based on a Tridion Item you can probably get pretty far by starting at the Engine.GetMediator method. If it isn't, you'll have to find some way to turn it into a valid Template object.
Template template = ...
IMediator mediator = engine.GetMediator(template);
mediator.Transform(engine, template, package);
When I have to create a Component object from a Tridion-based Item in the Package, I normally do something like this:
Component component = new Component(item.GetAsXmlDocument().DocumentElement,
engine.GetSession);
I haven't tried, but expect that you can do the same for a Template - given that you start with a valid Item from the Package representing a Template to begin with. You can probably clone the XML from an existing Item or find some other way to fake it.
If you get this to work, it will work across all registered template types. The Engine provides no special treatment for the types that come with Tridion.