I'm trying to line up divs horizontally, even if they go off-screen. Im using display: box;
<div id="container">
<div class="box">
1
</div>
<div class="box">
2
</div>
....
....
</div>
.box{
background-color: #7f94a7;
color: #fff;
height: 5.2rem;
width: 6rem;
display:table;
}
#container{
display: box;
display: -webkit-box;
}
Check out the jsfiddle here.
This works fine in chrome but in internet explorer 10, the box are aligned vertically....
Not really sure what the display:table is supposed to do on the .box class -- there aren't any cells or rows inside of it, so it isn't table-like at all. The table box sizing model is made to flex the width of the cells. Take a look at this example to see display:table in action... resize the output panel to see what happens: http://jsfiddle.net/vz33sfwc/
.box{
display:table-cell;
}
#container{
display:table;
}
It sounds like you actually want the boxes to NOT flex, but to go off-screen. To do that, we'll set the boxes to use display:inline-block -- this makes them sit next to one another on a single line. Then, we tell the container how to treat white space for the inline elements with white-space: nowrap;
.box{
display: inline-block;
}
#container {
white-space: nowrap;
}
See it in action here, again resizing the output panel for the effect: http://jsfiddle.net/k9yp05mj/ -- notice we get a horizontal scrollbar and the boxes do not flex in size.
Documentation
CSS whitespace on MDN - https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/white-space
CSS display on MDN - https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/display
Change your display: box; to display: inline-box; and use overflow: to keep or hide run-off from being visible.
As stated above, white space: nowrap; on content fixes issue.
CSS:
.box{
background-color: #7f94a7;
color: #fff;
height: 5.2rem;
width: 6rem;
display: inline-block;
}
#container{
display: box;
display: -webkit-box;
overflow-x: auto;
white-space: nowrap;
}
try just with "display : inline" for the child div.keep width auto i.e depending on content it'll adjust Check the fiddle here - http://jsfiddle.net/invincibleJai/p5tebcua/45/
Code:
.box{
background-color: #7f94a7;
color: #fff;
height: 5.2rem;
width: 6rem;
display:inline;
padding:0.2em;
}
<div id="container">
<div class="box">
1
</div>
<div class="box">
2
</div>
<div class="box">
3
</div>
<div class="box">
4
</div>
<div class="box">
5
</div>
<div class="box">
6
</div>
<div class="box">
7
</div>
<div class="box">
8
</div>
<div class="box">
9
</div><div class="box">
10
</div>
<div class="box">
11
</div><div class="box">
12
</div>
<div class="box">
13
</div>
</div>
Related
I am wanting to create a grid layout with responsive squares.
I feel like I should be able to do this with CSS Grid layout but having trouble setting the height of each square to be equal to the width.
Also having trouble setting a gutter between each square.
Would I be better off using flexbox?
Currently my HTML looks like this but will be dynamic so more squares may be added. And of course it needs to be responsive so will ideally use a media query to collapse it to one column.
<div class="square-container">
<div class="square">
<div class="content">
</div>
</div>
<div class="square">
<div class="content spread">
</div>
</div>
<div class="square">
<div class="content column">
</div>
</div>
</div>
Using css grid, this is as far as I got
.square-container{
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 30% 30% 30%;
.square {
}
}
I was able to get a bit further with flexbox and able to use space-between to align squares with a nice gutter but was still struggling to get the height to match the width of each square.
I wasn't able to find any examples of this being done with either flexbox or grid but any examples would be appreciated as well.
Thanks
The padding-bottom trick is the most used to accomplish that.
You can combine it with both Flexbox and CSS Grid, and since using percent for margin/padding gives inconsistent result for flex/grid items (on older browser versions, see edit note below), one can add an extra wrapper, or like here, using a pseudo, so the element with percent is not the flex/grid item.
Edit: Note, there's an update made to the specs., that now should give consistent result when used on flex/grid items. Be aware though, the issue still occurs on older versions.
Note, if you will add content to the content element, it need to be position absolute to keep the square's aspect ratio.
Fiddle demo - Flexbox
Edit 2: In a comment I were asked how to have a centered text, so I added that in below snippet.
.square-container {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
.square {
position: relative;
flex-basis: calc(33.333% - 10px);
margin: 5px;
border: 1px solid;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.square::before {
content: '';
display: block;
padding-top: 100%;
}
.square .content {
position: absolute;
top: 0; left: 0;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
display: flex; /* added for centered text */
justify-content: center; /* added for centered text */
align-items: center; /* added for centered text */
}
<div class="square-container">
<div class="square">
<div class="content">
<span>Some centered text</span>
</div>
</div>
<div class="square">
<div class="content spread">
</div>
</div>
<div class="square">
<div class="content column">
</div>
</div>
<div class="square">
<div class="content spread">
</div>
</div>
<div class="square">
<div class="content column">
</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS Grid version
.square-container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fill, minmax(30%, 1fr));
grid-gap: 10px;
}
.square {
position: relative;
border: 1px solid;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.square::before {
content: '';
display: block;
padding-top: 100%;
}
.square .content {
position: absolute;
top: 0; left: 0;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
<div class="square-container">
<div class="square">
<div class="content">
</div>
</div>
<div class="square">
<div class="content spread">
</div>
</div>
<div class="square">
<div class="content column">
</div>
</div>
<div class="square">
<div class="content spread">
</div>
</div>
<div class="square">
<div class="content column">
</div>
</div>
</div>
Try using viewport percentage units.
jsFiddle
.square-container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(3, 30vw);
grid-template-rows: 30vw;
grid-gap: 2.5vw;
padding: 2.5vw;
background-color: gray;
}
.square {
background-color: lightgreen;
}
body {
margin: 0; /* remove default margins */
}
<div class="square-container">
<div class="square">
<div class="content"></div>
</div>
<div class="square">
<div class="content spread"></div>
</div>
<div class="square">
<div class="content column"></div>
</div>
</div>
From the spec:
5.1.2. Viewport-percentage lengths: the vw, vh, vmin, vmax units
The viewport-percentage lengths are relative to the size of the
initial containing block. When the height or width of the initial
containing block is changed, they are scaled accordingly.
vw unit - Equal to 1% of the width of the initial containing block.
vh unit - Equal to 1% of the height of the initial containing
block.
vmin unit - Equal to the smaller of vw or vh.
vmax unit - Equal to the larger of vw or vh.
You can use the fact that padding is calculated based on the width and set padding-top: 100% directly to the square grid items (the grid items would be square now).
2019 update
Note that for flex items as well as grid items earlier this doesn't used to work - see the post linked in the comments to this answer:
Why doesn't percentage padding / margin work on flex items in Firefox and Edge?
Now that there is a consensus between browsers (newer versions) to have the same behaviour for padding for flex items and grid items, you can use this solution.
See demo below:
.square-container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fill, minmax(30%, 1fr));
grid-gap: 10px;
}
.square {
background: cadetblue;
padding-top: 100%; /* padding trick directly on the grid item */
box-sizing: border-box;
position: relative;
}
.square .content { /* absolutely positioned */
position: absolute;
top: 0;
right:0;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
}
<div class="square-container">
<div class="square">
<div class="content"> some content here</div>
</div>
<div class="square">
<div class="content"> some content here</div>
</div>
<div class="square">
<div class="content"> some content here</div>
</div>
<div class="square">
<div class="content"> some content here</div>
</div>
<div class="square">
<div class="content column">some content here and there is a lot of text here</div>
</div>
<div class="square">
<div class="content spread">text</div>
</div>
<div class="square">
<div class="content column">some text here</div>
</div>
</div>
You can achieve this in all modern browsers using CSS aspect-ratio property.
.container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(3, 1fr);
grid-gap: 5px;
}
.container div {
aspect-ratio: 1 / 1;
/* Styles below just for demo */
background-color: orange;
color: white;
font-family: Arial;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
}
<div class="container">
<div>A</div>
<div>B</div>
<div>C</div>
<div>D</div>
<div>E</div>
<div>F</div>
<div>G</div>
</div>
For days I was astonished that in 2020 there is no simple solution for this. I was convinced that with CSS grid this is gonna be a piece of cake... Flexbox solution provided by Ason is the only one that works across browsers. On Stack I found one more solution with CSS grid that uses padding-bottom: 100% but it doesn't work in Firefox (you get a lot of white space beneath the footer).
This is my take on the problem, I think it is the simplest solution of all that I have encountered these days.
CSS Grid solution on Codepen:
https://codepen.io/abudimir/pen/ExKqyGp
<div class="square-container">
I am wondering if this is possible: I have a header that can contain a variable amount of text. Below that I have another element which I want to take up the remaining height of the page.
<div class="header row">
<div class="title column large-5">Potentially very long text</div>
<div class="menu column large-7">Menu items</div>
</div>
<div class="content">
</div>
<div class="footer">
</div>
Normally I would do this using calc, eg:
.content {
height: calc(100vh - 75px);
}
Where 75px is the set height of .header.
But in this example, the .header element is dynamic and does not have a set height. Only a padding and font-size are set.
To complicate things, this also uses the Foundation Grid layout, which makes me nervous about using display: table (.title and .menu sit side by side on desktop, but stacked on mobile) .
Is there anyway to get the height of the dynamic header element (without resorting to JQuery)?
You can use flexbox and set .content to flex-grow: 1 so that it will fill to grow the available space.
body {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
min-height: 100vh;
margin: 0;
}
.content {
flex-grow: 1;
background: #eee;
}
<div class="header row">
<div class="title column large-5">Potentially very long text</div>
<div class="menu column large-7">Menu items</div>
</div>
<div class="content">
</div>
<div class="footer">
</div>
I made a small pen to show the way to do this using flex box, it involved changing your markup a bit:
css:
.container {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
height: 250px; // whatever you want here
}
.header {
width: 100%;
background: red;
padding: 10px;
}
.content {
background: yellow;
width: 100%;
flex-grow: 1;
}
So the content will always take the available space inside the content div.
check the whole pen: http://codepen.io/anshul119/pen/yMYeLa
hope this helps.
I am creating a simple css chart responsive that works on any browser.
This is my code:
<div style="width:500px;height:300px;">
<div style="width:10%;height:20%;background:#00ffff;float:left;"></div>
<div style="width:10%;height:40%;background:#00ffff;float:left;"></div>
<div style="width:10%;height:80%;background:#00ffff;float:left;"></div>
</div>
But as you can see, the chart is inverted:
http://jsfiddle.net/xkd6twsq/
I tried with:
position:relative;
bottom:0px;
but doesn't work:
http://jsfiddle.net/xkd6twsq/1/
Use display: inline-block instead of float. The parent needs display: table-cell and vertical-align to align graph to bottom.
<style>
div {
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: bottom;
}
div div {
display: inline-block;
width: 10%;
background: #0ff;
}
</style>
<div style="width:500px;height:300px;">
<div style="height:20%;"></div>
<div style="height:40%;"></div>
<div style="height:80%;"></div>
</div>
http://jsfiddle.net/xkd6twsq/4/
The problem is the float:left, using display: inline-block will get what you want:
<div style="width:500px;height:300px;">
<div style="width:10%;height:20%;background:#00ffff;display:inline-block;"></div>
<div style="width:10%;height:40%;background:#00ffff;display:inline-block;"></div>
<div style="width:10%;height:80%;background:#00ffff;display:inline-block;"></div>
</div>
All about floats from CSS-tricks explains when to use floats and this display types answer details why floats are not the best option.
I have HTML structure
<div class="wraper">
<div class="lewy-fluid">
<div class="lewy-fluid-fluid">
TITLE
</div>
<div class="lewy-fluid-fix">
Kontakt
</div>
</div>
<div class="prawy-fix">
Czat
</div>
</div>
And need to make:
_____________________________________________________________________________
| .LEWY-FLUID | .PRAWY-FIX |
and inside .LEWY-FLUID:
_________________________________________________________
| .LEWY-FLUID-FLUID | .LEWY-FLUID-FIX |
So I have fluid and fixed div and inside that fluid div I also have fluid and fixed div.
How can I make things inside .LEWY-FLUID to be how I want to?
fiddle link: http://fiddle.jshell.net/ozeczek/hu4JH/
I checked here and found a solution to the problem you are having. The main trick here is flipping the order of the divs (put the fixed right div first in your html, then the fluid left div after that).
<div class="wraper">
<div class="prawy-fix">Czat</div>
<div class="lewy-fluid">
<div class="lewy-fluid-fix">Kontakt</div>
<div class="lewy-fluid-fluid">Headshot media</div>
</div>
</div>
Then for your css, set your fixed divs with float:right and your desired width, and your fluid divs to have width:auto and overflow:hidden so they take up the remaining space.
Demo: http://fiddle.jshell.net/5kXHR/
For more about why you should use overflow:hidden, read here.
How about trying Flexbox? Right now I can only test on the latest version of browsers, but this seems to work fine and accomplish what you need:
HTML:
<div class="wrap">
<div class="fluid wrap">
<div class="fluid"></div>
<div class="fixed"></div>
</div>
<div class="fixed"></div>
</div>
CSS:
.wrap {
display: -webkit-flex;
display: -ms-flexbox;
display: flex;
}
.wrap div {
height: 5em;
-webkit-flex: 1 1 auto;
-ms-flex: 1 1 auto;
flex: 1 1 auto;
}
.fluid {
background: tomato;
width: 100%;
}
.fixed {
background: beige;
width: 150px;
min-width: 150px;
}
.fluid.wrap .fluid {
background: orange;
}
.fluid.wrap .fixed {
background:tomato;
}
Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/xdLPZ/2/
I wonder if any one can help me. I have a website with a header, footer and content containers. Now I wish to vertically centre the content between the header and footer containers instead of the page. Does anybody have any ideas how to achieve this???
try the below css
<div >header</div>
<div class="container">
<p>This small paragraph...</p>
</div>
<div >footer</div>
CSS:
div.container {
min-height: 10em;
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle ;}
try the below css
<div class="wrapper">
<div >header</div>
<div class="container">
<p>This small paragraph...</p>
</div>
<div >footer</div>
</div>
CSS:
.wrapper{ display: table; }
div.container {
min-height: 10em;
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle ;
}
Try this i just added wrapper with display:table style.
table-cell property will work only with a wrapper having display:table property