.news-header {
background-image: url(maureske_green_left.gif), url(maureske_green_body.gif), url(maureske_green_right.gif);
background-position: left, center, right;
background-repeat: no-repeat, repeat-x, no-repeat;
height: 31px;
}
This works good but the repeat-x of maureske_green_body.gif makes maureske_green_right.gif to not show up.
Setting a width doesnt make the right image to show neither.
If I do no-repeat on the center image all images show up but of course theres a gap between all three. So how do I fix without making center image same width as webpage?
Thanks in advance!
Jarosław
Top image layer is first in your css, so you need to reorder them this way:
background-image: url(maureske_green_left.gif), url(maureske_green_right.gif), url(maureske_green_body.gif);
In short version your new css will be:
.news-header {
background: url(maureske_green_left.gif) no-repeat left top,
url(maureske_green_right.gif) no-repeat right top,
url(maureske_green_body.gif) repeat center top;
height: 31px;
}
Interesting article about multiple css backgrounds here
I'm stuck on a CSS problem.
I would like to get a CSS stripe as background of my page like i did here, except that i want the stripe to be located on the bottom right corner of the page.
Moreover i want it to be a fixed background attachment.
I tried what is suggested here : How to position background image in bottom right corner? (CSS) but it seems to work only for background images and not for background gradients.
I tried changing offsets in the gradient definition but it's still relative to the top left corner, and the result would differ if the window size changes.
Here's my current code :
body
{
background: linear-gradient(
150deg,
rgba(180,214,14,0.0) ,
rgba(180,214,14,0.0) 70px,
rgba(180,214,14,0.4) 80px,
rgba(152,197,10,0.5) 150px,
rgba(0,0,0,0.4) 151px,
rgba(0,0,0,0) 160px
), no-repeat 0 0 !important;
background-attachment: fixed !important;
/* background-position: 80% 80% !important; */
background-repeat: no-repeat !important;
}
Any advice is welcomed !
I think you are correct, in that the background-position property only works for images and not gradients. At least that's what I'm finding by playing around with it.
So this isn't an answer to "how to make background-position work for gradients", but rather a suggestion to put your gradient on a different element and position IT to the bottom right.
Like:
div {
position: absolute;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
width: 160px;
height: 160px;
background: linear-gradient(
150deg,
rgba(180,214,14,0.0) ,
rgba(180,214,14,0.0) 70px,
rgba(180,214,14,0.4) 80px,
rgba(152,197,10,0.5) 150px,
rgba(0,0,0,0.4) 151px,
rgba(0,0,0,0) 160px
), no-repeat 0 0;
background-position: center;
}
Granted, you'll probably have to change the gradient to fit better within that element, but I think this might be the only way to achieve what you're trying to do.
Also, you'll want to make sure that body has position: relative (or whatever the containing element is).
I would like to use 2 images as a fixed image's background image so I used the code on the body.
background: url(images/31.jpg) 100% no-repeat, url(images/12.jpg) 100% no-repeat;
background-position: fixed;
I need them to fit the browser width 100% and I want image 2 to stack vertically after image 1. I have read quite a few websites about using multiple images with CSS3. Is this possible without JavaScript and if so why do my images stack on top of one another and image 1 doesn't start at top left?
the following reference css try it
#idName {
background-image: url(image1.png),url(image2.png);
background-position: center bottom, left top;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
You need to set the vertical size to 50% or so, else every images takes all the height
body {
background-image: url(http://placekitten.com/300/150), url(http://placekitten.com/200/120);
background-size: auto 50%;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: top center, bottom center;
}
fiddle
I'm using the standard comma-separated multiple image CSS like this:
background-image: url(image-one.png), url(image-two.png);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
However I need image-one.png to float and to be 85% width. Image-two.png does not get that styling.
How do I apply that float and width styling to just one of the images?
Here is an example of what I think you are describing:
background: url(image-one.png) left 0 no-repeat 10px 100px/85% 400px,
url(image-two.png) 5px 5px no-repeat 5px 5px/600px 400px;
I'm not sure the image and element size etc so you can ignore the px values and put in your own.
I've got three background images, all of width 643px. I want them to be set out like so:
top image (12px height) no-repeat
middle image repeat-y
bottom image (12px height) no repeat
I can't seem to do it without getting them to overlap (which is a problem because the images are partially transparent), is something like this possible?
background-image: url(top.png),
url(bottom.png),
url(middle.png);
background-repeat: no-repeat,
no-repeat,
repeat-y;
background-position: left 0 top -12px,
left 0 bottom -12px,
left 0 top 0;
Your problem is that the repeat-y is going to fill the whole height, no matter where you position it initially. Thus, it overlaps your top and bottom.
One solution is to push the repeating background into a pseudo element positioned off of the container by the 12px at the top and bottom. The result can be seen here (the opacity in the demo is just to show that there is no overlap going on). Without opacity, see here. The relevant code (tested in CSS3 browsers: IE9, FF, Chrome):
CSS
div {
position: relative;
z-index: 2;
background: url(top.png) top left no-repeat,
url(bottom.png) bottom left no-repeat;
}
div:before {
content: '';
position: absolute;
z-index: -1; /* push it to the background */
top: 12px; /* position it off the top background */
right: 0;
bottom: 12px; /* position it off the bottom background */
left: 0;
background: url(middle.png) top left repeat-y;
}
If you needed or wanted IE8 support (which does not support multiple backgrounds), then you could put the top background in the main div, and put the bottom background in by using the div:after pseudo element positioned to the bottom of the container.
If you can add padding/borders to the block equal to the backgrounds you want to position without overlapping other block, you can use the background-clip & background-origin to position the top and bottom backgrounds over the paddings/borders, and the repeating background over the content/paddings+content.
Here is an example: http://dabblet.com/gist/2668803
For your code, you'll possibly need to add something like this:
padding: 12px 0;
background-clip: padding-box, padding-box, content-box;
background-origin: padding-box, padding-box, content-box;
or
border: solid transparent;
border-width: 12px 0;
background-clip: border-box, border-box, padding-box;
background-origin: border-box, border-box, padding-box;
And you'll get what you need. If you can't get the paddings/borders, the pseudo-element like ScottS mentioned would work perfectly.
Try do it like this:
background: url(PICTURE.png) left top no-repeat, url(PICTURE2.png) right bottom no-repeat, url(PICTURE3.jpg) left top no-repeat;
}
EDIT:
Was just an example, but here's the css with your css:
background: url(top.png) left 0px top -12px no-repeat, url(middle.png) left 0px top 0px repeat-y, url(bottom.png) left 0px bottom -12px no-repeat;
}
I actually found a simpler fix, because I was having this same issue with a horizontal navigation.
Rather than adding code like the other answers you just have to list it differently in your CSS. The center image that repeats needs to be listed last, not first or second.
In my code it looks like this:
background-image: url(../images/leftNav.gif), url(../images/rightNav.gif), url(../images/centerNav.gif);
background-position: left, right, center;
background-repeat: no-repeat, no-repeat, repeat-x;
to use backgroud-position with 2 arguments, must to Write in extended writing backgroud-position-x and backgroud-position-y
background-position-x: left 0;
background-position-y: top -12px, bottom -12px, top 0;
A radical but effective way to deal with this, if:
you want to apply backgrounds with no overlapping to a ":before"
the ":before" element as a known max height
&:before {
background: url('vertical-line.png') no-repeat 0px,
url('vertical-line-repeat.png') no-repeat 140px,
url('vertical-line-repeat.png') no-repeat 200px,
url('vertical-line-repeat.png') no-repeat 260px,
url('vertical-line-repeat.png') no-repeat 320px,
url('vertical-line-repeat.png') no-repeat 380px,
url('vertical-line-repeat.png') no-repeat 440px,
url('vertical-line-repeat.png') no-repeat 500px,
url('vertical-line-repeat.png') no-repeat 560px,
url('vertical-line-repeat.png') no-repeat 620px,
url('vertical-line-repeat.png') no-repeat 680px,
url('vertical-line-repeat.png') no-repeat 740px;
}
Here's a method that uses 3 div's for each of the Top, Middle, and Bottom images that are transparent to apply to your webpage.
Background wallpaper is optional.
Tested in modern browsers and is IE8 friendly.
This method allows you to treat the body element as it should be treated, i.e., your webpage markup does not need to be in a wrapper or containing element.
jsFiddle Example
jsFiddle Example with centered filled
Since the above example uses image place holder content that is without transparency for Top and Bottom images, you can verify markup works with transparency with this jsFiddle that uses mini transparent icons in repeat mode HERE.
The only (practical, non hair-threatening) way I see is do do that in Javascript, when the page has loaded, and when it is resized, with a canvas sized to fit the innerHeight and the 3 images: draw the first one once at the top, draw the second as many times as required to cover the remainder of the canvas, and draw the 3rd one at the bottom of the canvas. Position the canvas at 0,0 with a ridiculously negative z-index.
I had a go at it with 3 images (643 x 12, 100 and 12) and of course the first issue I saw is that the 3rd image is drawn over part of the last iteration of the 2nd image -- unless you have a window height of exactly 12+12+(p2.height*X), you'll have some overlap. But that's expected, right?
I think z-index will fix this because z-index only affects CHILD elements, meaning you can't mess up anything else on the page that uses z-index.
top and bottom images z-index:3;
middle image z-index:2; background-repeat:repeat-y;