I will try to make this as clear as possible this is a very difficult situation and I will try to explain as clear as possible. I have not many experience in Rails but I want to do Rails in the best way I can. I've created a previous topic before but I don't really understand it Managing Large Scale apps via Rails .
Original situation:
We have had an app developed with only 1 customer in mind. To feed the customer needs we have the following branches:
Development
Customer DEV (separate site for testing new developments)
Customer ACC (separate site for accepting changes)
Customer PRD (the customer production website)
Current situation:
Now we have a second customer and all the branches have doubled. So we are now developing changes for each customer separately. These changes may include model/controller/helper changes and they have a different stylesheet (sass/css) and also different HTML.
So our 1 app has been split into 2 separate apps for 2 customers. And now I have to remembered what I did in each branch and try to implement it into other branches.
Problem:
I'm totally going to lose control of managing these apps if more customers buy it. So each customers could have different CSS / different HTML / different Models/Controllers/Library.
Problem Examples:
Each customer has different config/connections.yml file
Each customer has different translation files config/locales/en.yml
One customer wants to have a database with Users (model/controller) the other doesn't want to keep the users in the DB
My thoughts:
I'm really scared on losing the control of this app when more customers will buy this app. I'm scared that I'm going to have 100 Github branches when 25 customers will buy it. I don't know if many people has this problem or maybe should I start all over again with coding these apps. I don't know if this is even possible but if anyone could help me that would be awesome.
IMHO please consider following points for better management of applications with multiple customers:
Instead of creating separate branches for each customer and developing code separately, develop code in same branch for multiple customers(You can continue having 4 branches as per your release management).
If there are any features which are required by a customer but not
by other then create settings interface for turning a feature
on/off. This can be done by storing values in database or using gems
like flipper or rollout
For different HTML structure and css, do not maintain multiple templates/partials but maintain different layouts for different customers and render respective layout with appropriate css conditionally. Let templates & partials be common to all customers.
Related
Having toyed with the concept in the past, I am interested in using multivariate testing on my companies Sitecore website. There are a number of places where I feel we can definitely improve sales through the use of A/B testing in:
Running two entirely different templates to see what layouts work better for users
Running a number of different Sublayouts (forms) on the site to see which ones people are more likely to fill out
Trialling different content - Running two different sets of copy to see if users are more likely to stay on the page
I want to use the Marketing Suite within Sitecore, and I want to be able to measure who visits pages more and count, out of two or more sublayout forms, which form is used the most. Sadly, I have no experience with the OMS and am struggling to see how one actually implements these things.
Let's say I have a content item, with a bunch of sublayouts attached to it within its template. Can someone help guide me towards a way of achiving the three things I want to run multivariate testing on?
EDIT: On the subject of the two sublayouts I want to test on a template; I have two sublayouts, which are both simple ASP.NET email forms. Once a user fills in the form the contents of the form are written to a database and an email (using Sitecore.Context.Item to get an "Email From" field from the content item that runs the form).
This is where I get stuck. A number of the sublayouts I have don't seem to have any "content" that needs pulling from a data source. The only content I can see in the case of the two forms I want to test is the "Email To" fields. So, if I were to abstract those away into their own data templates, and then added those as data sources I assume that I would then have to change my code for these to stop using Sitecore.Context.Item?
The point where I get stuck is with the data sources for the Multivariate Test Variables and the data sources for the Sublayouts. If I have two data templates containing the Email fields for each, two sublayouts that contain the forms that need testing and two multivariate variables, what goes where?
I believe you can read about it in the Analytics Configuration Reference (PDF link) under section 2.2.
You essentially create a MV test that wraps over potential data sources of a sublayout. The test then randomly assigns a DataSource, so your sublayouts need to be written to work with a DataSource.
With Sitecore 8 released Multivariate Testing is now supported out of the box as well as AB Testing.
You can run two entirely different templates to see which Layout works best for the user by Page Test in Sitecore's Optimization Tool on the Launch Pad. Creating a Page Test you can select the current version of the Item then create a new Version of the Item with the different Layout. This can also be done for Content on the Page
After that you need to decide how a winner can be chosen e.g. most goals completed by users, registrations etc then Sitecore will automatically run the test for you showing A and B to various users and ultimately choose a winner based on the Test Objective. You can choose a winner mannually or let Sitecore automatically choose after a set Duration.
Creating a Mulitvariate Test on number of different Sublayouts as well as imagery, personalisation, content etc is a little more interesting. To create a Multivariate Test is done via Workflow Actions, I've posted a blog recently how to add Maultivariate Testing to workflow.
Approving with a Test will prompt Sitecore to create a Multivariate Test for all variables (Sublayouts, Content, Personalization etc). It creates an 'Experience' for every possible combination of these variables and tests them against each other.
For a more in-depth explination and guide I have recently posted a tutorial to create a Multivariate Test in Sitecore.
There are two trainings that you (and a developer on your team) should really consider attending: OMS Certified Marketer and OMS .NET Developer.
Working with a Sitecore Certified OMS .NET Developer, you will be able to accomplish your marketing objectives. This is what Sitecore Training is for!
Please see the following and regsiter for the next available trainings:
http://www.sitecore.net/Training/Course-Overview/OMS-11-Certified-Marketer.aspx
http://www.sitecore.net/Training/Course-Overview/OMS-11-NET-Developer.aspx
We have a client who is currently using Lotus Notes/Domino as their content management system and web server. For many reasons, we are recommending they sunset their Notes/Domino implementation and transition onto a more modern platform--such as Drupal.
The client has several web applications which would be a natural fit for Drupal. However, I am unsure of the best way to implement one of the web applications in Drupal. I am running into a knowledge barrier and wondered if any of you could fill in the gaps.
Situation
The client has a Lotus Domino application which serves as a front-end for querying a large DB2 data store and returning a result set (generally in table form) to a user via the web. The web application provides access to approximately 100 pre-defined queries--50 of which are public and 50 of which are secured. Most of the queries accept some set of user selected parameters as input. The output of the queries is typically returned to users in a list (table) format. A limited number of result sets allow drill-down through the HTML table into detail records.
The query parameters often involve database queries themselves. For example, a single query may pull a list of company divisions into a drop-down. Once a division is selected, second drop-down with the departments from that division is populated--but perhaps only departments which meet some special criteria--such as those having taken a loss within a specific time frame. Most queries have 2-4 parameters with the average probably being 3.
The application involves no data entry. None of the back-end data is ever modified by the web application. All access is purely based around querying data and viewing results.
The queries change relatively infrequently, and the current system has been in place for approximately 10 years. There may be 10-20 query additions, modifications, or other changes in a given year. The client simply desires to change the presentation platform but absolutely does not want to re-do the 100 database queries.
Once the project is implemented, the client wants their staff to take over and manage future changes. The client's staff have no background in Drupal or PHP but are somewhat willing to learn as necessary.
How would you transition this into Drupal? My major knowledge void relates to how we would manage the query parameters and access the queries themselves. Here are a few specific questions but feel free to chime in on any issue related to this implementation.
Would we have to build 100 forms by hand--with each form containing the parameters for a given query? If so, how would we do this?
Approximately how long would it take to build/configure each of these forms?
Is there a better way than manually building 100 forms? (I understand using CCK to enter data into custom content types but since we aren't adding any nodes, I am a little stuck as to how this might work.)
Would it be possible for the internal staff to learn to create these query parameter forms--even if they are unfamiliar with Drupal today? Would they be required to do any PHP programming?
How would we take the query parameters from a form and execute a query against DB2? Would this require a custom module? If so, would it require one module total or one module per query? (Note: There is apparently a DB2 driver available for Drupal. See http://groups.drupal.org/node/5511.)
Note: I am not looking for CMS recommendations other than Drupal as Drupal nicely fits all of the client's other requirements, and I hope to help them standardize on a single platform.
Any assistance you can provide would be helpful. Thank you in advance for your help!
Have a look at the Data module - it might be able to get you a long way towards a solution.
The biggest problem you are likely to have is connecting to the DB2 server through Drupal since it's DBA layer doesn't support it without patches (as you've discovered).
A couple things come to mind.
You can use Table Wizard to expose any custom tables to views. Views basically gives you a UI for writing custom sql queries. Once your tables are exposed to views you can use filters to "parameterize" the query. Also, views supports many display options including tables and pagers.
If you do need to write your own forms for advanced queries, take a look at the Drupal Form API which makes creating custom php forms a peice of cake.
Views is fairly easy to learn and, in my experience, most clients pick it up quickly. It really depends on the complexity of the query.
Form API should be easy for a developer to pick up, but does require a basic knowledge of php and writing Drupal code.
Does Lotus provide a web service to query it? If so, you can easily do this using a custom form (in your own module) and use Services module to query the data.
We use MS Dynamics 4.0 at work for our CRM. This handles all contact management, marketing, resource sharing w/ sharepoint integration, workflow management / collaboration and essentially is used by every department in the firm in some way or another.
We have requirements from business for a new application that we have a tight timeline on. We have only just started rolling out CRM, and most of the custom development was done by a consulting firm.
We need a relatively simple application that we need to track some data for sharing for a specific group. Some of this information already lives in our 'company' and 'client' CRM entity.
This new project would require us to add around 26 fields - we don't want to bloat our already large company entity - especially since only around 5% of our companies would use these extra fields.
We are basically debating a design right now - hybrid solution (create our own ASP.NET app that looks like CRM and communicates to it via web services and store all the 'supplemental' fields on our own database, possibly living on the same DB server as our CRM DB so we can easily write queries). The other alternative is to do it 100% in CRM.
I'm just looking for advice for people who have done something similar to this. Would you recommend doing a hybrid solution such as this or should we do 100% CRM? Our deadline is tight and the developers working on the project have limited CRM knowledge; this is why it's a bit of a debate. For those working with MS Dynamics - how would you typically handle a project like this, where we need to add many fields (and even sub fields with parent->child relationships of their own) that would only apply to a very small percentage of our main 'company' entity.. something to note: we are already having performance issues when people load up this company entity as is (it could take 5 seconds for the page to render) and the same goes for advanced finds.
Last thing to note - this portion of the application is only for storing the data. In the end, the user will be opening a VBA Excel workbook, pushing a 'pull down data' button, that will pull this data from wherever we wind up storing it. We just aren't sure where we should store/manage this data/UI.
Thanks very much for any advice.
EDIT: How can I create 2 list boxes next to each other with 2 buttons in the middle where one listbox is a lost of 'my foos' and the other is 'all foos' and you add/take away from 'my foos' list box??? the classic 'i have these foos as part of me' UI control with 2 list boxes and 2 arrow buttons... Should/can I use jquery for this? and does anyone happen to know of any jquery control that already does all of this out of the box? This is such a common control I'm sure it must be out there somewhere. I've browsed some toolkits and controls and some threads on here and seen some really awesome, even more complicated controls but not this particular one..
EDIT2: After doing more research, it seems like keeping the UI all in CRM would be more complicated then just making an ASP.NET app for that portion and putting it in an iframe or modal popup in CRM.
We can still setup all the data fields and relationships in CRM - and have the ASP.NET do the CRUD using Webservice calls.
It seems we would wind up having to do the same amount of work to get the functionality needed in CRM - except it would be more hackish and done in javascript. At what benefit? Keeping the UI in one place??? Not that much of a trade off IMO...
so far we are leaning towards keeping all data in CRM but putting the UI in ASP.NET
Any advice is greatly appreicated. Is what I'm saying sane? Thanks
I agree, you're better off going with 100% CRM.
If (and I stress if) you find the performance impact is significant, consider using a related entity to hold the additional fields.
CRM doesn't provide a 1-to-1 relationship type so you'll have to manage that yourself. Make your company entity the N side of the relationship so the related entity appears as a lookup.
Alternately, if the related entity lookup is too abstract for your users, add a tab with an iFrame to the company entity form. Use javascript to show/hide the tab and also to set the src of the iFrame to the url of the related entity.
I'd use CRM to store the data. You can stick the new fields in a separate pane in the UI so that it won't clutter. You can even add some Javascript to the UI to hide pane/fields from users who are not part of the group that requires them. I know this sounds a little hacke-ty, but it's a lot less work than coming up with an entirely different app and users will get a consistent experience. Having the data in one place is also a boon for reporting and such.
I can't say for sure, but I don't think adding a few columns to an entity (which already has a bazzilion columns) will deteriorate performance much further. I'd go over the installation and check for the usual performance pitfalls.
Creating ASP.NET applications to create a complex UI in an iframe is a simple solution that I use frequently for MS Dynamics CRM 4.0 applications.
Keeping all of the data in CRM makes a lot of sense, but make the UI however you want it.
The iframe calls your ASP.NET application with a Querystring containing the entity's GUID so that you can use web services to pull any related information.
You can both modify the fields showing on the form with JavaScript, directly update the database or both for consistency. Frequently it is easier just to hide the fields being updated in the ASP.NET application so there is no confusion.
An example from a long time ago was a loan morgage calculator that I built for an iframe of an opportunity that a sales representative would have up. It would find all of the customer's related loan balances and calculate different options that the sale representative could then turn into a quote. Click a few check boxes, and press a button and they were done without having to rekey a lot of information. Data was written to a number of CRM entities, emails were generated and the autodialer list would be modified not to call that customer again.
Learning to use MS CRM as a big development toolbox is the first step to being able to do some serious business process automation.
If you have any questions let me know.
I know that this doesn't fit your situation as you are deep in MS CRM, but there is a good article by Neal Ford that was recently posted to IBM Developer Works (http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-eaed10/) that discusses COTS vs home grown software. Here's a snippet.
One of the common questions that arise in big companies is the decision whether to build or buy: for the current requirements, should we buy COTS (Commercial Off-the-Shelf Software) or build it ourselves? The motivation for this decision is understandable — if the company can find some already written software that does exactly what's needed, it saves time and money. Unfortunately, lots of software vendors understand this desire and write packaged software that can be customized if it doesn't do exactly what the client needs. They are motivated to build the most generic software they can because it will potentially fit into more ecosystems. But the more general it is, the more customization is required. That's when an army of consultants shows up, sometimes taking years to get all the custom coding done.
At the company I work for, we have an intranet that provides employees with access to a wide variety of documents. These documents fall into several categories and subcategories, and each of these categories have their own web page. Below is one such page (each of the links shown will link to a similar view for that category):
http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/9800/dmss.jpg
We currently store each document as a file on the web server and hand-code links to these documents whenever we need to add a new document. This is tedious and error-prone, and it also means we lack any sort of security for accessing these documents. I began looking into document management systems (like KnowledgeTree and OpenKM), however, none of these systems seem to provide a categorized view like in the preview above.
My question is ... does anyone know of any Document Management System that allow for the type of flexibility we currently have with hand-coding links to our documents into various webpages (major and minor , while also providing security, ease of use, and (less important) version control? Or do you think I'd be better off developing such a system from scratch?
If you are trying to categorize the files or folders in the document management system, That's not a difficult task. You only need to access to admin panel to maintain the folders or categorize the folders
In Laserfiche, You can easily categorize your folders regarding the departments and can also be subcategorized them
You should look into Alfresco. It's extremely extensible and provides a lot of ways of accessing the repository.
Note: click the "Developers" tab for the community edition.
My question is ... does anyone know of
any Document Management System that
allow for the type of flexibility we
currently have with hand-coding links
to our documents into various webpages
(major and minor , while also
providing security, ease of use, and
(less important) version control?
Or do you think I'd be better off developing such a system from scratch?
Well there are companies that make a living selling doc management software. Anything you can get off the shelf is going to be a huge time saver, and its going to be better than anything you could reasonably develop by hand.
I've used a few systems:
Sharepoint: although I hear some people don't like it, I didn't either ;)
HyperOffice worked really well for my company of around 150 employees and has all the features you describe.
Current company uses Confluence, I like it :) But its probably one of those tools whose pricetag isn't worth it, especially if you're only using a subset of its features like doc management.
I haven't used it, but one guy I know raves about Alfresco, a free and open source doc management system. I looked at its website, seems simple enough to use.
We also faced a similar problem. However version control was more on our priority and we did look into many solutions in and around. We found Globodox extremely easy to install and use and more important the support team was absolutely fantastic
Try Mayan EDMS, it's Django based, and open source, used it as a base and build the custom features you wish on top of it.
Code location: https://gitlab.com/mayan-edms/mayan-edms
Homepage at: http://www.mayan-edms.com
The project is also available via PyPI at: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/mayan-edms/
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
Visual studio is pretty good but doesn't create stored procedures automatically. Iron Speed designer does supposedly. But is it any good?
I have used Ironspeed extensively for the past two years for most of our ASP.NET forms over data projects.
It works. Does several things well: stored procs, fast layout of table browse and CRUD screens, fast layout of single record CRUD screens. It manages the round-trip (or half-round trip) process decently, detecting changes in your back end db schema and updating its data access layer, then making the changed columns available for you to alter your UI (in record or table control panels). ISD (as they call it) does an excellent job in making security management for your app pretty painless, even down to the control level (if you use ISD's subclassed versions of asp.net controls). Final plus, not a small one, is the CSS-based theme control (easy to change to a variety of themes, easy to customize a particular theme, and not even too bad to build your own theme variant by forking an existing one you like). Depending upon whether you let ISD create your stored procs in the code base or the database, changing DB's at run time can be a piece of cake.
Fairly active forum with a core group of helpful contributors. You can probably avoid the paid tech support through the forum.
Okay, the down sides. Creates fairly large code conglomerations, being a three tiered architecture. As Galwegian says, like any framework, you've got the velvet handcuffs (get your mind out of the gutter if you are thinking about anything other than code limitations and conventions!). The velvet handcuffs are the page and control model, the data layer, lack of a business object/class capability per se, the postback model, and the temptation to make your user GUI look like THEIR user GUI that comes out of the box because it is so darned easy and convenient.
ISD builds a basic page by combining an HTML template (in to which you place ISD specific code generation tags and any other tags, etc., you which using the ISD GUI or by hand). The page model relies upon a code behind page created from a piece of code template. The base classes are almost completely overridable, so that you can override all of the default functions, regenerate the application and not lose your overrides. The database controls live in the page container, but have their own class definitions (i.e., their code-behind) in specific /app_code files. Again, each control type has its own base class with pretty completely overridable methods. A single record control (showing a single db record) is pretty simple. A table, showing several records, has a table class and a table row class. The ISD website (www.ironspeed.com/support) has good documentation of the ISD model as a whole.
So, where are the problems in this model?
1. Easy and tempting to live with their out of the box GUI. Point ISD at your database, pick the tables you want to have it turn in to pages, tell it the kinds of pages, give it a thematic style and five minutes later you're viewing the application. Cool. But, it is very easy to forget that their user GUI is probably not what your user wants to see. So, be prepared to think for yourself and tinker with the GUI thus created. Not hard to do, and you can use VS 2005 to help you.
Business objects. You could put together your own business objects, but it would be difficult and you would get no help from ISD. ISD does a LOT of building of simple validation and checking (appropriate look up values, ranges, lengths, etc.) ISD lets you build custom queries, but these are read-only. It is smart enough (and you can override the write from a page in any case) to let you take a one to many view and write it back to the database (you'd probably override the default base method, but it isn't that hard to do). However, when you get in to serious dependency checking, ISD is still really about tables and not business objects. So, you're going to write some code.
If you are smart, you'll write it once store it in app_code somewhere and use it by calling it from an overridden method in your table or record controls. If you are like most of us, you'll first spaghetti it in to one of the code-behind classes above, and then forget you did so, or have a copy in each of the 10 pages that manipulates customer data. In my world, that has usually meant 5 identical functions and 5 that are all different (even though they are all supposed to be the same). ISD makes it tempting to order marinara, because the model lends itself to spaghetti code. Of course, you can completely prevent this, but you gotta learn the ISD model to determine the best way to do it on your project.
Page state and postbacks. Although ISD is quite open about this problem and tells users not to just take the defaults of returning the whole asp.net page state in the postback stream (cache on the server instead), the default is to return the whole page. Can make for some BIG pages. Which makes users think S L O W. As I said, you can manipulate this. But, what newbie is going to get this when it is SO tempting to just point, click, and boom - instant application. Your manager is now off your back because her product inventory table is "on the web" with a cool search and edit GUI (of 400kb state pages if you've gone a bit nuts and have just taken the default behaviors of ISD). Great in-house, but the customers in the real world....
Again, knowledge is the key. You can fix this, but you need to know you SHOULD.
Database read/write postbacks. No big problem here, but you also need to know that the model is to fetch only the data used at the moment. If your table shows 1000 records in 50 record increments, when you go from records 1 to 50 to 51 through 100, you will postback and hit the database again. This keeps data current, but increases server traffic.
Overall: Try the demo version. Point it at something simple that you really want to turn in to an asp.net application. Build maybe three tables. Then dissect it using the above as a guide. See what YOU think and post back to this question.
I have used it for convenience for a very small project. It did what I wanted and saved me a couple of days work.
The main problem I found was when it came to customising or extending the generated project. You have to spend quite a bit of time trying to understand Ironspeed's way of doing things which, I'll admit, is not my way.
I'd use it again for a small project if I knew in advance I wouldn't have to customise it much after.
If stored procedure generation is all you are after, CodeSmith is a decent option at a fraction of the cost of IronSpeed. There are several sproc templates available, and you can create your own or tweak an existing if that is what you need. You can also gen .Net code to your hearts content with CodeSmith. Tons of business class templates already exist for this.
IronSpeed's value is not in the sproc generation, but in the RAD features. I agree with #Galwegian... IronSpeed is OK for mock ups or very simple apps, not so good at all if you need to do any customization.
You may want to check out Evolutility CRUD framework. It provides some of the same features (limited to CRUD) and is open source.
IronSpeed has been great (out-of-the-box) at helping me develop data-driven corporate Intranet applications. While the code model takes a little getting used to, it is effective at maintaining a nice three-tier app. While the page templates can appear garish compared to 2010's web-design, it gets the job done, when you need function over form.
Iron Speed Designer is great for simple CRUD type web applications. You can find some useful information on our web site http://www.dotnetarchitect.co.uk/