Using CSS to style SVG element - css

All,
I'm pretty new to using SVGs, and I'm hoping someone here can explain to me how to target a particular element of my SVG with CSS?
What I'm trying to do is put together a country map where specific areas will appear darker when the user hovers over them. The map was made in layers in Photoshop, then imported in Illustrator and exported as a SVG file. So far, so good. But I'm running into trouble when I try to style their individual parts (which Illustrator put in "g" IDs and tags).
The code looks like this:
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" version="1.1" x="0px" y="0px" viewBox="0 0 1762 2043" style="enable-background:new 0 0 1762 2043;" xml:space="preserve" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace">
<g id="Area1">
<image style="overflow:visible;" width="378" height="272" id="Area1" xlink:href=".../.../121F7A955DACD041.png" transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 657 912)">
</image>
</g>
Followed by an "Area2", "Area3", etc.
Now I figured if I simply used "Area1:hover" in my stylesheet, it would work -- but it doesn't.
Oddly enough, when I set "display: none" for the same ID in my CSS, it DOES hide the area. So why won't the hover attribute work?

The <g> element defines a group of SVG elements. It doesn't actually take up any space in the rendered SVG image. So there is nothing for you to :hover over in order to activate this rule in your stylesheet.
You can fix this by setting :hover rules for the group's child elements, or by adding a child selector to the CSS rule, like #Area1 > *:hover, for example.
Here's a simple example (JSFiddle link)
CSS:
#a1 > *:hover {
fill:#fc0;
}
SVG:
<svg viewBox="0 0 200 200">
<g id="a1" style="fill:#e82">
<path d="M50,50v100h100v-100z" />
</g>
</svg>
Update: Creating SVG maps with :hover style attributes
If you try to create an SVG map from multiple overlapping 
Working Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/b2f2jx0f/3/

Related

Import an SVG element from another document, without losing the CSS <style> from the original file

I need to create a number of SVG files and would love to keep a set of common symbols in one file and import them into the others.
I managed to do this using a <use> element:
<use href="common.svg#symbol1" />
The problem is that if common.svg has a CSS style that affects an element, the style has no effect in the file where the element is imported.
I uploaded two SVGs on svgur.com to show this:
https://svgur.com/i/bYv.svg
...defines a circle with id ball affected by a style that sets a red border around it.
<svg width="100" height="100" version="1.1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<style>#ball { stroke:#ff0000; stroke-width:10; }</style>
<circle id="ball" cx="50" cy="50" r="45" />
</svg>
https://svgur.com/i/bXA.svg
...uses the circle. The circle is visible but the border is not.
<svg width="100" height="100" version="1.1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<use href="bYv.svg#ball" />
</svg>
Questions:
Is this a bug of the SVG renderer I'm using or is it how it's supposed to behave?
Every renderer I tried (chrome, firefox, inkscape) shows the same result so I suspect this might be the intended behavior.
Is there any way to import an element from an external SVG file and the CSS styles that affect it too, so that it appears exactly like it does in its original document?
Is this a bug of the SVG renderer I'm using or is it how it's supposed to behave?
It is the intended behaviour. CSS rules do not apply across document boundaries. You are importing the SVG into your main document, but your CSS is in another document.
Is there any way to import an element from an external SVG file and the CSS styles that affect it too...
No.
Well I suppose you could technically write some Javascript to load the other file and extract the CSS rules. But I strongly suspect you don't want to do that.
You SVG "sprite document" should not have CSS rules in a <style> tag.
The best approach is to pre-prepare you SVGs to be used as sprites.
What I would do is import your common.svg into a vector editor and convert all your CSS attributes into presentation attributes. For example Illustrator lets you choose the method of styling when you export an SVG.
What you want is for something like this:
<svg>
<style>
.st0 {
fill: red;
}
</style>
<symbol id="whatever">
<path d="..." class="st0"/>
</symbol>
</svg>
to be converted to:
<svg>
<symbol id="whatever">
<path d="..." fill="red"/>
</symbol>
</svg>
According to the Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) 2
specification (W3C Editor’s Draft, 08 June 2021) it seems that the style of the original document should be applied where an element is imported.
Section 5.5. The ‘use’ element:
The cloned content inherits styles from the ‘use’ element and can be the target of user events. However, these cloned element instances remain linked to the referenced source and reflect DOM mutations in the original. In addition, all style rules that apply in the scope of the referenced element also apply in the scope of the cloned shadow tree.
And 5.5.3. Style Scoping and Inheritance:
The use-element shadow tree, like other shadow trees, exhibits style encapsulation, as defined in the CSS Scoping module [css-scoping-1]. This means that elements in the shadow tree inherit styles from its host ‘use’ element, but that style rules defined in the outer document do not match the elements in the shadow tree. Instead, the shadow tree maintains its own list of stylesheets, whose CSS rules are matched against elements in the shadow tree.
When the referenced element is from an external document, the stylesheet objects generated when processing that document apply to the shadow tree, and are read-only. All URL references in the stylesheet, including fragment-only references, must be made absolute, relative to the URL of the document that contains the referenced element. User agents may re-use the same stylesheet objects for any shadow trees that reference that same external document.
So it's the browsers and SVG renderers I tried that are not conforming to the standard.
I'm still looking for a way to emulate this behavior on existing SVG user agents.
Your styles will be applied, provided your svg asset code is inlined
<svg style="display:none" class="svg-asset" width="100" height="100" version="1.1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<style>
#inline-ball { stroke:#ff0000; stroke-width:10; }
</style>
<circle id="inline-ball" cx="50" cy="50" r="45" />
</svg>
<svg width="100" height="100" version="1.1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<use xlink:href="#inline-ball" />
</svg>
If you prefer not to inline svg code then "fragment identifiers" might be the better embedding approach.
It's basically a sprite concept:
So your image assets(like symbols) need to be positioned with some x or y offset on sprite pane (unlike symbols who could be positioned with overlapping).
You're actually loading a complete svg including embedded css style elements but choose a particular view frame.
See this articel on css.tricks.com
css.tricks.com: How SVG Fragment Identifiers Work
Your svg would be something like this
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" x="0px" y="0px" viewBox="0 0 32 96" >
<g id="icon01">
<path d="M20.6,23.3L14,16.7V7.9h4v7.2l5.4,5.4L20.6,23.3z M16-0.1c-8.8,0-16,7.2-16,16s7.2,16,16,16s16-7.2,16-16S24.8-0.1,16-0.1z M16,27.9c-6.6,0-12-5.4-12-12s5.4-12,12-12s12,5.4,12,12S22.6,27.9,16,27.9z"/>
</g>
<g id="icon02">
<path d="M32,43.2c0,2.7-1.2,5.1-3,6.8l0,0l-10,10c-1,1-2,2-3,2s-2-1-3-2l-10-10c-1.9-1.7-3-4.1-3-6.8c0-5.1,4.1-9.2,9.2-9.2c2.7,0,5.1,1.2,6.8,3c1.7-1.9,4.1-3,6.8-3C27.9,33.9,32,38.1,32,43.2z"/>
</g>
<view id="icon-clock-view" viewBox="0 0 32 32" />
<view id="icon-heart-view" viewBox="0 32 32 32" />
</svg>
For using the fragment identifiers we need to add <view> elements with corresponding sprite area coordinates (defined in viewBox attribute).
Unlike symbol definitions we don't nest the actual path data in view elements.
Embedding in html works by adding the target ID to our src url.
<img class="svg-fragment" src="fragment-ready-1.svg#icon-heart-view">
However, inlining svg graphics in your html, still offers the best styling controls.
(e.g styling elements in your websites css file)
Maybe we'll see additional support for styling remotely embedded svg assets in the future ... Until then we still have to cope with some browser quirks.

Chrome is clipping the edges off SVG images , where other browsers don't

I have some SVG icons I'm using which show up correctly in Firefox and Safari, like this:
...but they come out clipped at the edges like this in Chrome (both MacOS and Windows):
The source images are square (they have square viewBoxes, even if there's extra internal blank space), and my SVG markup treats them as square:
<image id="download" href="assets/download.svg" x="161.5" y="0.5" width="2.5" height="2.5"/>
<text id="low-battery-text" x="169" y="2.75" text-anchor="end"></text>
<image id="low-battery" href="assets/low-battery.svg" x="169.5" y="0.5" width="2.5" height="2.5"/>
If I make the specified height of these icons a bit taller then Chrome stops clipping them, but that changes the positioning and scaling of the images a bit too. And besides, it shouldn't be necessary.
I get the impression that Chrome is ignoring the viewBox values for the SVG images, it's finding the internal edges of the images, and scaling according to that (but that's just a guess). (No, that's not it.)
Here's what the SVG inside one of the SVG files looks like:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<svg version="1.1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 30 30">
<g>
<path fill="#0F0" d="M25.462,19.105v6.848H4.515v-6.848H0.489v8.861c0,1.111,0.9,2.012,2.016,2.012h24.967c1.115,0,2.016-0.9,2.016-2.012
v-8.861H25.462z"/>
<path fill="#0F0" d="M14.62,18.426l-5.764-6.965c0,0-0.877-0.828,0.074-0.828s3.248,0,3.248,0s0-0.557,0-1.416c0-2.449,0-6.906,0-8.723
c0,0-0.129-0.494,0.615-0.494c0.75,0,4.035,0,4.572,0c0.536,0,0.524,0.416,0.524,0.416c0,1.762,0,6.373,0,8.742
c0,0.768,0,1.266,0,1.266s1.842,0,2.998,0c1.154,0,0.285,0.867,0.285,0.867s-4.904,6.51-5.588,7.193
C15.092,18.979,14.62,18.426,14.62,18.426z"/>
</g>
</svg>
I can only find very different topics discussed when I try to Google for an answer to this problem, so I hoping someone who may have encountered a similar issue might have a suggestion for fixing it.
Update:
Interesting experiment - it isn't a good solution, but it's perhaps revealing of the underlying problem.
If I bypass using an SVG image file, and paste the content of the SVG file into my own SVG, the clipping problem goes away:
<svg viewBox="0 0 30 30" x="161.5" y="0.5" width="2.5" height="2.5">
<g>
<path fill="#0F0" d="M25.462,19.105v6.848H4.515v-6.848H0.489v8.861c0,1.111,0.9,2.012,2.016,2.012h24.967c1.115,0,2.016-0.9,2.016-2.012
v-8.861H25.462z"/>
<path fill="#0F0" d="M14.62,18.426l-5.764-6.965c0,0-0.877-0.828,0.074-0.828s3.248,0,3.248,0s0-0.557,0-1.416c0-2.449,0-6.906,0-8.723
c0,0-0.129-0.494,0.615-0.494c0.75,0,4.035,0,4.572,0c0.536,0,0.524,0.416,0.524,0.416c0,1.762,0,6.373,0,8.742
c0,0.768,0,1.266,0,1.266s1.842,0,2.998,0c1.154,0,0.285,0.867,0.285,0.867s-4.904,6.51-5.588,7.193
C15.092,18.979,14.62,18.426,14.62,18.426z"/>
</g>
</svg>

How can I refer to an internal gradient definition inside an SVG sprite symbol?

SUMMARY: An SVG sprite contains five icon <symbol> blocks, one of which references its own gradient definition by ID. It is no longer able to find this gradient and render properly.
JSFIDDLE: http://jsfiddle.net/Qtq24/1/
I am switching some graphics to SVG, and being that they are icons (in this case for social networking profiles) I'd like to keep them in a sprite (as I had with PNG before).
I've followed this guide to SVG sprites on CSS-tricks.com (along with this follow-up which advises using <symbol> instead of <g>).
I now have an SVG sprite file, social-sprite.svg, which you can view in full here.
This is one complete <svg> block containing five different <symbol> blocks, each with an id and with a viewBox attribute. In each case I got the SVG code for each symbol by preparing official icons in Adobe Illustrator and retaining the relevant parts of the processed code.
The .svg file is included via PHP as soon as the <body> tag opens (and this is why the main <svg> container inside it is marked with style="display: none;") so that the references to each symbol work from the HTML.
Four icons work perfectly, and the only one I am having trouble with is the YouTube icon, because it uses an internally-defined gradient. Here is the YouTube part of the SVG code:
<symbol id="youtube" viewBox="0 0 400 281.641">
<path id="Triangle" fill="#FFFFFF" d="M159.845,191.73l106.152-54.999L159.845,81.348V191.73z"/>
<path id="The_Sharpness" opacity="0.12" fill-rule="evenodd" clip-rule="evenodd" fill="#420000" d="M159.845,81.348l93.091,62.162
l13.061-6.778L159.845,81.348z"/>
<g id="Lozenge">
<g>
<linearGradient id="SVGID_1_" gradientUnits="userSpaceOnUse" x1="200.4204" y1="2.6162" x2="200.4204" y2="278.9292">
<stop offset="0" style="stop-color:#E52D27"/>
<stop offset="1" style="stop-color:#BF171D"/>
</linearGradient>
<path fill="url(#SVGID_1_)" d="M392.928,62.226c0,0-3.839-27.073-15.617-38.995C362.371,7.583,345.626,7.506,337.947,6.59
c-54.975-3.974-137.441-3.974-137.441-3.974h-0.171c0,0-82.464,0-137.44,3.974c-7.68,0.916-24.419,0.993-39.364,16.641
C11.753,35.153,7.92,62.226,7.92,62.226s-3.929,31.792-3.929,63.583v29.805c0,31.791,3.929,63.582,3.929,63.582
s3.833,27.073,15.611,38.995c14.945,15.646,34.575,15.152,43.318,16.792c31.43,3.015,133.571,3.946,133.571,3.946
s82.552-0.124,137.526-4.099c7.679-0.915,24.424-0.993,39.363-16.64c11.778-11.922,15.617-38.995,15.617-38.995
s3.923-31.791,3.923-63.582v-29.805C396.851,94.017,392.928,62.226,392.928,62.226z M159.863,191.73l-0.018-110.383
l106.152,55.384L159.863,191.73z"/>
</g>
</g>
</symbol>
And this is called in the HTML with:
<svg width="30" height="21">
<use xlink:href="#youtube" src="fallback.png" width="30" height="21" />
</svg>
The opening two paths work fine, the problem is that in this new combined sprite SVG file, with each icon separated as a <symbol>, the "Lozenge" <path> is unable to find the #SVGID_1_ reference to the <linearGradient>.
In Firefox this causes the lozenge to display as white (I assume, perhaps it is not displaying at all - not really looked into it):
whilst Chrome renders it in black:
Obviously neither is acceptable. The only thing I can do at the moment is remove fill="url(#SVGID_1_)" on the path and just fill with a flat colour red appropriate to the YouTube logo. This is not a proper solution though, even discounting the fact that bastardising the YouTube logo in this way would not be accepted under their brand guidelines.
Things I've tried (and had no luck with):
removing the two <g> wrappers that surround the gradient and the path, so the whole of the symbol is just <path>-<path>-<linearGradient>-<path>
wrapping the gradient definition inside a <defs> container
wrapping it in a <defs> and also moving it to the top of the SVG file, i.e. outside the bounds of the YouTube-specific <symbol>
changing ID name (you never know!)
redefining the gradient with percentages rather than pixel values
So how do I get an already-internal <symbol> to reference an also-internal <linearGradient> definition?
EDIT: It turns out the gradient fails when the whole <svg> block is marked with style="display: none;". If this style is removed, the gradient renders properly. But as a reminder, this styling is added so that when you import the SVG sprite it is not rendered instantly on the page, and just allows you to make references to the id-defined symbols as required.
visibility: hidden or opacity: 0 both allow the gradient to render properly, obviously they don't offer proper solutions though as they still demarcate the space that the SVG would have taken up if visible.
After discovering all this, I was pretty sure it would be no problem to have the fully visible <svg> with no stylings added INSIDE a container <div> which is hidden. However, even this causes the gradient not to render. I'm no closer to solving the issue.
Firstly please note the edit to my question - whereupon I discover that the use of display: none to hide the SVG symbols until we need them was the problem.
I kept fiddling and settled upon this "answer", which is far from perfect, but should still be reliable for any such situation.
All you need to do is wrap the entire <svg> code in a <div> container which must be displayed but will never affect layout, so I've just done this via mega overkill CSS such as:
height: 0; width: 0; position: absolute; visibility: hidden;
And this works great. See the final fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/Qtq24/5/
If anyone has a better solution, I'd love to hear it as this feels like a bit of a hacky way of doing it but I guess no more hacky than having to use display: none; anyway.
Don't use style="display: none;" in SVG. You have it on the root <svg> element. Either visibility:hidden, height/width="0" or <defs> are better alternatives.
There used to be a bug in Firefox with gradient elements in symbols. That bug was fixed many versions ago now. The original code works as expected.
<svg width="30" height="21">
<symbol id="youtube" viewBox="0 0 400 281.641">
<linearGradient id="SVGID_1_" gradientUnits="userSpaceOnUse" x1="200.4204" y1="2.6162" x2="200.4204" y2="278.9292">
<stop offset="0" style="stop-color:#E52D27"/>
<stop offset="1" style="stop-color:#BF171D"/>
</linearGradient>
<path id="Triangle" fill="#FFFFFF" d="M159.845,191.73l106.152-54.999L159.845,81.348V191.73z"/>
<path id="The_Sharpness" opacity="0.12" fill-rule="evenodd" clip-rule="evenodd" fill="#420000" d="M159.845,81.348l93.091,62.162
l13.061-6.778L159.845,81.348z"/>
<g id="Lozenge">
<g>
<path fill="url(#SVGID_1_)" d="M392.928,62.226c0,0-3.839-27.073-15.617-38.995C362.371,7.583,345.626,7.506,337.947,6.59
c-54.975-3.974-137.441-3.974-137.441-3.974h-0.171c0,0-82.464,0-137.44,3.974c-7.68,0.916-24.419,0.993-39.364,16.641
C11.753,35.153,7.92,62.226,7.92,62.226s-3.929,31.792-3.929,63.583v29.805c0,31.791,3.929,63.582,3.929,63.582
s3.833,27.073,15.611,38.995c14.945,15.646,34.575,15.152,43.318,16.792c31.43,3.015,133.571,3.946,133.571,3.946
s82.552-0.124,137.526-4.099c7.679-0.915,24.424-0.993,39.363-16.64c11.778-11.922,15.617-38.995,15.617-38.995
s3.923-31.791,3.923-63.582v-29.805C396.851,94.017,392.928,62.226,392.928,62.226z M159.863,191.73l-0.018-110.383
l106.152,55.384L159.863,191.73z"/>
</g>
</g>
</symbol>
<use xlink:href="#youtube" width="30" height="21" />
</svg>

How do I change the colour of an SVG image in a CSS content property?

I'd like to use an SVG image as a CSS sprite through a content property, bootstrap-style, like so:
i.rectangle-image {
content: url(rectangle.svg);
}
and here's my SVG:
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 100 100">
<rect x="10" y="10" width="80" height="80"/>
</svg>
and proposed HTML:
<div><i class="rectangle-image"></i> Hello, world!</div>
I'd like to be able to re-colour the SVG in my application, for example to have the icon appear purple in some locations, and white in others. I know I can accomplish this by having three different SVG files (or data URIs) with the fill attribute set differently on the <rect> tag, but I'm wondering if there's a way for me to do this through CSS in my HTML?
I've tried adding a fill attribute to the i.rectangle-image selector, but that doesn't work.
I've looked at this answer and it's not quite what I want. They suggest embedding SVG throughout the page, and I'd prefer to do this via CSS content if possible. Any thoughts? Am I out of luck?
If you use the CSS content facility you're loading the SVG data basically as an image. For privacy reasons you can't affect how the image is displayed using external CSS or javascript.
If you want to change the contents of SVG data you'd either have to load it via an <object> or <iframe> tag or put it inline in the HTML file.
What abouth giving the SVG transparency and fill the background using css background color?
The sugested solution from #MMM looks great:
<svg version="1.1" id="Layer_1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" x="0px" y="0px"
width="13px" height="12.917px" viewBox="0 0 13 12.917" enable-background="new 0 0 13 12.917" xml:space="preserve">
<polygon fill="#000000" points="6.504,0 8.509,4.068 13,4.722 9.755,7.887 10.512,12.357 6.504,10.246 2.484,12.357 3.251,7.887 0,4.722 4.492,4.068 "/>
<script>
document.getElementsByTagName("polygon")[0].setAttribute("fill", location.hash);
</script>
</svg>
http://jsbin.com/usaruz/2/edit
http://codepen.io/Elbone/pen/fHCjs
You can use SVG Image Editor tool to edit the colors in front end and copy the code and use it where you wanna place it, which requires short time of period.. Try it surely it will work out

Svg - color background/overlay of a text element

I'm just starting on svg and trying to figure out the limitations of styling.
I have an svg text element in svg. Some of my text elements are tagged with data-editable="true".
I would like for users to be able to easily see what the tagged elements are. I'm imagining a simple, toggleable, translucent overlay.
When I hover over the element in the DOM view in chrome the text element is rendered with a blue-ish overlay. I would like to get a similar effect or something that is somewhat close.
I'd prefer using css if that is possible but any way of achieving that effect would be good. Worst comes to worst I can hack something with inserting rect elements using d3 and jquery but that seems quite messy.
Building on top of an answer by Erik Dahlström
<svg width="100%" height="100%" viewBox="0 0 500 140" preserveAspectRatio="xMidYMid meet">
<style type="text/css">
*[data-editable=true]:hover{ filter:url(#highlight) }
</style>
<filter x="0" y="0" width="1" height="1" id="highlight">
<feFlood flood-color="rgba(100,200,0,.5)"/>
<feComposite in="SourceGraphic"/>
</filter>
<text data-editable="true" y="100" font-size="100">test</text>
</svg>
This works with plain CSS and a filter definition.

Resources