I am trying to validate a SAML response which is coming from Siteminder IDP from a third party. I have installed the certificate provided by them. When I call the ValidateToken method (System.IdentityModel.Tokens) to create claims, I get following error :
WIF10201: No valid key mapping found for
securityToken:'System.IdentityModel.Tokens.X509SecurityToken' and
issuer: 'issuer uri'
I dug in deep to find the error and its being thrown by method GetIssuerName (System.IdentityModel.Tokens).
Where is the problem? I googled for this issue but didn't find anything specific to my case. Does the SAML token from my client have a problem or there is something I am missing in implementation. I am fairly new to federated auth so please excuse any inaccuracy with the terminology used.
Gaurav
Ok found the solution but could't quite understand the readon behind it (complete noob, will update the answer when I know more).
Followed this approach of converting the SAML2 response to WSFed response, then on that new token I ran my code, now the error is gone.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/bradleycotier/archive/2012/10/28/saml-2-0-tokens-and-wif-bridging-the-divide.aspx
Note : you still have to override the validate token method (which I had originally done) to avoid the following error :
“ID4154: A Saml2SecurityToken cannot be created from the Saml2Assertion because it contains a SubjectConfirmationData which specifies an InResponseTo value. Enforcement of this value is not supported by default. To customize SubjectConfirmationData processing, extend Saml2SecurityTokenHandler and override ValidateConfirmationData.”
Thanks.
You are probably missing a configuration that maps the issuer name (as specified inside the token) to the certificate (probably specified with a thumbprint). I guess you solve this with some configuration in your web.config. Have a look at p.e. Microsoft validating issuer name registry The page contains some sample configuration. Setting this up correctly depends entirely on your situation.
I wanted to make a note for future reference, since I also ran into this error but my resolution was different. I got the WIF10201 error in a custom MVC application that is using ADFS (3.0) claims-based authentication under Windows Server 2012. In the web.config of the MVC application, the thumbprint of the ADFS token signing key is recorded. It turns out, when the signing certificate is about to expire, ADFS creates a new key. The new key is marked "primary" and the old key is marked as "secondary" in the ADFS console (under AD FS/Service/Certificates). So in my web.config there was, of course, still the thumbprint of the old (secondary) key. As soon as I replaced it with the thumbprint of the new (primary) key, the error disappeared.
Related
I am trying to verify a HS256 JWT Token generated with locally ran KeyCloak Authentication Provider on https://jwt.io.
The KeyCloack instance is running on my local machine inside a docker container. I have applied almost the same steps as described in this answer (which on contrary applies the RS algorithm instead, and works as described): https://stackoverflow.com/a/55002225/1534753
My validation procedure is very simple:
1.) Request the token (with Postman) from my local docker KeyCloak instance with:
POST requesting http://localhost:8080/auth/realms/dev/protocol/openid-connect/token
2.) Copy the token contents inside the jwt.io's "Encoded" section
3.) I verify that the header and payload are as expected and correct
4.) I copy the client secret from my KeyCloak instance admin dashboard, you can see the reference on the image below:
5.) I paste the secret into the "VERIFY SIGNATURE" section on jwt.io and the "Encoded" token section changes, hence resulting with an invalid signature and a invalid (i.e. different) token.
My core question is what am I missing here? Why does the token change when I apply the expected secret!? Am I applying the right secret, the one from the client? If I understand JWT infrastructre and standard correctly then It should stay the same if the secret (with the expected algorithm applied) is valid. My reasoning is that something with JWT creation on KeyCloak is specific. I have not touched the HS256 algorithm provider on KeyCloak, everything is used as default with the docker installation guide on using KeyCloak. The settings related to the token and algorithm are setup to use HS256, and the algorithm is specified as expected in the JWT's header section correctly which can be verified after the encoded token is pasted into the jwt.io's page.
I need this to work as I am trying to apply the same JWT validation process inside a .NET Core web API application. I have encountered this whole issue in there, i.e. inside the System.IdentityModel.Tokens.JWT and the JwtSecurityTokenHandle.ValidateSignature method which results with an invalid signature and finally resulting in an exception.
On side note, I am accessing the token with Postman and its Authorize feature the configuration can be seen on the image below:
One more side note is I have a user "John" which belongs to my "Demo" realm. I use him to request an access token from KeyCloak.
To get the secret used for signing/verifying HS256 tokens, try using the following SQL:
SELECT value FROM component_config CC INNER JOIN component C ON(CC.component_id = C.id) WHERE C.realm_id = '<realm-id-here>' and provider_id = 'hmac-generated' AND CC.name = 'secret';
If you use the resulting secret to verify the tokens, the signature should match. I’m not sure if this secret is available through the UI, probably not.
Source: https://keycloak.discourse.group/t/invalid-signature-with-hs256-token/3228/3
you can try using Keycloak Gatekeeper.
If you want to verify that token in that way you need to change the Client Authenticator to "Signed JWT with client secret", otherwise you can use this "Gatekeeper" option. Here you can read more about it.
I've encountered a challenge regarding internet-facing deployment installation for CRM using a AD FS server. After the setup is complete, users are able to access the CRM server - but when trying to run custom pages the following error message is prompted:
"The authentication endpoint Kerberos was not found on the configured Secure Token Service!"
I've found several solutions on the internet for this issue:
First I found a KB article from Microsoft providing a possible
solution, this involves updating MEX endpoints by running a provided
PowerShell script.
(https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/2828015/configuring-ad-fs-2.1-with-microsoft-dynamics-crm-2011).
But this doesn't seem to be the issue.
Another solution could be to update the CRM rollup version (currently have version 14 installed, latest is version 18) - this is something that I want to avoid as it might lead to further issues.
Have anybody else encountered a similar issue, and in that case how did you solve it?
I have just spent last few days to figure this exact same error message and it turned out that it was the "Domain" attribute in crm connection string. Copied my answer to my own question at the Microsoft Dynamics CRM community forum here:
"Well, I found the culprit - it was the Domain attribute in the connection string:
For connecting from outside the domain, it does not like to have a Domain in the connection string:
Connection string format 1 (without Domain attribute): "Authentication Type=Passport;Server=https://devcrm.myco.com;Username=devuser#myco.com;Password=pwd" - this works both inside and outside the domain "myco.com"
Connection string format 2 (with Domain attribute): "Authentication Type=Passport;Server=https://devcrm.myco.com;Domain=myco;Username=devuser#myco.com;Password=pwd" - this only works inside the domain myco.com but NOT outside (exception: The authentication endpoint Kerberos was not found on the configured Secure Token Service!)
The key is in the Xrm.Client.CrmConnection.ClientCredential:
If Domain is NOT specified in the connection string, when connecting from outside domain, Xrm.Client.CrmConnection.ClientCredentials.UserName is populated whereas the ClientCredentials.Windows.ClientCredentials.UserName is empty.
But if the Domain is specified, Xrm.Client.CrmConnection.ClientCredentials.UserName becomes null and Xrm.Client.CrmConnection.ClientCredentials.Windows.ClientCredentials.UserName populated, which led to the service trying to authenticate user as a Windows AD user so of course it would fail when running app from outside Windows domain. And it explains why the same app works inside the domain even with Domain specified in the connection string.
For more detail, refer here for my original post asking for help in Dynamics CRM Forum
Im working with Kentor Auth Services. Im getting an error when testing the SAML integration using Kentor Sample Idp
ID1035: The SAML Assertion did not contain any
AudienceRestrictionConditions. To accept assertions without
AudienceRestrictionConditions, set
SecurityTokenHandlerConfiguration.AudienceRestriction.AudienceMode to
AudienceUriMode.Never.
Can someone let me know why im getting this error. Also I'm seeing a field called Audience. I have left it as blank since im not sure what needs to be added there I have tried adding 'Never', but on checking the source it seems like it requires an Uri.
Can someone please let me know what needs to be given in this field?
By default WIF/AuthServices checks the Audience restriction in the SAML response. To handle the error you need to do either of:
Put the EntityId of the SP in the Audience field.
Set spOptions.SystemIdentityModelIdentityConfiguration.AudienceRestriction.AudienceMode = AudienceUriMode.Never;.
for HERE REST api I have registered app_id and app_key and appended them in url but it is giving me this "error"Unauthorized","error_description":"Unauthorized. The request is not from an authorized source "
Also, the FAQs page mentions the following:
How do I generate an app_id and app_code for my application?
To generate an app_id and app_code for an application, you need to
sign in then go to https://developer.here.com/plans to select and
register for the appropriate plan.
At the final step in the registration process, an app_id and app_code
is automatically generated for your application.
Please note, it can take up to an hour for a new app_id to be whitelisted against all services.
So if you had just created your credentials when you got this error, you may want to try again.
Looking back at the error I received when I attempted to access the API, however, I got the following response:
{"details":"invalid credentials for I5zJljd5cZyOx5SyROKT","additionalData":[],"type":"PermissionError","subtype":"InvalidCredentials"}
So it may be that Jason's comment above is more appropriate but I'll leave this answer for other users who may come searching after creating new credentials.
A good way to check your credentials would be to make a valid URL call to any of the REST APIs - e.g. the Geocoder API: https://geocoder.cit.api.here.com/6.2/geocode.json?searchtext=London&app_id={YOUR_APP_ID}&app_code={YOUR_APP_CODE} - it gives an error response for an invalid pair.
As mentioned in the answer : Need separate credentials for WSE API? - you may need to request additional access for the HERE Platform extensions
selfservesupport#here.com here is the support. Describe ur problem and attach an snapshot where you get error at what request. (URL)
I'm configuring a Service Provider to connect to ADFS, and looking up the error we get says:
The Federation Service encountered an error while processing the SAML authentication request.
Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.XmlSignature.SignatureVerificationFailedException: MSIS0037: No signature verification certificate found for issuer 'myapp.domain.com'.
at Microsoft.IdentityServer.Protocols.Saml.Contract.SamlContractUtility.CreateSamlMessage(MSISSamlBindingMessage message)
at Microsoft.IdentityServer.Service.SamlProtocol.SamlProtocolService.Issue(IssueRequest issueRequest)
at Microsoft.IdentityServer.Service.SamlProtocol.SamlProtocolService.ProcessRequest(Message requestMessage)
I'm just the client / SP, I don't have access to the ADFS server, its managed by a different company, in a different country. So, like Jon Snow, I know nothing.
The internet seems to suggest that perhaps these two Microsoft KB's might be relevant:
KB2843638 (a security update that causes an issue)
KB2896713 (a follow up patch)
Is the metadata not trusted by the IDP, or that would be a different issue?
I have seen this error when the request and the Relying Party identifier registration on ADFS (2.1) did not match in casing. For instance the error would occur if the request said: urn:MyRPId and the ADFS registration was urn:myrpid.