Calling an API, I need to specify time in milliseconds. I use DateTime in Python 3 to convert from and to human readable dates and times. But when debugging, I get different results depending on what website I use to convert, so I'm having a hard time debugging when the timestamps are (maybe) wrong. The API doesn't combine time and date in their predicates, but uses milliseconds for both.
Let's look at the date predicate 1656547200000
If I go to https://currentmillis.com it says it's June 30th. All good.
If I go to https://www.epochconverter.com it says it's June 30th. All good.
Let's look at the time predicate from 12600000 to 26700000.
12600000, 26700000
If I go to https://currentmillis.com it says it's UTC (24h) 03:30 - 07:25
If I go to https://www.epochconverter.com it says it's UTC (24h) 20:00 - 00:40
Why that different results?
Historically, UNIX systems reckon time as temporal units (seconds, millis, nanos, etc.) elapsed since an absolute origin instant termed "the Epoch": January 1st, 1970 00:00:00 UTC. This is formally recognized in POSIX.
So "UNIX time" is that system of reckoning, and "Epoch timestamps" are points in time in that system.
Now, you appear to me to be conflating temporal units in your use of Epoch timestamps.
In the case of your "short" timestamp, 12600000 seconds since the Epoch is a different point in time than 12600000 milliseconds since the Epoch. That's why you see them resolve to different times of day, as your converters are interpreting them differently. If you'd included the date in your output, you'd have seen the two points in time are almost six months apart.
I'm trying to convert java datetime instant to hh:mm format using moment js
moment("2020-03-21T17:34:00Z").utcOffset(-0500).format("hh:mm")
it should give me 12:34, but somehow it is giving "12:14" which is the wrong time.
The moment js .utcOffset() method takes the offset in minutes.
so if you want to get 12:34 you need to use -300 instead of -0500
moment("2020-03-21T17:34:00Z").utcOffset(-300).format("hh:mm")
A few things:
The utcOffset function behaves differently whether you pass a string or a number. As a number, it's expected to be in terms of minutes. Since you have hours and minutes in your offset, you should pass it as a string: .utcOffset("-0500")
Format strings are case sensitive. You should use HH:mm (24-hour time), or hh:mm a (12-hour time). Since you used hh:mm without an a, anything after 12 pm will be misrepresented.
You are supplying a fixed offset. If that is your intent, then ok. But do recognize that there is a difference between an offset and a time zone. (See "Time Zone != Offset" in the timezone tag wiki.) For example, if you wanted to convert to US Eastern Time, you should use .tz('America/New_York) instead of .utcOffset("-0500"). (US Eastern time is at -4 for the date given, not -5.) You would need the moment-timezone addon to make this work.
Lastly, recognize that Moment is in maintenance mode. The moment team generally recommends Luxon for new development.
moment("2013-12-31T19:51:57.000-0800").format("HH:mm") yields a 24hr hour format in GMT but I would like it in local time "11:51".
Is this possible with moment's format method?
That is incorrect. The code you gave will not show the the value in GMT. It will first adjust using the offset you gave it (-08:00), and then it will convert it to the correct offset as your own local time zone. So if you're time zone offset happens to be -08:00 for that particular time, you will see no conversion at all.
Also, you seem to be misunderstanding how the offset is applied. When you have an offset on an ISO8601 formatted string (like the one you supplied here), that means the time is already in the offset that is supplied. 19:51 is the local time that is in effect at the -8:00 offset.
To convert to UTC / GMT - you need to first invert the sign, then apply it. So the UTC time here is 3:51:57 AM on 2014-01-01.
Your requested output of 11:51 is not valid for this timestamp, no matter how you look at it.
I exported my Firefox bookmarks, and the 'dateAdded' fields look like this:
1260492675000000
1260492675000000
1266542833000000
They're too big to be a Unix timestamp, and I can't make sense of them. What are they? (I want to convert it into something usable/readable.)
It is PRTime.
This type is a 64-bit integer representing the number of microseconds since the NSPR epoch, midnight (00:00:00) 1 January 1970 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). A time after the epoch has a positive value, and a time before the epoch has a negative value.
PRTime as described on this page.
You can extract the time using the f3e tool if you can find a link to it.
How to represent the start and end times for one day?
Using October 23, 2008 as an example, is it start 2008-10-23 12:00:00 AM and end 2008-10-23 11:59:59 PM?
I would like to cite a site, http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-time.html
The international standard notation for the time of day is
hh:mm:ss
where hh is the number of complete hours that have passed since midnight (00-24), mm is the number of complete minutes that have passed since the start of the hour (00-59), and ss is the number of complete seconds since the start of the minute (00-60). If the hour value is 24, then the minute and second values must be zero.
Note: The value 60 for ss might sometimes be needed during an inserted leap second in an atomic time scale like Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). A single leap second 23:59:60 is inserted into the UTC time scale every few years as announced by the International Earth Rotation Service in Paris, to keep UTC from wandering away more than 0.9 s from the less constant astronomical time scale UT1, which is defined by the actual rotation of the earth. In practice you are not very likely to see a clock showing 23:59:60. Most synchronized clocks resynchronize again to UTC some time after a leap second has happened, or they temporarily slow down near the time of a leap seconds, to avoid any disruption that an out-of-range timestamp might otherwise cause.
An example time is
23:59:59
which represents the time one second before midnight.
As with the date notation, the separating colons can also be omitted as in
235959
and the precision can be reduced by omitting the seconds or both the seconds and minutes as in
23:59, 2359, or 23
It is also possible to add fractions of a second after a decimal dot or comma, for instance the time 5.8 ms before midnight can be written as
23:59:59.9942 or 235959.9942
As every day both starts and ends with midnight, the two notations 00:00 and 24:00 are available to distinguish the two midnights that can be associated with one date. This means that the following two notations refer to exactly the same point in time:
1995-02-04 24:00 = 1995-02-05 00:00
In case an unambiguous representation of time is required, 00:00 is usually the preferred notation for midnight and not 24:00. Digital clocks display 00:00 and not 24:00.
ISO 8601 does not specify, whether its notations specify a point in time or a time period. This means for example that ISO 8601 does not define whether 09:00 refers to the exact end of the ninth hour of the day or the period from 09:00 to 09:01 or anything else. The users of the standard must somehow agree on the exact interpretation of the time notation if this should be of any concern.
If a date and a time are displayed on the same line, then always write the date in front of the time. If a date and a time value are stored together in a single data field, then ISO 8601 suggests that they should be separated by a latin capital letter T, as in 19951231T235959.
A remark for readers from the U.S.:
The 24h time notation specified here has already been the de-facto standard all over the world in written language for decades. The only exception are a few English speaking countries, where still notations with hours between 1 and 12 and additions like “a.m.” and “p.m.” are in wide use. The common 24h international standard notation is widely used now even in England (e.g. at airports, cinemas, bus/train timetables, etc.). Most other languages do not even have abbreviations like “a.m.” and “p.m.” and the 12h notation is certainly hardly ever used on Continental Europe to write or display a time. Even in the U.S., the military and computer programmers have been using the 24h notation for a long time.
The old English 12h notation has many disadvantages like:
It is longer than the normal 24h notation.
It takes somewhat more time for humans to compare two times in 12h notation.
It is not clear, how 00:00, 12:00 and 24:00 are represented. Even encyclopedias and style manuals contain contradicting descriptions and a common quick fix seems to be to avoid “12:00 a.m./p.m.” altogether and write “noon”, “midnight”, or “12:01 a.m./p.m.” instead, although the word “midnight” still does not distinguish between 00:00 and 24:00 (midnight at the start or end of a given day).
It makes people often believe that the next day starts at the overflow from “12:59 a.m.” to “1:00 a.m.”, which is a common problem not only when people try to program the timer of VCRs shortly after midnight.
It is not easily comparable with a string compare operation.
It is not immediately clear for the unaware, whether the time between “12:00 a.m./p.m.” and “1:00 a.m./p.m.” starts at 00:00 or at 12:00, i.e. the English 12h notation is more difficult to understand.
Please consider the 12h time to be a relic from the dark ages when Roman numerals were used, the number zero had not yet been invented and analog clocks were the only known form of displaying a time. Please avoid using it today, especially in technical applications! Even in the U.S., the widely respected Chicago Manual of Style now recommends using the international standard time notation in publications.
Surely, if you just want to represent 1 day, you don't need to include the time at all - especially as this raises such a level of discussion about when a day starts or ends. In my experience, date handling is usually complicated enough, without introducing any extra complexity.
Today is Oct 20th 2008 - no more information is necessary.
Or am I missing something?
Oct. 23 starts at 2008-10-23 12AM and finishes at 2008-10-24 12AM—a day ends at the exact same point the next one begins. The very last second begins at 11:59:59 PM but you still have a whole second before the day is over.
Your notation is strange. I'd suggest the standard way of specifying a full day range is:
2008-10-23 00:00:00 and finish 2008-10-23 23:59:59
The definition of the day you mention in the question is any time that is >= 2008-10-23 00:00:00 and < 2008-10-24 00:00:00 .
If you were to use mathematical interval notation, you would write it as
[2008-10-23 00:00:00 , 2008-10-24 00:00:00)
The [ means inclusion, and ) means up to but not including.
In this way you make it easier for users and for yourself.
It depends what you mean by a day. Date handling is, sadly, always more complex than it looks.
To convert your example into 24h ISO date format, you'd say:
2008-10-23 00:00:00 - 2008-10-23 23:59:59
However depending on whether you interpret a range as inclusive or exclusive that could omit the last second of the day*. Programmers normally prefer to keep the upper bound exclusive, so you'd go for:
2008-10-23 00:00:00 - 2008-10-24 00:00:00
Or, as a slightly nicer way of stating the same, if supported (or for human readability):
2008-10-23 00:00:00 - 2008-10-23 24:00:00
*: actually possibly more than one. If the span represents a day in the UTC timezone (or another timezone aligned to it, which is quite likely), there can occasionally be an extra 'leap second' at the end of the day, 23:59:60, in a pointless attempt to keep UTC in line with sidereal time. The next leap second is planned for the end of this year. However, many systems ignore leap seconds because they're silly and annoying.
If you want to represent a 'calendar day' independently of timezones your best bet is the Julian day number. Today is 2454760.