i have a box whose width is variable because it depends of the size of a container. The box has no content so im using margins to define its width relatively but it is not working. This is my code:
.box {
background: url("back.jpg") no-repeat scroll 0 0 / cover transparent;
border: 4px solid black;
box-shadow: 0 0 0 5px #826200;
outline: 3px solid white;
overflow:hidden;
}
.box:before {
content:"";
border-top: 2px solid red;
margin: -20px 0 7px -7px;
position:absolute;
width:auto;
}
This is my fiddle http://jsfiddle.net/x7rrj/3/
Please notice how the red border goes outside of the box without honoring the right margin and if i set the width to auto then the red border wont display at all. Is it possible to solve this using CSS only?
Thank you.
I looked at the fiddle and noticed the top red border wasn't showing.
It had a line with the padding: 0 100%;
Removing that line seem to fix your issue.
Is this the final result you wanted?
http://jsfiddle.net/z5952/
.box {
background: url("back.jpg") no-repeat scroll 0 0 / cover transparent;
border: 4px solid black;
box-shadow: 0 0 0 5px #826200;
outline: 3px solid white;
overflow:hidden;
}
.box:before {
border-top: 2px solid white;
content: "";
margin: -9px 0 7px -7px;
position: absolute;
width: auto;
}
Is this something you are looking for?
http://jsfiddle.net/x7rrj/16/
since you are using position:absolute to position the line, you may also use top, right and left to control the position and width as well:
.box:before {
border-top: 2px solid red;
content: "";
padding: 0 100%;
position: absolute;
top: 3px;
right: 3px;
left: 3px;
}
Okay, i found the answer thanks to an idea given to me by Edward. The problem was solved by replacing margins with top, left and right.
.box {
background: url("back.jpg") no-repeat scroll 0 0 / cover transparent;
border: 4px solid black;
box-shadow: 0 0 0 5px #826200;
outline: 3px solid white;
overflow:hidden;
}
.box:before {
border-top: 2px solid white;
content: "";
width: auto;
position: absolute;
top: 3px;
right: 3px;
left: 3px;
}
Related
I'm trying to style the heading of a page with the CSS border property, using the following code:
h2 {
display: inline-block;
margin: 5px 0 5px 0;
padding: 0 0 0 5px;
background-color: #eee;
border-color: #aaa;
color: #000;
border-style: dotted dotted dotted solid;
border-width: 1px 1px 1px 5px;
}
The result is
,
which Is ok, but the left border has "pointy" tips, with gaps (what looks like a kind of "provision" for a, in this case, non-existent similar border), like in the image below
Is there a way to get "square" tips for the left border?
No you can't with a native border. But you can fake it using a :before element:
h2 {
position: relative; /* make title relative */
display: inline-block;
margin: 5px 0 5px 0;
padding: 0 0 0 5px;
background-color: #eee;
border-color: #aaa;
color: #000;
border-style: dotted dotted dotted solid;
border-width: 1px 1px 1px 5px;
}
h2:before {
content: "";
position: absolute;
height: calc(100% + 2px); /* 2px is the addition of the border-bottom (1px) and the border-top (1px) */
width: 5px; /* same size than the border-left */
background-color: #aaa;
left: -5px;
top: -1px; /* size of the border-top */
}
<h2>A title</h2>
I want to be able to skew an element in the way the image displays below.
I have been playing around with it, but dont seem to be able to get close to replicating that shape.
My css code is
transform:skew(30deg,30deg);
Is transform even the right way to do this? Please let me know the best, most browser compatible, solution.
You can apply some rotate transform around the X axis and apply an appropriate pespective before:
div {
width:300px;
height:200px;
background:url(http://placekitten.com/300/200);
border:2px solid red;
border-top-width:4px;
border-bottom-width:1px;
-webkit-transform: perspective(200px) rotateX(40deg);
margin:100px;
}
Demo
Try this:
Html
<div class="trapezium"></div>
StyleSheet
.trapezium {
border-bottom: 80px solid #fff;
border-left: 45px solid transparent;
border-right: 45px solid transparent;
padding: 0 8px 0 0;
height: 0;
width: 120px;
position: relative;
margin: 2em auto;
}
.trapezium:before {
border-bottom: 90px solid #000;
border-left: 50px solid transparent;
border-right: 50px solid transparent;
padding: 0 8px 0 0;
height: 0;
width: 130px;
position: absolute;
bottom: -85px;
left: -55px;
content: "";
z-index: -1;
}
Here is the Demo
I'm trying to make an inset pill using pure CSS:
Where the two color blocks are clickable separately.
But I can't figure out how to apply the box shadow to the containing element. The closest I got was using an :after element and positioning it over the links; but that covers up the links, making them un-clickable:
(jsFiddle)
<div class="pill">
✚
⦿
</div><!--/.pill-->
.pill {
position: relative;
float: left;
&:after {
content: "";
display: block;
border-radius: 8px;
box-shadow: inset 1px 2px 0 rgba(0,0,0,.35);
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
}
a {
display: block;
padding: 4px 6px;
text-decoration: none;
color: #fff;
float: left;
&.plus {
background: #3c55b1;
border-radius: 8px 0 0 8px;
border-right: 1px solid darken(#3c55b1, 30%);
}
&.circle {
background: #40be84;
border-radius: 0 8px 8px 0;
border-left: 1px solid lighten(#40be84, 15%);
}
}
}
I'm aware of the pointer-events property, but browser support is pretty shabby.
So what do we think? Possible?
You are not using the spread property on the box shadow, so you want to create a border, instead using box shadow add a border to each element.
Remove the:after property and will get the normal behavior
jsFiddle
Make it simple,
draw your box-shadow from a, so it doesn't matter wich size they take.
http://codepen.io/gcyrillus/pen/xwcKg
.pill {
position: relative;
float: left;
background:#eee;
padding:0.5em;
}
a {
display: inline-block;
padding: 4px 6px;
width:1em;
text-align:center;
text-decoration: none;
color: #fff;
font-weight:bold;
box-shadow:inset 1px 2px 0 rgba(0,0,0,.35);
}
.plus {
background: #3c55b1;
border-radius: 8px 0 0 8px;
border-right: 1px solid #0c2571;
position:relative;
}
.circle {
background: #40be84;
border-radius: 0 8px 8px 0;
box-shadow:
inset 0px 2px 0 rgba(0,0,0,.35),
inset 1px 0 0 #70de94
;
}
Is there a way to make my #inner_div stop appearing behind the #main_div if it exceeds a certain width? I tried removing the overflow:hidden from #main_div in css but that causes the background of the #main_div to load very slowly, so I would like to find another solution if possible. Thanks
Main div css:
#main_div {
-moz-border-radius:5px;
-moz-box-shadow: 0 3px 3px rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1), 0 3px 0 #BBBBBB, 0 4px 0 #AAAAAA, 0 5px 3px #444444;
background: none repeat scroll 0 0 #F6F6F6;
border: 1px solid #FFFFFF;
margin: 20px auto;
overflow: hidden;
padding: 10px;
width: 970px;
}
Inner div css:
.inner_div{
font-size:12px;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;
margin: 5px 0px 0px 10px;
border-style: solid;
border-width: 1px;
border-color: #000000;
z-index: 0;
visibility: hidden;
position: absolute;
/* white-space: nowrap;*/
text-align: left;
padding: 5px 5px 5px 5px;
width:200px;
}
Instead of using overflow:hidden, you should use the new "micro clearfix".
Go here: http://nicolasgallagher.com/micro-clearfix-hack/
In your markup, you simply just add the class "cf" on #main_div
Attempting to use a custom hex color for my css triangle (border). However since it uses border properties I am unsure how to go about doing this. I would like to steer clear of javascript and css3 simply because of compatibility. I am trying to have the triangle have a white background with a 1px border (around the angled sides of the triangle) with color #CAD5E0. Is this possible? Here's what I have so far:
.container {
margin-left: 15px;
width: 200px;
background: #FFFFFF;
border: 1px solid #CAD5E0;
padding: 4px;
position: relative;
min-height: 200px;
}
.container:after {
content: '';
display: block;
position: absolute;
top: 10px;
left: 100%;
width: 0;
height: 0;
border-color: transparent transparent transparent #CAD5E0;
border-style: solid;
border-width: 10px;
}
My fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/4ZeCz/
You actually have to fake it with two triangles....
.container {
margin: 15px 30px;
width: 200px;
background: #fff;
border: 1px solid #a00;
position: relative;
min-height: 200px;
padding: 20px;
text-align: center;
color: #fff;
font: bold 1.5em/180px Helvetica, sans-serif;
text-shadow: 0 0 1px #000;
}
.container:after,
.container:before {
content: '';
display: block;
position: absolute;
left: 100%;
width: 0;
height: 0;
border-style: solid;
}
.container:after {
top: 10px;
border-color: transparent transparent transparent #fdd;
border-width: 10px;
}
.container:before {
top: 9px;
border-color: transparent transparent transparent #a00;
border-width: 11px;
}
Updated Fiddle here
I know you accept that but check this one also with less css:
.container {
margin-left: 15px;
width: 200px;
background: #FFFFFF;
border: 1px solid #CAD5E0;
padding: 4px;
position: relative;
min-height: 200px;
}
.container:after {
content: '';
display: block;
position: absolute;
top: 10px;
right:-7px;
width: 10px;
height: 10px;
background: #FFFFFF;
border-right:1px solid #CAD5E0;
border-bottom:1px solid #CAD5E0;
-moz-transform:rotate(-45deg);
-webkit-transform:rotate(-45deg);
}
http://jsfiddle.net/4ZeCz/3/
I think this is a simpler one using clip-path:
.container {
width: 150px;
min-height: 150px;
background: #ccc;
padding: 8px;
padding-right: 6%;
display: inline-block;
clip-path: polygon(0% 0%,0% 100%,90% 100%,90% 5%,100% 10%,90% 15%,90% 0%);
}
<div class="container">
test content
</div>
Another way to accomplish this, especially for somebody who needs this to work with equilateral or even scalene triangles like I did, is to use filter: drop-shadow(...) with multiple values and no blur radius. This has the added benefit of not needing multiple elements, or access to both :before and :after (I was trying to accomplish this with :after content that was inline, so wanted to avoid absolute positioning too).
For the above case, the :after's CSS could look like this (fiddle):
.container {
margin-left: 15px;
width: 200px;
background: #FFFFFF;
border: 1px solid #CAD5E0;
padding: 4px;
position: relative;
min-height: 200px;
}
.container:after {
content: '';
display: block;
position: absolute;
top: 10px;
left: 100%;
width: 0;
height: 0;
border-style: solid;
border-width: 20px 0 40px 15px; /* skewed to show support for non-right-angle triangles */
border-color: transparent transparent transparent #fff;
filter: drop-shadow(1px 0 0 #CAD5E0) drop-shadow(0 .5px 0 #CAD5E0);
}
<div class="container">
Test Container
</div>
I think there are some limitations or weirdness, though:
No support in IE11 (though seems fine in FF, Chrome, and Edge)
I'm not quite sure why .5px for the <offset-y> value in the second drop-shadow() above appears more like 1px than 1px would have, though I imagine it's related to trigonometry (though at least on my monitor I see no difference between the actual trig-based values or .5px or even .1px for that matter).
Borders greater than 1px (well, their appearance that way) don't seem to work well. Or at least I haven't found the solution, though see below for a less-than-optimal way to go a little bigger. (I would think the documented-but-unsupported 4th parameter (<spread-radius>) of drop-shadow() might be what I'm really looking for instead of multiple filter values, but adding it in just broke things entirely.) Here you can see what starts to happen when going beyond 1px (fiddle):
.container {
background-color: #eee;
padding: 1em;
}
.container:after {
content: "";
width: 0;
height: 0;
border-style: solid;
border-width: 20.4px 10px 0 10px;
border-color: yellow transparent transparent transparent;
margin-left: .25em;
display: inline-block;
filter: drop-shadow(-6px -4px 0 green) drop-shadow(6px -4px 0 red) drop-shadow(0 6px 0 blue);
}
<div class="container">
Test Container
</div>
Notice the funniness that the first one (green) gets applied once, but the second one (red) is getting applied both to the yellow triangle created via border as well as the green drop-shadow(), and the last one (blue) gets applied to all of the above. (Perhaps that's also related to the .5px appearance thing).
But I guess you can take advantage of these drop-shadows building on each other if you need something wider-looking than 1px, by changing them to something like the following (fiddle):
filter: drop-shadow(0 0 2.5px red) drop-shadow(0 0 0 red) drop-shadow(0 0 0 red) drop-shadow(0 0 0 red) drop-shadow(0 0 0 red) drop-shadow(0 0 0 red) drop-shadow(0 0 0 red) drop-shadow(0 0 0 red) drop-shadow(0 0 0 red);
where the very first one has a blur-radius set (2.5px in this case, though the result appears multiplied), and all the rest have blur at 0. But this will only work for the same color on all sides, and it results in some rounded-looking corners as well as quite rough edges the bigger you go.
.triangle{
position: absolute;
width:0px;
height:0px;
border-left: 45px solid transparent;
border-right: 45px solid transparent;
border-bottom: 72px solid #DB5248;
}
.triangle:after{
position: relative;
content:"!";
top:8px;
left:-8px;
color:#DB5248;
font-size:40px;
}
.triangle:before{
content:".";
color: #DB5248;
position: relative;
top:-14px;
left:-43px;
border-left: 41px solid transparent;
border-right: 41px solid transparent;
border-bottom: 67px solid white;
}