Is there a way in css to have something be 100% of window size when its container is only 25%? - css

I'm trying to make a picture menu that when clicked has the other options slide away and show the entire image of the option clicked.
The images are lined up and I'm using overflow hidden to hide the parts that I don't want shown until their clicked.
The animation works fine but if the browser window is larger then the image width then it leaves white space where the image runs out of room. I can set the image to a new width during the transition but it makes the transition look strange as the size of the image is changing too which I don't want.
Is there a way to set something to the size of the window even if its container isn't that size?
http://jsfiddle.net/539Y9/ -
A basic jsfiddle is here. Its harder to tell since I don't have images and you'll probably need to look at dev tools to see the size of the divs but I want those divs to be 100% and hidden by its parent container.
HTML:
<div id="imageMenu">
<ul>
<li class="imageMenuItem"><div id='image1'></div></li>
<li class="imageMenuItem"><div id='image2'></div></li>
<li class="imageMenuItem"><div id='image3'></div></li>
<li class="imageMenuItem"><div id='image4'></div></li>
</ul>
</div>
CSS:
#imageMenu ul {
list-style: none;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
#imageMenu li {
text-decoration: none;
float: left;
width: 25%;
z-index: 0;
}
#image1 {
width: 100%;
height: 25px;
background-color: red;
}
#image2 {
width: 100%;
height: 25px;
background: green;
}
#image3 {
width: 100%;
height: 25px;
background-color: blue;
}
#image4 {
width: 100%;
height: 25px;
background-color: yellow;
}

Just specify width: 400% on the images.
Since you split the original width into 4 by using 25%, you can get the original width at the child element again if you multiply its width by 4. Which is 400%.

I'm not sure what animation you're referring to, but you can use the vw unit to size the element relative to the viewport instead of its parent.
The viewport-percentage lengths are relative to the size of the initial containing block. When the height or width of the initial containing block is changed, they are scaled accordingly.
The initial containing block here is the root element in your document, not the element's parent.
#image1, #image2, #image3, #image4 {
width: 100vw;
}
JSFiddle demo - notice how the yellow div element at the end stretches by the same width as the entire result pane? All your div elements here are doing this but are being covered by the next one along.
Here's a second demo where I've added a hover effect to your div elements to show how this works.

Related

css relative alignment upon image

I am trying to align a div on top of my image. Horizontal alignment works fine, vertical offset however doesn't. Also, the background-color of #studentenlijn is not applied.
HTML Snippet:
<div id="container">
<div id="studentenlijn">STUDENTENLIJN</div>
<img src="http://lsvb.nl/s/lsvbheader.jpg" class="banner" />
</div>
Relevant CSS
#studentenlijn {
width: 10%;
height: 10%;
position: absolute;
top: 30%;
left: 72%;
background-color: #660000;
}
JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/YGeLA/
Any ideas?
Your body had a height of 0, thus affecting the height of the containers within it when you try to specify a percentage height. Another problem was that you had a floating image within your container div, and thus you need to hide the overflow in order for the container to properly calculate the heights of elements within.
I have made some minor changes to your fiddle here:
http://jsfiddle.net/YGeLA/1/
I added:
height: 100%; to the body element
overflow: hidden; to #container which forces the container to respect the height of all elements within it.
The size of your div is:
#studentenlijn {
width: 10%;
height: 10%;
}
So it'll be a % of the parent element. The parent element, your container, is:
#container {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
At this point, your browser can't determine which size should have your block.
So you won't be able to center it (Since you can't center an element which have not a browser-determined size).
You can't see the background-color for the same reason. It is applied, but you won't see your colored block because his size is 0.
Try to solve it, and it would be easier to center your div. In case it doesn't help you, edit your post with your modification :)
the container height is 0px. so you can't give height 100%
you have to set height in px
look at this update
#container {
position:relative;
width:100%;
height:100%;
line-height: 0;
}
.banner {
width:100%;
}
#studentenlijn {
width:200px;
height:30px;
position:absolute;
top:35px;
left:72%;
background-color:#660000;
line-height:30px
}
http://jsfiddle.net/YGeLA/2/

Play button centred with different image/video sizes

How can I keep the play button centred even if the the image/video size changed?
.image{
position:relative;
width:500px; //changed
height:300px;
}
Here is my example...
Attention: my images/videos haven't no specific size, so they can change according to their own size... This is just an example!
I set up three examples to show how you could solve this problem.
Please see the fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/audetwebdesign/mxSkQ/
The HTML is essentially yours:
<div class ="image ex1">
<a href="#">
<img src="http://placehold.it/200x150" alt="video">
<span class="play">
<span></span>
</span>
</a>
</div>
I am using a demo image with configurable dimensions, 200x150 for example, easily changed for testing.
Example 1 - Image Size Determines Size of the Parent Container
.ex1.image {
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
margin-left: 50px;
}
.image a {
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
}
/* Gets rid of the extra white space that follows an inline element*/
.image img {
vertical-align: bottom;
}
If you want the .image div to shrink to fit the image, use inline-block to display.
The margin-left is optional, will depend on the rest of the layout.
Important: To center the play button motif, simply set the a tag to display as inline-block and your arrow-motif-span will position itself nicely.
Because img is an inline element, browsers insert a small space after it that can show up if you have borders or backgrounds. Use vertical-align: bottom to clean that up.
Example 2 - Parent Container Has A Specified Width
You can specify a width for the .image parent container and then use text-align to position the image element.
.ex2.image {
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
width: 400px;
height: auto;
text-align: center;
}
Example 3 - Parent Container Has Full Width and Specified Height
In this example, I let the parent container fill up the width of the window and set the
height to 200px. To get vertical centering, I set margin-top to a hard-coded value that will depend on the height of the image. If you let the image take on a fixed height, this example is useful.
.ex3.image {
position: relative;
display: block;
width: auto;
height: 200px;
text-align: center;
}
.ex3.image a {
margin-top: 25px;
}
You need
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
margin: -25px 0 0 -25px; // top and left equal to half of the size * (-1)
http://jsfiddle.net/nGKcn/13/
Try playing with the image size/different images.
Give the image CSS of:
display: block;
margin: 0 auto;
This is just a general way you put stuff in the middle.
Unless I'm missing something maybe?

set div width as a percentage of height

I am trying to set the width of the .full_height_div element using pure css, based on its height. It has to be width-relative-to-height, and not height-relative-to-width. The reason for this is that the parent container (.set_rectangle_height) is already a div with height relative to the page width. Obviously, as the page is resized the divs on the page will resize, so i cannot set a fixed width in px for the .full_height_div child.
So .rectangle and .set_rectangle_height make up the parent container which has a width as a percentage of the page and a height relative to this width. See here for an explanation for this method.
But the problem is that then I want to place a div inside the parent with height: 100% and width relative to this height. The aim is then that I will be able to alter the browser window size and everything will keep its aspect ratio.
here is my failed attempt:
.rectangle
{
position: relative;
width: 30%;/*the outermost div is always a % of the page
width, even while resizing*/
display:inline-block;
background-color: green;
}
.set_rectangle_height
{
padding-bottom: 30%;/*this sets the height of the outermost div
to a ratio of 1:3*/
position: relative;
float: left;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.full_height_div/*this is the div that i want to have a width relative
to its height*/
{
height: 100%;
width: 20px;/*i will delete this once .square_set_width is working*/
position: absolute;
background-color: red;
}
.square_set_width
{
display: inline-block;
padding-left: 100%; /*i want to use something like this line to set
the width of this div to be equal to .full_height_div's height - ie a 1:1 aspect
ratio, but padding-left does not work :( */
position: relative;
height: 100%;
background-color: blue;
}
<div class='rectangle'>
<div class='set_rectangle_height'>
<div class='full_height_div'>
<div class='square_set_width'></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
So, this is what the above incorrect markup looks like:
And this is what i want it to look like:
I know I could find the blue square percentage height in javascript, then set the width to be equal to this height, but it would be really handy if there is a pure css fix for what I am trying to do. I will be using this structure a lot and I don't really want to go writing code to resize all the divs on my page.
you have to use javascript for that. If I understood you, you want a perfect blue square. Use
var height = $('.square_set_width').height();
$('.square_set_width').css('width',height);
here is a jsfiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/a8kxu/
Edit: instead of doing padding-bottom: 30% do height: 70% instead. Here is another fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/a8kxu/1/
Edit #2: Sorry, but you cant use css to do this. Its not powerful enough
If i understand you correctly
you can do
#divID {
width: 75%;
margin-left: auto; // this is used to center the container
margin-right: auto;// this as well
}

Setting width/height as percentage minus pixels

I'm trying to create some re-usable CSS classes for more consistency and less clutter on my site, and I'm stuck on trying to standardize one thing I use frequently.
I have a container <div> that I don't want to set the height for (because it will vary depending on where on the site it is), and inside it is a header <div>, and then an unordered list of items, all with CSS applied to them.
It looks a lot like this:
I want the unordered list to take up the remaining room in the container <div>, knowing that the header <div> is 18px tall. I just don't know how to specify the list's height as "the result of 100% minus 18px".
I've seen this question asked in a couple other contexts on SO, but I thought it would be worth asking again for my particular case. Does anyone have any advice in this situation?
You can use calc:
height: calc(100% - 18px);
Note that some old browsers don't support the CSS3 calc() function, so implementing the vendor-specific versions of the function may be required:
/* Firefox */
height: -moz-calc(100% - 18px);
/* WebKit */
height: -webkit-calc(100% - 18px);
/* Opera */
height: -o-calc(100% - 18px);
/* Standard */
height: calc(100% - 18px);
For a bit of a different approach you could use something like this on the list:
position: absolute;
top: 18px;
bottom: 0px;
width: 100%;
This works as long as the parent container has position: relative;
I use Jquery for this
function setSizes() {
var containerHeight = $("#listContainer").height();
$("#myList").height(containerHeight - 18);
}
then I bind the window resize to recalc it whenever the browser window is resized (if container's size changed with window resize)
$(window).resize(function() { setSizes(); });
Don't define the height as a percent, just set the top=0 and bottom=0, like this:
#div {
top: 0; bottom: 0;
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
}
Presuming 17px header height
List css:
height: 100%;
padding-top: 17px;
Header css:
height: 17px;
float: left;
width: 100%;
Use negative margins on the element you would like to minus pixels off. (desired element)
Make overflow:hidden; on the containing element
Switch to overflow:auto; on the desired element.
It worked for me!
Try box-sizing. For the list:
height: 100%;
/* Presuming 10px header height */
padding-top: 10px;
/* Firefox */
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
/* WebKit */
-webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
/* Standard */
box-sizing: border-box;
For the header:
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
height: 10px;
Of course, the parent container should has something like:
position: relative;
Another way to achieve the same goal: flex boxes.
Make the container a column flex box, and then you have all freedom to allow some elements to have fixed-size (default behavior) or to fill-up/shrink-down to the container space (with flex-grow:1 and flex-shrink:1).
#wrap {
display:flex;
flex-direction:column;
}
.extendOrShrink {
flex-shrink:1;
flex-grow:1;
overflow:auto;
}
See https://jsfiddle.net/2Lmodwxk/
(try to extend or reduce the window to notice the effect)
Note: you may also use the shorthand property:
flex:1 1 auto;
I tried some of the other answers, and none of them worked quite how I wanted them to. Our situation was very similar where we had a window header and the window was resizable with images in the window body. We wanted to lock the aspect ratio of the resizing without needing to add in calculations to account for the fixed size of the header and still have the image fill the window body.
Below I created a very simple snippet that shows what we ended up doing that seems to work well for our situation and should be compatible across most browsers.
On our window element we added a 20px margin which contributes to positioning relative to other elements on the screen, but does not contribute to the "size" of the window. The window-header is then positioned absolutely (which removes it from the flow of other elements, so it won't cause other elements like the unordered list to be shifted) and its top is positioned -20px which places the header inside of the margin of the window. Finally our ul element is added to the window, and the height can be set to 100% which will cause it to fill the window's body (excluding the margin).
*,*:before,*:after
{
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.window
{
position: relative;
top: 20px;
left: 50px;
margin-top: 20px;
width: 150px;
height: 150px;
}
.window-header
{
position: absolute;
top: -20px;
height: 20px;
border: 2px solid black;
width: 100%;
}
ul
{
border: 5px dashed gray;
height: 100%;
}
<div class="window">
<div class="window-header">Hey this is a header</div>
<ul>
<li>Item 1</li>
<li>Item 2</li>
<li>Item 3</li>
<li>Item 4</li>
<li>Item 5</li>
</ul>
</div>
Thanks, i solved mine with your help, tweaking it a little since i want a div 100% width 100% heigth (less height of a bottom bar) and no scroll on body (without hack / hiding scroll bars).
For CSS:
html{
width:100%;height:100%;margin:0px;border:0px;padding:0px;
}
body{
position:relative;width:100%;height:100%;margin:0px;border:0px;padding:0px;
}
div.adjusted{
position:absolute;width:auto;height:auto;left:0px;right:0px;top:0px;bottom:36px;margin:0px;border:0px;padding:0px;
}
div.the_bottom_bar{
width:100%;height:31px;margin:0px;border:0px;padding:0px;
}
For HTML:
<body>
<div class="adjusted">
// My elements that go on dynamic size area
<div class="the_bottom_bar">
// My elements that goes on bottom bar (fixed heigh of 31 pixels)
</div>
</div>
That did the trick, oh yes i put a value little greatter on div.adjusted for bottom than for bottom bar height, else the vertical scrollbar appears, i adjusted to be the nearest value.
That difference is because one of the elements on dynamic area is adding an extra bottom hole that i do not know how to get rid of... it is a video tag (HTML5), please note i put that video tag with this css (so there is no reason for it to make a bottom hole, but it does):
video{
width:100%;height:100%;margin:0px;border:0px;padding:0px;
}
The objetive: Have a video that takes the 100% of the brower (and resizes dynamically when browser is resized, but without altering the aspect ratio) less a bottom space that i use for a div with some texts, buttons, etc (and validators w3c & css of course).
EDIT: I found the reason, video tag is like text, not a block element, so i fixed it with this css:
video{
display:block;width:100%;height:100%;margin:0px;border:0px;padding:0px;
}
Note the display:block; on video tag.
I'm not sure if this work in your particular situation, but I've found that padding on the inside div will push content around inside of a div if the containing div is a fixed size. You would have to either float or absolutely position your header element, but otherwise, I haven't tried this for variable size divs.

css columns shrinking 100% pixel value

I have a page which is divided up into 3 divs, left center and right. I don't want to display anything in the left and right, they just frame the page.
#leftDiv
{
background-color: Gray;
width: 10%;
left: 0px;
top: 0px;
position: absolute;
height: 100%;
}
#rightDiv
{
background-color: Gray;
height: 100%;
width: 10%;
left: 90%;
top: 0px;
position: absolute;
clear:both;
}
The center div has a table, which allows the user to select how many rows to see. If they chose a large value then the body of the table went beyond the bottom of the left and right div.
To correct this I put the following code in
if ($("#leftDiv").length == 1) {
$("#leftDiv").height($("body").height() + "px");
}
if ($("#rightDiv").length == 1) {
$("#rightDiv").height($("body").height() + "px"); ;
}
this works fine until the user selects a smaller value than the page size, after selecting a larger value.
Then the left and right divs get set to less than 100%.
What i need is a way to find out what 100% is in pixels and then I can compare this to the height of the body and decide which is bigger.
Any ideas?
Thanks
John
Use margin: 0 auto
Kill your left and right columns, give your main div a width, and then center that div using an auto left and right margin. For example:
#mainDiv {
width: 80%;
margin: 0 auto;
}
Why are you creating empty elements to frame the page? How about setting the body background to the colour you require and:
#center_div {width: /* whatever */;
margin: 0 auto; /* to center in the viewport */
overflow: auto; /* or visible */
}
You could leave off the overflow property, and simply use min-width in place of width (I can't remember how cross-browser compatible this is) to define the 'normal' width, in such a way that the content will force the div to be larger as required to display the content.
If the left and right divs don't have any contents, then there's no need for them to be separate divs: apply their formatting to your container div instead, and center your contents div using margin: 0 auto. Obviously, you'll need to give the container div a specified width, and a non-transparent background. Then you can let the browser take care of resizing the window as needed - there's no need for you to reinvent the wheel for that part.
CSS:
#container {background-color:gray;}
#content {background-color:white;width:80%;margin:0 auto;}
Html:
...
<body>
<div id="container">
<div id="content">
...your content here...
</div>
</div>
</body>
...
(If your page doesn't have a container div, then you can apply the background color to the body element instead, and save even more code.)

Resources