I'm new to Unity and c# and I'm trying to get the basics down but I seem to be having some trouble with the collision. I want to get a falling object to destroy when it collides with another object that is stationary. All of the objects are set to Box Collider 2D in Unity and after hours of searching I can't seem to figure out what's wrong with it. Any help would be much appreciated!
using UnityEngine;
using System.Collections;
public class Destroy : MonoBehaviour {
// Use this for initialization
void Start () {
transform.position = new Vector2 (0, -10);
Debug.Log ("Game Start");
}
// Update is called once per frame
void Update () {
}
void OnCollisionEnter2D(Collision2D col)
{
if (col.gameObject.tag == "Target") //|| (col.gameObject.tag == "fallingCube2"))
{
Debug.Log ("There has been a collision!");
Destroy (col.gameObject);
}
else
if (col.gameObject.tag == "otherTarget")
{
Debug.Log ("There has been a collision!");
Destroy (col.gameObject);
}
}
}
Make sure that the Tag is the same (care with uppercase), and use col.tag == "Target".
The GameObject must have and BoxCollider2D or other Collider2D with the property isTrigger to false.
I always use OnTriggerEnter2D(Collider2D col) because I dont want that my pj stops falling or whatever
Related
In my app, I have a searchbox which allows users to filter as they type. For some reason I can't get an InfinteProgress to properly display while the filtering is being executed.
Here's my code:
Pass 1
public void renderForumList(){
try{
magnify = mStateMachine.findForumSearchIcon(form);
}catch(NullPointerException ex){
System.out.println("User typed additional character in search term before previous term finished executing");
}
InfiniteProgress infi = new InfiniteProgress();
magnify.getParent().replace(magnify, infi, null);
Display.getInstance().invokeAndBlock(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
for (int i = 0;i < containerStates.length;i++){
if(containerStates[i] != listItems[i].isVisible()){
listItems[i].setHidden(!containerStates[i]);
listItems[i].setVisible(containerStates[i]);
}
}
Display.getInstance().callSerially(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
mStateMachine.findForumsListComponent(form).animateLayout(200);
mStateMachine.findContainer2(form).replace(infi, magnify, null);
}
});
}
});
}
In this version, the infinite progress shows up in the proper position, but it doesn't spin.
Pass 2
public void renderForumList(){
try{
magnify = mStateMachine.findForumSearchIcon(form);
}catch(NullPointerException ex){
System.out.println("User typed additional character in search term before previous term finished executing");
}
InfiniteProgress infi = new InfiniteProgress();
magnify.getParent().replace(magnify, infi, null);
for (int i = 0;i < containerStates.length;i++){
if(containerStates[i] != listItems[i].isVisible()){
listItems[i].setHidden(!containerStates[i]);
listItems[i].setVisible(containerStates[i]);
}
}
mStateMachine.findForumsListComponent(form).animateLayout(200);
mStateMachine.findContainer2(form).replace(infi, magnify, null);
}
}
}
In this version, the magnifier icon just flashes briefly, but the InfiniteProgress spinner is never visible.
I get the same results on the simulator and on an Android device.
How can I get the InfiniteProgress to spin while the search is taking place?
invokeAndBlock opens a new thread and thus violates the EDT as you access UI components on a separate thread.
Try using callSerially instead to postpone the following code into the next EDT cycle although I'm not sure that will help as everything is still happening on the EDT.
Alternatively I'm guessing the method isVisible takes time, so you can enclose that call alone in invokeAndBlock.
To understand invokeAndBlock check out the developer guide https://www.codenameone.com/manual/edt.html
I'm implementing a DynamicItemStart button inside a Menu Controller. I'm loading the dynamic items for this button when Visual Studio starts. Everything is loaded correctly so the initialize method is called an I see all the new items in this Dynamic button. After the package is completely loaded I want to add more items to this Dynamic button, but since the package is already loaded the initialize method is not called again and I cannot see the new items in this Dynamic button. I only see the ones that were loaded when VS started.
Is there any way that I can force the update of this Dynamic button so it shows the new items?. I want to be able to update the VS UI after I added more items but outside the Initialize method.
The implementation I did is very similar to the one showed on this msdn example:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb166492.aspx
Does anyone know if an Update of the UI can be done by demand?
Any hints are greatly appreciated.
I finally got this working. The main thing is the implementation of a derived class of OleMenuCommand that implements a new constructor with a Predicate. This predicate is used to check if a new command is a match within the DynamicItemStart button.
public class DynamicItemMenuCommand : OleMenuCommand
{
private Predicate<int> matches;
public DynamicItemMenuCommand(CommandID rootId, Predicate<int> matches, EventHandler invokeHandler, EventHandler beforeQueryStatusHandler)
: base(invokeHandler, null, beforeQueryStatusHandler, rootId)
{
if (matches == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("Matches predicate cannot be null.");
}
this.matches = matches;
}
public override bool DynamicItemMatch(int cmdId)
{
if (this.matches(cmdId))
{
this.MatchedCommandId = cmdId;
return true;
}
this.MatchedCommandId = 0;
return false;
}
}
The above class should be used when adding the commands on execution time. Here's the code that creates the commands
public class ListMenu
{
private int _baselistID = (int)PkgCmdIDList.cmdidMRUList;
private List<IVsDataExplorerConnection> _connectionsList;
public ListMenu(ref OleMenuCommandService mcs)
{
InitMRUMenu(ref mcs);
}
internal void InitMRUMenu(ref OleMenuCommandService mcs)
{
if (mcs != null)
{
//_baselistID has the guid value of the DynamicStartItem
CommandID dynamicItemRootId = new CommandID(GuidList.guidIDEToolbarCmdSet, _baselistID);
DynamicItemMenuCommand dynamicMenuCommand = new DynamicItemMenuCommand(dynamicItemRootId, isValidDynamicItem, OnInvokedDynamicItem, OnBeforeQueryStatusDynamicItem);
mcs.AddCommand(dynamicMenuCommand);
}
}
private bool IsValidDynamicItem(int commandId)
{
return ((commandId - _baselistID) < connectionsCount); // here is the place to put the criteria to add a new command to the dynamic button
}
private void OnInvokedDynamicItem(object sender, EventArgs args)
{
DynamicItemMenuCommand invokedCommand = (DynamicItemMenuCommand)sender;
if (null != invokedCommand)
{
.....
}
}
private void OnBeforeQueryStatusDynamicItem(object sender, EventArgs args)
{
DynamicItemMenuCommand matchedCommand = (DynamicItemMenuCommand)sender;
bool isRootItem = (matchedCommand.MatchedCommandId == 0);
matchedCommand.Enabled = true;
matchedCommand.Visible = true;
int indexForDisplay = (isRootItem ? 0 : (matchedCommand.MatchedCommandId - _baselistID));
matchedCommand.Text = "Text for the command";
matchedCommand.MatchedCommandId = 0;
}
}
I had to review a lot of documentation since it was not very clear how the commands can be added on execution time. So I hope this save some time whoever has to implement anything similar.
The missing piece for me was figuring out how to control the addition of new items.
It took me some time to figure out that the matches predicate (the IsValidDynamicItem method in the sample) controls how many items get added - as long as it returns true, the OnBeforeQueryStatusDynamicItem gets invoked and can set the details (Enabled/Visible/Checked/Text etc.) of the match to be added to the menu.
I am trying to write an application, but it is constantly crashing when using the uiimagepickercontroller. I thought that it might be because I was not disposing of the picker after each use, but it will often freeze up on first run as well. Usually I'll take a picture and it just freezes, never asking to "use" the picture.
Do you have any suggestions? Here is my code. Has anyone gotten this to work?
public override void ViewDidLoad ()
{
base.ViewDidLoad ();
myPicker = new UIImagePickerController();
myPicker.Delegate = new myPickerDelegate(this);
myAlbumButton.Clicked += delegate {
if(UIImagePickerController.IsSourceTypeAvailable(UIImagePickerControllerSourceType.PhotoLibrary)){
myPicker.SourceType = UIImagePickerControllerSourceType.PhotoLibrary;
myPicker.AllowsEditing = true;
this.PresentModalViewController (myPicker, true);
}else{
Console.WriteLine("cannot get album");
}
};
myCameraButton.Clicked += delegate {
if(UIImagePickerController.IsSourceTypeAvailable(UIImagePickerControllerSourceType.Camera)){
myPicker.SourceType = UIImagePickerControllerSourceType.Camera;
//myPicker.AllowsEditing = true;
this.PresentModalViewController (myPicker, true);
}else{
Console.WriteLine("cannot get camera");
}
};
}
private class myPickerDelegate : UIImagePickerControllerDelegate
{
private TestView _vc;
public myPickerDelegate ( TestView controller):base()
{
_vc = controller;
}
public override void FinishedPickingImage (UIImagePickerController myPicker, UIImage image, NSDictionary editingInfo)
{
// TODO: Implement - see: http://go-mono.com/docs/index.aspx?link=T%3aMonoTouch.Foundation.ModelAttribute
_vc.myImageView.Image = image;
myPicker.DismissModalViewControllerAnimated(true);
}
}
Try to call your event handlers code from the main thread by using BeginInvokeOnMainThread().
So my issue was very similar.
Instead of having a delegate class, I had the delegates inline for the picker.
For some reason the app froze every time after talking the image, not stopping in any breakpoint after that.
The solution that worked for me was to use this book:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33770921/Professional-iPhone-Programming-with-MonoTouch-and-NET-C
I have in an Object an QVector of Coordinates (my type) that I want to transfer to an other Vector ( I validate and than want to use ist ).
Header
bool getVector(QVector<Coordinates> &getCoordinates );
C File
static QVector<Coordinates> current;
int getVector( QVector<Coordinates> &getCoordinates)
{
.... stuff ...
getCoordinates = current;
.... stuff ....
return 0;
}
And I use it like
....
QVector<Coordinates> currentCoordinates;
getVector(currentCoordinates);
currentCoordinates.X // CRASH
The debugger goes to this line where an Live Crash happens
inline QVector(const QVector<T> &v) : d(v.d) { d->ref.ref(); if (!d->sharable) detach_helper(); }
So my how can I fix this? As I can use this to get all the other Variables with this methode.
A likely cause of your problem is that current has not been constructed before getVector is called. Initialization of static objects in C++ is a thorny area, and a frequent source of bugs - for more information, see this question, and the static initialization order fiasco FAQ entry.
A simple solution to this problem is to provide access to current via a function, i.e. replace
static QVector<Coordinates> current;
with
static QVector<Coordinates>& getCurrent()
{
static QVector<Coordinates> current;
return current;
}
Note, however, that the function as written above is not thread-safe. If multiple threads may call getCurrent, then it should be protected with a QMutex.
For gareth and the Forum :
the header:
typedef QVector<Coordinates> VesselCoordinates;
bool (*getVessel)(Charakter forCharakter, Vessel& getVessel,VesselCoordinates &getCoordinates );
later i bind tis function pointer to an static function ( cause this part of my Program will be one day convertet to c)
cpp file lower layer:
static struct {
Charakter currentPlayerVessel;
VesselCoordinates possibility;
}data;
static bool getVessel(Charakter forCharakter, Vessel& getVessel,VesselCoordinates &getCoordinates );
// funktion to bind the funktion pointer to this static funktion so it can be called outside the File
static bool serverNamespace::getVessel(Charakter forCharakter, Vessel& getVessel,VesselCoordinates &getCoordinates )
{
bool retValue= false;
if ( forCharakter == data.currentPlayerVessel){
// TODO abfragen ob die Adresse regestriert ist!
if ((true == minSize()) and ((true == shipsInRow())or (true == shipsInLine())))
{
retValue = true;
Vessel test = (Vessel)data.possibility.size();
getVessel = test;
getCoordinates = data.possibility;
}
}
return retValue;
}
And then i can use this in the upper layer cpp file to get the information i need:
// in an Funktion :
VesselCoordinates currentCoordinates;
currentCoordinates.clear();
Vessel currentVessel;
if (true == basicFleet->getVessel(currentCharakter,currentVessel, currentCoordinates ))
// doing stuff to it
so its worik fine but your idea worked just as fine. Maybe you can see why my idea is also working.
Thank you
elektor
I wrote a program to test my binary tree and when I run it, the program seems to crash (btree.exe has stopped working, Windows is checking for a solution ...).
When I ran it through my debugger and placed the breakpoint on the function I suspect is causing it, destroy_tree(), it seemed to run as expected and returned back to the main function. Main, in turn, returned from the program but then the cursor jumped back to destroy_tree() and looped recusively within itself.
The minimal code sample is below so it can be ran instantly. My compiler is MinGW and my debugger is gdb (I'm using Code::Blocks).
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
struct node
{
int key_value;
node *left;
node *right;
};
class Btree
{
public:
Btree();
~Btree();
void insert(int key);
void destroy_tree();
private:
node *root;
void destroy_tree(node *leaf);
void insert(int key, node *leaf);
};
Btree::Btree()
{
root = NULL;
}
Btree::~Btree()
{
destroy_tree();
}
void Btree::destroy_tree()
{
destroy_tree(root);
cout<<"tree destroyed\n"<<endl;
}
void Btree::destroy_tree(node *leaf)
{
if(leaf!=NULL)
{
destroy_tree(leaf->left);
destroy_tree(leaf->right);
delete leaf;
}
}
void Btree::insert(int key, node *leaf)
{
if(key < leaf->key_value)
{
if(leaf->left!=NULL)
insert(key, leaf->left);
else
{
leaf->left = new node;
leaf->left->key_value = key;
leaf->left->left = NULL;
leaf->left->right = NULL;
}
}
else if (key >= leaf->key_value)
{
if(leaf->right!=NULL)
insert(key, leaf->right);
else
{
leaf->right = new node;
leaf->right->key_value = key;
leaf->right->left = NULL;
leaf->right->right = NULL;
}
}
}
void Btree::insert(int key)
{
if(root!=NULL)
{
insert(key, root);
}
else
{
root = new node;
root->key_value = key;
root->left = NULL;
root->right = NULL;
}
}
int main()
{
Btree tree;
int i;
tree.insert(1);
tree.destroy_tree();
return 0;
}
As an aside, I'm planning to switch from Code::Blocks built-in debugger to DDD for debugging these problems. I heard DDD can display visually pointers to objects instead of just displaying the pointer's address. Do you think making the switch will help with solving these types of problems (data structure and algorithm problems)?
Your destroy_tree() is called twice, you call it once and then it gets called after the execution leaves main() from the destructor.
You may think it should work anyway, because you check whether leaf!=NULL, but delete does not set the pointer to NULL. So your root is not NULL when destroy_tree() is called for the second time,
Not directly related (or maybe it is) to your problem, but it's good practice to give structs a constructor. For example:
struct node
{
int key_value;
node *left;
node *right;
node( int val ) : key_val( val ), left(NULL), right(NULL) {}
};
If you do this, your code becomes simpler, because you don't need worry about setting the pointers when you create a node, and it is not possible to forget to initialise them.
Regarding DDD, it;'s a fine debugger, but frankly the secret of debugging is to write correct code in the first place, so you don't have to do it. C++ gives you a lot of help in this direction (like the use of constructors), but you have to understand and use the facilities it provides.
Btree::destroy_tree doesn't set 'root' to 0 after successfully nuking the tree. As a result, the destructor class destroy_tree() again and you're trying to destroy already destroyed objects.
That'll be undefined behaviour then :).
Once you destroy the root.
Make sure it is NULL so it does not try to do it again (from the destructor)
void Btree::destroy_tree(node *leaf)
{
if(leaf!=NULL)
{
destroy_tree(leaf->left);
destroy_tree(leaf->right);
delete leaf;
leaf = NULL; // add this line
}
}