I'm testing a website that opens in-browser pop-ups to display object details. These pop-ups are sometimes modal, by which I mean that they render the rest of the screen inoperative and trigger a gray transparent overlay that covers everything but the pop-up. This overlay is intended behavior, which means that I need a way to detect whether or not it was correctly triggered.
However, I am not familiar enough with the implementation of such overlays to determine where in the DOM I should look to find the properties that govern such behavior. As such, I was hoping someone with more information on how such overlays are usually configured could point me in the right direction.
The obvious solution is to simply try to click a button and see what happens but I was hoping to write a method that I could implement throughout the test suite rather than having to write a different check for each circumstance.
For those interested I'm scripting in Java using Selenium.
I know this is old, but it may still help someone else. I had just recently solved a similar problem for our React site. I believe we were using the react-block-ui module to implement our blocking overlays.
Basically, I was able to detect a certain element was blocked by an overlay because of 2 known facts:
The element was within a containing div ("the overlay") that followed a certain naming convention. In our case, it was section-overlay-X.
This overlay would have a class attribute (named av-block-ui) if it was blocking.
(Hopefully, you have access to this information, too... or something similarly useful.)
With this information, I wrote up a couple utility methods to help me determine whether or not that particular WebElement is blocked by an overlay. If it was blocked, throw a ElementNotInteractableException.
For Java:
...
By SECTION_OVERLAY_ANCESTOR_LOCATOR = By.xpath("./ancestor::div[contains(#id, 'section-overlay-')][1]");
...
private WebElement findUnblockedElement(By by) {
WebElement element = driver.findElement(by);
if (isBlockedByOverlay(element)) {
throw new ElementNotInteractableException(String.format("Element [%s] is blocked by overlay", element.getAttribute("id")));
} else {
return element;
}
}
private boolean isBlockedByOverlay(WebElement element) {
List<WebElement> ancestors = element.findElements(SECTION_OVERLAY_ANCESTOR_LOCATOR);
WebElement overlayAncestor = ancestors.get(0);
String overlayClass = overlayAncestor.getAttribute("class");
return !StringUtils.isBlank(overlayClass);
}
Here's my snippet on it:
https://bitbucket.org/snippets/v_dev/BAd9dq/findunblockedelement
This won't work in all situations, but I solved this problem by checking the overflow value of the body element. The flavor of modal I was trying to get past disabled scrolling of the page while it was active.
Related
Question
I'm working with Adobe Scene7 BasicZoomViewer and I'm looking for a way to tell the ZoomViewer to reset the zoom so that the user is no longer zoomed in on an image but instead will show the default "zoom" level.
What I've found
The closest thing I found to what I need is this reset property ZoomView.reset which "Resets the viewport when the frame (image) changes. If set to 0 it preserves the current viewport with the best possible fit while preserving the aspect ratio of the newly set image".
This looks close to something I need but it states that it will reset or preserve the aspect ratio when a new image has been inserted but I am not inserting new images.
Demo from Adobe
There is a button on the image that the API inserts into the page that resets the zoom level. Adobe provides a demo page that shows what I'm working with. If you look at the bottom left, the right-most button is the reset button. When clicked, it has to make some kind of API call and I need to figure out which one it is.
Edit
I've been able to find a minified version of the BasicZoomViewer and I am currently attempting to make sense of the code.
There is an event listener placed on the "Zoom Reset Button" that just simply calls a reset() method on line 274 in the uglified version of the file. Currently, I am trying to make sense of the file and figure out how to access this method.
c.zoomResetButton.addEventListener("click", function () {
c.zoomView.zoomReset()
});
I will be answering my own question. If someone finds a better way please feel free to answer as well.
tldr;
Create a variable to hold the instance of your s7viewers.BasicZoomViewer() and inside of that you can access the event handlers and much more.
Example of calling the reset zoom handler
// instantiate the s7viewers class and save it in a variable
var s7BasicZoomViewer = new s7viewers.BasicZoomViewer({
containerId: 's7viewer',
params: {
asset: assetUrl,
serverurl: serverUrl
})
// example of how to call the "zoomReset()" method
s7BasicZoomViewer.zoomResetButton.component.events.click[0].handler()
Explanation
After digging through the minified code that was uglified I found an event listener on the s7zoomresetbutton DOM class name, or perhaps it's watching for the ID of that DOM element which is the same ID as the container div for your S7 BasicZoom Viewer plus some added text to make this ID unique. For example, if the container div is s7viewer then the reset zoom button will have an ID of s7viewer_zoomresetbutton.
Now, going through the code I found this event listener which let me know there must be some way to call the zoomReset() method.
c.zoomResetButton.addEventListener("click", function () {
c.zoomView.zoomReset()
});
In the code above, the value of c is this or in other words it's the instance of your S7 BasicViewerZoom and in my case I have multiple depending on how many images I need to zoom on.
When instantiating the s7viewers class you can then reference that instance later and access the event handlers on each button and other properties and methods.
From there it was just looking through the object returned from the instance and calling the handler for the reset button.
I want to test a page with responsive layout.
Some elements (like the menu) will be different depending on resolution.
how can I target them to run with the same test classes?
i'm thinking about How.CSS, using = "a.normal-link, a#responsive-link"
is this a good idea? is there a better way?
and is it possible to "inject" some kind of workaround-logic for specific occasions? (for example: if the normal login-button is not visible, try to open the responsive menu, then click the other (responsive) login-link)
I was just thinking about a try-catch block, but that feels wrong for an alternative route.
thanks
As, you need to check whether an element is visible or not, it is better to use if/else blocks, to validate the same. Sample piece of code is given below:
if(driver.findElement(<Your element>).isDisplayed()) {
// Perform your operations
} else {
// Open the button from menu item
}
Hope this helps.
I have a problem.
My app is a tab bar controller and its first view controller is a split view controller.
This seems to be not ok for Apple because documents say a split voew controller must be the root, so perhaps that is the reason of my problems.
The problem is that sometimes, willHideViewController from UISplitViewControllerDelegate is not called, so, for this reason, the upper/left button sometimes is not created, which is anoying.
I realised, to reproduce this error, try several times this:
-Landscape mode.
-Select a tab different to split view controller tap.
-Move the iPad to portrait in that tab.
-Go to the split view controller tab, and sometimes, willHideViewController is not called so you will not see the upper button. However if I rotate my iPad to landscape and after that to portrait, it's fixed.
I tried to force manually several rotations to work around this problem, but no luck.
I still have to try any split view controller clone class from github or similar.
Do you have idea what's going on or any work around?
Here I show you two examples working properly.
Thanks a lot for your help.
Where do you set the splitViewControllers delegate? Perhaps you can set the delegate when you load the tab. It sounds like you set it only when you have rotated once?
Otherwise, see this example
Here they have the TableViewController be the delegate of the splitviewcontroller. Perhaps you could do the same with the TabBarController?
I've concluded that this can't be done in any way that I consider 'sufficiently' legitimate. It's possible to get frustratingly close, but the issue of having the willShow..., willHide disseminated to the split view controllers under each tab remains.
The solution that seems most likely to work is,
https://github.com/grgcombs/IntelligentSplitViewController/blob/master/IntelligentSplitViewController.m
Though this code is undoubtedly clever, it's a bit too 'side door' for me. I suspect (but don't know) that just invoking the delegate methods is not sufficient. Surely the UISplitViewController itself needs to change it's internal state as well as calling the delegate methods? This method 'just' invokes the delegate methods when there's an orientation change.
So... I've decided on a more legitimate solution, which is to use the new method introduced in iOS 5.
- (BOOL) splitViewController:(UISplitViewController *)svc
shouldHideViewController:(UIViewController *)vc
inOrientation:(UIInterfaceOrientation)orientation
{
return NO;
}
So, the master menu is never hidden, and therefore the problem of managing the popover doesn't arise.
Of course, this is still not totally 'legit' as it still includes UISplitViewControllers that are not at the top level (the UITabViewController is at the top level, and the split views are on each tab)
Good luck with whichever solution you choose.
I'll update this reply when I've confirmed Apple will approve an app using this solution.
Is there a method to add/insert an element in the current DOM?
Let me start by saying, this is a really bad idea. Think long and hard about why you want to do this. Then, if you still want to dynamically add elements, think about it some more. WebDriver is meant to mimic user interaction with your page, users don't typically add elements willy-nilly.
That said, if you're absolutely set on doing this I'd suggest using the JavascriptExecutor to add an element via JavaScript
WebDriver driver; // Assigned elsewhere
JavascriptExecutor js = (JavascriptExecutor) driver;
js.executeScript("document.getElementById('myDiv').appendChild(document.createTextNode(' New Element'))")
It's ugly for a reason.
First and foremost, I apologize for any vagueness in this question. At this point, I'm simply trying to get some new ideas of things to try in order to diagnose this bug.
Anyway, the problem I'm having is with an application that's using a custom moduleloader. That moduleloader has been compiled into an swc and the moduleloader is being instantiated via its namespace. This all works perfectly fine. The problem I'm encountering is specific to mx:button controls used within modules. For whatever reason, their labels are being truncated so, for example, Sign In is showing up with an ellipsis, as Sign ...
After quite a bit of fooling around I have been able to establish the following:
This problem only seems to occur within modules. If a button control is used in the main mxml, the label does not get truncated.
The button control whose label is being truncated does not have a width specified (setting its width to 100% or a specific pixel width doesn't fix the issue)
The button control is using the default padding (messing with the padding by setting left and right to 5 or any other value doesn't help matters either).
We are not using any embedded fonts so I've ruled that out as a possibility as well.
mx:CheckBox and mx:LinkButton are equally impacted by this problem although mx:CheckBox also seems to not want to show its checkbox, it just shows the truncated label.
A potential side affect of this is that attaching a dataprovider to mx:ComboBox causes the combobox control to throw a drawing error but I'm not entirely certain that it's related to the above problem.
One interesting thing I did find while perusing the net for an answer was a mention of fontContext and its relationship to IFlexModuleFactory. There's no specification for fontContext within our implementation of moduleloader so I'm not entirely certain if this could be the issue. In any case, if anyone has any ideas, it would be hugely appreciated. On the other hand, if you know exactly what ails me and can provide me with an answer, I might just wet myself with excitement. It's late. I'm tired. I NEED my Flex app to play nice.
Thanks in advance,
--Anne
Edit: To clarify what I'm looking for with this question, I really just need to know the following:
Could this issue be caused by a namespace conflict?
What else can potentially override the default behavior of labels if no CSS has been implemented?
Has anyone encountered a problem with inheritance being lost while using a custom implementation of moduleloader?
Has anyone encountered this problem or a similar problem with or without using moduleloader?
I'm not sharing any code with this question simply because I'd have to share the entire application and, unfortunately, I can't do that. Again, I'm not looking for the end all, be all solution, just some suggestions of things to look out for if anyone has any ideas.
I've been dealing with this issue myself, off and on and in various forms, for a year, and while I haven't figured out just what's causing it yet, there's clearly a mismeasurement happening somewhere along the line.
What I have been able to to, though, is work around it, essentially by subclassing button-type controls (in my case, Button, LinkButton, PopUpButton, et. al.) and assigning their textField members instances of a UITextField extension whose truncateToFit element simply returns false in all cases:
public class NonTruncatingUITextField extends UITextField
{
public function NonTruncatingUITextField ()
{
super();
}
override public function truncateToFit(s:String = null):Boolean
{
return false;
}
}
The custom component just extends Button (or whatever other button-type control is the culprit -- I've created a half-dozen or so of these myself, one for each type of control), but uses a NonTruncatingTextField as its label, where specified by the component user:
public class NonTruncatingButton extends Button
{
private var _truncateLabel:Boolean;
public function NonTruncatingButton()
{
super();
this._truncateLabel = true;
}
override protected function createChildren():void
{
if (!textField)
{
if (!_truncateLabel)
textField = new NonTruncatingUITextField();
else
textField = new UITextField();
textField.styleName = this;
addChild(DisplayObject(textField));
}
super.createChildren();
}
[Inspectable]
public function get truncateLabel():Boolean
{
return this._truncateLabel;
}
public function set truncateLabel(value:Boolean):void
{
this._truncateLabel = value;
}
}
... so then finally, in your MXML code, you'd reference the custom component thusly (in this case, I'm telling the control never to truncate its labels):
<components:NonTruncatingButton id="btn" label="Click This" truncateLabel="false" />
I agree it feels like a workaround, that the component architecture ought to handle all this more gracefully, and that it's probably something we're both overlooking, but it works; hopefully it'll solve your problem as you search for a more definitive solution. (Although personally, I'm using it as-is, and I've moved on to other things -- time's better spent elsewhere!)
Good luck -- let me know how it works out.
I've used the custom button and link button class solutions and still ran into problems - but found a workaround that's worked every time for me.
Create a css style that includes the font you'd like to use for you label. Be sure to check 'embed this font' right under the text selection dropdown. Go back and apply the style to your button (or your custom button, depending on how long you've been bashing your hear against this particular wall), and voila!
Or should be voila...
I just came across this issue and solve it this way:
<mx:LinkButton label="Some label"
updateComplete="event.target.mx_internal::getTextField().text = event.target.label"
/>;
I've had some success preventing Flex's erroneous button-label truncation by setting labelPlacement to "bottom", as in:
theButton.labelPlacement = ButtonLabelPlacement.BOTTOM;
Setting the label placement doesn't seem to help prevent truncation in some wider button sizes, but for many cases it works for me.
In cases where you can't use a bottom-aligned button label (such as when your button has a horizontally aligned icon), janusz's approach also seems to work. here's a version of janusz's .text reassignment technique in ActionScript rather than MXML:
theButton.addEventListener(FlexEvent.UPDATE_COMPLETE, function (e:FlexEvent):void {
e.target.mx_internal::getTextField().text = e.target.label;
});
The preceding code requires you to import mx_internal and FlexEvent first, as follows:
import mx.events.FlexEvent;
import mx.core.mx_internal;
And here are the results…
Before (note truncation despite ample horizontal space):
After:
The only downside to this approach is you lose the ellipsis, but in my case I considered that a welcome feature.