I am working on a game, and that game has a battery life function for a flash light. Basically, when the flash light is turned on, it reduces the life and when it's off, it stops.
But to achieve this, I need to access a variable that will determine whether or not the flash light is turned on or off.
var UTWeap_FlashLight light; // declaring a new variable from the class UTWeap_FlashLight.uc
// reduces battery life of the flash light
exec function ReducePower()
{
if(light.bCheck==true)
{
if(0<power) // loops till power 1 is = 0
{
power--; // reduce the value of power
if(power==0) // if it equals 0
{
power2 = power2 - 1; // set power2 to it's own value - 1
power=100; // reset power back to 100
}
}
}
}
but whenever I compile the code, it tells me that it can't find the variable bCheck, meaning I can't check whether or not the flash light is on. I want to call that variable from this class
UTWeap_FlashLight.uc
exec function TurnOff()
{
if(!Flashlight.LightComponent.bEnabled)
{
Flashlight.LightComponent.SetEnabled(true);
bCheck = true;
}
else
{
Flashlight.LightComponent.SetEnabled(false);
}
}
this part of the code is where I turn on/off the flash light. When I turn it on, I want to set bCheck to 1 so I can then later use it as a condition to detect whether or not the flash light is on. But I can't use the variable, it will just not change it's value. I later found out you CAN'T use variables from other classes, which is pretty dumb. Any help appreciated.
Well, I figured out how to use variables from other classes in unreal script.
IF you're wondering how to do the same use this:
class'<yourclassname>'.default.<yourvariablename>; // remove the < >
Related
this is my first time of asking a question in stackoverflow, sorry if my english is not really good. I hope this is a good start.
I am currently trying to use my stm32's key button/ user button (i mean the one button which already included on it in buying written "key") and i want to use the button to do some project. I did some research and found the key button is on pin A0, so i labelled it to BUTTON. So i try to check if the button is functioning using this code:
on private variable section
int a; //variable declare
on while section
while (1){
a = 0
if (HAL_GPIO_ReadPin(BUTTON_GPIO_Port, BUTTON_Pin)){
a = 1;
} else {
a = 0;
}
}
i'm expecting that when i debug the code and then see the live variable, i will find that variable "a" is gonna turn into 1 when i press the key button, but it is not working as i expected. The variable "a" is still on 0 whatever i do.
im kinda desperate, please help, i appreciate all of the answer :D.
You are setting a = 0; every time around the loop. It might briefly be set to 1 if the button is pressed, but then it will be set back to zero.
Also, the compiler may well detect that the variable a is not actually used for anything, so it might just optimize out the setting of a.
Lastly, HAL_GPIO_ReadPin() can return GPIO_PIN_RESET or GPIO_PIN_SET. So you should test that it is one of those.
Try this:
volatile int a = 0; // Tell compiler not to optimize out setting of 'a'
while (1) {
// No need to set 'a' to zero here
if (HAL_GPIO_ReadPin(BUTTON_GPIO_Port, BUTTON_Pin) == GPIO_PIN_SET){
a = 1;
} else {
a = 0;
}
}
I have a player and a few NPCs.
The NPCs have random movement, and I control my players movement. They both have RigidBody2D to deal with physics and BoxCollider2D to deal with Collisions.
However, when I walk into a NPC my player pushes it. Same thing if a NPC moves into my player while the player stands still.
I can't set the mass of either object to some extreme number since that will interfere with how they behave with other objects in my game.
What I want:
When an NPC collides with the player, the NPC stops (I get this effect if I set player mass to ex. 1000, but then the player can push the NPC, which I dont want), and the NPC acts as a "wall", i.e it doesnt move, but nor can the player push it around. How can I do this?
EDIT: So I created my own method for it:
void OnCollisionEnter2D(Collision2D other){
if (other.gameObject.name == "Player") {
collidedWithPlayer = true; //we only move if !collidedWithPlayer
isMoving = false; //stop moving
myRigidBody.mass = 1000; //turn NPC into "wall"
}
}
void OnCollisionExit2D(Collision2D other){
if (other.gameObject.name == "Player") {
collidedWithPlayer = false;
waitCounter = waitTime; //stop NPC from starting to move right after we exit
myRigidBody.mass = 1;
}
}
I mean this works, but is there no native method to do this?
What you are trying to do is essentially use a "realistic" physics engine to create rather unrealistic physics. That's why it's not supported by Unity's built-in functions. Furthermore, you are correct in assuming that messing with the object masses is not a good idea.
Here's one suggestion that avoids playing with mass. It's a bit kludgey, but give it a try and see if it works for you. (I assume your player rigidbody is not Kinematic?)
Step 1: Create 2 new layers; call them NPCWall and PlayerWall. Setup 2D physics so that player collides with NPCWall and NPC collides with PlayerWall, but player does not collide with NPCs. (If your NPCs and player are on the same layer, then of course put them on 2 separate layers.)
Step 2: Create an NPCWall prefab that uses the same kind of collider as the NPCs. I assume you only have one size of NPC. Likewise, create a PlayerWall prefab that uses the same kind of collider as the player. Set the NPCWall prefab to NPCWall layer, and PlayerWall prefab to PlayerWall layer.
Step 3: We can't parent the NPCWall to the NPC, because it would end up as part of the rigidbody. Therefore add a simple script to the NPCWall and PlayerWall:
public class TrackingWall
{
//This invisible wall follows an NPC around to block the player.
//It also follows the player around to block NPCs.
Transform followTransform;
public void Init(Transform targetTrans)
{
followTransform = targetTrans;
transform.position = followTransform.position;
transform.rotation = followTransform.rotation;
}
void Update()
{
if (followTransform == null)
Destroy(gameObject);
transform.position = followTransform.position;
transform.rotation = followTransform.rotation;
}
}
Step 4: In the NPC and player scripts:
TrackingWall myWallPrefab;
void Start()
{
[whatever else you are doing in Start()]
TrackingWall myWall = Instantiate<TrackingWall>(myWallPrefab);
myWall.Init(transform);
}
Obviously, for NPCs, myWallPrefab should be set to the NPCWall prefab, and for players, myWallPrefab should be set to the PlayerWall prefab.
In theory this should give each character an impenetrable, immovable wall that only moves when they do, prevents other characters from pushing them, and cleans itself up when they are destroyed. I can't guarantee it will work though!
I am writing PIC code in C and encountered the following problems:
When I write my delay as _delay_ms(500), my code doesn't compile, it says it didn't recognize this instruction. I am using MPLAB.
I want to write a program that would count how many time the push button is pressed then return that value and display it using LED's. I know how to display it, but not how to make the program to wait for the push of the push button on the pickit.
main()
{
TRISA=0;//Sets all ports on A to be outputs
TRISB=1;//Sets all ports on B to be inputs
for(;;){
if(PORTBbits.RB0==1){//When the button is pressed the LED is off
PORTAbits.RA1 =0;
count=count+1;
}
else{
PORTAbits.RA1=1;
count = count +1;
}
if (count > 20){//if count =20 aka 20 button presses the LED turns on
PORTAbits.RA0=1;
}
else{
PORTAbits.RA0=0;
}
}
}
There are a few issues:
Assuming you're using a PIC24 or a dsPIC, you need to include libpic30.h
Before you include libpic30.h you need to #define FCY to be your instruction rate so that the delay takes the correct number of cycles. See the comments in the libpic30.h file for details.
The function is __delay_ms not _delay_ms. Note that there are two underscores at the beginning.
The name is all lower case, not Delay_ms as in your comment.
You need to add delay in your code when you detect a key is pressed. As you are saying the _delay_ms(500) is not recognized, You can try something like following:
unsigned char x;
// Just waste a few cycles to create delay
for (x = 0; x < 100; x++)
{
// No operation instruction
Nop();
}
You can create your own delay function with specific number of iterations of this for loop. Measure the exact delay created by this function using a profiler if you need. IMO any arbitrary delay, like say 100 iterations as stated above shall work.
I'm modifying the Qt 5 Terminal example and use a QTextEdit window as a terminal console. I've encountered several problems.
Qt does a strange interpretation of carriage return ('\r') in incoming strings. Ocassionally, efter 3-7 sends, it interprets ('\r') as new line ('\n'), most annoying. When I finally found out I choose to filter out all '\r' from the incoming data.
Is this behaviour due to some setting?
Getting the cursor interaction to work properly is a bit problematic. I want the console to have autoscroll selectable via a checkbox. I also want it to be possible to select text whenever the console is running, without losing the selection when new data is coming.
Here is my current prinout function, that is a slot connected to a signal emitted as soon as any data has arrived:
void MainWindow::printSerialString(QString& toPrint)
{
static int cursPos=0;
//Set the cursorpos to the position from last printout
QTextCursor c = ui->textEdit_console->textCursor();
c.setPosition(cursPos);
ui->textEdit_console->setTextCursor( c );
ui->textEdit_console->insertPlainText(toPrint);
qDebug()<<"Cursor: " << ui->textEdit_console->textCursor().position();
//Save the old cursorposition, so the user doesn't change it
cursPos= ui->textEdit_console->textCursor().position();
toPrint.clear();
}
I had the problem that if the user clicked around in the console, the cursor would change position and the following incoming data would end up in the wrong place. Issues:
If a section is marked by the user, the marking would get lost when new data is coming.
When "forcing" the pointer like this, it gets a rather ugly autoscroll behaviour that isn't possible to disable.
If the cursor is changed by another part of the program between to printouts, I also have to record that somehow.
The append function which sound like a more logical solution, works fine for appending a whole complete string but displays an erratic behaviour when printing just parts of an incoming string, putting characters and new lines everywhere.
I haven't found a single setting regarding this but there should be one? Setting QTextEdit to "readOnly" doesn't disable the cursor interaction.
3.An idea is to have two cursors in the console. One invisible that is used for printouts and that is not possible at all to manipulate for the user, and one visible which enables the user to select text. But how to do that beats me :) Any related example, FAQ or guide are very appreciated.
I've done a QTextEdit based terminal for SWI-Prolog, pqConsole, with some features, like ANSI coloring sequences (subset) decoding, command history management, multiple insertion points, completion, hinting...
It runs a nonblocking user interface while serving a modal REPL (Read/Eval/Print/Loop), the most common interface for interpreted languages, like Prolog is.
The code it's complicated by the threading issues (on user request, it's possible to have multiple consoles, or multiple threads interacting on the main), but the core it's rather simple. I just keep track of the insertion point(s), and allow the cursor moving around, disabling editing when in output area.
pqConsole it's a shared object (I like such kind of code reuse), but for deployment, a stand-alone program swipl-win is more handy.
Here some selected snippets, the status variables used to control output are promptPosition and fixedPosition.
/** display different cursor where editing available
*/
void ConsoleEdit::onCursorPositionChanged() {
QTextCursor c = textCursor();
set_cursor_tip(c);
if (fixedPosition > c.position()) {
viewport()->setCursor(Qt::OpenHandCursor);
set_editable(false);
clickable_message_line(c, true);
} else {
set_editable(true);
viewport()->setCursor(Qt::IBeamCursor);
}
if (pmatched.size()) {
pmatched.format_both(c);
pmatched = ParenMatching::range();
}
ParenMatching pm(c);
if (pm)
(pmatched = pm.positions).format_both(c, pmatched.bold());
}
/** strict control on keyboard events required
*/
void ConsoleEdit::keyPressEvent(QKeyEvent *event) {
using namespace Qt;
...
bool accept = true, ret = false, down = true, editable = (cp >= fixedPosition);
QString cmd;
switch (k) {
case Key_Space:
if (!on_completion && ctrl && editable) {
compinit2(c);
return;
}
accept = editable;
break;
case Key_Tab:
if (ctrl) {
event->ignore(); // otherwise tab control get lost !
return;
}
if (!on_completion && !ctrl && editable) {
compinit(c);
return;
}
break;
case Key_Backtab:
// otherwise tab control get lost !
event->ignore();
return;
case Key_Home:
if (!ctrl && cp > fixedPosition) {
c.setPosition(fixedPosition, (event->modifiers() & SHIFT) ? c.KeepAnchor : c.MoveAnchor);
setTextCursor(c);
return;
}
case Key_End:
case Key_Left:
case Key_Right:
case Key_PageUp:
case Key_PageDown:
break;
}
you can see that most complexity goes in keyboard management...
/** \brief send text to output
*
* Decode ANSI terminal sequences, to output coloured text.
* Colours encoding are (approx) derived from swipl console.
*/
void ConsoleEdit::user_output(QString text) {
#if defined(Q_OS_WIN)
text.replace("\r\n", "\n");
#endif
QTextCursor c = textCursor();
if (status == wait_input)
c.setPosition(promptPosition);
else {
promptPosition = c.position(); // save for later
c.movePosition(QTextCursor::End);
}
auto instext = [&](QString text) {
c.insertText(text, output_text_fmt);
// Jan requested extension: put messages *above* the prompt location
if (status == wait_input) {
int ltext = text.length();
promptPosition += ltext;
fixedPosition += ltext;
ensureCursorVisible();
}
};
// filter and apply (some) ANSI sequence
int pos = text.indexOf('\x1B');
if (pos >= 0) {
int left = 0;
...
instext(text.mid(pos));
}
else
instext(text);
linkto_message_source();
}
I think you should not use a static variable (like that appearing in your code), but rely instead on QTextCursor interface and some status variable, like I do.
Generally, using a QTextEdit for a feature-rich terminal widget seems to be a bad idea. You'll need to properly handle escape sequences such as cursor movements and color mode settings, somehow stick the edit to the top-left corner of current terminal "page", etc. A better solution could be to inherit QScrollArea and implement all the needed painting–selection-scrolling features yourself.
As a temporary workaround for some of your problems I can suggest using ui->textEdit_console->append(toPrint) instead of insertPlainText(toPrint).
To automatically scroll the edit you can move the cursor to the end with QTextEdit::moveCursor() and call QTextEdit::ensureCursorVisible().
I want to write an FSM which starts with an idle state and moves from one state to another based on some event. I am not familiar with coding of FSM and google didn't help.
Appreciate if someone could post the C data structure that could be used for the same.
Thanks,
syuga2012
We've implemented finite state machine for Telcos in the past and always used an array of structures, pre-populated like:
/* States */
#define ST_ANY 0
#define ST_START 1
: : : : :
/* Events */
#define EV_INIT 0
#define EV_ERROR 1
: : : : :
/* Rule functions */
int initialize(void) {
/* Initialize FSM here */
return ST_INIT_DONE
}
: : : : :
/* Structures for transition rules */
typedef struct {
int state;
int event;
(int)(*fn)();
} rule;
rule ruleset[] = {
{ST_START, EV_INIT, initialize},
: : : : :
{ST_ANY, EV_ERROR, error},
{ST_ANY, EV_ANY, fatal_fsm_error}
};
I may have the function pointer fn declared wrong since this is from memory. Basically the state machine searched the array for a relevant state and event and called the function which did what had to be done then returned the new state.
The specific states were put first and the ST_ANY entries last since priority of the rules depended on their position in the array. The first rule that was found was the one used.
In addition, I remember we had an array of indexes to the first rule for each state to speed up the searches (all rules with the same starting state were grouped).
Also keep in mind that this was pure C - there may well be a better way to do it with C++.
A finite state machine consists of a finite number discrete of states (I know pedantic, but still), which can generally be represented as integer values. In c or c++ using an enumeration is very common.
The machine responds to a finite number of inputs which can often be represented with another integer valued variable. In more complicated cases you can use a structure to represent the input state.
Each combination of internal state and external input will cause the machine to:
possibly transition to another state
possibly generate some output
A simple case in c might look like this
enum state_val {
IDLE_STATE,
SOME_STATE,
...
STOP_STATE
}
//...
state_val state = IDLE_STATE
while (state != STOP_STATE){
int input = GetInput();
switch (state) {
case IDLE_STATE:
switch (input) {
case 0:
case 3: // note the fall-though here to handle multiple states
write(input); // no change of state
break;
case 1:
state = SOME_STATE;
break
case 2:
// ...
};
break;
case SOME_STATE:
switch (input) {
case 7:
// ...
};
break;
//...
};
};
// handle final output, clean up, whatever
though this is hard to read and more easily split into multiple function by something like:
while (state != STOP_STATE){
int input = GetInput();
switch (state) {
case IDLE_STATE:
state = DoIdleState(input);
break;
// ..
};
};
with the complexities of each state held in it's own function.
As m3rLinEz says, you can hold transitions in an array for quick indexing. You can also hold function pointer in an array to efficiently handle the action phase. This is especially useful for automatic generation of large and complex state machines.
The answers here seem really complex (but accurate, nonetheless.) So here are my thoughts.
First, I like dmckee's (operational) definition of an FSM and how they apply to programming.
A finite state machine consists of a
finite number discrete of states (I
know pedantic, but still), which can
generally be represented as integer
values. In c or c++ using an
enumeration is very common.
The machine responds to a finite
number of inputs which can often be
represented with another integer
valued variable. In more complicated
cases you can use a structure to
represent the input state.
Each combination of internal state and
external input will cause the machine
to:
possibly transition to another state
possibly generate some output
So you have a program. It has states, and there is a finite number of them. ("the light bulb is bright" or "the light bulb is dim" or "the light bulb is off." 3 states. finite.) Your program can only be in one state at a time.
So, say you want your program to change states. Usually, you'll want something to happen to trigger a state change. In this example, how about we take user input to determine the state - say, a key press.
You might want logic like this. When the user presses a key:
If the bulb is "off" then make the bulb "dim".
If the bulb is "dim", make the bulb "bright".
If the bulb is "bright", make the bulb "off".
Obviously, instead of "changing a bulb", you might be "changing the text color" or whatever it is you program needs to do. Before you start, you'll want to define your states.
So looking at some pseudoish C code:
/* We have 3 states. We can use constants to represent those states */
#define BULB_OFF 0
#define BULB_DIM 1
#define BULB_BRIGHT 2
/* And now we set the default state */
int currentState = BULB_OFF;
/* now we want to wait for the user's input. While we're waiting, we are "idle" */
while(1) {
waitForUserKeystroke(); /* Waiting for something to happen... */
/* Okay, the user has pressed a key. Now for our state machine */
switch(currentState) {
case BULB_OFF:
currentState = BULB_DIM;
break;
case BULB_DIM:
currentState = BULB_BRIGHT;
doCoolBulbStuff();
break;
case BULB_BRIGHT:
currentState = BULB_OFF;
break;
}
}
And, voila. A simple program which changes the state.
This code executes only a small part of the switch statement - depending on the current state. Then it updates that state. That's how FSMs work.
Now here are some things you can do:
Obviously, this program just changes the currentState variable. You'll want your code to do something more interesting on a state change. The doCoolBulbStuff() function might, i dunno, actually put a picture of a lightbulb on a screen. Or something.
This code only looks for a keypress. But your FSM (and thus your switch statement) can choose state based on what the user inputted (eg, "O" means "go to off" rather than just going to whatever is next in the sequence.)
Part of your question asked for a data structure.
One person suggested using an enum to keep track of states. This is a good alternative to the #defines that I used in my example. People have also been suggesting arrays - and these arrays keep track of the transitions between states. This is also a fine structure to use.
Given the above, well, you could use any sort of structure (something tree-like, an array, anything) to keep track of the individual states and define what to do in each state (hence some of the suggestions to use "function pointers" - have a state map to a function pointer which indicates what to do at that state.)
Hope that helps!
See Wikipedia for the formal definition. You need to decide on your set of states S, your input alphabet Σ and your transition function δ. The simplest representation is to have S be the set of integers 0, 1, 2, ..., N-1, where N is the number of states, and for Σ be the set of integers 0, 1, 2, ..., M-1, where M is the number of inputs, and then δ is just a big N by M matrix. Finally, you can store the set of accepting states by storing an array of N bits, where the ith bit is 1 if the ith state is an accepting state, or 0 if it is not an accepting state.
For example, here is the FSM in Figure 3 of the Wikipedia article:
#define NSTATES 2
#define NINPUTS 2
const int transition_function[NSTATES][NINPUTS] = {{1, 0}, {0, 1}};
const int is_accepting_state[NSTATES] = {1, 0};
int main(void)
{
int current_state = 0; // initial state
while(has_more_input())
{
// advance to next state based on input
int input = get_next_input();
current_state = transition_function[current_state][input];
}
int accepted = is_accepting_state[current_state];
// do stuff
}
You can basically use "if" conditional and a variable to store the current state of FSM.
For example (just a concept):
int state = 0;
while((ch = getch()) != 'q'){
if(state == 0)
if(ch == '0')
state = 1;
else if(ch == '1')
state = 0;
else if(state == 1)
if(ch == '0')
state = 2;
else if(ch == '1')
state = 0;
else if(state == 2)
{
printf("detected two 0s\n");
break;
}
}
For more sophisticated implementation, you may consider store state transition in two dimension array:
int t[][] = {{1,0},{2,0},{2,2}};
int state = 0;
while((ch = getch()) != 'q'){
state = t[state][ch - '0'];
if(state == 2){
...
}
}
A few guys from AT&T, now at Google, wrote one of the best FSM libraries available for general use. Check it out here, it's called OpenFST.
It's fast, efficient, and they created a very clear set of operations you can perform on the FSMs to do things like minimize them or determinize them to make them even more useful for real world problems.
if by FSM you mean finite state machine,
and you like it simple, use enums to name your states
and switch betweem them.
Otherwise use functors. you can look the
fancy definition up in the stl or boost docs.
They are more or less objects, that have a
method e.g. called run(), that executes
everything that should be done in that state,
with the advantage that each state has it's own
scope.