I have the following use case where I want to make use of hierarchical queries to get the desired result.
In my use case I have two types of node say 'A' and 'B'. So the unique identifier of node is its ID and Type.
Now the problem is when two nodes with same Id and different type, when I call connect by clause only on id I get child for other types of nodes also (if id of that node is same).
create table TreeTest (
nodeid integer,
nodetype char(1),
parentid integer,
parenttype char(1)
);
Data in table for this particular use case:
1, 'A', NULL, null
2, 'A', 1, 'A'
3, 'A', 1, 'A'
2, 'B', NULL, null
3, 'B', 2, 'B'
Now I am firing the following query (which is not giving the correct result)
SELECT * FROM TREETEST
START WITH PARENTID = 1
CONNECT BY PRIOR nodeid = PARENTID;
I tried following query also, but again wrong result
SELECT * FROM TREETEST
START WITH PARENTID = 1 AND PARENTTYPE = 'A'
CONNECT BY PRIOR nodeid = PARENTID AND NODETYPE = PARENTTYPE;
Kindly provide the correct query and kindly also explain why second query is not working.
Expected output:
2 A 1 A
3 A 1 A
SELECT *
FROM treeTest
START WITH parentId = 1
AND parentType = 'A'
CONNECT BY PRIOR nodeId = parentId
AND PRIOR nodeType = parentType
;
Explanation: PRIOR is an operator applied to a column name, not to the whole condition.
Related
I'm performing an Sqlite3 query similar to
SELECT * FROM nodes WHERE name IN ('name1', 'name2', 'name3', ...) LIMIT 1
Am I guaranteed that it will search for name1 first, name2 second, etc? Such that by limiting my output to 1 I know that I found the first hit according to my ordering of items in the IN clause?
Update: with some testing it seems to always return the first hit in the index regardless of the IN order. It's using the order of the index on name. Is there some way to enforce the search order?
The order of the returned rows is not guaranteed to match the order of the items inside the parenthesis after IN.
What you can do is use ORDER BY in your statement with the use of the function INSTR():
SELECT * FROM nodes
WHERE name IN ('name1', 'name2', 'name3')
ORDER BY INSTR(',name1,name2,name3,', ',' || name || ',')
LIMIT 1
This code uses the same list from the IN clause as a string, where the items are in the same order, concatenated and separated by commas, assuming that the items do not contain commas.
This way the results are ordered by their position in the list and then LIMIT 1 will return the 1st of them which is closer to the start of the list.
Another way to achieve the same results is by using a CTE which returns the list along with an Id which serves as the desired ordering of the results, which will be joined to the table:
WITH list(id, item) AS (
SELECT 1, 'name1' UNION ALL
SELECT 2, 'name2' UNION ALL
SELECT 3, 'name3'
)
SELECT n.*
FROM nodes n INNER JOIN list l
ON l.item = n.name
ORDER BY l.id
LIMIT 1
Or:
WITH list(id, item) AS (
SELECT * FROM (VALUES
(1, 'name1'), (2, 'name2'), (3, 'name3')
)
)
SELECT n.*
FROM nodes n INNER JOIN list l
ON l.item = n.name
ORDER BY l.id
LIMIT 1
This way you don't have to repeat the list twice.
I have two tables Procedures and ProcedureTypes.
Procedures has a column Type which is a varchar with the values (1, 2), (3, 4), (4, 5) etc...
ProcedureType has a primary key 'ID' 1 to 9.
ID Description
1 Drug
2 Other-Drug
etc...
ID is an integer value and Type is varchar value.
Now I need to join these two tables to show the values
ID in the Procedures table
ProcedureType in the Procedures table
Description in the ProceduresType table with the value separated by a "-".
For example if he value in Type is (1,2) the new table after join should show values in the description like (Drug-Other Drug)
I have used this query bot to no avail
SELECT * FROM dbo.[Split]((select RequestType from GPsProcedures), ',')
Can anyone tell me how to do it and why the above query is not working
with Procedures as (
select 1 as ID, '1,2,3' as Typ
),
ProcedureTypes as (
select 1 as TypeID, 'Drug' as Name
union select 2 , 'Other-Drug'
union select 3 , 'Test 3'
)
/*Get one extra column of type xml*/
,Procedures_xml as (
select id,CONVERT(xml,' <root> <s>' + REPLACE(Typ,',','</s> <s>') + '</s> </root> ') as Typ_xml
from Procedures
)
/*Convert the field string to multiple rows then join to procedure types*/
, Procdure_With_Type as (
select ID,T.c.value('.','varchar(20)') as TypeID,
ProcedureTypes.Name
from Procedures_xml
CROSS APPLY Typ_xml.nodes('/root/s') T(c)
INNER JOIN ProcedureTypes ON T.c.value('.','varchar(20)') = ProcedureTypes.TypeID
)
/*Finally, group the procedures type names by procedure id*/
select id,
STUFF((
SELECT ', ' + [Name]
FROM Procdure_With_Type inn
WHERE (Procdure_With_Type.ID = inn.ID)
FOR XML PATH(''),TYPE).value('(./text())[1]','VARCHAR(MAX)')
,1,2,'') AS NameValues
from Procdure_With_Type
group by ID
You can't have a select statement as a parameter for a function, so instead of this:
SELECT * FROM dbo.[Split]((select RequestType from GPsProcedures), ',')
Use this:
select S.*
from GPsProcedures P
cross apply dbo.[Split](P.RequestType, ',') S
I've got two tables already populated with data with the given schemas:
CREATE TABLE objects
(
id BIGINT NOT NULL,
latitude BIGINT NOT NULL,
longitude BIGINT NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (id)
)
CREATE TABLE tags
(
id BIGINT NOT NULL,
tag_key VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
tag_value VARCHAR(500),
PRIMARY KEY (id , tag_key)
)
object.id and tags.id refer to the same object
I'd like to populate a third table with the unique combinations of tag_key and tag_value. For example:
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO objects (id) VALUES (0);
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO tags (id, tag_key, tag_value) VALUES (0, 'a', 'x');
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO objects (id) VALUES (1);
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO tags (id, tag_key, tag_value) VALUES (1, 'a', 'y');
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO objects (id) VALUES (2);
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO tags (id, tag_key, tag_value) VALUES (2, 'a', 'x');
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO tags (id, tag_key, tag_value) VALUES (2, 'a', 'y');
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO objects (id) VALUES (3);
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO tags (id, tag_key, tag_value) VALUES (3, 'a', 'x');
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO objects (id) VALUES (4);
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO tags (id, tag_key, tag_value) VALUES (4, 'a', 'y');
Should result in 3 entries of
0: ([a,x])
1: ([a,y])
3: ([a,x][a,y])
Currently I have:
CREATE TABLE tags_combinations
(
id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
tag_key VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
tag_value VARCHAR(500)
);
The id shouldn't be related to the original id of the object, just something to group unique combinations.
This is the query I have so far:
SELECT
t1.tag_key, t1.tag_value
FROM
tags t1
WHERE
t1.id
IN
(
/* select ids who's every tags entry is not under one id in tags_combinations */
SELECT
t2.id
FROM
tags t2
WHERE
t2.tag_key, t2.tag_value
NOT IN
(
)
);
The part with the comment is what I am not sure about, how would I select every id from tags that does not have all of the corresponding tag_key and tag_value entries already under one id in tags_combinations?
To clarify exactly the result I am after: From the sample data given, it should return 4 rows with:
row id tag_key tag_value
0 0 a x
1 1 a y
2 2 a x
3 2 a y
SQL is a set-based language. If you reformulate your question in the language of set theory, you can directly translate it into SQL:
You want all rows of the tags table, except those from duplicate objects.
Objects are duplicates if they have exactly the same key/value combinations. However, we still want to return one of those objects, so we define duplicates only as those objects where no other duplicate object with a smaller ID exists.
Two objects A and B have exactly the same key/value combinations if
all key/value combinations in A also exist in B, and
all key/value combinations in B also exist in A.
All key/value combinations in A also exist in B if there is no key/value combination in A that does not exist in B (note: double negation).
SELECT id, tag_key, tag_value
FROM tags
WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM tags AS dup
WHERE dup.id < tags.id
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM tags AS A
WHERE A.id = tags.id
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM tags AS B
WHERE B.id = dup.id
AND B.tag_key = A.tag_key
AND B.tag_value = A.tag_value)
)
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM tags AS B
WHERE B.id = dup.id
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM tags AS A
WHERE A.id = tags.id
AND A.tag_key = B.tag_key
AND A.tag_value = B.tag_value)
)
)
ORDER BY id, tag_key;
This is not easy in SQLite. We want to identify groups of tag key/value pairs. So we could group by id and get a string of the associated pairs with group_concat. This would be the way to do it in another DBMS. SQLite, however, cannot order in group_concat, so we might end up with 2: 'a/x,a/y' and 5: 'a/y,a/x'. Two different strings for the same pairs.
Your best bet may be to write a program and find the distinct pairs iteratively.
In SQLite you may want to try this:
insert into tags_combinations (id, tag_key, tag_value)
select id, tag_key, tag_value
from tags
where id in
(
select min(id)
from
(
select id, group_concat(tag_key || '/' || tag_value) as tag_pairs
from
(
select id, tag_key, tag_value
from tags
order by id, tag_key, tag_value
) ordered_data
group by id
) aggregated_data
group by tag_pairs
);
Ordering the data before applying group_concat is likely to get the tag pairs ordered, but in no way guaranteed! If this is something you want to do only once, it may be worth a try, though.
To merge multiple rows into one value, you need a function like group_concat().
The ORDER BY is needed to ensure a consistent order of the rows within a group:
SELECT DISTINCT group_concat(tag_key) AS tag_keys,
group_concat(tag_value) AS tag_values
FROM (SELECT id,
tag_key,
tag_value
FROM tags
ORDER BY id,
tag_key,
tag_value)
GROUP BY id;
If you want to have keys and values interleaved, as shown in the question, you need to do more string concatenation:
SELECT DISTINCT group_concat(tag_key || ',' || tag_value, ';') AS keys_and_values
FROM (...
I have an application which has data spread accross 2 tables.
There is a main table Main which has columns - Id , Name, Type.
Now there is a Sub Main table that has columns - MainId(FK), StartDate,Enddate,city
and this is a 1 to many relation (each main can have multiple entries in submain).
Now I want to display columns Main.Id, City( as comma seperated from various rows for that main item from submain), min of start date(from submain for that main item) and max of enddate( from sub main).
I thought of having a function but that will slow things up since there will be 100k records. Is there some other way of doing this. btw the application is in asp.net. Can we have a sql query or some linq kind of thing ?
This is off the top of my head, but firstly I would suggest you create a user defined function in sql to create the city comma separated list string that accepts #mainid, then does the following:
DECLARE #listStr VARCHAR(MAX)
SELECT #listStr = COALESCE(#listStr+',' , '') + city
FROM submain
WHERE mainid = #mainid
... and then return #listStr which will now be a comma separated list of cities. Let's say you call your function MainIDCityStringGet()
Then for your final result you can simply execute the following
select cts.mainid,
cts.cities,
sts.minstartdate,
sts.maxenddate
from ( select distinct mainid,
dbo.MainIDCityStringGet(mainid) as 'cities'
from submain) as cts
join
( select mainid,
min(startdate) as 'minstartdate',
max(enddate) as 'maxenddate'
from submain
group by mainid ) as sts on sts.mainid = cts.mainid
where startdate <is what you want it to be>
and enddate <is what you want it to be>
Depending on how exactly you would like to filter by startdate and enddate you may need to put the where filter within each subquery and in the second subquery in the join you may then need to use the HAVING grouped filter. You did not clearly state the nature of your filter.
I hope that helps.
This will of course be in stored procedure. May need some debugging.
An alternative to creating a stored procedure is performing the complex operations on the client side. (untested):
var result = (from main in context.Main
join sub in context.SubMain on main.Id equals sub.MainId into subs
let StartDate = subs.Min(s => s.StartDate)
let EndDate = subs.Max(s => s.EndDate)
let Cities = subs.Select(s => s.City).Distinct()
select new { main.Id, main.Name, main.Type, StartDate, EndDate, Cities })
.ToList()
.Select(x => new
{
x.Id,
x.Name,
x.Type,
x.StartDate,
x.EndDate,
Cities = string.Join(", ", x.Cities.ToArray())
})
.ToList();
I am unsure how well this is supported in other implimentations of SQL, but if you have SQL Server this works a charm for this type of scenario.
As a disclaimer I would like to add that I am not the originator of this technique. But I immediately thought of this question when I came across it.
Example:
For a table
Item ID Item Value Item Text
----------- ----------------- ---------------
1 2 A
1 2 B
1 6 C
2 2 D
2 4 A
3 7 B
3 1 D
If you want the following output, with the strings concatenated and the value summed.
Item ID Item Value Item Text
----------- ----------------- ---------------
1 10 A, B, C
2 6 D, A
3 8 B, D
The following avoids a multi-statement looping solution:
if object_id('Items') is not null
drop table Items
go
create table Items
( ItemId int identity(1,1),
ItemNo int not null,
ItemValue int not null,
ItemDesc nvarchar(500) )
insert Items
( ItemNo,
ItemValue,
ItemDesc )
values ( 1, 2, 'A'),
( 1, 2, 'B'),
( 1, 6, 'C'),
( 2, 2, 'D'),
( 2, 4, 'A'),
( 3, 7, 'B'),
( 3, 1, 'D')
select it1.ItemNo,
sum(it1.ItemValue) as ItemValues,
stuff((select ', ' + it2.ItemDesc --// Stuff is just used to remove the first 2 characters, instead of a substring.
from Items it2 with (nolock)
where it1.ItemNo = it2.ItemNo
for xml path(''), type).value('.','varchar(max)'), 1, 2, '') as ItemDescs --// Does the actual concatenation..
from Items it1 with (nolock)
group by it1.ItemNo
So you see all you need is a sub query in your select that retrieves a set of all the values you need to concatenate and then use the FOR XML PATH command in that sub query in a clever way. It does not matter where the values you need to concatenate comes from you just need to retrieve them using the sub query.
I have a table Studies that I perform a SELECT on.
I then need to perform a further SELECT on the recordset returned. I've tried this (simplified for clarity):
SELECT * FROM Studies
WHERE Id = '2' OR Id = '3' OR Id = '7';
SELECT * FROM Studies
WHERE (Name = 'Test')
AND Id IN (SELECT * FROM Studies WHERE Id = '2' OR Id = '3' OR Id = '7');
But I keep getting the following SQL error:
Only a single result allowed for a SELECT that is part of an expression
Where am I going wrong? If it's not evident from my code - I am relatively new to database programming.
Thanks
You can't return more than one column in a IN (...) subquery. You have to change the * (return all columns) to ID. But your query does not need a subquery, You can just add the ID's to the first query. You usually want to avoid subqueries where you can because of performance reasons.
SELECT *
FROM Studies
WHERE Name = 'Test'
AND ID IN ('2', '3','7')
Or if you want to keep your structure:
SELECT *
FROM Studies
WHERE (Name = 'Test')
AND ID IN (SELECT ID FROM Studies WHERE ID = '2' OR ID = '3' OR ID = '7');
SELECT * FROM Studies WHERE (Name = 'Test') AND ID IN (SELECT ID FROM Studies WHERE ID = '2' OR ID = '3' OR ID = '7');