I'm trying to set up a 106 pixel Adalight configuration around the TV in my family room. Anyway, the Processing IDE is telling me there's an unexpected token: { in this line
{0,1,0}, {0,2,0}, {0,3,0}, {0,4,0}, {0,5,0}, {0,6,0}, {0,7,0}, {0,8,0}, {0,9,0}, {0,10,0}, // Top edge
I can't find where there's an out of place {
Here's the entire section of code
http://pastebin.com/ZxiWbTu9 (It wasn't all going in as code, sorry.)
You are missing a comma at the end of the previous line, and on lines 7 and 9.
Related
When I run this code it gives me an error, I am still a beginner so I don't know how to fix it.
This is what I have written so far
Giving a look in your code, you missed to place some semicolons (;) at the end of some instructions, to be more specific you miss them in lines:
5
32
34
37
40
In line 9, you have to type "Serial.begin(9600);" instead "serial.begin(9600);"
On the last else, you forgot to enclose the instructions between "{}" and placing the '}' to close the void loop.
You are making reference to a routine named getVoltage, but I don't see it
Another issue that I can see is that you have to write with uppercase words like: OUTPUT, INPUT, HIGH and LOW
Please share more details once you be able to fix this observations
As it is written here
https://documentation.magnolia-cms.com/display/DOCS56/Dialog+definition I assume there is a possibility for every dialog to insert the following line into the yaml:
modalityLevel: non-modal
If I do this to an existing Component-Dialog which could be quite complex (with tabs and so on) the console logs an error.
WARN agnolia.config.source.yaml.YamlConfigurationSource: 1 major and 0 minor problems have been encountered
(Note: if I do modalityLevel: light it works..)
The reason I want to do this is to have more than one dialog opened at once.
Is that possible in Magnolia 5.5.5 (or 5.6)?
Okay there we go, after some investigation it turns out that the problem is within Magnolia. I have created the following issue https://jira.magnolia-cms.com/browse/MGNLUI-4328 for the problem. For now please ignore what the definition app says and we will fix it as soon as possible.
Cheers,
FWIW, I get the same behavior on the current demo ...
It's defined here:
info.magnolia.ui.api.overlay.OverlayLayer
65 /**
66 * The available levels of modality.
67 * Determines how "modal" it is -
68 * -STRONG creates a dark background that prevents clicks.
69 * -LIGHT adds a border, creates a transparent background that prevents clicks.
70 * -NON_MODAL does not prevent clicks.
71 */
72 public static enum ModalityLevel {
73 STRONG("strong", "modality-strong"),
74 LIGHT("light", "modality-light center-vertical"),
75 NON_MODAL("non-modal", "modality-non-modal");
And it's used here:
info.magnolia.ui.framework.overlay.OverlayPresenter
216 final OverlayCloser closer = openOverlay(new ViewAdapter(shortcutPanel), ModalityLevel.NON_MODAL);
And it's used here:
info.magnolia.dam.app.assets.field.UploadAssetActionRenderer
155 progressIndicatorCloseHandle = layer.openOverlay(new ViewAdapter(progressIndicator), ModalityLevel.NON_MODAL);
and etc.
So that seems like a false positive.
Interestingly, I don't see any tests for this ... for example, I see:
assertEquals("light", session.getProperty("/modules/ui-framework/dialogs/rename/modalityLevel").getString());
and
assertEquals("strong", session.getProperty("/modules/pages/dialogs/createPage/modalityLevel").getString());
but nothing with "non-modal"
I thought maybe the "-" character, but this appears, all else equal, to be valid yaml
---
modalityLevels: strong
modalityLeveln: non-modal
modalityLevell: light
Would have to dig deeper to see what is happening here.
UPDATE: if you change it to "non_modal", there's no longer an error in the definitions app.
Good day. The programs function is to take an equipment number (or none), display that number with a description (or all) in alv, and then run IE03 should the user double click on
Program worked fine in client 110, but in 150 a runtime error happens. This morning I tried to make a new program with a shorter name (only lead I had), activated it (window popped up asking me to activate the previous version as well). That didn't work and now the original doesn't work in either.
The program "SAPLSKBH" is terminating because program line is too long, being 78 chars wide which is too much for the internal table "\FUNCTION=K_KKB_FIELDCAT_MERGE\DATA=L_ABAP_SOURCE[]"
It sounds like you are using REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY for output, is that correct?
Check you source code; somewhere you have a line that is more than 78 characters. The function K_KKB_FIELDCAT_MERGE takes the source code of your program to produce a structure that corresponds to the table/structure you give it. (In the old days, there was a limit of 78 characters width for a line of ABAP code, and this is an old function module).
You can alternatively build a field catalog yourself in code, rather than use this function.
For debugging purposes, I usually use something like console.log('line number #').
Not sure if it's the best way to handle it but I think it would be helpful if I can just print out the line number of the line where I'm putting the console.log() dynamically.
Let's say:
1 //do something
2 if(file){
3 console.log('Line 3');
4 $('#uploads').css({ 'height' : 'auto' });
5 } else {
6 console.log(getLineNumber()); //just an example
7 $('#tags').val(temp);
8 }
In the above, if I happen to remove line 1 for instance, line 3 will be technically incorrect as the line number is decremented by 1 but the log will still show 3. But in line 6, suppose getLineNumber() returns the line number, then it will still make sense even after a line above has been removed.
So is there an easy way which acts like getLineNumber()?
You can use onerror event handler for that.
See the last example on this page: http://www.tutorialspoint.com/javascript/javascript_error_handling.htm
Direct link to example: http://www.tutorialspoint.com/cgi-bin/practice.cgi?file=javascript_40
I'm learning the Flex command-line debugger, and I haven't been able to find information on this particular use case.
I'd like to add a breakpoint to a specific line in one of my class files. I can add breakpoints at the start of a function in a class, but I can't figure out how to set it at a specific line (e.g. line 117 in Foo.as)?
When I try to set one for a file on a given line, I get one at a different location:
(fdb) break Foo 111
Breakpoint 1 at 0x######: file Foo.as, line 115
I've verified the line # I'm specifying is valid, so I don't think the FDB is trying to compensate.
Am I doing something wrong? Is this possible in FDB?
Abso-lutely,
check out the help in fdb, it's fairly helpful :). Just type help or type help then a command. help break gives the output below, lots of nice ways to hook in there, the syntax your using is just missing a colon in between the class and the line number specified, just tried with an MXML file and it worked fine.
Set breakpoint at specified line or function.
Examples:
break 87
Sets a breakpoint at line 87 of the current file.
break myapp.mxml:56
Sets a breakpoint at line 56 of myapp.mxml.
break #3:29
Sets a breakpoint at line 29 of file #3.
break doThis
Sets a breakpoint at function doThis() in the current file.
break myapp.mxml:doThat
Sets a breakpoint at function doThat() in file myapp.mxml.
break #3:doOther
Sets a breakpoint at function doOther() in file #3.
break
Sets a breakpoint at the current execution address in the
current stack frame. This is useful for breaking on return
to a stack frame.
To see file names and numbers, do 'info sources' or 'info files'.
To see function names, do 'info functions'.
Abbreviated file names and function names are accepted if unambiguous.
If line number is specified, break at start of code for that line.
If function is specified, break at start of code for that function.
See 'commands' and 'condition' for further breakpoint control.