Dots & Dashes currently has a rather unsightly nav-above box on its blog pages, as seen above the below post:
http://dotsanddashes.co.uk/blog/huge-moves-savage-sister/
Having inspected the element on Chrome, it seems easy enough to remove it via HTML, although I'm struggling to find all the applicable bits in the CSS stylesheet... I think/ hope this is a pretty rudimentary fix, for which I apologise in advance, but my grasp of CSS is slightly dodgy in truth..!
Thanks.
You can hide it with CSS using the rule:
#nav-above {
display: none;
}
This will remove it from the flow of the page so things should appear the same as deleting from the DOM tree in the Chrome inspector.
Note that the relevant source and images etc are still downloaded by users so ideally you should actually remove it from the source if you no longer want it.
Related
Have found great help with R on SO--now for something completely different.
I am working in WordPress 5.8.3.
I am building a website using the Blank Canvas theme, a child-theme of Seedlet--Not sure whether that is all relevant. I am a novice with WP and all things web development. I have installed the Events Calendar plugin and have it all configured with some test events and dates so no issues there. I am customizing the theme colours using the Additional CSS prompt from the WordPress dashboard interface.
I haven't gotten permission to publish the site, so unfortunately I can't offer a live demo. I will try to be explicit.
I have found helpful resources with instructions on how to use this utility for menus, for general custom CSS, and some useful information for changing properties of footers with CSS. Now I am trying to modify hyperlink colours within the Events calendar widget. I have approached this problem the same way as all the others but this one has stumped me. I elaborate:
From this image, you can see the Events Calendar hyperlink text is yellow. I opened the inspector and determined that this object is called .tribe-events-widget .tribe-events-widget-events-list__view-more-link. I thought the following code should change the colour
.tribe-events-widget .tribe-events-widget-events-list__view-more-link {
color:#000;
}
It does not. This code makes no visible change. However, when I also change the background-color like this:
.tribe-events-widget .tribe-events-widget-events-list__view-more-link {
background-color:black;
color:#000;
}
The result is:
This led me to believe that there is no colour option for this element---HOWEVER, the inspector shows that this element has the 'color' property:
And I'm stumped. I'm not even sure when or how this color-link-accent got defined. This check-mark toggle is not a permanent solution and besides, I would very much like to understand what is going on here.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
It's a bit difficult to be certain of the problem as we don't have the context, however I was surprised that you saw just this:
.tribe-events-widget .tribe-events-widget-events-list__view-more-link
and didn't find an anchor (a) element within it.
I would have expected that you'd have to do:
.tribe-events-widget .tribe-events-widget-events-list__view-more-link a {
color:#000;
}
as it is quite likely the anchor element will have its own special styling which will override your setting because of the increase specificity.
If that doesn't work then use your browser dev tools inspect facility to find out more about the context of that a element - you may need to give even more hints to the browser on pinning it down.
Well, this would have helped me, so I will post the solution to my question for posterity. I learned from this question and thread about overriding cascading commands. I still don't understand where the command producing the yellow text in the first place was, but I managed to override it by appending !important in my CSS. The full CSS to turn the text from yellow to black is:
.tribe-events-widget .tribe-events-widget-events-list__view-more-link {
color:black !important;
}
Reading on, this does not necessarily mean that I was specific enough about the context although I find it hard to tell in this case. This reference has some other useful info as to when it is appropriate to use !important. It seems this is not the optimal solution.
Hope somebody else can benefit from my toiling...
on a certain website I would like to change the appearance of a certain link. The operator of said website did something to it so that it does not work the way it used to anymore.
(I'm moderately new to CSS, this much in advance.)
The link goes [website]/internal/main.php?action=menu&id=[some number]. So far I've been changing it with
a[href*="main.php?action=menu&id"] { font-size: 30px;}
but that does not work anymore. So basically 'select any link that cointains that string and change the fontsize to 30px'.
However it would be really helpful/convenient to be able to edit it. Any other links on the page can still be edited via the above CSS. After reading a little I thought adding "!important" would solve the problem, but it did not.
I was under the impression that no matter what the website 'does' that the user has full control over what the browser displays, as it should fetch the 'intended' thing from the server and THEN add custom CSS to it, effectively changing it.
To that end I've been using the Firefox AddOn "Stylus" to edit/change the appearance. Other similar programs also did not manage to change said links. (Stylish, StyleBot for Chrome). It is the same issue on both Chrome and Firefox. I have not tried any other browsers but i imagine it is the same there.
I'd be very thankful for any pointers in the right direction, explanations of where my understanding of the matter is wrong and/or solutions to this problem.
Thank you in advance
Most likely the original CSS definition for links on tha site is done for the different states a:link, a:hover, a:active and a:visited
So you should change your rule to
a:link[href*="main.php?action=menu&id"],
a:visited[href*="main.php?action=menu&id"] { font-size: 30px;}
And similar for the two other states
After spending a while creating an online portfolio, then uploading it, I noticed an issue with one of my sections. On the "Advertisement" section, I noticed it was not displaying the information, just the title. So, I kept on re-pushing the stylesheet.css, even editing it, and it would still look the same. The HTML, CSS, and JS is working how I wrote it. But it is just the section that is not showing. After browsing online and on stackoverflow for an answer, I believe it has to do with Firefox. When using Firebug, I noticed the section's background has been removed, causing the entire section to "disappear." It works just fine on Chrome. I'm not worried about IE, I know that browser has some issues in itself. Anyway, would anyone on here have an idea to resolve this issue, if I can? Or even, what could be causing this issue?
Here is my website to see for yourselves. www.voelkerdesigner.com
Cheers!
It is the opposite for me your entire site works in firefox for me but not in chrome, looking through your code, its being caused by your naming conventions. Namely #advertise
I use the adguard extension in chrome and below is the css it plugs into my html pages to hide ads, so im guessing your using an adblocker in firefox
#adsense_top, #adsensewide, #adspace, #adspace_top, #adspot-300x250-pos-1, #adspot-300x250-pos-2, #adswidget1-quick-adsense, #adswidget2-quick-adsense, #adtext, #adtop, #adv-masthead, #adv-top, #advert1, #advert2, #advertbox3, #advertise, #advertisement1, #advertisetop, #advertising-container, #advertising_wrapper {
display: none!important;
}
Might as well post a random answer on this... As i wont visit posted links by new users.. i'm just gonna guess that your background image might not be 100%...
In general i use background-image instead of background.. Short hand can be a little pain and breaks in some browsers if not perfect.
so i would compare against the following example
background-image:url('images/mybg.jpg');
background-image:url('http://somesite.com/images/mybg.jpg');
Basically alot of people do not use the url and just go straight for a file name or dont quote it.. And have seen that be the problem in the past, so do use the url('') method.
Otherwise if it still fails to work and you know the image is absolute, you would then have some other css that is either over riding your elements background or is preventing it from loading.
Another trick is using your console / inspect element to manually inject the background-image and see if that works... So once the page has loaded in chrome, inspect the element as normal.. And double click on your css property listing as you can add your own styles this way and if it fails, then its not the markup but something else.
Problem:
Thanks for taking the time to read this. I'm having a problem which I need to solve as simple as possible. There's a website I'm re-developing, but since I updated to IE8, I've totaly forgotten about IE7, but ofcourse, there are still people using it.
I need to know what specific things I should change for this site to display the same way as it does in IE8. But I don't know where to start. Is there anyone with experience in this, who can give me a guideline? Are there scripts for doing so?
URL: http://www.testsite.c-tz.nl/
If you view this with IE8 it looks perfect.
But if you view it with IE7, things are not where they supposed to be, very ugly.
As the other said, your question is to broad. You'll need to break it down in smaller problems - which will possibly help you solve it yourself along the way.
One thing I did notice: IE has problems with display: inline-block on elements, which were orignally block elements. Either use span (only possible if it doesn't contain block elements), or use another method to places blocks side by side such as float.
BTW, you have far too many divs in your HTML. It's not necessary to wrap every img, every ul, etc. in it's own div. Usually any styles you apply to the div can just as well be applied you the "wrapped" element directly.
This is not a cool idea... But you can try when you are sick with very old browsers like ie6 or ie5 ...
1.use javascript to detect the browser and version..
2.later use the similar way to redirect the visitor to download the IE 8..
<script>
if(''+browserName+''+fullVersion+'' == "Microsoft Internet Explorer6.0" )
{
alert("You're using an Old Browser.Update the browser to view the website.(or) Try Latest Google Chrome , Firefox , Safari, Opera")
window.location = "http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=43"
}
//document.write(''+browserName+''+fullVersion+'');
</script>
I have been working on a webpage. It is the first I have actually tried to design using an image and then use proper CSS layout rather than tables.
http://www.roccocammisola.com/proj/brunel/bgimage.html
I have been having issues with the shadows on either side of the main content area. Of course these are only an issue in IE. As you can see the shadow has been cut down to about 10% of its actual height.
With my relative inexperience how do I look for relevant fixes to this issue.
Any help would be very much appreciated.
FireBug, the most crucial tool for debugging CSS, amongst other things.
get it here
IE Web Developer Toolbar
It's not as good as firebug in general, but it helps when you have an IE-specific problem.
In addition to Firebug, making sure your HTML is valid is an invaluable tool and can minimize CSS headaches. Sometimes your CSS may not work right because there are mistakes in the HTML. The different browsers have different ways of dealing with improperly written HTML which can sometimes make it seem like there's a cross-browser CSS issue. The validator can help you find mistakes in your markup.
http://validator.w3.org/
+1 for FireBug
In this particular case, I'd just suggest a new approach for your shadows. Currently, you have them as items. You typically want to use CSS background images for things like this.
.mainShadowRight {
*/ your other stuff */
url('images/mainShadowRight.gif');
}
Your .mainShadowRight CSS class specifies a min-height (which IE6 doesn't understand, and IE7 doesn't always 100% get correctly)
and as DLarsen pointed out, it appears you are missing the background-image: url(); bit.
Thanks for all your answers, seems to have done the trick.
I think I spazzed out with the upload as I should definitley have had the bg-image stuff there.
That IE web developer toolbar looks pretty good too as I have firebug and web developer bar for FF.
Another hot recommendation for debugging CSS - CSS Viewer.
It's a Firefox add-on that allows you to hover over elements in a web page and see their exact style. Often you figure out that the final style was not what you meant, possibly due to some inheritance of styles.