I have two data frames with 2 columns in each. For example:
df.1 = data.frame(col.1 = c("a","a","a","a","b","b","b","c","c","d"), col.2 = c("b","c","d","e","c","d","e","d","e","e"))
df.2 = data.frame(col.1 = c("b","b","b","a","a","e"), col.2 = c("a","c","e","c","e","c"))
and I'm looking for an efficient way to look up the row index in df.2 of every col.1 col.2 row pair of df.1. Note that a row pair in df.1 may appear in df.2 in reverse order (for example df.1[1,], which is "a","b" appears in df.2[1,] as "b","a"). That doesn't matter to me. In other words, as long as a row pair in df.1 appears in any order in df.2 I want its row index in df.2, otherwise it should return NA. One more note, row pairs in both data frames are unique - meaning each row pair appears only once.
So for these two data frames the return vector would be:
c(1,4,NA,5,2,NA,3,NA,6,NA)
Maybe something using dplyr package:
first make the reference frame
use row_number() to number as per row index efficiently.
use select to "flip" the column vars.
two halves:
df_ref_top <- df.2 %>% mutate(n=row_number())
df_ref_btm <- df.2 %>% select(col.1=col.2, col.2=col.1) %>% mutate(n=row_number())
then bind together:
df_ref <- rbind(df_ref_top,df_ref_btm)
Left join and select vector:
gives to get your answer
left_join(df.1,df_ref)$n
# Per #thelatemail's comment, here's a more elegant approach:
match(apply(df.1,1,function(x) paste(sort(x),collapse="")),
apply(df.2,1,function(x) paste(sort(x),collapse="")))
# My original answer, for reference:
# Check for matches with both orderings of df.2's columns
match.tmp = cbind(match(paste(df.1[,1],df.1[,2]), paste(df.2[,1],df.2[,2])),
match(paste(df.1[,1],df.1[,2]), paste(df.2[,2],df.2[,1])))
# Convert to single vector of match indices
match.index = apply(match.tmp, 1,
function(x) ifelse(all(is.na(x)), NA, max(x, na.rm=TRUE)))
[1] 1 4 NA 5 2 NA 3 NA 6 NA
Here's a little function that tests a few of the looping options in R (which was not really intentional, but it happened).
check.rows <- function(data1, data2)
{
df1 <- as.matrix(data1);df2 <- as.matrix(data2);ll <- vector('list', nrow(df1))
for(i in seq(nrow(df1))){
ll[[i]] <- sapply(seq(nrow(df2)), function(j) df2[j,] %in% df1[i,])
}
h <- sapply(ll, function(x) which(apply(x, 2, all)))
sapply(h, function(x) ifelse(is.double(x), NA, x))
}
check.rows(df.1, df.2)
## [1] 1 4 NA 5 2 NA 3 NA 6 NA
And here's a benchmark when row dimensions are increased for both df.1 and df.2. Not too bad I guess, considering the 24 checks on each of 40 rows.
> dim(df.11); dim(df.22)
[1] 40 2
[1] 24 2
> f <- function() check.rows(df.11, df.22)
> microbenchmark(f())
## Unit: milliseconds
## expr min lq median uq max neval
## f() 75.52258 75.94061 76.96523 78.61594 81.00019 100
1) sort/merge First sort df.2 creating df.2.s and append a row number column. Then merge this new data frame with df.1 (which is already sorted in the question):
df.2.s <- replace(df.2, TRUE, t(apply(df.2, 1, sort)))
df.2.s$row <- 1:nrow(df.2.s)
merge(df.1, df.2.s, all.x = TRUE)$row
The result is:
[1] 1 4 NA 5 2 NA 3 NA 6 NA
2) sqldf Since dot is an SQL operator rename the data frames as df1 and df2. Note that for the same reason the column names will be transformed to col_1 and col_2 when df1 and df2 are automatically uploaded to the backend database. We sort df2 using min and max and left join it to df1 (which is already sorted):
df1 <- df.1
df2 <- df.2
library(sqldf)
sqldf("select b.rowid row
from df1
left join
(select min(col_1, col_2) col_1, max(col_1, col_2) col_2 from df2) b
using (col_1, col_2)")$row
REVISED Some code improvements. Added second solution.
Related
Suppose I have a data.frame like THIS (or see my code below). As you can see, after every some number of continuous rows, there is a row with all NAs.
I was wondering how I could split THIS data.frame based on every row of NA?
For example, in my code below, I want my original data.frame to be split into 3 smaller data.frames as there are 2 rows of NAs in the original data.frame.
Here is is what I tried with no success:
## The original data.frame:
DF <- read.csv("https://raw.githubusercontent.com/izeh/i/master/m.csv", header = T)
## the index number of rows with "NA"s; Here rows 7 and 14:
b <- as.numeric(rownames(DF[!complete.cases(DF), ]))
## split DF by rows that have "NA"s; that is rows 7 and 14:
split(DF, b)
If we also need the NA rows, create a group with cumsum on the 'study.name' column which is blank (or NA)
library(dplyr)
DF %>%
group_split(grp = cumsum(lag(study.name == "", default = FALSE)), keep = FALSE)
Or with base R
split(DF, cumsum(c(FALSE, head(DF$study.name == "", -1))))
Or with NA
i1 <- rowSums(is.na(DF))== ncol(DF)
split(DF, cumsum(c(FALSE, head(i1, -1))))
Or based on 'b'
DF1 <- DF[setdiff(seq_len(nrow(DF)), b), ]
split(DF1, as.character(DF1$study.name))
You can find occurrence of b in sequence of rows in DF and use cumsum to create groups.
split(DF, cumsum(seq_len(nrow(DF)) %in% b))
I'm trying to merge 2 data frames in R, but I have two different columns with different types of ID variable. Sometimes a row will have a value for one of those columns but not the other. I want to consider them both, so that if one frame is missing a value for one of the columns then the other will be used.
> df1 <- data.frame(first = c('a', 'b', NA), second = c(NA, 'q', 'r'))
> df1
first second
1 a <NA>
2 b q
3 <NA> r
> df2 <- data.frame(first = c('a', NA, 'c'), second = c('p', 'q', NA))
> df2
first second
1 a p
2 <NA> q
3 c <NA>
I want to merge these two data frames and get 2 rows:
row 1, because it has the same value for "first"
row 2, because it has the same value for "second"
row 3 would be dropped, because df1 has a value for "second", but not "first", and df2 has the reverse
It's important that NAs are ignored and don't "match" in this case.
I can get kinda close:
> merge(df1,df2, by='first', incomparables = c(NA))
first second.x second.y
1 a <NA> p
> merge(df1,df2, by='second', incomparables = c(NA))
second first.x first.y
1 q b <NA>
But I can't rbind these two data frames together because they have different column names, and it doesn't seem like the "R" way to do it (in the near future, I'll have a 3rd, 4th and even 5th type of ID).
Is there a less clumsy way to do this?
Edit: Ideally, the output would look like this:
> df3 <- data.frame(first = c('a', 'b'), second = c('p','q'))
> df3
first second
1 a p
2 b q
row 1, has matched because the column "first" has the same value in both data frames, and it fills in the value for "second" from df2
row 2, has matched because the column "second" has the same value in both data frames, and it fills in the value for "first" from df1
there is no row 3, because there is no column that has a value in both data frames
Using sqldf we can do, as in SQL we can alternate between joining conditions using OR
library(sqldf)
df <- sqldf("select a.*, b.*
from df1 a
join df2 b
ON a.first = b.first
OR a.second = b.second")
library(dplyr)
#If value in first is NA i.e. is.na(first) is TRUE then use first..3 value's else use first value's and the same for second
df %>% mutate(first = ifelse(is.na(first), first..3, first),
second = ifelse(is.na(second), second..4, second)) %>%
#Discard first..3 and second..4 since we no longer need them
select(-first..3, -second..4)
first second
1 a p
2 b q
Say I have some data of the following kind:
df<-as.data.frame(matrix(rnorm(10*10000, 1, .5), ncol=10))
I want a new dataframe that keeps the 10 original columns, but for every column retains only the highest 10 and lowest 10 values. Importantly, the rows have names corresponding to id values that need to be kept in the new data frame.
Thus, the end result data.frame is gonna be of dimensions m by 10, where m is very likely to be more than 20. But for every column, I want only 20 valid values.
The only way I can think of doing this is doing it manually per column, using dplyr and arrange, grabbing the top and bottom rows, and then creating a matrix from all the individual vectors. Clearly this is inefficient. Help?
Assuming you want to keep all the rows from the original dataset, where there is at least one value satisfying your condition (value among ten largest or ten smallest in the given column), you could do it like this:
# create a data frame
df<-as.data.frame(matrix(rnorm(10*10000, 1, .5), ncol=10))
# function to find lowes 10 and highest 10 values
lowHigh <- function(x)
{
test <- x
test[!(order(x) <= 10 | order(x) >= (length(x)- 10))] <- NA
test
}
# apply the function defined above
test2 <- apply(df, 2, lowHigh)
# use the original rownames
rownames(test2) <- rownames(df)
# keep only rows where there is value of interest
finalData <- test2[apply(apply(test2, 2, is.na), 1, sum) < 10, ]
Please note that there is definitely some smarter way of doing it...
Here is the data matrix with 10 highest and 10 lowest in each column,
x<-apply(df,2,function(k) k[order(k,decreasing=T)[c(1:10,(length(k)-9):length(k))]])
x is your 20 by 10 matrix.
Your requirement of rownames is conflicting column by column, altogether you only have 20 rownames in this matrix and it can not be same for all 10 columns. Instead, here is your order matrix,
x_roworder<-apply(df,2,function(k) order(k,decreasing=T)[c(1:10,(length(k)-9):length(k))])
This will give you corresponding rows in original data matrix within each column.
I offer a couple of answers to this.
A base R implementation ( I have used %>% to make it easier to read)
ix = lapply(df, function(x) order(x)[-(1:(length(x)-20)+10)]) %>%
unlist %>% unique %>% sort
df[ix,]
This abuses the fact that data frames are lists, finds the row id satisfying the condition for each column, then takes the unique ones in order as the row indices you want to keep. This should retain any row names attached to df
An alternative using dplyr (since you mentioned it) which if I remember correctly doesn't particular like row names
# add id as a variable
df$id = 1:nrow(df) # or row names
df %>%
gather("col",value,-id) %>%
group_by(col) %>%
filter(min_rank(value) <= 10 | min_rank(desc(value)) <= 10) %>%
ungroup %>%
select(id) %>%
left_join(df)
Edited: To fix code alignment and make a neater filter
I'm not entirely sure what you're expecting for your return / output. But this will get you the appropriate indices
# example data
set.seed(41234L)
N <- 1000
df<-data.frame(id= 1:N, matrix(rnorm(10*N, 1, .5), ncol=10))
# for each column, extract ID's for top 10 and bottom 10 values
l1 <- lapply(df[,2:11], function(x,y, n) {
xy <- data.frame(x,y)
xy <- xy[order(xy[,1]),]
return(xy[c(1:10, (n-9):n),2])
}, y= df[,1], n = N)
# check:
xx <- sort(df[,2])
all.equal(sort(df[l1[[1]], 2]), xx[c(1:10, 991:1000)])
[1] TRUE
If you want an m * 10 matrix with these unique values, where m is the number of unique indices, you could do:
l2 <- do.call("c", l1)
l2 <- unique(l2)
df2 <- df[l2,] # in this case, m == 189
This doesn't 0 / NA the columns which you're not searching on for each row. But it's unclear what your question is trying to do.
Note
This isn't as efficient as using data.table since you're going to get a copy of the data in xy <- data.frame(x,y)
Benchmark
library(microbenchmark)
microbenchmark(ira= {
test2 <- apply(df[,2:11], 2, lowHigh);
rownames(test2) <- rownames(df);
finalData <- test2[apply(apply(test2, 2, is.na), 1, sum) < 10, ]
},
alex= {
l1 <- lapply(df[,2:11], function(x,y, n) {
xy <- data.frame(x,y)
xy <- xy[order(xy[,1]),]
return(xy[c(1:10, (n-9):n),2])
}, y= df[,1], n = N);
l2 <- unique(do.call("c", l1));
df2 <- df[l2,]
}, times= 50L)
Unit: milliseconds
expr min lq mean median uq max neval cld
ira 4.360452 4.522082 5.328403 5.140874 5.560295 8.369525 50 b
alex 3.771111 3.854477 4.054388 3.936716 4.158801 5.654280 50 a
How do I find the minimum value from an R data table other than a particular value?
For example, there could be zeroes in the data table and the goal would be to find the minimum non zero value.
I tried using the sapply with min, but am not sure how to specify the extra criteria that we have so that the minimum is not equal to a certain value.
More generally, How do we find the minimum from a data table not equal to any element from a list of possible values?
If you want to find the minimum value from a vector while excluding certain values from that vector, then you can use %in%:
v <- c(1:10) # values 1 .. 10
v.exclude <- c(1, 2) # exclude the values 1 and 2 from consideration
min.exclude <- min(v[!v %in% v.exclude])
The logic won't change much if you are using a column from a data table/frame. In this case you can just replace the vector v with the apropriate column. If you have your excluded values in a list, then you can flatten it to produce your v.exclude vector.
This can be done with data.table (as the OP mentioned about data table in the post) after setting the key
library(data.table)
setDT(df, key='a')[!.(exclude)]
# a b
#1: 4 40
#2: 5 50
#3: 6 60
If we need the min value of 'a'
min(setDT(df, key='a')[!.(exclude)]$a)
#[1] 4
For finding the min in all the columns (using the setkey method), we loop over the columns of the dataset, set the key as each of the column, subset the dataset, get the min value in a previously created list object.
setDT(df)
MinVal <- vector('list', length(df))
for(j in seq_along(df)){
setkeyv(df, names(df)[j])
MinVal[[j]] <- min(df[!.(exclude)][[j]])
}
MinVal
#[[1]]
#[1] 4
#[[2]]
#[1] 10
data
df <- data.frame(a = c(0,2,3,2,1,2,3,4,5,6),
b = c(10,10,20,20,30,30,40,40,50,60))
exclude <- c(0,1,2,3)
Assuming you are working with a data.frame
Data
df <- data.frame(a = c(0,2,3,2,1,2,3,4,5,6),
b = c(10,10,20,20,30,30,40,40,50,60))
Values to exlude from our minimum search
exclude <- c(0,1,2,3)
we can find the minimum value from column a excluding our exclude vector
## minimum from column a
min(df[!df$a %in% exclude,]$a)
# [1] 4
Or from b
exclude <- c(10, 20, 30, 40)
min(df[!df$b %in% exclude,]$b)
# [1] 50
To return the row that corresponds to the minimum value
df[df$b == min( df[ !df$b %in% exclude, ]$b ),]
# a b
# 9 5 50
Update
To find the minimum across multiple rows we can do it this way:
## values to exclude
exclude_a <- c(0,1)
exclude_b <- c(10)
## exclude rows/values from each column we don't want
df2 <- df[!(df$a %in% exclude_a) & !(df$b %in% exclude_b),]
## order the data
df3 <- df2[with(df2, order(a,b)),]
## take the first row
df3[1,]
# > df3[1,]
# a b
#4 2 20
Update 2
To select from multiple columns we can iterate over them as #akrun has shown, or alternatively we can construct our subsetting formula using an expression and evaluate it inside our [ operation
exclude <- c(0,1,2, 10)
## construct a formula/expression using the column names
n <- names(df)
expr <- paste0("(", paste0(" !(df$", n, " %in% exclude) ", collapse = "&") ,")")
# [1] "( !(df$a %in% exclude) & !(df$b %in% exclude) )"
expr <- parse(text=expr)
df2 <- df[eval(expr),]
## order and select first row as before
df2 <- df2[with(df2, order(a,b)),]
df2 <- df2[1,]
And if we wanted to use data.table for this:
library(data.table)
setDT(df)[ eval(expr) ][order(a, b),][1,]
comparison of methods
library(microbenchmark)
fun_1 <- function(x){
df2 <- x[eval(expr),]
## order and select first row as before
df2 <- df2[with(df2, order(a,b)),]
df2 <- df2[1,]
return(df2)
}
fun_2 <- function(x){
df2 <- setDT(x)[ eval(expr) ][order(a, b),][1,]
return(df2)
}
## including #akrun's solution
fun_3 <- function(x){
setDT(df)
MinVal <- vector('list', length(df))
for(j in seq_along(df)){
setkeyv(df, names(df)[j])
MinVal[[j]] <- min(df[!.(exclude)][[j]])
}
return(MinVal)
}
microbenchmark(fun_1(df), fun_2(df), fun_3(df) , times=1000)
# Unit: microseconds
# expr min lq mean median uq max neval
# fun_1(df) 770.376 804.5715 866.3499 833.071 869.2195 2728.740 1000
# fun_2(df) 854.862 893.1220 952.1207 925.200 962.6820 3115.119 1000
# fun_3(df) 1108.316 1148.3340 1233.1268 1186.938 1234.3570 5400.544 1000
I have a data frame, df2, containing observations grouped by a ID factor that I would like to subset. I have used another function to identify which rows within each factor group that I want to select. This is shown below in df:
df <- data.frame(ID = c("A","B","C"),
pos = c(1,3,2))
df2 <- data.frame(ID = c(rep("A",5), rep("B",5), rep("C",5)),
obs = c(1:15))
In df, pos corresponds to the index of the row that I want to select within the factor level mentioned in ID, not in the whole dataframe df2.I'm looking for a way to select the rows for each ID according to the right index (so their row number within the level of each factor of df2).
So, in this example, I want to select the first value in df2 with ID == 'A', the third value in df2 with ID == 'B' and the second value in df2 with ID == 'C'.
This would then give me:
df3 <- data.frame(ID = c("A", "B", "C"),
obs = c(1, 8, 12))
dplyr
library(dplyr)
merge(df,df2) %>%
group_by(ID) %>%
filter(row_number() == pos) %>%
select(-pos)
# ID obs
# 1 A 1
# 2 B 8
# 3 C 12
base R
df2m <- merge(df,df2)
do.call(rbind,
by(df2m, df2m$ID, function(SD) SD[SD$pos[1], setdiff(names(SD),"pos")])
)
by splits the merged data frame df2m by df2m$ID and operates on each part; it returns results in a list, so they must be rbinded together at the end. Each subset of the data (associated with each value of ID) is filtered by pos and deselects the "pos" column using normal data.frame syntax.
data.table suggested by #DavidArenburg in a comment
library(data.table)
setkey(setDT(df2),"ID")[df][,
.SD[pos[1L], !"pos", with=FALSE]
, by = ID]
The first part -- setkey(setDT(df2),"ID")[df] -- is the merge. After that, the resulting table is split by = ID, and each Subset of Data, .SD is operated on. pos[1L] is subsetting in the normal way, while !"pos", with=FALSE corresponds to dropping the pos column.
See #eddi's answer for a better data.table approach.
Here's the base R solution:
df2$pos <- ave(df2$obs, df2$ID, FUN=seq_along)
merge(df, df2)
ID pos obs
1 A 1 1
2 B 3 8
3 C 2 12
If df2 is sorted by ID, you can just do df2$pos <- sequence(table(df2$ID)) for the first line.
Using data.table version 1.9.5+:
setDT(df2)[df, .SD[pos], by = .EACHI, on = 'ID']
which merges on ID column, then selects the pos row for each of the rows of df.