I have some images which get smaller as the browser size does.
It works well for me but as the images get smaller the space between them gets bigger.
When the browser is at its smallest, the space between images is the size of the image.
If you resize your browser slowly down to the smallest you will see the media queries kick in and see what i mean.
Ive tried that many things ive lost track.
Ive tried replicating it in a fiddle but it just requires most of my code to do so, so i can only offer the link to the page http://www.techagesite.com/page-1work1112211.htm
.top_grow{
display:inline-block;
vertical-align:top;
font-size:0;
margin:0 auto;
overflow:hidden;
white-space:nowrap;
}
.cats {width:100%;
height:100%;
display:block;
font-size:0;
}
.text{
font-size:11px;
letter-spacing:1px;
word-spacing:1px;
}
<div class="top_grow">
<a href="http://www.techagesite.com/hd-wii-wallpapers-mario-kart-super-mario-galaxy-2.htm">
<img class="cats" src="http://freephonewallpapersformobile.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/super-mario-galaxy-hd-desktop-background_small1.jpg"></img>
<div class="text">
Mario Galaxy
</div>
</a>
</div>
It looks as though your images are being spaced out with a space character. The space character does not have a fluid width.
The solution would be to use floats.
Something like
.holder {
width: 100%;
}
.img-holder {
float: left;
margin-right: 3%;
width: 22%;
height: 100px;
background-color: #ccc;
}
img {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
<div class="holder">
<div class="img-holder"><img src="#" /></div>
<div class="img-holder"><img src="#" /></div>
<div class="img-holder"><img src="#" /></div>
<div class="img-holder"><img src="#" /></div>
</div>
This will give you four columns of images with a variable width gutter.
You will need to alter this to suit your own purposes, but I hope this sends you in the right direction.
Try it out in a new file first, then apply what you learn to your specific issue and this should work fine.
Related
I am having an issue with my divs moving when the page is resized. If you look at the plunker you will see a Header with boxes below. If you resize the workspace by dragging the scroll bar to the left you will see how the page should be. I tried wrapping all items in 1 div named wrapper and tried both relative and absolute positioning with a min-width. I also did the same for body. After inspecting the page with firebug looks like the html tag should have sizing or positioning. That didn't work either (see below). I would like to be able to minimize my screen to 50% and maximize to 250% and keep the same initial layout as if my screen is at 95% based on the wrapper. Any ideas?
Here's plnkr
<html>
body, html{margin:0px; padding:0px; width:100%; min-width: 900px; position:relative}
div.wrapper{ width:95%; min-width: 900px; padding-left: 6px; padding-top:5px; position: relative; }
<body>
<div class="wrapper" >
<div id="header">
<img align="left" style="padding-left:10px; padding-top:5px; width: 80px; height: 65px"><h1> Header</h1>
</div>
<div class="left"></div>
<div class="right"></div>
</div> <!--end wrapper -->
</body>
</html>
you could use percentage and fix min-wheight + set overflow to auto (looks like frameset .. not so nice actually)
Or you could try to relay on box-sizing and use vertical padding on percentage value(it will use parent's width as reference).
floatting pseudo can then, be used and will allow divs to grow taller instead showing a scrollbar.
. {
box-sizing:border-box;
}
.wrapper {
max-width:1300px;
margin:auto; /* ?*/
}
.wrapper #header ~ div {
border:double;
margin:0.4% 0.2%;
padding:5px;
}
#header, .right, .rightbottom {
overflow:hidden;
}
.left {
float:left;
width:30%;
}
.left:before {
content:'';
float:left;
padding-top:204.5%;
}
.right:before, .rightbottom:before {
content:'';
padding-top:30%;
float:left;
}
.wrapper #header ~ div.rightbottom {
border:solid 1px;
}
.rightbottom:before {
padding-top:60%;
}
<div class="wrapper" >
<div id="header">
<img align="left" style="padding-left:10px; padding-top:5px; width: 80px; height: 65px"><h1> Header</h1>
</div>
<div class="left">
</div>
<div class="right" >
<div class="gridStyle" data-ng-grid="gridOptions1">grid</div>
</div>
<div class="rightbottom">right bottom</div>
</div>
http://plnkr.co/edit/K1yOpBOfX3ukqHX7f2oa?p=preview
I'm not too sure of what kind of behavior you look for once there is real stuff in your pages.
If you want the header and the two divs to always have their own row, perhaps you could contain them each in divs that are set to width: 100%?
How to size/wrap a div container around an image inside It? Where float: right and margin-left: auto are potentially causing issues.
I'm struggling to get a div to be sized by wrapping properly around the image inside it. Please have a look at the example I'm referring to here:
Link to Example
(Might be worth playing around with the window size to help explain my problem)
I'm practicing with Bootstrap for the first time. The red blocks on each side are grid blocks 1 and 12, with the blue, and green sections filling the remaining 10. The big orange rectangles are responsive images that I want to be kept central spaced 20px apart at all times.
Using Chrome's "Inspect Element" (or similar) - If you inspect the orange rectangle on the right hand side, and have a look at the container div (class="container-img-r") - This div is wrapping around the orange image exactly how I wanted (albeit including the invisible border). But I'm not having much luck achieving the same result with the div container for the orange image on the left side (it still fills the blue parent element)
I've played around with different options for float/margins/position but can't seem to crack it.
Here's the CSS I have for the relevent content:
.container-img-l {
/* float:right; ??? Nothing I tried here seemed to make a difference */
}
.container-img-r {
float:left;
}
.item-pos-l {
margin-left:auto;
border-right:10px solid transparent; /* Margins just collapsed when resizing window */
height:323px;
width:510px;
}
.item-pos-r {
float:left;
border-left:10px solid transparent;
height:323px;
width:510px;
}
The reason for me wanting the div to accurately wrap around the responsive images is that I want to overlay some more CSS content over the images, scaling/re-positioning automatically as the window/device size changes (Click here and you'll clearly see where I'm hoping to implement this responsive style).
Maybe there are clashes with the Bootstrap CSS at play but I'm out of ideas.
Your first link doesn't remotely look like the html you want to make responsive. It would be best to learn responsive and fluid (no pixels heights or widths if possible) css before attempting to modify a framework you are unfamiliar with. Also, you have an error in your html - validate it to make sure you've closed all your elements. Also indent and comment all your code and avoid the use of inline styles.
Demo: http://jsbin.com/wazanu/2/
http://jsbin.com/wazanu/2/edit -- edit link
CSS:
body {background:#eee}
.header {padding:20px;}
.portfolio-grid .col-sm-6 {
margin-bottom: 30px
}
.img-wrapper .title {
text-align:center;
}
#media (min-width:768px) {
.img-wrapper {
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
}
.img-wrapper img {width:100%;}
.img-wrapper .title {
position: absolute;
text-align:left;
bottom: -90px;
padding: 0 20px 20px 20px;
height: 150px;
background: red;
transition: all .5s ease-in-out;
}
.img-wrapper .title h3 {
margin: 0;
height: 60px;
line-height: 60px;
}
.img-wrapper:hover .title {
bottom: 0
}
}
HTML:
<header class="header text-center">
My header
</header>
<div class="container">
<div class="row portfolio-grid">
<div class="col-sm-6">
<div class="img-wrapper">
<img src="http://placekitten.com/g/400/300" class="img-responsive center-block" alt="">
<div class="title">
<h3>Title of Project</h3>
<p>Content about project goes here</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<!--/.col-sm-6 -->
<div class="col-sm-6">
<div class="img-wrapper">
<img src="http://placebear.com/g/400/300" class="img-responsive center-block" alt="">
</div>
</div>
<!--/.col-sm-6 -->
<div class="clearfix visible-sm"></div>
<div class="col-sm-6">
<div class="img-wrapper">
<img src="http://placekitten.com/g/400/300" class="img-responsive center-block" alt="">
</div>
</div>
<!--/.col-sm-6 -->
<div class="col-sm-6">
<div class="img-wrapper">
<img src="http://placekitten.com/g/400/300" class="img-responsive center-block" alt="">
</div>
</div>
<!--/.col-sm-6 -->
</div>
<!--/.row-->
</div>
<!--/.container-->
HTML
<div class="cont">
<div class="size" id="size1"></div>
<div class="text">Here is some textHere is some text Here is some text</div>
</div>
<div class="cont">
<div class="size" id="size2"></div>
<div class="text">Here is some textHere is some text Here is some text</div>
</div>
CSS
.size {
background-color: red;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
}
#size2 {
width: 200px;
}
.cont {
padding: 10px;
float: left;
}
I need div.cont's widths to be the width of their contained div.size (in my actual example div.size is an image and its with will vary in each instance).
This isnt happening as div.text takes up more space than its container, how can I stop this and make the text wrap?
JS Fiddle
Deleted all the previous stuff as I have (after doing some digging) found an exact duplicate with working solution.
My answer was also incorrect (as the op then specified the image MUST be allowed to be variable)
The answer is found on this jsfiddle and is an exact duplicate of css - shrink a parent div to fit one child's width and constrain the width of the other child
//html
<div id="container">
<div id="child1"><img src="//www.google.com/logos/2012/Teachers_Day_Alt-2012-hp.jpg" width="300" height="116"></div>
<div id="child2">Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.</div>
</div>
<br/>
<a id="longtext" href="#">lengthen/shorten text</a>
//css
#container{border:1px solid #f00;display:inline-block;margin:10px; display: table;}
#child1{border:1px solid #0f0;margin:10px; display: table-row; width: 1px;}
#child2{border:1px solid #00f;margin:10px; display: table-cell; width: 1px;}
img {border:1px solid #000;}
and basically it works using display:table-* (have a good read up)
'.size{ float:left;}'
let me know if this helps.
Expanding on Paul Sullivan's approach,
in your css:
.size {
...
display:block; /*assuming its an image - making sure its block level*/
...
}
.cont {
...
position:relative; /*add this to parent container if comming from cms*/
...
}
.text {
...
position:absolute;
top:100%; /*just to make sure content doesnt overlaps image*/
...
}
Just gives a plus point for getting content to stretch as wide as the image (plus padding)
Hope it helps,
Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/BKRsT/3/
I'm stuck again with css positioning. I would like to create a page which shows one in the middle, surrounded by 10 other ones. Of course, it should look the same on every resolution (mobiles excluded).
But as i change the screensize, the site keeps on changing its look.
HTML
<div class="wrapper" id="wrapper">
<div class="element" id="element-1">Lorem1</div>
<div class="element" id="element-2">Ipsum2</div>
<div class="element" id="element-3">Lorem3</div>
<div class="element" id="element-4">Ipsum4</div>
<div class="element" id="element-5">Lorem5</div>
<span class="break"></span>
<div class="background" id="background"><span>Neologizmo</span></div>
<div class="element" id="element-8">Ipsum8</div>
<div class="element" id="element-9">Lorem9</div>
<span class="break"></span>
<div class="element" id="element-10">M10</div>
<div class="element" id="element-11">M11</div>
<div class="element" id="element-12">12</div>
</div>
CSS
http://nopaste.info/f6d200c414.html
Oups, already accepted an answer :$
Well anyway, since I was working on it, here is a generic solution. The idea is that you always have numberOfsquares/2 -1 squares at the top and bottom, and always one square on the left and one square on the right.
here is a fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/PyU87/
It will display depending on the wrapper size which depends on the browser size. So this would also work on smartphones.
How does this work? You said you didn't want layouts to change as the screen changes size so I made it use fixed widths and be inside a wrapper so that can't happen.
DEMO
#wrapper {
width: 450px;
height: auto;
padding: 10px;
}
div {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
border: 1px solid #000;
float: left;
margin: 5px;
}
#background {
width: 212px;
padding: 0;
}
It doesn't stay where I want it, look at this:
<div style="float: left; width: 30%">
<img src="{avatar}" alt="" />
</div>
<div style="float:right; width: 70%; text-align: left">
{message}
</div>
<div style="clear:both"></div>
Internet Explorer:
Mozilla Firefox:
I want the text to be in the top (tried vertical-align: top), and i'd like the image to be in the white box in IE.
Hope someone more skilled can help me out.
Thanks!
Can't figure out the problem :/
Edit: Added whole code
* { padding: 0; margin: 0; }
body {
font: 11px Geneva, "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Verdana, sans-serif;
width: 999px;
background: #EFEFEF;
}
#content {
width: 400px;
}
.thread-content {
padding: 5px;
border: 1px solid #CECFCE;
background: #FFF;
}
div.header {
border: 1px solid #CECFCE;
background: #FFF;
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
<div id="content">
<div class="header">{title}</div>
<div class="thread-content">
<div style="float: left; width: 30%; padding: 5px">
<img src="{avatar}" alt="user avatar" />
</div>
<div style="float: right; width: 70%; text-align: left">
{message}
</div>
<div style="clear:both"></div>
</div>
</div>
Be sure the margin of both are set to 0:
<img src="{avatar}" alt="" style="float: left; width: 30%; margin: 0px"/>
<div style="float:right; width: 70%; text-align: left; margin: 0px">
{message}
</div>
<div style="clear:both"></div>
As css can be really tricky, some other solutions to try:
Let both float left, should make no difference.
Make sure the border doesn't increase the size.
Descrease the width of one a bit, IE is stubborn.
This happens because the sum of the (external) widths of the two floating divs is larger than the internal width of the external box, so they don't fit in the same row.
Try increasing the width of the external div, decreasing its padding, decreasing the width or margin or padding of the internal boxes.
Code works fine when I tried it. You sure there isn't any padding or margin on the image or the text? That would mess up the percentages you're using. If you have it examine the image and text in Firebug to see what styles are being applied.
When you say width: 30% or width: 70% it implies the width of the content inside the div excluding the padding, border and margin of the div. Looking at the images I am sure you have added some padding etc to both divs. Also I do not see any 'background: #fff' in your code, so I am not sure which one is the 'white' box.
Ok, did I get voted down because I used a table?
I am not by trade a designer, I am actually a programmer and I know there are hard-core css designers that cringe at the idea of using a table layout but it seems to works for me. The graphic designers that I work with give auto generated table layout from fireworks to work with which is a real pain.
Anyway the way I personally would try to accomplish the dersired effect though pure css would be more like.
<html>
<head>
<title>SandBox</title>
<style type="text/css">
#outerDiv
{
margin:0;
background-image:url(myImage.gif);
background-position:top left;
background-repeat:no-repeat;
padding-left:30%;
min-height:200px;
background-color:#777777;
}
#innerDiv
{
background-color:#333333;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="container" style="width:500px;">
<div id="outerDiv">
<div id="innerDiv">content goes here</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
Note: I am not a designer. I also made this a wiki. So please edit or at least leave a comment if you going to vote down.